Fig. 2: Comparison of 2D images and 3D stereoscopic observation and verification of scale calibration results. | Communications Engineering

Fig. 2: Comparison of 2D images and 3D stereoscopic observation and verification of scale calibration results.

From: Superalloys fracture process inference based on overlap analysis of 3D models

Fig. 2

a, b 3D fracture surface models of IN718 after 650 C high temperature (HT) and room temperature (RT) tensile experiments with an indentation spacing in the model. c, d Corresponding 2D Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images of the fracture surface. e Intergranular fracture at 650 C. f Transgranular fracture at RT g The distance between two diagonals of grain in an SEM image and a 3D fracture morphology model. h The distance between two void defects in an SEM image and a 3D fracture morphology model.

Back to article page