Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Earth & Environment
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications earth & environment
  3. articles
  4. article
Seasonal freezing increases High Arctic erosion and landscape response to climate extremes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 March 2026

Seasonal freezing increases High Arctic erosion and landscape response to climate extremes

  • Jonas A. Eschenfelder  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2917-38911,2,
  • Shawn M. Chartrand  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9309-11371,
  • A. Mark Jellinek  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7372-78713 &
  • …
  • Cansu Culha  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-25953 

Communications Earth & Environment , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 288 Accesses

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cryospheric science
  • Geomorphology

Abstract

Conventional views suggest Arctic landscapes erode more slowly than temperate ones due to seasonal ground ice increasing sediment cohesion. However, observations of relatively rapid cold region channelisation challenge this paradigm. Using flume experiments, scaling theory and field data, we show that thawing riverbeds erode faster than unfrozen counterparts. Early in the thaw season, surface water injections advect heat and momentum fluxes into the bed, driving convective stirring that localises subsurface thawing and increases bed erosion. Resultant bed and thaw front topographies continue modulating subsurface flow paths, sustaining spatially variable erosion, which generates a stepped surface topography for subsequent thaw seasons. At the landscape scale, this coupled thermal-erosional response results in a characteristic topographic fingerprint composed of discontinuous channel segments interspersed by depositional zones. Our findings suggest that cold region landscapes respond more quickly to a changing climate relative to temperate ones and are sensitive to early season extreme weather events.

Similar content being viewed by others

High Arctic channel incision modulated by climate change and the emergence of polygonal ground

Article Open access 12 September 2023

Fluvial erosion linked to warming in the Canadian Arctic

Article Open access 06 April 2025

Assessment of freeze-thaw erosion by retrogressive thaw slump on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau combined with geophysical methods

Article Open access 11 June 2025

Data availability

The collated mean particle flux for the frozen and unfrozen flume experiments, temperature data from the 2024-11-06 frozen experiment, and sideview images used to calculate the thaw depth for the 2024-11-06 frozen experiment, and a close-up video of the bed during the 2024-11-06 frozen experiment are available on figshare at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.3023478740.

Code availability

The Python scripts used to generate Figs. 1f, g, 3, and 5, as well as the workflow to track the water surface, bed surface, and thaw front surface from side-view images, are available in the data repository above. All of these scripts were run on Python version 3.10.12.

References

  1. Anderson, R.S. Geomorphology: the mechanics and chemistry of landscapes. (Cambridge University Press, 2010).

  2. Grau Galofre, A. & Jellinek, A. M. The geometry and complexity of spatial patterns of terrestrial channel networks: Distinctive fingerprints of erosional regimes. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 122, 1037–1059 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hecht, H. & Oguchi, T. Global evaluation of erosion rates in relation to tectonics. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 4, 40 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roe, G. H., Whipple, K. & Fletcher, J. K. Feedbacks among climate, erosion, and tectonics in a critical wedge orogen. Am. J. Sci. 308, 815–842 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G., Miller, J. P. & Wohl, E. E. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology (Courier Dover Publications, 2020-09-16), 2nd edn. Google-Books-ID: vnb2DwAAQBAJ.

  6. Church, M. Bed material transport and the morphology of alluvial river channels. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 34, 325–354 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Einstein, H. A. The Bed-load Function for Sediment Transportation in Open Channel Flows (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1950). Google-Books-ID: lAcgzrAdnc0C.

  8. Shields, A. F. Anwendung der Aehnlichkeitsmechanik und der Turbulenzforschung auf die Geschiebebewegung https://web.archive.org/web/20110718072601/http://repository.tudelft.nl/assets/uuid:61a19716-a994-4942-9906-f680eb9952d6/Shields.pdf (1936-06-30).

  9. Wiberg, P. L. & Smith, J. D. Calculations of the critical shear stress for motion of uniform and heterogeneous sediments. Water Resour. Res. 23, 1471–1480 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jain, R. K. & Kothyari, U. C. Cohesion influences on erosion and bed load transport. Water Resour. Res. 45 (2009).

  11. Lamb, M. P., Dietrich, W. E. & Venditti, J. G. Is the critical shields stress for incipient sediment motion dependent on channel-bed slope?. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 113, e2007JF000831 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rowland, J. C. et al. Arctic landscapes in transition: Responses to thawing permafrost. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 91, 229–230 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Douglas, M. M., Miller, K. L., Schmeer, M. N. & Lamb, M. P. Ablation-limited erosion rates of permafrost riverbanks. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 128, e2023JF007098 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Godin, E. & Fortier, D. Geomorphology of a thermo-erosion gully, Bylot Island, Nunavut, Canada. Can. J. Earth Sci. 49, 979–986 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chartrand, S. M. et al. High arctic channel incision modulated by climate change and the emergence of polygonal ground. Nat. Commun. 14, 5297 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walvoord, M. A. & Kurylyk, B. L. Hydrologic impacts of thawing permafrost-a review. Vadose Zone J. 15, vzj2016.01.0010 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Piliouras, A., Lauzon, R. & Rowland, J. C. Unraveling the combined effects of ice and permafrost on arctic delta morphodynamics. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 126, e2020JF005706 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rowland, J. C. et al. Scale-dependent influence of permafrost on riverbank erosion rates. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 128, e2023JF007101 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Del Vecchio, J. et al. Patterns and rates of soil movement and shallow failures across several small watersheds on the Seward Peninsula, Alaska. Earth Surf. Dyn. 11, 227–245 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Douglas, M. M., Dunne, K. B. J. & Lamb, M. P. Sediment entrainment and slump blocks limit permafrost riverbank erosion. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL102974 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Douglas, M. M. & Lamb, M. P. A model for thaw and erosion of permafrost riverbanks. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 129, e2023JF007452 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geyman, E. C., Douglas, M. M., Avouac, J.-P. & Lamb, M. P. Permafrost slows arctic riverbank erosion. Nature 634, 359–365 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Costard, F., Dupeyrat, L., Gautier, E. & Carey-Gailhardis, E. Fluvial thermal erosion investigations along a rapidly eroding river bank: application to the Lena River (central Siberia). Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 28, 1349–1359 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dupeyrat, L. et al. Effects of ice content on the thermal erosion of permafrost: Implications for coastal and fluvial erosion. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 22, 179–187 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sha, A. et al. Accelerated river meander migration on the Tibetan plateau caused by permafrost thaw. Geophys. Res. Lett. 52, e2024GL111536 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, T. et al. Shifted sediment-transport regimes by climate change and amplified hydrological variability in cryosphere-fed rivers. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi5019 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liljedahl, A. K. et al. Pan-arctic ice-wedge degradation in warming permafrost and its influence on tundra hydrology. Nat. Geosci. 9, 312–318 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fortier, D., Allard, M. & Shur, Y. Observation of rapid drainage system development by thermal erosion of ice wedges on Bylot Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 18, 229–243 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ielpi, A., Lapôtre, M. G. A., Finotello, A. & Roy-Léveillée, P. Large sinuous rivers are slowing down in a warming Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 375–381 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kanevskiy, M. et al. Patterns and rates of riverbank erosion involving ice-rich permafrost (Yedoma) in northern Alaska. Geomorphology 253, 370–384 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sophocleous, M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol. J. 10, 52–67 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rempel, A. W., Wettlaufer, J. S. & Worster, M. G. Premelting dynamics in a continuum model of frost heave. J. Fluid Mech. 498, 227–244 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Musa, R. A., Takarrouht, S., Louge, M. Y., Xu, J. & Berberich, M. E. Pore pressure in a wind-swept rippled bed below the suspension threshold. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 119, 2574–2590 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Louge, M. Y., Valance, A., Ould el Moctar, A. & Dupont, P. Packing variations on a ripple of nearly monodisperse dry sand. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 115 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2009JF001384. (2010).

  35. Louge, M. Y. et al. Seepage-induced penetration of water vapor and dust beneath ripples and dunes. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 115, e2009JF001385 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hassan, M. A., Tonina, D., Beckie, R. D. & Kinnear, M. The effects of discharge and slope on hyporheic flow in step-pool morphologies. Hydrol. Process. 29, 419–433 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang, X. et al. Enhanced poleward moisture transport and amplified northern high-latitude wetting trend. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 47–51 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, X., Sorteberg, A., Zhang, J., Gerdes, R. & Comiso, J. C. Recent radical shifts of atmospheric circulations and rapid changes in arctic climate system. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2008GL035607. (2008).

  39. Zhang, X. et al. Weather and climate extremes in a changing Arctic. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1–21 https://www.nature.com/articles/s43017-025-00724-4 (2025).

  40. Eschenfelder, J., Chartrand, S., Jellinek, M. & Culha, C. Supplementary materials to coupled thaw-entrainment experiments https://figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Supplementary_materials_to_coupled_thaw-entrainment_experiments/30234787/1 (2026).

  41. Louge, M. Y., Carroll, C. S. & Turnbull, B. Role of pore pressure gradients in sustaining frontal particle entrainment in eruption currents: The case of powder snow avalanches. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 116 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2011JF002065. (2011).

  42. Roux, N., Costard, F. & Grenier, C. Laboratory and numerical simulation of the evolution of a river’s talik. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 28, 460–469 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wankiewicz, A. Hydrothermal processes beneath arctic river channels. Water Resour. Res. 20, 1417–1426 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liu, W., Fortier, R., Molson, J. & Lemieux, J.-M. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of cryo-hydrogeological processes in a river-talik system in a continuous permafrost environment. Water Resour. Res. 58, e2021WR031630 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, W., Fortier, R., Molson, J. & Lemieux, J.-M. A conceptual model for talik dynamics and icing formation in a river floodplain in the continuous permafrost zone at Salluit, Nunavik (Quebec), Canada. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 32, 468–483 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Painter, S. L., Coon, E. T., Khattak, A. J. & Jastrow, J. D. Drying of tundra landscapes will limit subsidence-induced acceleration of permafrost thaw. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 120, e2212171120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kim, B.-M. et al. Major cause of unprecedented Arctic warming in January 2016: Critical role of an Atlantic windstorm. Sci. Rep. 7, 40051 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Furbish, D. J., Schmeeckle, M. W., Schumer, R. & Fathel, S. L. Probability distributions of bed load particle velocities, accelerations, hop distances, and travel times informed by Jaynes’s principle of maximum entropy. J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 121, 1373–1390 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Robert, A. River processes: an introduction to fluvial dynamics. (Routledge, 2014).

  50. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jaqaman, K. et al. Robust single-particle tracking in live-cell time-lapse sequences. Nat. Methods 5, 695–702 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ershov, D. et al. TrackMate 7: integrating state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms into tracking pipelines. Nat. Methods 19, 829–832 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yen, J.-C., Chang, F.-J. & Chang, S. A new criterion for automatic multilevel thresholding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 4, 370–378 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Walt, S. vd et al. scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ 2, e453 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Otsu, N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. 9, 62–66 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Roberts, L. G. Machine perception of three-dimensional solids https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/11589. Accepted: 2005-08-17T19:45:17Z. (1963).

  57. Turcotte, D. L. & Schubert, G. Geodynamics (Cambridge University Press, 2002-03-25).

  58. Powell, D. M. Flow resistance in gravel-bed rivers: Progress in research. Earth-Sci. Rev. 136, 301–338 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Goharzadeh, A., Khalili, A. & Jørgensen, B. B. Transition layer thickness at a fluid-porous interface. Phys. Fluids 17, 057102 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Voermans, J. J., Ghisalberti, M. & Ivey, G. N. The variation of flow and turbulence across the sediment-water interface. J. Fluid Mech. 824, 413–437 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Bear, J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media (Dover Publishing, 1988-01-01). Google-Books-ID: lurrmlFGhTEC.

  62. Kurylyk, B. L. & Hayashi, M. Improved Stefan equation correction factors to accommodate sensible heat storage during soil freezing or thawing. Permafr. Periglac. Process. 27, 189–203 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Bogaart, P. W., Tucker, G. E. & de Vries, J. J. Channel network morphology and sediment dynamics under alternating periglacial and temperate regimes: a numerical simulation study. Geomorphology 54, 257–277 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Li, D., Overeem, I., Kettner, A. J., Zhou, Y. & Lu, X. Air temperature regulates erodible landscape, water, and sediment fluxes in the permafrost-dominated catchment on the Tibetan Plateau. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR028193 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Discovery Grants (A.M.J., S.M.C) and Northern Research Supplement (S.M.C); NSF EAR Postdoctoral Fellowship Program (C.C.) and the Toolik Tundra Award (C.C). We thank Sam Anderson, Grace Johnson, Cara James, Antero Kukko, Gordon Osinski, Simona Ruso, Axel Nobelt, and Anna Grau-Galofre for their help in the field during Summer 2024 on Tallurutit. We thank the Polar Continental Shelf Program and their Resolute Bay staff for logistical support of our 2024 expedition. We thank the Inuit of the Qikiqtani Region of Nunavut for their permission to carry out fieldwork on their land in Nunavut and the community of Qausuittuq (Resolute Bay) for welcoming us during our stay in the summer of 2024. We encourage you to learn more about the land, communities and people of the Qikiqtani Region through the Qikiqtani Inuit Association (https://www.qia.ca/about-qikiqtani/). We also thank the Inuit Heritage Trust Inc (https://www.ihti.ca/) for their guidance on the traditional name for Tallurutit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Jonas A. Eschenfelder & Shawn M. Chartrand

  2. Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

    Jonas A. Eschenfelder

  3. Department of Earth Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    A. Mark Jellinek & Cansu Culha

Authors
  1. Jonas A. Eschenfelder
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shawn M. Chartrand
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Mark Jellinek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cansu Culha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.A.E., S.M.C., and A.M.J. developed the experimental set-up, methodology, physical model and scaling analysis of the experiments. J.A.E. conducted the experiments and processed the data. J.A.E. developed the conceptual model and regime space applied in Figures 4 and 5 with input from S.M.C, A. M. J. and C.C. J.A.E., A.M.J., and C.C. collected the thaw depth measurements and field photos. S.M.C. collected the drone-based photography of the field site. All authors contributed to the writing and revising of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas A. Eschenfelder.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Earth and Environment thanks Sarah Evans and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Nicola Colombo. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Materials (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download DOCX )

Supplementary Data 1 (download ZIP )

Supplementary Data 2 (download ZIP )

Supplementary Data 3 (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eschenfelder, J.A., Chartrand, S.M., Jellinek, A.M. et al. Seasonal freezing increases High Arctic erosion and landscape response to climate extremes. Commun Earth Environ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03468-1

Download citation

  • Received: 28 November 2025

  • Accepted: 19 March 2026

  • Published: 30 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03468-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Earth & Environment (Commun Earth Environ)

ISSN 2662-4435 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing