Table 4 Comparative table of different fundamental approaches able to represent and learn gravity fields of three-dimensional bodies.

From: Geodesy of irregular small bodies via neural density fields

 

Approach

 

Masc.

Harm.

Poly.

geodesyNets

Differentiable

Inside Brillouin sphere

Heterogeneous densities

✗ *

Shape model not needed

Can utilize shape model

Accurate in the near field

  1. Mascons (Masc), Spherical Harmonics (Harm), and Polyhedral gravity (Poly) models are compared, qualitatively, to our GeodesyNets.
  2. *Note that models based on Polyhedral gravity can be used to some degree for heterogeneous densities but such a practice is impractical and limited.