Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
COVID-19 vaccination carries no association with childbirth rates in Sweden
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 January 2026

COVID-19 vaccination carries no association with childbirth rates in Sweden

  • Dennis Nordvall1,2,
  • Thomas Schön2,
  • Jorma Hinkula  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1908-56092,
  • Olle Eriksson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5306-27531,2,
  • Armin Spreco2,
  • Örjan Dahlström2,
  • Johan Lyth2,
  • Daniel Axelsson1,
  • Elin Gursky3,
  • Marie Blomberg  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-550X2 &
  • …
  • Toomas Timpka  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6049-54022 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 7662 Accesses

  • 283 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Epidemiology
  • Preventive medicine

Abstract

Background

Speculative claims about COVID-19 vaccines affecting fertility and childbirth have circulated widely. We aimed to examine whether COVID-19 vaccination is causally associated with childbirth in Swedish women.

Methods

We conducted a cohort study using a representative population of 369,000 to emulate a randomized experiment, comparing childbirth rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated women. Cox proportional hazards models were applied, treating vaccination as a time-varying covariate. Causal modeling was used to adjust for potential bias. To capture vaccine effects on both conception and established pregnancies, the index event was set at an estimated conception date, 280 days prior to childbirth.

Results

We show that with an assumed average pregnancy length of 280 days, there are no statistically significant associations between COVID-19 vaccination and childbirth (unadjusted HR = 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-1.00); adjusted HR = 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.09). Assuming a shorter pregnancy length (266 days), the associations between vaccination and childbirth remain insignificant (unadjusted HR = 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.02); adjusted HR = 1.04 (95% CI 0.98-1.11)). Neither are there statistically significant associations between COVID-19 vaccination and recorded miscarriages (unadjusted HR = 0.84 (95% CI 0.69-1.03); adjusted HR = 0.86 (95% CI 0.70-1.05).

Conclusions

COVID-19 vaccination is not associated with a decrease in childbirth after adjusting for common confounding factors. These findings provide evidence to support vaccination policies for women of childbearing age.

Plain Language Summary

Early, unfounded rumors spread during the COVID-19 pandemic claimed that mRNA vaccination could cause infertility. Later, suspicions were raised regarding whether reductions in childbirth observed during the pandemic were associated with the novel COVID-19 vaccines. We therefore study effects of COVID-19 vaccination in a representative population of Swedish women, and adjust for any confounding effects. No association is observed between COVID-19 vaccination and childbirth, or between vaccination and recorded miscarriages. We thus find no evidence for any connections between COVID-19 vaccination and the observed decrease in childbirth. Our results are relevant for consideration when vaccination policies involving women of childbearing age are determined.

Similar content being viewed by others

A population-based matched cohort study of early pregnancy outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection

Article Open access 17 October 2022

Evaluating miscarriage incidence after COVID-19 vaccination

Article Open access 01 July 2025

Lack of association between COVID-19 vaccines and miscarriage onset using a case-crossover design

Article Open access 27 March 2024

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request five years after article publication from the corresponding author [toomas.timpka@liu.se]. The data are not publicly available due to Swedish legislation. Source Data for Fig. 2 is provided as Supplementary Data.

Code availability

The R code required to replicate our results is available from GitHub at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18138478.

References

  1. Malik, M., Bauer-Maison, N., Guarna, G. & D’Souza, R. D. Social Media Misinformation about Pregnancy and COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review. Med Princ. Pr. 33, 232–241 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbasi, J. Widespread misinformation about infertility continues to create COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. JAMA 327, 1013–1015 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berkowitz, H. E. & Vann, J. C. J. Strategies to address COVID-19 vaccine and pregnancy myths. MCN Am. J. Matern Child Nurs. 48, 215–223 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vesco, K. K. et al. Obstetric Complications and Birth Outcomes After Antenatal Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination. Obstet. Gynecol. 143, 794–802 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Norman, M. et al. Neonatal outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy. JAMA 331, 396–407 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fernández-García, S. et al. PregCOV-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium. Effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob. Health 9, e014247 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manniche, V., Fürst, T., Schmeling, M., Gilthorpe, J. D. & Hansen, P. R. Rates of successful conceptions according to COVID-19 vaccination status: Data from the Czech Republic. Int J. Risk Saf. Med 36, 302–306 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winkler-Dworak, M., Zeman, K. & Sobotka, T. Birth rate decline in the later phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of policy interventions, vaccination programmes, and economic uncertainty. Hum. Reprod. Open 2024, hoae052 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jasilioniene, A., Jasilionis, D., Jdanov, D. & Myrskylä, M. Association between the COVID-19 vaccination campaign and fertility trends: a population-level time series analysis for 22 countries. BMJ Public Health 3, e001410 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Winters, M. et al. Debunking COVID-19 vaccine misinformation with an audio drama in Ghana, a randomized control trial. Sci. Rep. 15, 8955 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Soucheray, S. RFK Jr says no COVID vaccines for healthy children, pregnant women. CIDRAP News. May 27, 2025. [2026-01-20] https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/rfk-jr-says-no-covid-vaccines-healthy-children-pregnant-women#:~:text=News-,RFK%20Jr%20says%20no%20COVID%20vaccines%20for%20healthy%20children%2C%20pregnant,Steven%20J.

  12. Magnus, M. C., Wilcox, A. J., Morken, N. H., Weinberg, C. R. & Håberg, S. E. Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study. BMJ 364, l869 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Firouzbakht, M., Sharif Nia, H., Kazeminavaei, F. & Rashidian, P. Hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study based on the health belief model. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22, 611 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greenland, S. Basic methods for sensitivity analysis of biases. Int J. Epidemiol. 25, 1107–1116 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hernán, M. A., Hernández-Díaz, S. & Robins, J. M. A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology 15, 615–625 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hui, L. et al. Suboptimal care factors and stillbirths during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria: A state-wide linkage study of stillbirths and Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity case reviews. Women Birth 38, 101855 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sandoval, M. N. et al. COVID-19 infection history as a risk factor for early pregnancy loss: results from the electronic health record-based Southeast Texas COVID and Pregnancy Cohort Study. BMC Med 23, 274 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Franklin, JB. et al.; JAMA Summit on Clinical Trials Participants. Modernizing the Data Infrastructure for Clinical Research to Meet Evolving Demands for Evidence. JAMA. 5, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.0268 (2024).

  19. Socialstyrelsen. Statistics on pregnancies, births and newborns (in Swedish). [2025-06-03] https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/alla-statistikamnen/graviditeter-forlossningar-och-nyfodda/.

  20. Hoem, B. & Hoem, J. M. Sweden’s family policies and roller-coaster fertility. Jinko Mondai Kenkyu 52, 1–22 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (VR 2021-05608, VR 2022-05608, VR 2025-06721), Region Östergötland (ALF-936190), and the Research Council of Southeast Sweden (FORSS-940915).

Funding

Open access funding provided by Linköping University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden

    Dennis Nordvall, Olle Eriksson & Daniel Axelsson

  2. Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Dennis Nordvall, Thomas Schön, Jorma Hinkula, Olle Eriksson, Armin Spreco, Örjan Dahlström, Johan Lyth, Marie Blomberg & Toomas Timpka

  3. William Carey University, Hattiesburg, MS, USA

    Elin Gursky

Authors
  1. Dennis Nordvall
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Schön
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jorma Hinkula
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olle Eriksson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Armin Spreco
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Örjan Dahlström
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Johan Lyth
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Daniel Axelsson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Elin Gursky
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Marie Blomberg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Toomas Timpka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.N., T.S., and T.T. conceived and designed this study; D.N. analyzed the data; A.S., O.E., J.L., Ö.D., and T.T. verified the results; D.N. and T.T. wrote this paper; T.S., O.E., J.L., A.S., J.H., M.B., D.A., E.G., and Ö.D. revised the manuscript and provided intellectual content. T.T. is the guarantor of the content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toomas Timpka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks Victoria Male and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary materials (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nordvall, D., Schön, T., Hinkula, J. et al. COVID-19 vaccination carries no association with childbirth rates in Sweden. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01396-x

Download citation

  • Received: 22 July 2025

  • Accepted: 13 January 2026

  • Published: 21 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01396-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing