Table 2 Comparison of outcomes between CABG and PCI for patients with LM with any vessel disease

From: Revascularization strategy for left main coronary artery disease comparing percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting

Outcomes

CABGa

(N = 1180)

PCIa

(N = 526)

Adjusted HRb (95% CI)

(PCI as the reference group)

P-value for aHR

All cause death at 30 days follow-up

19(1.6%)

33(6.3%)

0.32(0.18, 0.60)

0.0003

30 days Readmission for MI

14(1.2%)

29(5.5%)

0.28(0.13, 0.56)

0.0004

All-cause death at longest follow-up (mean follow-up = 7 years)

253(40%)

231(58.4%)

0.58(0.48, 0.70)

3.56e-08

Rehospitalization (mean follow-up = 6.5 years)

711(75.6%)

352(71.6%)

0.97(0.84, 1.11)

0.645

Readmission for MI (mean follow-up = 6.5 years)

82(10.7%)

97(22.3%)

0.40(0.29, 0.55)

1.23e-08

Readmission for stroke (mean follow-up = 6.5 years)

63(8.3%)

22(5.7%)

1.41(0.85, 2.33)

0.183

Repeat revascularization(mean follow up = 6.5 years)

56(5.4%)

84(16.3%)

0.25(0.18, 0.36)

8.74e-15

  1. Bold values indicate statistical significance.
  2. CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, MI myocardial infarction.
  3. aThe failure rate in the parentheses were estimates from the Kaplan–Meier curve or cumulative incidence curve at the longest follow-up.
  4. bAdjusted based on the covariates listed in Table 1.
Back to article page