Table 2 Oral pharmacological agent adequate to achieve target glucose levels vs need for escalation to insulin to achieve glucose targets.

From: Precision gestational diabetes treatment: a systematic review and meta-analyses

Precision Marker

Studies

Participants

Statistical method

Effect Estimate (95%CI)

GRADE

Age (years)

11

1473

Mean difference (95%CI)

−1.04 [−2.10, 0.03]

Nulliparity

8

1215

Odds Ratio (95%CI)

1.55 [1.17, 2.04]

Body mass index (kg/m2)

10

1692

Mean difference (95%CI)

−1.21 [−2.21, −0.21]

Previous history of GDM

8

1412

Odds Ratio (95%CI)

0.43 [0.30, 0.63]

Haemoglobin A1C (%)

6

1152

Mean difference (95%CI)

−0.21 [−0.29, −0.13]

Fasting glucose (mg/dl)

12

1836

Mean difference (95%CI)

−8.02 [−11.87, −4.16]

1-h glucose (mg/dl)

8

1177

Mean difference (95%CI)

−10.64 [−18.25, −3.02]

2-h glucose (mg/dl)

10

1378

Mean difference (95%CI)

−7.31 [−11.38, −3.25]

3-h glucose (mg/dl)

6

679

Mean difference (95%CI)

0.00 [−11.79, 11.79]

Family history of diabetes

6

1040

Odds Ratio (95%CI)

0.79 [0.50, 1.25]

Gestational age at GDM diagnosis (weeks)

11

1473

Mean difference (95%CI)

2.64 [1.42, 3.86]

Gestation at oral pharmacological agent initiation (weeks)

7

967

Mean difference (95%CI)

3.79 [2.08, 5.51]

  1. Very low .
  2. Low .