Introduction

The interaction of electrons with collective bosonic modes in solids is of practical and fundamental interest in condensed matter physics. This interaction not only affects the transport properties of actual devices but also induces novel quantum phenomena. A prominent example is the formation of polarons, composite quasiparticles of electrons dressed in phonon clouds due to the strong electron-phonon interaction1. Polarons lead to significantly enhanced quasiparticle mass that modifies charge carrier transport properties, and play a critical role in superconducting and many-body phenomena in high-Tc cuprates2,3, manganites4, two-dimensional (2D) electron gases in heterostructures5, transition metal dichalcogenides6,7, and superconducting monolayer FeSe8. Other notable examples include electron-magnon interactions in ferromagnetic metals9 and electron interactions with antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations in iron-based superconductors10.

Less studied electron-boson coupling in solids is the interaction between electrons and plasmons, quasiparticles of collective charge density oscillations. The electron-plasmon coupling can produce composite quasiparticles known as plasmarons or plasmonic polarons, characterized by distinctive plasmon-loss satellites in the energy spectrum1,11, analogous to polarons from electron-phonon interaction12,13. Plasmonic polarons exhibit unique properties distinct from conventional phonon-induced polarons, which may offer advantages in specific applications. Notably, plasmonic polarons generally have higher characteristic energies and greater tunability than phononic polarons11. Since plasmons are excited with a characteristic frequency (\({\omega }_{{{{\rm{Plasmon}}}}}\)) related to the carrier density (\(n\)), plasmon energy can be effectively modulated by altering the charge carrier density13,14 and temperature15,16,17. Furthermore, electron-plasmon coupling can significantly impact the low-energy properties of materials, such as enhancing quasiparticle mass and limiting charge carrier mobilities2,18.

Despite the important role of electron-plasmon coupling in determining the electronic properties of solids, the plasmonic polaron has been scarcely investigated in real materials. The scarcity is primarily due to the relatively weak electron-plasmon coupling strength18 and the challenge of achieving sufficiently high doping levels to drive a material system into a well-defined plasmonic regime while maintaining stoichiometry. To date, only a limited number of studies have reported this phenomenon, primarily focusing on heavily electron-doped oxide semiconductors and 2D materials all in their thin film forms12,13,19, often involving external treatments such as post-annealing, surface irradiation5,12, or extrinsic surface carrier doping14,19. Consequently, open questions still remain about whether there is a way to achieve an optimal charge carrier density to realize well-defined plasmonic polaron signatures in bulk materials without external treatments and how these signatures could be distinguished from those of other bosonic excitation modes.

In this paper, we report a direct observation of plasmonic polarons formed by electron-plasmon coupling in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2, using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) and high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy (HR-EELS) measurements. Our experimental results reveal that bulk 1T-TiS2 is a highly electron-doped semiconductor with a band gap of ~ 0.5 eV due to self-intercalated Ti atoms, which serve as a charge reservoir between 1T-TiS2 layers. The most pronounced feature in an ARPES band structure is a satellite band at ~ 0.2 eV below the conduction band minimum, typically observed in a polaronic system due to “shake-off” excitations in the photoemission process20. HR-EELS clearly distinguishes between phonon and plasmon excitation energies and uncovers that the bulk plasmon excitation corresponds to the polaronic energy obtained in ARPES. First-principle many-body calculations, including the calculated plasmon self-energy, successfully reproduce the satellite band, confirming the formation of plasmonic polarons in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2. Furthermore, we find that the energy of the satellite in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 is tunable by varying the charge carrier density, in agreement with the expectation within the plasmonic polaron picture, and that the modification of the band structure and dielectric environment by temperature strongly affects the formation of the plasmonic polaron. Our findings demonstrate that plasmonic polarons can be formed intrinsically in bulk materials via interstitial adatoms, providing a versatile material platform enabling a systematic study of the plasmonic polaron state.

Results and Discussion

Atomic and electronic structures of 1T-TiS2 and Ti self-intercalated 1T-TiS2

Figure 1a illustrates the crystal structure of the layered octahedral 1T-TiS2, which crystallizes in a CdI2-type layered structure (P-3m1) with a hexagonal Ti sublayer sandwiched between two S sublayers. The three sublayers constitute a single layer of 1T-TiS2, weakly bonded to adjacent layers by van der Waals forces. It is generally known that foreign atoms can easily enter in the van der Waals gaps in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs)21,22. In the case of 1T-TiS2, the self-intercalation of Ti atoms has been directly observed, and theoretical analysis suggests that excess Ti is energetically more favorable than S vacancies23. The extra atoms are randomly distributed between 1T-TiS2 layers23 and our Raman spectrum further supports the presence of intercalated Ti atoms, indicated by a broad shoulder peak (Sh) on the high-energy side of the A1g peak (Figure S1)22,24. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis (Figure S2) confirms the non-stoichiometric composition of TiS2, which would give a chemical formula Ti1.089S2, assuming Ti intercalation. To account for the Ti intercalation in our calculation, we have adopted Hubbard U correction to Ti 3 d orbitals and added excess electrons in 1T-TiS2. Figure 1b presents a density functional theory (DFT) calculation for self-intercalated 1T-TiS2, which accurately reproduces the ARPES data from the as-cleaved self-intercalated sample shown in Fig. 1c. Using orbital-projected calculations via Wannier functions, we find that the valence band maximum (VBM) at the Γ point is primarily composed of S 3p orbitals, while the conduction band minimum (CBM) at the Μ point is dominated by Ti 3 d orbitals (Figure S3).

Fig. 1: Atomic and electronic structures of 1T-TiS2 and Ti self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.
Fig. 1: Atomic and electronic structures of 1T-TiS2 and Ti self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

a Top- and side-view schematics of TiS2 with 1 T structure. The sky-blue and yellow balls represent the Ti and S atoms, respectively. b DFT calculated electronic structures of self-intercalated TiS2 with 1 T structure. Hubbard U correction to Ti 3 d orbitals and added excess electrons are adopted in 1T-TiS2 to mimic the electronic structure of the self-intercalated 1T-TiS2. The amount of doped electron is one electron per 8 unit-cells. (Inset: The Brillouin zone of 1T-TiS2 with high-symmetry points.) c ARPES spectra of the as-cleaved self-intercalated TiS2 (Ti1.089S2) along the Γ-M direction for Ti-intercalated TiS2 with the p-polarization. Calculated bands are overlapped with green dashed line. d Energy distribution curve (EDC) taken at kx = 1.07 Å–1 (M point). Green and orange areas indicate quasiparticle peak and its satellite peak, respectively.

While the overall ARPES band features are well matched with the DFT + U calculations (green dashed lines in Fig. 1c), the calculated band structures do not replicate the additional satellite feature observed ~0.24 eV below the Fermi energy (EF) at the M point. This satellite band displays not only the well-defined “peak-dip-hump” structure but also a broad tail concentrated at higher binding energies at the M point (Fig. 1d). The satellite feature exhibits momentum dependence, as evidenced by ARPES constant-energy maps (CEMs) (Figure S4). This satellite spectral feature resembles well-known polaronic states reported in previous ARPES studies12,13,19,25,26. The entire conduction band is scattered by a particular bosonic mode to higher binding energies, while the original band shape is preserved due to shake-off excitations of the bosonic mode during the photoemission process20 (Fig. 4b). Therefore, new spectral weight in the ARPES intensity map (Fig. 1d) emerges due to these excitations below the quasiparticle band, separated by bosonic-excitation energy (\(\hslash \Omega\)). These characteristic features (the QP pocket at M and its satellite) were consistently observed across multiple cleaved samples and at different locations on each sample. While the self-intercalated Ti atoms are microscopically distributed at random (ref. 23), our ARPES measurements—which average over a macroscopic beam spot ( ~ 50–100 μm)—reveal a highly uniform and reproducible electronic structure. This indicates that the self-intercalation is macroscopically homogeneous.

Plasmonic polaron in the self-intercalated 1T-TiS2

In order to identify the bosonic mode coupled with electron, we have conducted low-energy excitation measurements using HR-EELS. Figure 2a shows a boson momentum (\(q\))-resolved HR-EELS spectrum taken along the Γ−Μ direction at 35 K. The HR-EELS measurements reveal two characteristic collective excitations in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2. A low-energy excitation mode within below ~50 meV originates from the lattice vibrations (phonon). It is well matched with the energy scale of the calculated phonon modes for self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 (Figure S5). Another excited bosonic mode appears in the HR-EELS spectrum at ~200 meV. This high-energy mode is distinct from the phonon dispersion, with peak intensity strong only near the Γ and rapidly diminishing as the momentum increases (Figure S6). This characteristic feature is well described by the Landau damping in plasmon dispersion, where the plasmon decays into single particle electron-hole pair excitations27,28. In addition, the non-zero plasmon loss energy at \(q=0.0\) Å−1 indicates that the experimentally obtained bosonic mode at ~200 meV originates from the bulk plasmon. Other possible collective modes, such as exciton or impurity states, can be reasonably ruled out due to the transient nature of exciton and momentum dependence of the observed satellites29,30. Given the similar energy scale of the ARPES satellite band at the M-point (Fig. 1d), we conclude that the bosonic excitation coupled with electrons in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 is indeed the bulk plasmon rather than a phonon.

Fig. 2: Plasmonic polaron in the self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.
Fig. 2: Plasmonic polaron in the self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

a Boson momentum-resolved HR-EELS of the self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 at 35 K. q indicates boson momentum transfer. be ARPES intensity maps of self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 sample after additional electron doping via in-situ Rb deposition. f The evolution of bosonic energy extracted from ARPES data (be) as a function of n. g, h DFPT calculated spectral function and ARPES spectra along the K − M − K direction for self-intercalated 1T-TiS2. The calculated spectral function is post-processed with Gaussian broadening and Fermi-Dirac statistic (Figure S9).

One of the key distinctions between conventional polarons, originating from the electron-phonon coupling, and plasmonic polarons is the charge carrier density dependence of their characteristic excitation energy. While the characteristic energy of phonon modes (e.g., Fröhlich polaron) remains independent of charge carrier density11,12,20, the characteristic energy of the plasmonic polarons can be tuned by the carrier concentration11,12,14. To delineate the nature of the bosonic mode by tuning the charge carrier density further, we deposited Rb atoms on the surface of the as-cleaved self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 at 20 K31. The overall spectral shift to higher binding energy reflects an increased Fermi energy due to electron doping (Fig. 2b–e and Figures S7, 8). More importantly, the characteristic energy (\(\hslash \Omega\)) determined by separation between the quasiparticle (QP) and satellite peaks at the M point increases with rising charge carrier density, from 197 ± 0.8 meV (\(n=1.37\times {10}^{21}\,{{{{\rm{cm}}}}}^{-3}\)) to 214 ± 1.2 meV (\(n=4.29\times {10}^{21}\,{{{{\rm{cm}}}}}^{-3}\)), as shown in Fig. 2f. The increased satellite energy supports the formation of plasmonic polarons and highlights the possibility of manipulating these composite particles by tuning the charge carrier density.

The formation of the plasmonic polaron is further supported by the density functional perturbation theory (DFPT). Figure 2g shows the calculated spectral intensity, modified by the calculated plasmon self-energy using the cumulant expansion method (Figure S9). Our DFPT calculation accurately reproduces the spectral weight of the plasmon satellite state observed in the ARPES results (Fig. 2h), clearly demonstrating the formation of plasmonic polaron in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2. We note that the spectral intensity in Fig. 2h only shows the first-order satellite feature, with no higher-order satellites observed, unlike other polaronic features reported in the literature8,12,13,14,26. Based on the energy distribution curve (EDC) profile of ARPES data taken at M point (Fig. 1f), the first-order satellite has ~8 times less intensity compared to the quasiparticle peak. Assuming that the second-order satellite weight is reduced by a similar factor, its intensity would be at the background level12,13,19 (Fig. S10).

Temperature-dependent plasmonic dynamics in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2

Further insights into plasmonic polaron states can be gained by examining the temperature dependence of ARPES satellite features, as plasmon energy has a subtle yet clear temperature dependence15,16,17. Until now, the temperature-dependence study in plasmonic polaron systems has been considered challenging, as these states are typically induced by light irradiation, dosing of the adatoms on the surface, or ferromagnetic transition12,13,19,26, which are not sustainable at high temperatures. In contrast, the self-intercalated 1T-TiS2, with its robust interstitial Ti atoms, is well-suited for investigating temperature-dependent plasmonic states.

Figure 3a presents the temperature-dependent HR-EELS spectra for self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 taken at \(q=0.0\) Å−1. The obtained HR-EELS spectra exhibit three features with increasing temperature: (i) a gradual shift of the bulk plasmon resonance peak towards lower loss energy, (ii) a reduction in the plasmon peak intensity, and (iii) an increase in the full width at half maximum (FWHM). These behaviors correspond well to plasmon damping due to increased electron-electron and electron-phonon scatterings at elevated temperatures16,27,32. The plasmon damping effects are also captured in the plasmonic polaronic state in ARPES results. Figure 3b shows the temperature-dependent ARPES spectra taken at the M point, where the plasmonic polaron state emerges (Fig. 1d). With increasing temperature, EDCs clearly show a reduction in spectral weight of QP peaks along with suppression of the plasmon satellite peak (Fig. 3b and S11). To characterize the temperature-dependent plasmon damping, we plot the FWHMs of both HR-EELS and ARPES spectra in Fig. 3c. The FWHMs of the plasmon state in both spectra increase dramatically ( ~ 50 meV), while QP FWHM increases more moderately ( ~ 12 meV). As temperature rises, plasmonic polarons become rapidly unstable compared to the QP peak due to plasmon damping from enhanced lattice vibrations and thermal excitations, leading to the dissolution of polaronic states at high temperatures16,27,32. As a result, the features associated with plasmonic polarons weaken, and FHWM increases with reduced QP intensity due to increased inelastic scattering, consistent with HR-EELS observations. We further notice that both QP and satellites peaks in ARPES spectra shift to higher binding energies with increasing temperature, but the satellite peak moves less, reducing the separation between the QP and satellite peaks (Fig. 3b (inset) and S12).

Fig. 3: Temperature-dependent plasmonic dynamics in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.
Fig. 3: Temperature-dependent plasmonic dynamics in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

a Temperature-dependent EDCs obtained from HR-EELS at q = 0.0 Å–1. b Temperature-dependent EDCs obtained from ARPES at the M point. c Temperature-dependent FWHMs obtained from satellite and QP peaks in ARPES (red and blue points) and HR-EELS (green points), respectively. d Evolution of bosonic energy obtained from ARPES (red points) and HR-EELS (green points) as a function of temperature.

In Fig. 3d, the bosonic energies extracted from ARPES (red points) and HR-EELS (green points) both decrease with increasing temperatures. To investigate the temperature dependence of electron-plasmon coupling, we extracted the charge carrier density (\(n\)) and the effective mass (\({m}^{* }\)) of the electron pocket at the M point from ARPES data. Our analysis reveals a gradual increase in \(n\) and a decrease in \({m}^{* }\) with rising temperature (Figure S13). Considering the relation for bulk plasmon energy, \(\hslash \Omega \propto \sqrt{n{/\epsilon m}^{* }}\), the temperature dependent behavior of \(\sqrt{n{/m}^{* }}\) contrasts sharply with the observed reduction in plasmon energy at higher temperatures (Figs. 3d and 4a). This discrepancy suggests that the dielectric constant (\(\epsilon\)) must increase with temperature to reconcile the observed trends in \(n\) and \({m}^{* }\), indicating that \(\epsilon\) plays a critical role in modulating plasmon energy as a function of temperature (Fig. 4a). To extract 1/\(\epsilon\), we have used the plasmon energy relation of \(\hslash \Omega \propto \sqrt{n{/\epsilon m}^{* }}\), where the plasmon energy (\(\hslash \Omega\)) and \(\sqrt{n{/m}^{* }}\) were extracted from ARPES results (Fig. 3d, S12 and S14). As \(\epsilon\) can be influenced by changes in \(n\) and crystal structure33,34, the observed increase in \(n\) partially contributes to the enhancement of \(\epsilon\) at elevated temperatures. The minor discrepancies between plasmon energies measured by ARPES and HR-EELS (Fig. 3d) can be attributed to the different mechanisms inherent to these techniques32,35,36,37.

Fig. 4: Temperature-dependent many-body characteristic of self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.
Fig. 4: Temperature-dependent many-body characteristic of self-intercalated 1T-TiS2.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Full size image

a Normalized values of \(\sqrt{n{/m}^{* }}\) (purple circles) and 1/\(\epsilon\) (pink rhombus) as a function of temperature, respectively. The normalizations were based on the value of 20 K. b Schematic illustrating the formation of the plasmonic polaron in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 at low and high temperatures. Light green background indicates the increase of the dielectric screening.

Additionally, temperature-dependent in-plane tensile stress of 1T-TiS2 further contributes to the overall temperature dependence of plasmon energies. Temperature-dependent ARPES data show an unexpected band shift at the Γ point, where the S-induced hole band shifts to higher binding energy with increasing temperature. This band shift is well reproduced by DFT calculations under an in-plane tensile stress of ~1.3%, consistent with Raman spectroscopy measurements22 (Figures S15 and S16). These findings suggest that observed tensile stress is an additional factor influencing the temperature evolution of plasmonic energy. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of plasmonic polarons requires the combined use of ARPES, HR-EELS, and theoretical calculations.

It is fascinating to notice that similar satellite features in ARPES spectra have been discussed in connection with the enhancement of superconductivity, e.g., at the interface of single-layer FeSe and SrTiO38,38 and Cr-intercalated ZrTe239. While BCS theory may be extended to a general bosonic field including plasmon1, it is not yet clear whether plasmonic polaron may play a similar role as the phononic polarons in creating and enhancing superconductivity. It would be interesting to see whether it is possible to find similar satellite features through the intercalation of charge-donating atoms in the van der Waals gap of superconducting TMDCs such as MoS2 and NbSe240,41, and how the superconductivity is affected when plasmonic polarons are formed in these systems.

In summary, our combined investigation with ARPES, HR-EELS, and DFT on the exotic bosonic coupling in self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 unambiguously confirms the presence of plasmonic polarons. This result establishes self-intercalated material as a promising platform to utilize the plasmonic polaron with a highly tunable electronic structure that can be modified by carrier density and temperature. Our study demonstrates that TMDCs are ideal materials for the creation, study, and control of plasmonic polarons in bulk, owing to their propensity to incorporate additional transition metal atoms into the van der Waals gap between layers42,43,44. Moreover, its layered structure and intrinsic plasmonic nature make self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 advantageous for constructing van der Waals heterostructures, which is promising in exploiting plasmonic physics, such as realizing high-temperature superconductors through hybrid phonon-plasmon coupling and opening new opportunities for plasmonic applications.

Methods

Sample and ARPES measurement

The self-intercalated 1T-TiS2 single crystals were purchased from HQ Graphene. The EDX measurements were performed at the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) to determine the ratio of atomic weights. ARPES data were taken at Beamlines 10.0.1 and 4.0.3, Advanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, using Scienta R4000 and R8000 analyzers, respectively. The base pressure was better than 4 × 10−11 Torr. The photon energy was set at 52 eV for p-polarizations with energy and angular resolution of 18–25 meV and 0.1°, respectively. To achieve high-quality ARPES data of self-intercalated TiS2, the samples were cleaved at low temperatures ( ~ 20 K). Rubidium (Rb) deposition was carried out by in-situ evaporation of Rb on the sample surfaces using a commercial SAES getter source mounted in the analysis chamber.

HR-EELS measurements

The 1T-TiS2 single crystals were also examined with an HR-EELS system equipped with an Ibach-type ELS5000 monochromator from LK technologies and an Scienta R4000 analyzer45 HR-EELS measurements were performed at temperatures ranging from 35 K to 291 K with a primary electron beam energy of 110 eV.

Density Functional Theory Calculations

All DFT and DFPT calculations for 1T-TiS2 (space group P\(\bar{3}\)m1) were performed using the Quantum ESPRESSO46 package. We adopted the Hubbard corrections (DFT + U) for hopping mechanism of intercalation with an effective onsite Coulomb parameter U = 3.25 eV for Ti (3 d). The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof for solids (PBEsol) exchange-correlation functionals and norm-conserving pseudopotentials were used. We employed a plane wave kinetic energy cutoff of 50 Ry (680 eV), kinetic energy cutoff for charge density and potential for norm-conserving pseudopotential of 500 Ry, and 12 × 12 × 12 Monkhorst-Pack mesh to sample the Brillouin zone. Estimated self-consistent field accuracy is equal to 1 × 10−12 Ry. The phonon dispersions were obtained with a 4 × 4 × 4 supercell. To illustrate the real space orbital and orbital projected bands, we used Wannier function disentanglement with Wannier9047. We used cumulant expansion function in EPW code48 to obtain spectral functions with electron-phonon and electron-plasmon self-energy. The retarded electron self-energy is driven by Raleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory:

$$\int \frac{{{{\rm{dq}}}}}{{\Omega }_{{{{\rm{BZ}}}}}}{\sum }_{{{{\rm{m}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}{\left|{{{{\rm{g}}}}}_{{{{\rm{mn}}}}}^{{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}\left({{{\rm{k}}}},{{{\rm{q}}}}\right)\right|}^{2}\left[\frac{{{{\rm{n}}}}\left({{{{\rm{\omega }}}}}_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}\right)+{{{\rm{f}}}}\left({{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}\right)}{{{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{nk}}}}}-{{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}-{{{{\rm{\omega }}}}}_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}-{{{\rm{i}}}}{{{\rm{\eta }}}}}+\frac{{{{\rm{n}}}}\left({{{{\rm{\omega }}}}}_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}\right)+1-{{{\rm{f}}}}\left({{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}\right)}{{{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{nk}}}}}-{{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}+{{{{\rm{\omega }}}}}_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}-{{{\rm{i}}}}{{{\rm{\eta }}}}}\right].$$

Here, \({{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}\) is electron energy, \({{{\rm{n}}}}({{{{\rm{\omega }}}}}_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}})\) is the Bose occupation factors, \({{{\rm{f}}}}({{{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}})\) is Fermi-Dirac occupation factors, \({{{\rm{\eta }}}}\) is infinitesimal, \({{{{\rm{\omega }}}}}_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}\) is plasmon/phonon frequency. The \({{{{\rm{g}}}}}_{{{{\rm{mn}}}}}^{{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}\) \(({{{\rm{k}}}},{{{\rm{q}}}})\) represents matrix elements between the initial state \({{{{\rm{\psi }}}}}_{{{{\rm{nk}}}}}\) and the final state \({{{{\rm{\psi }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}\) for electron-phonon and electron-plasmon coupling49 given by

\({{{{\rm{g}}}}}_{{{{\rm{mn}}}}}^{{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}({{{\rm{k}}}},{{{\rm{q}}}})=\langle {{{{\rm{\psi }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}|{\partial }_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}{{{\rm{V}}}}|{{{{\rm{\psi }}}}}_{{{{\rm{nk}}}}}\rangle\), and \({{{{\rm{g}}}}}_{{{{\rm{mn}}}}}^{{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}({{{\rm{k}}}},{{{\rm{q}}}})={[\frac{{{{{\rm{\varepsilon }}}}}_{0}\Omega }{{{{{\rm{e}}}}}^{2}{{\hslash }}}\frac{\partial {{{\rm{\epsilon }}}}({{{\rm{q}}}},{{{\rm{\omega }}}})}{\partial {{{\rm{\omega }}}}}]}_{{{{{\rm{\omega }}}}}_{{{{\rm{q}}}}}}^{-1/2}\frac{1}{|{{{\rm{q}}}}|}\langle {{{{\rm{\psi }}}}}_{{{{\rm{mk}}}}+{{{\rm{q}}}}}|{{{{\rm{e}}}}}^{{{{\rm{iq}}}}\cdot {{{\rm{r}}}}}|{{{{\rm{\psi }}}}}_{{{{\rm{nk}}}}}\rangle\), respectively, with \({\partial }_{{{{\rm{q}}}}{{{\rm{\nu }}}}}{{{\rm{V}}}}\) the derivative of the self-consistent potential associated with a phonon of wavevector \({{{\rm{q}}}}\), \({{{\rm{\nu }}}}\) branch index, \(\Omega\) the volume of one unit cell.