Introduction

For decades, the field of magnetism has focused on classifying collinear magnetic orders into two main categories: antiferromagnetic orders or ferromagnetic orders. The former is a crystal-symmetry compensated state with a net zero magnetization and Kramers degenerate bands, while the latter arises from spin splitting of the electronic band structure, generating a net magnetization. In recent years, several groups reported theoretical predictions of collinear antiferromagnets demonstrating various time-reversal symmetry breaking phenomena and spin-polarized behaviors1,2,3,4, subsequently named altermagnets5. Altermagnetism exists in the space between antiferromagnetism and ferromagnetism—it is characterized by a net zero magnetization, yet the Kramers degeneracy is lifted by a non-relativistic, momentum-dependent spin-splitting of the electronic bands. The band splitting is driven by crystal symmetries connecting opposite-spin sublattices, linked by rotational symmetry in real space6. Due to intrinsic time-reversal symmetry breaking predicted to emerge in these systems, altermagnets have been theorized to exhibit numerous exotic phenomena, such as large anomalous Hall effect, spin-polarized currents and magneto-optical Kerr effect2,7,8.

Since its initial theoretical formulation, altermagnetism and related properties have now been explored in several materials, such as RuO29,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21, MnTe22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29 and others30,31,32,33,34,35,36. MnTe for example has been found to exhibit Kramers degeneracy lifting22,23,24, an anomalous Hall effect25,26, anisotropic magnetoresistance27 and time-reversal symmetry breaking28. As altermagnetism is generally driven by specific crystal symmetries of the spin-sublattice, it is crucial to fully understand the spin ordering in these systems, whether other strongly correlated electronic phases can be realized, and to what extent spins can be tuned by external parameters. This has, however, remained challenging. Moreover, there has been little atomic-scale insights exploring the family of altermagnets.

Recently, a quasi-2D layered system, Co-intercalated 2H-NbSe2 (Co0.25NbSe2), emerged as another altermagnetic candidate37. Experiments, supported by theoretical calculations, showed that it exhibits a spin-polarized electronic band structure consistent with altermagnetism37,38,39. Given that the “parent” material 2H-NbSe2 hosts the canonical 3a0 × 3a0 charge density wave and superconductivity40,41,42, Co intercalation of the superconducting 2H-NbSe2 is a potentially promising platform in the quest for engineering correlated electron states that coexist with altermagnetism. Indeed, through optical pump-and-probe spectroscopy as well as magnetic susceptibility measurements, two phase transition temperatures have already been identified, one around 150 K which has been attributed to the altermagnetic transition, and another around 50 K which has yet to be fully characterized, suggesting a richer electronic environment beyond pure altermagnetism37,39. In this work, we study altermagnet Co0.25NbSe2 using a combination of low-temperature spectroscopic imaging STM, spin-polarized STM, and density functional theory (DFT) to provide a fresh insight into this newly fabricated system. We observe non-dispersive 2a0 × 2a0 charge modulations on the Se termination, distinct from those in the parent compound 2H-NbSe2. DFT surprisingly confirms a 2a0 ×  2a0 charge modulation on the Se termination, suggesting that the Se surface can serve as a “window" into the Co superstructure underneath, allowing us to probe the magnetic ordering. Although DFT simulations agree well with the measured topographs, differential conductance dI/dV spectra further reveal a partial gap opening centered at the Fermi level, which is not observed in our DFT calculations of the material in the altermagnetic state, possibly suggesting an origin beyond pure altermagnetic state with spins perfectly aligned with the c-axis. By performing spin-polarized STM, we detect a spectroscopic change in the density of states (DOS), accompanied by a change in the relative intensities of the charge modulations for different STM tip-spin direction. This measurement suggests an additional spin component associated with the modulations. Interestingly, we find that the out-of-plane magnetic field can be used to alter the electronic density-of-states, as well as the amplitude of density wave modulations, which can gradually increase or decrease depending on the direction and strength of the magnetic field. Taken together, our experiments reveal an apparent tunability that can be attributed to Co spins that are not fully aligned with the c-axis, being tilted by the external magnetic field, which can have profound implications on the altermagnetic properties and should be taken into account to fully understand this system and related altermagnets.

Results

Surface characterization and identification of charge modulations

We cleave the samples in ultra-high vacuum at cryogenic temperature and immediately insert them into the microscope head (“Methods”). The crystals have a 2D layered structure, with interstitial Co atoms residing between adjacent Se-Nb-Se slabs, above the Nb atoms (Fig. 1a). The topographic height between adjacent layers is 6.2 Å (Fig. 1b), which matches the expected interlayer distance extracted from the diffraction measurements (Fig. 1a). Typical STM topographs show a hexagonal lattice with two possible surface terminations: the Se termination in which Se atoms form a hexagonal lattice with the lattice constant a0 ≈ 3.7  Å (Fig. 1c), or the Co termination where some of the interstitial Co atoms are left on top of the Se surface (Fig. 1d, and Supplementary Fig. 8). The remaining Co atoms on the surface exhibit a tendency to order into a 2 × 2 superstructure, consistent with their expected structure in the bulk between the adjacent NbSe2 slabs37. Interestingly, STM topographs of the Se termination also show additional modulations that are approximately commensurate with the Se lattice, where every other atom appears brighter than the adjacent ones in all in-plane lattice directions (inset in Fig. 1c). This can be seen in the corresponding Fourier transforms (FTs) of STM topographs where, in addition to the Se atomic Bragg peaks, another set of superstructure peaks with wave vectors \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2a0}^{i}=\frac{1}{2}{{{\bf{Q}}}}_{Se}^{i}\) (i = 1, 2, or 3 labels different in-plane lattice direction) appears (Fig. 1e). We have observed these 2 × 2 modulations on 5 samples with 8 different STM tips. The 3a0 × 3a0 charge density wave state known to exist in the bulk and on the Se surface of undoped NbSe2 at about \(\frac{1}{3}{{{\bf{Q}}}}_{Se}^{i}\)40 is notably absent in Co0.25NbSe2 (Fig. 1e, f). The 2a0 × 2a0 modulations detected on the Se surface are centered directly on top of Se atoms (Fig. 1c). This is laterally offset from the Co atom positions, which are centered under every other Nb atom in the layer below (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1: Crystal structure and surface identification.
Fig. 1: Crystal structure and surface identification.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

a 3D ball model of the crystal structure of Co0.25NbSe2 as viewed from the side. b (Top) STM topograph of a step edge from a Se-termination to the next Se-termination. (Bottom) A linecut perpendicular to the step-edge along the red line in the top panel, smoothed by the nearest-neighbor averaging. The step height is approximately a half the unit cell shown in (a). c, d STM topographs of the Se-terminated surface and the Co superstructure, respectively. e, f Drift-corrected Fourier transforms of the Se surface and Co surface in (c, d), respectively. Circles denote the peaks corresponding to a real-space wave length of 2a0, while the diamonds corresponds to the a0 wave length. STM setup conditions: b Vsample = 1 V, Iset =  10 pA; c, Vsample = 50 mV, Iset = 200 pA; d Vsample = 100 mV, Iset =  10 pA.

In this work, we primarily focus on characterizing the Se surface termination. To gain further insight into the observed charge modulations, we acquire a series of STM topographs and differential conductance dI/dV(r,V) maps in a range of biases (Fig. 2, and Supplementary Fig. 1). The same \({{{\bf{Q}}}}_{2a0}^{i}=\frac{1}{2}{{{\bf{Q}}}}_{Se}^{i}\) peaks can be seen by eye and in the FTs of all STM topographs acquired with a bias between −500 and +500 meV (Fig. 2a–d, i, and Supplementary Figs. 13). Similarly, \({{{\bf{Q}}}}_{2a0}^{i}\) is detected in dI/dV(r, V) in a range of different biases (Supplementary Fig. 1g–i). The wave vectors are extremely localized in reciprocal space (~1–2 pixels width or 0.007–0.014 Å−1 width) and non-dispersive with energy. To determine the precise origin of these charge modulations, we turn to DFT calculations (“Methods”). Topographic simulations at −200 mV, −100 mV, +100 mV, and +200 mV capture most features seen in experiment, including the 2a0 × 2a0 modulation (Fig. 2e–h). The 2a0 × 2a0 structure seen is a projection of the Co electronic superstructure to the surface, allowing us to probe this otherwise inaccessible layer. The 2a0 ×  2a0 charge modulations remain visible in STM data up to at least 50 K, which was the highest temperature scale accessible in our STM experiment (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Fig. 2: Energy dependence of charge modulations.
Fig. 2: Energy dependence of charge modulations.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

ad Bias dependent STM topographs of the Se surface. eh DFT simulations of the Se termination with a constant tip height of 3 Å (see “Methods”). i A representative Fourier Transform of the Se termination. j Linecut taken along \({{{\bf{Q}}}}_{Se}^{1}\) as defined by red dotted line in (i) for different biases, with \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2ao}^{1}\) and \({{{\bf{Q}}}}_{Se}^{1}\) identified. k, l Same as (j) but taken along \({{{\bf{Q}}}}_{Se}^{2}\) and \({{{\bf{Q}}}}_{Se}^{3}\), respectively. STM setup conditions: a Vsample = −200 mV, Iset = 100 pA; b Vsample = −100 mV, Iset = 100  pA; c Vsample = 100 mV, Iset = 100 pA.d Vsample = 200 mV, Iset = 100 pA.

Spin-polarized sample characterization and effects of magnetic field

Using the Se termination as a “window” to the underlying Co superstructure, it is interesting to further examine if there are any detectable spin characteristics associated with the charge modulations to see if spin information is also transmitted to the surface. For this purpose, we utilize spin-polarized STM tips such that the spin polarization of the tip can be controlled by external magnetic field (Supplementary Fig. 6, “Methods”). We acquire topographs and dI/dV(r, V) maps (Fig. 3a, b, and Supplementary Fig. 5) as a function of magnetic field applied parallel or antiparallel to the c-axis. By subtracting dI/dV maps taken over identical areas at different fields to create a spin-resolved magnetic contrast map (M(r, V)) (Fig. 3c), we are able to visualize in real space a 2a0 × 2a0 spin modulation commensurate with the charge. Let us first focus on the intensity of the three \(| {{{\bf{Q}}}}_{2a0}^{i}|\) peaks in STM topographs acquired in magnetic field applied in the opposite directions (Fig. 3e). We can observe systematic differences in the intensities for positive magnetic fields, when the tip spin polarization is “up”, compared to negative magnetic fields when the tip’s spin polarization is “down” (Fig. 3e). Examining this behavior in more detail, a similar asymmetry can be seen in FTs of dI/dV(r,V) maps as well. Dispersions of the intensities of \(| {{{\bf{Q}}}}_{2a0}^{i}|\) as a function of bias V (Fig. 3f–h), as well the dI/dV spectrum (Fig. 3i), appear distinctly different for opposite directions of the magnetic field. The change is systematic across many fields swept and different bias setup conditions used (Fig. 4, and Supplementary Fig. 7).

Fig. 3: Characterization of spin modulations using spin-polarized STM.
Fig. 3: Characterization of spin modulations using spin-polarized STM.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

a Drift-corrected STM topograph at 8 T, b dI/dV layer from a DOS map of the same area, and c Spin-resolved magnetic contrast map M(r) obtained by subtracting the dI/dV map in b from its −8 T counterpart. d Fourier transform of the area shown in Supplementary Fig. 5, which was the area used to obtain data in ei. e Intensities of the three charge modulation peaks from the Fourier transform of STM topographs taken at different fields with a spin-polarized tip. Inset cartoon schematics show spin-polarized tip alignment with external magnetic field. fh Intensities of the charge modulation peaks \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2a0}^{1}\), \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2a0}^{2}\), and \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2a0}^{3}\) in dI/dV maps as a function of energy for different magnetic fields. i dI/dV spectra of the Se surface at 0 T (black), 10 T (red), and −10 T (blue) taken over the area denoted by a yellow square in Supplementary Fig. 5. j DFT-simulation of the Se-projected density of states summed over the Se surface atoms from a simulation of the Se-terminated surface. STM setup conditions: a Vsample = 50 mV, Iset = 200; b Vsample = 50 mV, Iset = 200, Vexc = 5 mV (rms); eh Vsample = 50 mV, Iset = 150 pA, Vexc = 5 mV (rms); i Vsample = −200 mV, Iset = 200 pA, Vexc = 2 mV (rms).

Fig. 4: Magnetic tunability of the electronic density-of-states and the density wave modulations.
Fig. 4: Magnetic tunability of the electronic density-of-states and the density wave modulations.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

a Difference in spectra (Δ(dI/dV)) defined as the spectrum at some field subtracted from the first 0 T measurement taken (\(dI/dV({B}_{z})-dI/dV(0T\,({1}^{st}))\). Spectra were acquired with a spin-polarized tip. b Same as (a), but with data acquired with a non-spin-polarized tip. ce Intensity of the 2a0 peaks in Fourier space as a function of sample bias for different magnetic fields along \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2a0}^{1}\), \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2a0}^{2}\), and \({{{\bf{q}}}}_{2a0}^{3}\), respectively acquired with a spin-polarized tip. f-h, The same as (ce), but with data acquired with a non-spin-polarized tip. A pedagogical cartoon demonstrating a possible spin-canting scenario in i no field, j weak field, k stronger field to explain the behavior seen in (ce). STM setup conditions: a Vsample = 100 mV, Iset = 300 pA, Vexc = 2 mV (rms); b Vsample = 100 mV, Iset = 300 pA, Vexc = 2 mV (rms); ce Vsample = 50 mV, Iset = 150 pA, Vexc = 5 mV (rms); fh Vsample = 50 mV, Iset = 150 pA, Vexc = 5 mV (rms).

Given the strong agreement between theory and DFT in topographs, it is interesting to further compare these experimental spectroscopic features to theory. A notable difference between the integrated DOS spectrum from surface-projected DFT calculations and our large-scale STM dI/dV spectrum is that DFT predicts no prominent spectral gap at the Fermi level in the altermagnetic state of the system (Fig. 3i, j). However, our dI/dV spectra detect a partial V-shaped spectral gap Δ ≈ 30 meV centered at the Fermi level (Fig. 3i). Thus, some qualitative difference must be present between the DFT optimized structure and STM experiments. We find that the gap is generally homogeneous across the sample and impurities (Supplementary Fig. 12). The spectra show a substantial amount of residual conductance at zero energy (Fig. 3i, and Supplementary Fig. 12), suggesting that the Fermi surface is not fully gapped at low temperature.

Lastly, we turn to the most intriguing aspect of our spin-polarized STM data. As we examine the evolution of dI/dV spectra more closely, we observe a continuous change in the intensity at higher magnetic fields (Fig. 4a). \(| {{{\bf{Q}}}}_{2a0}^{i}|\) Fourier transform amplitudes also exhibit fine magnetic-field-induced changes at higher fields (Fig. 4c–e, and Supplementary Fig. 9). These cannot be explained by a gradual change of the STM tip polarization direction only, as the tip’s spin-direction should already be fully aligned with the external field by a few Tesla. As such, it appears that out-of-plane magnetic field modifies the electronic density-of-states of the sample as well as the spin modulations associated with the Co superstructure. To better understand if these magnetic-field-induced changes concomitantly alter electronic properties in the pure charge channel, we repeat equivalent measurements with a non-spin-polarized STM tip. Interestingly, we find a smaller, but nevertheless sizable, response in the electronic density-of-states, resulting in a spectral change of opposite magnitude when magnetic field reverses direction (Fig. 4b). The amplitudes of \(| {{{\bf{Q}}}}_{2a0}^{i}|\) show substantially smaller changes as a function of the fields taken compared to the spin-polarized data (Fig. 4f–h, and Supplementary Fig. 10). Given that the spin-polarized tunneling current is proportional to the alignment between the tip and sample (\({I}_{SP}\propto {\vec{P}}_{S}\,\cdot \,{\vec{P}}_{t}\)), we can only attribute this to a gradual “canting” of the Co spins with a pronounced effect on the electronic density-of-states. Fig. 4i–k shows a simple cartoon schematic of this gradual “canting” behavior, consistent with our experimental data.

Discussion

While the field of altermagnetism has progressed rapidly, atomic-scale imaging of material candidates has been extremely rare. Our experiments provide an atomic-scale spectroscopic glimpse to reveal 2a0 × 2a0 modulations with both charge and spin components in Co-intercalated NbSe2. Based on DFT simulations, we attribute these modulations to the reflection of the ordering of the underlying Co superstructure. We further uncover an apparent tunability of the spin modulations likely due to tilting of the underlying Co moments. Spin tilting could potentially provide an explanation for the unidentified 50 K transition seen by other experiments37,39. In the scenario of canted spins, spin canting can in principle break the spatial symmetry mapping between spin-up and spin-down states, which in turn could affect the altermagnetic band splitting since the compensation between spin-sublattices may no longer be present.

It is interesting to note that we observe a partial gap opening at the Fermi level (Fig. 3i) that is not predicted by DFT simulations that consider Co0.25NbSe2 in the altermagnetic state with spins aligned perfectly aligned along the c-axis (Fig. 3j). It is conceivable that the spectral gap opening could arise from the magnetic ordering in the 2 × 2 superstructure, but not captured by DFT calculations. Another possibility could be due to a yet to be identified “hidden” order, such as an additional charge, spin or orbital density waves. This will be of high interest to pursue in future experiments and theoretical simulations.

Given the asymmetric response of the density waves dependent on the tip’s spin polarization, the density modulations detected in our experiments also break the time-reversal symmetry. This is further supported by the spin-polarized DOS measurements that show distinct differences for opposite tip spin polarizations (Fig. 3i). In future work, it would be of particular interest to explore the existence and potential control of time-reversal symmetry breaking domains via spin-polarized STM, complementary to the X-ray photoemission electron microscopy domain studies of altermagnetic MnTe thin films43.

While superconductivity is not detected in our samples, the parent system 2H-NbSe2 without Co intercalation is a well-known bulk superconductor with ~3a0 × 3a0 charge density wave state. Therefore, it would be of particular interest to explore how undoped 2H-NbSe2 evolves into a non-superconducting altermagnet at x = 1/4 Co concentration by studying a range of intermediate Co concentrations. It is conceivable that intercalation of a smaller density of Co atoms, or intercalating a different magnetic element altogether, could stabilize both superconductivity and altermagnetism in the same compound, providing a unique platform to study the interplay of superconductivity and altermagnetism, potentially generating unconventional Cooper pair density waves44. In general, intercalating transition metal dichalcogenides can provide a widely tunable platform to realize new materials systems, in the search for novel correlated electronic states in altermagnets.

Methods

Sample growth

Single crystals of Co0.25NbSe2 were grown via the chemical vapor transport. High-purity powders of cobalt (Co, 99.99%), niobium (Nb, 99.999%), and selenium (Se, 99.9999%) were used as starting materials. To minimize contamination and residual oxygen, the quartz ampoule underwent thorough chemical cleaning and vacuum heat treatment before loading the reactants. The precursor materials were then sealed inside a quartz ampoule (~10 mm in diameter and 150 mm in length) along with iodine (5 mg/cm3 relative to ampoule volume) as a transport agent. After being evacuated to high vacuum, the sealed ampoule was placed in a two-zone horizontal furnace, with the source region maintained at a higher temperature than the deposition zone. Achieving high-quality crystal growth required precise control of the temperature gradient and iodine concentration. For Co0.25NbSe2, the source region was maintained at 960–980 °C, while the growth region temperature was systematically increased from 880 to 900 °C over 100 h. The system was then held at these temperatures for an additional 300 h to enable the formation of large single crystals. Finally, a controlled cooling process was implemented over 100 h, lowering the source region to 200 °C and the growth region to 100 °C before allowing the ampoule to reach room temperature naturally. The obtained crystals had typical dimensions of ~5 × 5 × 0.1 mm3. Residual iodine was removed by rinsing the crystals with a methanol solution. The composition was preliminarily assessed via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, JEOL 7500).

STM experiments

Samples were glued to the sample holder using EPO-TEK H20E silver conducting epoxy and cured at 175 °C for 20 min. The cleaving rod was then glued to the top of the sample in the same way. We cold-cleaved the crystals in UHV at a cryogenic temperature (approximately few tens of Kelvin) and quickly inserted them into the STM head for scanning. STM data was acquired using a customized Unisoku USM1300 microscope. The STM tips used were homemade, chemically-etched tungsten tips, annealed in UHV to bright orange color prior to STM experiments. For preparing a spin-polarized tip, the tip scanned and bias-pulsed over the sample, which gave rise to the tip picking up Co adatoms and becoming spin-polarized. After acquiring data with the spin-polarized tip, its spin polarization was characterized by scanning on a UHV-cleaved surface of FeTe (see Supplementary Fig. 6), an antiferromagnet with a well-defined bicollinear AFM ordering on the surface. By this, we found that typical spin-polarized tips are ferromagnetic-like (i.e., change their polarization direction with different directions of magnetic field). Unless otherwise specified, STM measurements were taken at about 4.8 K.

STM analysis

To read out the intensity of the 2 × 2 peaks in the Fourier transform, the Lawler–Fujita drift-correction algorithm was applied to our topographs and DOS maps45. This algorithm shifts and crops the original image so that the atomic Bragg peaks are single pixel and even integer coordinates in Fourier space, thus minimizing artificial effects from piezo and thermal drift. Since the 2 × 2 peaks are a multiple of the lattice constant, these too are shifted to single pixels for intensity read-out.

ARPES experiments

The ARPES data (Supplementary Fig. 11) were obtained at the CASSIOPÉE beamline of Synchrotron SOLEIL (France) using linearly horizontal polarized light with 70 eV and 25 eV photon energies. The Fermi surfaces were integrated ±15 meV from the Fermi level. The samples were cleaved in UHV at a pressure better than 3 × 10−10 mbar, and the spectra were collected with a Scienta R4000 analyzer with momentum and energy resolution better than 0.018 Å−1 and 10 meV, respectively.

DFT calculations

DFT calculations have been performed in the collinear spin-polarized configuration and via the plane-wave pseudopotential method, as implemented in the Quantum ESPRESSO package46,47. Electron-ion interaction has been modeled for Se atoms via a norm-conserving pseudopotential, while for Nb and Co atoms via ultrasoft pseudopotentials: we chose an energy cut-off of 45 Ry and 450 Ry for the wave-function and electron density, respectively.

Electronic band structure for the bulk Co-doped 2 × 2 NbSe2 supercell in the altermagnetic phase has been obtained through Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof48 exchange-correlation functional, sampling the Brillouin zone with a k-vector mesh of 9 × 9 × 16 points and a first-order Methfessel–Paxton49 electronic smearing of 5 mRy. Electronic dispersion has then been mapped into the large Brillouin zone of undoped 1 × 1 NbSe2 via an unfolding procedure50 implemented in the code unfold.x51.

The electronic DOS projected on the Se atoms was then calculated for the surface, employing a slab geometry consisting of 5 layers of 2H-NbSe2 and four Co atoms. In order to properly simulate a 2D system we added 20 Å of vacuum in the non-periodic direction orthogonal to the surface. Ground-state electronic density was then obtained via a k-vector mesh of 9 × 9 × 1 points and a first-order Methfessel–Paxton49 electronic smearing of 5 mRy, while DOS has been computed with a k-vector mesh of 54 × 54 × 1 points and a Gaussian electronic smearing of 0.25 mRy.

STM images at constant height (3 Å from the surface) have been obtained by integrating the DOS from the bias potential to the Fermi energy, as proposed by Tersoff and Hamann52.