Fig. 3: Clustered heatmap of the subset of proteins identified to have a log fold change ≥ 1 or <−1.0 (p < 0.05) Timepoint comparisons: T1R vs. T1S or T2R vs. T2S. | Communications Earth & Environment

Fig. 3: Clustered heatmap of the subset of proteins identified to have a log fold change ≥ 1 or <−1.0 (p < 0.05) Timepoint comparisons: T1R vs. T1S or T2R vs. T2S.

From: Protein signatures predict coral resilience and survival to thermal bleaching events

Fig. 3: Clustered heatmap of the subset of proteins identified to have a log fold change ≥ 1 or <−1.0 (p < 0.05) Timepoint comparisons: T1R vs. T1S or T2R vs. T2S.

Heatmap shades of blue indicate averaged normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) values for bioreplicates per condition, normalized by the row mean. Rows are clustered using a correlation algorithm and a dendrogram was set to cut 12 distinct clusters (indicated by #s 1–12 black). Right panel dot-matrix indicates metabolic categories identified through KEGG, UniProt and GO (D) viral defense or (R) reproduction, CO2 or as a substrate (CO2-) or product (CO2+), or Ca- binding domain (i.e., Ca-binding).

Back to article page