Table. 2 Cost-benefit analysis of different engineering and econometric scenarios [HM Hydrological Modeling, SHM Socio-Hydrological Modeling]

From: Integrating human decision-making into a hydrological model to accurately estimate the impacts of agricultural policies

Policy Scenarios

Approach

Additional Area Converted (km2)

Total Budget Spent in million dollars ($)

Area Enrolled (km2)

Total annual average NO3-N (kg) from agriculture

Change in total annual average NO3-N (kg) from agriculture

Change in nitrate per area (kg km−2)

Benefit per enrolled area ($ km−2)

Total benefits in million dollars ($)

Benefit-cost ratio

Scenario 1

-

0

0

0

11,339,000

   

0

 

Scenario 2

HM

1260

15.5

1260

10,288,000

1,051,000

830

17400

21.9

1.41

Scenario 3

HM

1260

23.3

1260

9,737,000

1,602,000

1270

26600

33.5

1.44

Scenario 4

SHM

50

0.6

50

11,297,000

42,000

900

18800

0.94

1.57

Scenario 5

SHM

180

3.4

330

11,152,000

187,000

1000

21300

3.8

1.12

  1. Notes: The benefit of one kg N reduction used in this analysis is $20.90 from Ribaudo, et al. (2005).