Fig. 2: Differences in prediction skill between the metabolic index and temperature.
From: Extended predictability of metabolic constraints on fish habitat
A–C Differences in prediction skill, calculated as the correlation coefficient of temperature subtracted from that of the metabolic index \(({{\Phi }}_{N})\), at 0–100 m with \({E}_{o}\) values for different hypoxia sensitivities at a 1-year lead-time: A high (\({E}_{o}\) = 0.2 eV), B medium (\({E}_{o}\) = 0.7 eV), and C low (\({E}_{o}\) = 1.2 eV) sensitivities. D–F, G–I are similar to A–C, but at 100–300 m and 300–800 m depth, respectively. J–R show similar analyses to A–I but for 2-year lead-time forecasts. Positive values indicate that the metabolic index prediction skill is higher than that of temperature.
