Fig. 4: Binding, ACE2 inhibition, and Fc effector antibody responses in plasma among COVID-19 hospitalized patients at enrollment and 1-month post-enrollment (MPE). | Communications Medicine

Fig. 4: Binding, ACE2 inhibition, and Fc effector antibody responses in plasma among COVID-19 hospitalized patients at enrollment and 1-month post-enrollment (MPE).

From: Application of machine learning algorithms to identify serological predictors of COVID-19 severity and outcomes

Fig. 4

The binding (ac) IgG and (d) IgA antibodies recognizing ancestral SARS-CoV-2 spike (S), spike receptor binding domain (S-RBD), or nucleocapsid (N) were quantified by ELISA, and measured as the binding antibody units (BAU) per mL if international standards were available or as the area under the curve (AUC) if standards were not available and titration curves could only be generated. e The percentage of ACE2 inhibition for the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 variant was calculated and arcsine transformed for analyses. fh The Fc effector antibody responses were measured based on C1q complement fixation in response to either the spike or S-RBD or antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and reported as arbitrary units (AU). Antibody responses were compared among COVID-19 hospitalized patients classified as moderate (WHO score 3–4), severe (WHO score 5–7), or deceased (WHO score 8) using samples collected at enrollment vs. 1 MPE. Data are presented as means with standard deviations, indicated by error bars. p-values for statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) by linear mixed-effects regression to compare change over time or Welch’s ANOVA to compare across groups within a time point are indicated. Limit of detection (LOD) are indicated by the dashed lines.

Back to article page