Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Materials
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications materials
  3. articles
  4. article
Acute deformation characteristics of standard and flexible lithium-ion battery electrodes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 January 2026

Acute deformation characteristics of standard and flexible lithium-ion battery electrodes

  • Sam Riley1,
  • Antonis Vamvakeros1,2,
  • Gustavo Quino  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-37123,
  • John Morley4,
  • Mengzheng Ouyang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4896-416X4,
  • Andrew Shevchuk5,
  • Kehan Huang6,
  • Pierre-Olivier Autran  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4600-63717,
  • Stefan Michalik  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9459-322X8,
  • Genoveva Burca  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6867-96288,9,10,
  • Billy Wu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3963-49001,
  • Nigel Brandon  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2230-86664 &
  • …
  • Chandramohan George  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2906-63991 

Communications Materials , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1034 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy storage
  • Physical chemistry

Abstract

Understanding the strain tolerance of both standard and mechanically flexible battery electrodes is prerequisite for optimizing performance, safety, and longevity, particularly in heavy-duty applications, flexible electronics and wearables. Achieving this requires a deeper understanding of how mechanical strain drives electrode degradation. In this work, we directly compare the strain response of electrospun (flexible) and slurry-cast (conventional) electrodes. To simulate acute mechanical stress, electrodes underwent a controlled 180° folding, pressing, and unfolding protocol designed to induce measurable damage, we then employed a combination of characterization techniques, including synchrotron X-ray nano-computed tomography, X-ray diffraction mapping, electrochemical analysis, and in situ Tensiometer-scanning electron microscopy to assess both structural and electrochemical degradation modes and provide a standardised upper-bound for strain induced damage. Our results reveal that electrospun electrodes exhibit significantly greater resilience to deformation, attributed to their freestanding architecture and fibrous morphology. These findings underscore the importance of characterizing deformation mechanisms to guide the design of high-performance batteries.

Similar content being viewed by others

Achieving dynamic stability and electromechanical resilience for ultra-flexible battery technology

Article Open access 19 December 2024

Visualization and quantification of lattice strain in battery cathode particles through electron backscatter diffraction imaging

Article Open access 06 January 2026

Thermal-healing of lattice defects for high-energy single-crystalline battery cathodes

Article Open access 04 February 2022

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Chang, J., Huang, Q., Gao, Y. & Zheng, Z. Pathways of developing high-energy-density flexible lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 33, 2004419 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, S. et al. Deformable lithium-ion batteries for wearable and implantable electronics. Appl. Phys. Rev. 9 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117252 (2022).

  3. Zhou, G., Li, F. & Cheng, H.-M. Progress in flexible lithium batteries and future prospects. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1307–1338 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kong, L., Tang, C., Peng, H.-J., Huang, J.-Q. & Zhang, Q. Advanced energy materials for flexible batteries in energy storage: A review. SmartMat 1 https://doi.org/10.1002/smm2.1007 (2020).

  5. Cha, H., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Cho, J. & Park, M. Issues and challenges facing flexible lithium-ion batteries for practical application. Small 14, 1702989 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harks, P.-P. R. M. L. et al. Immersion precipitation route towards high performance thick and flexible electrodes for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 441, 227200 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Waldmann, T., Scurtu, R.-G., Richter, K. & Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. 18650 vs. 21700 Li-ion cells – A direct comparison of electrochemical, thermal, and geometrical properties. J. Power Sources 472, 228614 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schilling, A., Schmitt, J., Dietrich, F. & Dröder, K. Analyzing bending stresses on lithium-ion battery cathodes induced by the assembly process. Energy Technol. 4, 1502–1508 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kok, M. D. R. et al. Virtual unrolling of spirally-wound lithium-ion cells for correlative degradation studies and predictive fault detection. Sustain. Energy Fuels 3, 2972–2976 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pfrang, A. et al. Geometrical inhomogeneities as cause of mechanical failure in commercial 18650 lithium ion cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 166, A3745 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gelam, S. D., Maddipatla, S., Chicone, C. & Pecht, M. Core collapse in cylindrical Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 623, 235471 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cui, Y. Silicon anodes. Nat. Energy 6, 995–996 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gelb, J., Finegan, D. P., Brett, D. J. L. & Shearing, P. R. Multi-scale 3D investigations of a commercial 18650 Li-ion battery with correlative electron- and X-ray microscopy. J. Power Sources 357, 77–86 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gaikwad, A. M. et al. A high areal capacity flexible lithium-ion battery with a strain-compliant design. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401389 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wei, D. et al. Ultra-flexible and foldable gel polymer lithium–ion batteries enabling scalable production. Mater. Today Energy 23, 100889 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, L., Wu, H., La Mantia, F., Yang, Y. & Cui, Y. Thin, flexible secondary li-ion paper batteries. ACS Nano 4, 5843–5848 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu, T. et al. Formation of hierarchically ordered structures in conductive polymers to enhance the performances of lithium-ion batteries. Nat. Energy 8, 129–137 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, H., Yang, J., Hou, H., Chen, S. & Yao, H. Nitrogen-doped carbon paper with 3D porous structure as a flexible free-standing anode for lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 7, 7769 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad, S., Copic, D., George, C. & De Volder, M. Hierarchical Assemblies of Carbon Nanotubes for Ultraflexible Li-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 28, 6705–6710 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hu, L. et al. Silicon-conductive nanopaper for Li-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2, 138–145 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Y. et al. Spider silk-inspired binder design for flexible lithium-ion battery with high durability. Adv. Mater. 35, 2303165 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xu, G. et al. A high-energy 5 V-class flexible lithium-ion battery endowed by laser-drilled flexible integrated graphite film. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 9468–9477 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Han, D.-Y. et al. Hierarchical 3D electrode design with high mass loading enabling high-energy-density flexible lithium-ion batteries. Small 19, 2305416 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kang, S. et al. Stretchable lithium-ion battery based on re-entrant micro-honeycomb electrodes and cross-linked gel electrolyte. ACS Nano 14, 3660–3668 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pushparaj, R. I. et al. Electrospun flexible nanofibres for batteries: Design and application. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-022-00148-4 (2023).

  26. Ilango, P. R. et al. Electrospun flexible nanofibres for batteries: Design and application. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6, 12 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yan, Y., Liu, X., Yan, J., Guan, C. & Wang, J. Electrospun nanofibers for new generation flexible energy storage. Energy Environ. Mater. 4, 502–521 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qian, G. et al. Designing flexible lithium-ion batteries by structural engineering. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 690–701 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Suo, Z., Ma, E. Y., Gleskova, H. & Wagner, S. Mechanics of rollable and foldable film-on-foil electronics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1177–1179 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chang, J., Huang, Q. & Zheng, Z. A figure of merit for flexible batteries. Joule 4, 1346–1349 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, C. et al. Microspherical LiFePO3.98F0.02/3DG/C as an advanced cathode material for high-energy lithium-ion battery with a superior rate capability and long-term cyclability. Ionics 27, 1–11 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. <Yu_2007_J._Electrochem._Soc._154_A253.pdf>. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2434687 兴.

  33. Singh, G. K., Ceder, G. & Bazant, M. Z. Intercalation dynamics in rechargeable battery materials: General theory and phase-transformation waves in LiFePO4. Electrochim. Acta 53, 7599–7613 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Robinson, W. H. & Truman, S. D. Stress-strain curve for aluminium from a continuous indentation test. J. Mater. Sci. 12, 1961–1965 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, N. S. et al. Anisotropic tensile ductility of cold-rolled and annealed aluminum alloy sheet and the beneficial effect of post-anneal rolling. Scr. Mater. 60, 340–343 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ewaldz, E., Patel, R., Banerjee, M. & Brettmann, B. K. Material selection in electrospinning microparticles. Polymer 153, 529–537 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, X. et al. In-situ fabrication of carbon-metal fabrics as freestanding electrodes for high-performance flexible energy storage devices. Energy Storage Mater. 30, 329–336 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Boll, F. et al. Assessing the effect of stabilization and carbonization temperatures on electrochemical performance of electrospun carbon nanofibers from polyacrylonitrile. Adv. Energy Sustainability Res. 4, 2300121 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yi, S. et al. Effects of carbonization temperature on structure and mechanical strength of electrospun carbon nanofibrous mats. Mater. Lett. 273, 127962 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ahsan, Z. et al. Recent progress in capacity enhancement of LiFePO4 cathode for li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Energy Conv. Storage 18 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047222 (2020).

  41. Cai, M. et al. Recent advances in synthesis and modification of phosphate-based cathode materials. J. Energy Storage 95, 112511 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Li, W. et al. Synchrotron-based X-ray absorption fine structures, X-ray Diffraction, and X-ray microscopy techniques applied in the study of lithium secondary batteries. Small Methods 2, 1700341 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Deng, Z. et al. Recent progress on advanced imaging techniques for lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2000806 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Coelho, A. TOPAS and TOPAS-academic: An optimization program integrating computer algebra and crystallographic objects written in C++. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 51, 210–218 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.G. acknowledges the Royal Society for URF funding (UF160573). We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for provision of synchrotron radiation facilities under proposal ma6063. The DOI for the ESRF measurements is https://doi.org/10.15151/ESRF-ES-1614593162. We thank Diamond Light Source for access to beamline I12 (MG36699) that contributed to the results presented here. AV acknowledges financial support from the Royal Society as a Royal Society Industry Fellow (IF\R2\222059).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Sam Riley, Antonis Vamvakeros, Billy Wu & Chandramohan George

  2. Finden Ltd, The Oxford Science Park, Magdalen Centre, Robert Robinson Avenue, Oxford, UK

    Antonis Vamvakeros

  3. Department of Aeronautics, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Gustavo Quino

  4. Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

    John Morley, Mengzheng Ouyang & Nigel Brandon

  5. Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Andrew Shevchuk

  6. Department of Materials, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Kehan Huang

  7. ESRF—The European Synchrotron, CS40220, F-38043, Grenoble, France

    Pierre-Olivier Autran

  8. Diamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, Didcot, UK

    Stefan Michalik & Genoveva Burca

  9. Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, ISIS Pulsed Neutron and Muon Source, Harwell Campus, Didcot, UK

    Genoveva Burca

  10. Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK

    Genoveva Burca

Authors
  1. Sam Riley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonis Vamvakeros
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gustavo Quino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. John Morley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mengzheng Ouyang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andrew Shevchuk
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kehan Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pierre-Olivier Autran
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Stefan Michalik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Genoveva Burca
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Billy Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nigel Brandon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Chandramohan George
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.R and C.G: conceptualization, writing, and revision, AV: helped and performed the beamline I12 and ID11 experiments; process of the synchrotron data. G.Q: performed SEM tensiometer testing. J.M.: assisted with synchrotron experiments. M.O.: Assistance with electrospinning setup and process. A.S., N.B., B.W.: Revision and advice. K.H: Assistance with TGA measurements. P.O.A: assistance with ID11 proposal instrumentation and setup at the ESRF (European Synchrotron Radiation Facility). S.M. and G.B.: assistance with I12, proposal, instrumentation, and setup at the DLS (Diamond Light Source). All authors: revision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandramohan George.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Materials thanks Amit Chanda and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Supporting Information PDF

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riley, S., Vamvakeros, A., Quino, G. et al. Acute deformation characteristics of standard and flexible lithium-ion battery electrodes. Commun Mater (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-025-01064-y

Download citation

  • Received: 25 June 2025

  • Accepted: 19 December 2025

  • Published: 10 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-025-01064-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Materials (Commun Mater)

ISSN 2662-4443 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing