Human activities in coastal and marine regions increasingly generate inter-sectoral conflicts, emphasizing the need of effective spatial planning. India’s marine ecosystems, which sustain millions of livelihoods, are under mounting pressure from overexploitation, climate change and competing human uses. To address these challenges, developing a robust marine spatial planning framework is essential for both conservation and sustainable ocean use. Puducherry, with high recreational potential, serves as a pilot site for such an initiative, aiming to balancing stakeholder interests and needs, strengthening coastal resilience, and promoting a sustainable blue economy.
Introduction
Ensuring sustainable ocean planning and management worldwide is imperative due to pervasive anthropogenic impacts that are adversely affecting a significant part of the ocean1. In such context, marine spatial planning (MSP) emerges as a crucial strategy to achieve sustainability departing from sectoral management approaches2. Widely acknowledged today, MSP is an integrated framework for ecosystem-based management, aiming to analyze and allocate marine spaces to achieve ecological, economic, and social objectives3,4. The ultimate goal of MSP is to organize and manage marine resource use while balancing environmental, economic, and social goals, minimizing conflicts and promoting compatibility between human activities and the environment3. Unlike traditional sector-by-sector designation, MSP offers a forward-looking approach to resolving disputes and fostering sustainable coexistence5. It is crucial to note that MSP can only regulate human uses, such as fisheries, aquaculture, shipping, offshore wind energy, tourism, and mining, among others, but not the marine ecosystem itself or its individual components6.
While MSP has been widely used in European seas7 and is gaining traction in Asian countries8, it will continue to play a crucial role in achieving the objectives of a blue economy and biodiversity conservation globally9,10. The relationship between MSP and the blue economy is symbiotic, as MSP facilitates the growth of blue economy sectors and ensures responsible and sustainable ocean resource use, particularly in resolving conflicts between users and the ecosystem11. However, MSP is not without potential pitfalls and numerous studies have identified the importance of addressing social, political, ecological, economic, and governance challenges if MSP is to be sustainable and equitable10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. This study aims to develop a strategic framework for implementing MSP across diverse coastal regions in India, emphasizing the advancement of ecological sustainability, resilience and inclusive economic growth by addressing climate related challenges. Through a comprehensive analysis, this study underscores the need for strategic MSP implementation in Indian marine regions to balance ecological conservation and socio-economic growth.
Rationale for MSP development in India
MSP in India is a strategic approach for managing ocean resources while ensuring ecological sustainability and economic growth. With a rapidly expanding blue economy, increasing human activities and mounting environmental pressures, there is an urgent need for integrated spatial management to minimize sectoral conflicts and safeguard marine biodiversity. MSP provides a systematic framework for coordinating diverse ocean-based industries while addressing challenges such as coastal degradation and climate-induced risks. By implementing MSP, India seeks to optimize resource allocation, enhance governance mechanisms, and build resilient coastal ecosystems that support long-term socio-economic development.
The Government of India has recognized the blue economy as a key driver of growth, with the Draft National Policy for India’s Blue Economy-202119 identifying MSP as essential for unlocking this potential while ensuring sustainability. Since 2021, India has commenced MSP implementation for its ocean areas and coastal zones, conducting pilot studies in selected regions20. Puducherry was chosen as one of the pilot sites for developing MSP in India due to its environmental, social, economic and governance dynamics. The region experiences significant coastal erosion and increasing urbanization pressures, which affect its marine ecosystems and resource management21. Nestled along the southeastern shoreline, this Union Territory boasts a relatively compact coastal zone, which enables targeted policy interventions and effective stakeholder engagement. With a growing tourism sector and traditional fishing livelihoods22,23, MSP ensures resource management while preserving its biodiversity. Its relatively small coastal zone allows for targeted policy interventions and stakeholder engagement and also makes MSP implementation more manageable24,25. Existing environmental assessments such as the shoreline change studies26 highlight its readiness for MSP, while climate-induced challenges like rising sea levels and habitat degradation underscore the need for proactive planning to balance ecological conservation and economic growth.
This initiative has been supported by a collaborative India–Norway MSP project organized under the umbrella of the 2020 “India-Norway Integrated Ocean Management and Research Initiative”27. Norway has over 20 years of experience with MSP, through the development of its Integrated Ocean Management Plans28. Such experience is particularly relevant for India, showing how human activities such as fisheries, oil exploitation, and shipping can be balanced with environmental conservation objectives29,30. This collaborative MSP project aims to develop a tailored framework that accommodates the unique environmental and socio-economic conditions of India’s diverse coastal areas.
India’s MSP framework
MSP is a multifaceted process that involves key steps and tasks as outlined in the UNESCO-IOC global guide on MSP6. India and Norway share common principles in MSP, such as an ecosystem-based approach, multi-sectoral integration and stakeholder-driven governance. Both countries aim to balance economic growth with marine conservation, ensuring sustainable ocean resource management. However, key differences arise due to geographical, socio-economic and governance contexts. Norway’s MSP is deeply rooted in its long-standing maritime traditions, extensive exclusive economic zone (EEZ), and strong regulatory frameworks, whereas India’s MSP is emerging within a rapidly expanding blue economy, addressing diverse coastal challenges like urbanization, fisheries management and climate resilience. While no universal MSP procedure exists, countries and regions can adapt the framework based on their specific needs and requirements. Based on such MSP global guidelines6, the Indian Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES) developed a seven-step framework tailored for the Indian EEZ (see Fig. 1).
The seven-step MSP framework illustrates the iterative process of stakeholder engagement, vision and goals establishment, data collection, analysis of interrelationships, preparation of the marine spatial plan, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. Stakeholder engagement fosters collaboration and inclusivity, while defining a clear vision and goals ensures alignment with sustainable development objectives. Comprehensive data collection enables informed decision-making, followed by thorough analysis of interrelationships among various factors. This informs the preparation of the MSP, which is then implemented, with ongoing monitoring and evaluation to adapt and refine the plan over time, ensuring its effectiveness and relevance in achieving desired outcomes for marine resource management.
As India stands at the crossroads of economic development and continues to develop its blue economy, the development of marine spatial plans is crucial for ensuring that such growth is sustainable, inclusive and equitable. However, developing MSP for Puducherry is a multifaceted endeavor that requires balancing ecological, economic, and social objectives. The development of MSP in Puducherry presents a transformative opportunity to foster a resilient and inclusive blue economy while addressing the ecological, economic, and social needs of the region. By prioritizing stakeholder engagement, the conservation of ecologically sensitive ecosystems (e.g., mangroves and corals), and the sustainable management of marine resources (e.g., optimizing sustainable fishing activities and unlocking sustainable economic opportunities in tourism and aquaculture), the implementation of MSP in Puducherry can serve as a model for a balanced development. Furthermore, by ensuring continued collaboration and adaptive management, it has the potential to contribute significantly to India’s broader goals for sustainable ocean governance, setting a precedent for the Indian Ocean region and beyond.
The case of Puducherry MSP
The Puducherry MSP initiative aims to conserve ecologically important areas such as mangroves, coral reefs, and turtle nesting grounds while accommodating key human activities like fishing, tourism and port related activities31. The MSP management area covers the ocean from the shoreline all the way out to the limit of the country’s EEZ. Protecting the existing ecosystems ensures environmental sustainability, supports coastal resilience, and fosters socio-economic benefits, making conservation an integral part of the marine spatial plan. The plan integrates areas for fishing activities, tourism, coral reef conservation and marine navigational pathways, therefore harmonizing economic development with environmental preservation within the boundaries of the marine management area (Fig. 2). Through meticulous zoning and regulation, the marine spatial plan for Puducherry seeks to optimize fishing while ensuring the long-term health of fish stocks. Additionally, it aims to ensure that economic activities such as aquaculture and tourism are compatible with conservation goals. Clear spatial limitations are established to prevent conflicts between different marine uses, while designated areas for cable protection safeguard vital communication infrastructure. Moreover, safe and efficient navigational pathways are delineated, promoting maritime safety and efficiency. Finally, by embracing stakeholder engagement, regulatory frameworks’ development, capacity building, and adaptive management, the plan aspires to foster ecological resilience of marine ecosystems and support the sustainable development of Puducherry’s coastal communities. In effect, the proper engagement of stakeholders has been essential in the Puducherry MSP process. The process has promoted the engagement of local communities, fishermen, tourism operators, and other key stakeholders to ensure their concerns and aspirations are properly considered, fostering collaboration through transparent decision-making aligned with the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 “Life Below Water”17,18,32.
The figure outlines key features and designations within the plan aimed at sustainable marine resource management and conservation. This plan includes proposed areas for various activities, delineated on the map. Coral conservation areas, fishing activity zones, cables corridors, vessel operation channels, port limits, and boat prohibited zones are depicted using distinct colors or symbols. These designations reflect efforts to balance economic development with environmental protection, ensuring the long-term health and productivity of marine ecosystems in Puducherry. This map provides crucial spatial information for stakeholders, policymakers, and resource managers involved in the implementation of the Marine Spatial Plan, guiding decision-making processes for the sustainable use and conservation of marine resources.
The MSP initiative for Puducherry began in October 2022, with the engagement of stakeholders and the establishment of goals and a vision for the future (steps 1 and 2, Fig. 1)33. These were followed by the launch of a spatial database in a geographical information system environment in February 2023 (step 3), which laid the groundwork to further analyzing impacts and interrelationships (step 4). During 2024, the process has progressed to the preparation of the plan (including zoning) and its implementation (steps 5, 6 and 7, Fig. 1). A Web GIS-based Dashboard named SAHAV was developed, providing decision-makers with comprehensive details and data related to various project aspects, progress, and underlying parameters. As of 2025, the MSP process has advanced with stakeholder meetings playing a crucial role in refining zoning strategies and implementation frameworks33,34. Additionally, benthic habitat workshops have been conducted to assess marine ecosystem health, integrating scientific findings into spatial planning efforts, which provided critical insights into habitat conservation priorities and sustainable development initiatives35. The ongoing monitoring and evaluation stage incorporates feedback from these engagements, ensuring that MSP remains adaptive and responsive to ecological and socio-economic dynamics. Furthermore, the SAHAV portal, has been officially recognized as a Digital Public Good (DPG) by the DPG alliance underscoring its role in promoting transparent, science-based ocean governance and supporting adaptive MSP frameworks.
Challenges, insights and future directions in MSP
Despite the fact that the Puducherry MSP initiative is still under development, it serves as a practical example or blueprint for guiding the implementation of marine area-based management approaches in other Indian regions. However, the applicability of MSP across India’s diverse coastal jurisdictions presents unique challenges. Governance structures vary between coastal states and Union Territories, influencing policy enforcement and stakeholder participation. Additionally, environmental conditions differ widely, with some regions facing erosion and urbanization pressures while others contend with mangrove conservation, fisheries management, or industrial expansion. Socio-economic factors also play a role, as coastal communities depend on marine resources for livelihoods, tourism, and industry, necessitating MSP frameworks that balance economic growth and ecological preservation. Further obstacles include multi-sectoral coordination, fragmented marine spatial data, and climate adaptation concerns such as rising sea levels and habitat degradation. It underscores the imperative for implementing ecosystem-based MSP with strong sustainability goals, prioritizing ocean health and resilience over blue growth objectives, aligned with the urgency to achieve UN SDG 1417,18,32.
However, certain limitations were acknowledged. The development of MSP in Puducherry must navigate several challenges, including data scarcity, stakeholder conflicts, and governance complexities. These require careful planning and alignment with national and international frameworks. Aligning MSP in Puducherry with national policies (such as the Draft National Policy for India’s Blue Economy-2021), collaborating with international partners (as with the Indo-Norway International Ocean Management and Research Initiative), and benefiting from the support of the Government of Puducherry, is crucial to enhancing and advancing sustainable ocean management and governance36. India’s collaboration with Norway on MSP provided insights into ecosystem-based management, scientific assessments and stakeholder coordination. However, Norway’s strict zoning regulations and centralized governance were not fully applicable to India’s multi-level governance and livelihood-based marine sectors. This partnership helped India refine its adaptive MSP model, ensuring flexible zoning, community engagement and localized environmental strategies for sustainable ocean management. Additionally, the development of MSP in Puducherry highlights the importance of comprehensive data collection and active stakeholder participation (e.g., fishermen and tourism operators) to ensure effective MSP outcomes13, balancing economic, social, and environmental objectives for long-term sustainability. In effect, MSP’s failure to prioritize social well-being in some cases is a concern37, especially for small-scale fishers and aquaculturists38. However, shared knowledge platforms (e.g., geographical information systems) can reduce conflicts and foster inclusive MSP development39. Also, international MSP practices, such as the Norwegian successful case study40, show the value of transparent discussions about trade-offs in reducing conflicts.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Halpern, B. S. et al. Spatial and temporal changes in cumulative human impacts on the world’s ocean. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–7 (2015).
Agardy, T., Notarbartolo di Sciara, S. & Christie, P. Mind the gap: addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 35, 226–232 (2011).
Douvere, F. The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Mar. policy 32, 762–771 (2008).
Ehler, C. & Douvere, F. Visions for a Sea change: Report of the First International Workshop on Marine Spatial Planning, Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the Man and the Biosphere Programme UNESCO Headquarters. Paris, France. 8-10 November 2006. Paris, France, UNESCO, 83 pp. (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission Manuals and Guides; 46). https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1415 (2007).
Stancheva, M., Stanchev, H., Zaucha, J., Ramieri, E. & Roberts, T. Supporting multi-use of the sea with maritime spatial planning. The case of a multi-use opportunity development-Bulgaria, Black Sea. Mar. Policy 136, 104927 (2022).
UNESCO-IOC/European Commission. MSPglobal International Guide on Marine/Maritime Spatial Planning. Paris, UNESCO. (IOC Manuals and Guides no 89) (2021).
Zaucha, J. et al. Implementing the EU MSP Directive: current status and lessons learned in 22 EU Member States. Mar. Policy 171, 106425 (2025).
IOC-UNESCO. State of the Ocean Report. Paris, IOC-UNESCO. (IOC Technical Series, 190). https://doi.org/10.25607/4wbg-d349 (2024).
Gilliland, P. M. & Laffoley, D. Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 32, 787–796 (2008).
Ehler, C. N. Two decades of progress in Marine Spatial Planning. Mar. Policy 132, 104134 (2021).
World Bank. Marine Spatial Planning for a Resilience and Inclusive Blue Economy. 126 pp. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099813206062230702/pdf/IDU0afe34d600494f04ee009e8c0edf0292c1a96.pdf (2022).
Jones, P. J., Lieberknecht, L. M. & Qiu, W. Marine spatial planning in reality: introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Mar. Policy 71, 256–264 (2016).
Clarke, J. & Flannery, W. The post-political nature of marine spatial planning and the need for re-politicization. Mar. Policy 121, 103927 (2020).
Frazão Santos, C. et al. Major challenges in developing marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 132, 103248 (2021).
Reimer, J., Toonen, H. & Qiu, W. Conservation-ready marine spatial planning: integrating biodiversity goals into MSP from the outset. Environ. Sci. Policy 138, 241–250 (2023).
O’Hagan, A. M., Paterson, S. & Le Tissier, M. Addressing the tangled web of governance mechanisms for land-sea interactions: Assessing implementation challenges across scales. Mar. Policy 112, 103715 (2020).
Saunders, F., Gilek, M., Gee, K. & Zaucha, J. Examining the implementation of marine spatial planning: ‘conditions’ and ‘actors’ in the integration of land and sea uses. Environ. Sci. Policy 112, 160–171 (2020).
Gopnik, M. et al. Coming to the table: early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Mar. Policy 36, 1139–1149 (2012).
EAC-PM. India’s blue economy-A draft policy framework, Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 44pp. https://services.incois.gov.in/documents/Blue_Economy_policy.pdf (2020).
Press Information Bureau, Government of India. (2021). India-Norway cooperation in marine spatial planning begins; Lakshadweep and Puducherry identified as pilot sites. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1702137.
Rajkumar, P. et al. A study on shoreline changes in parts of Pondicherry and Tamil Nadu using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int. J. 3, 917–932 (2015).
Marzooth, M. A Study on Tourism Attractiveness Factors in Pondicherry. Asian J. Manag. Sci. 5, 12–16 (2016).
Kumaran, M. et al. Socio-economics and livelihood status of coastal fishers in the Puducherry Union Territory of India-An exploratory study. Indian J. Fish. 68, 82–91 (2021).
Tailor, F., Shukla, A. & Trumbic, I. Relevance of Marine Spatial Planning in coastal zone management planning: Opportunities and challenges in Indian context – case study of Odisha. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 130, 97 (2021).
Murthy, M. R. et al. Marine spatial planning for a resilient and inclusive blue economy: Lakshadweep, India, a pilot study. Curr. Sci. 126, 229 (2024).
Frazão Santos, C. et al. Integrating climate change in ocean planning. Nat. Sustain 3, 505–516 (2020).
Anon. Letter of intent between the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India and the Ministry of Climate and Environment, Government of Norway and the Minstry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Norway for Establishing the Framework for India-Norway Integrated Ocean Management & Research Initiative. 3pp. Available at: https://www.mea.gov.in/Portal/LegalTreatiesDoc/NO20B3709.pdf (2020).
Meld. St. 21 (2023–2024) Report to the Storting (white paper) Norway’s integrated ocean management plans, pp192. https://www.regjeringen.no/en/dokumenter/meld.-st.-21-20232024/id3032474/?ch=1 (2023).
Olsen, E. et al. The Norwegian ecosystem-based management plan for the Barents Sea. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 599–602 (2007).
Ottersen, G., Olsen, E., van der Meeren, G. I., Dommasnes, A. & Loeng, H. The Norwegian plan for integrated ecosystem-based management of the marine environment in the Norwegian Sea. Mar. Policy 35, 389–398 (2011).
National Centre for Coastal Research. Marine Spatial Planning for Puducherry, 38pp. Available at: https://dste.py.gov.in/pczma/Pdf/MSP%20Dashboard%20User%20Guide.pdf (2023).
United Nations (UN). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (2015).
Pomeroy, R. & Douvere, F. The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Mar. policy 32, 816–822 (2008).
Biggs, D. et al. The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could “mental models” help?. Conserv. Lett. 4, 169–183 (2011).
Natural Resources Wales. GN030-intro Benthic habitat assessment guidance for marine developments and activities: Over-arching principles and methods for benthic marine habitat survey and monitoring in the context of ecological impact assessment. Natural Resources Wales, Bangor. 35 pp. https://cdn.naturalresources.wales/688958/gn030-intro-over-arching-principles-and-methods-final-2-mar2019.pdf (2019).
Trouillet, B. Reinventing marine spatial planning: a critical review of initiatives worldwide. Ocean Coast. Manag. 198, 105362 (2020).
Flannery, W. & McAteer, B. Assessing marine spatial planning governmentality. Marit. Stud. 19, 269–284 (2020).
Farmery, A. K. et al. Blind spots in visions of a “blue economy” could undermine the ocean’s contribution to eliminating hunger and malnutrition. One Earth 4, 28–38 (2021).
Dineshbabu, A. P., Thomas, S., Rohit, P. & Maheswarudu, G. Marine spatial planning for resource conservation, fisheries management and for ensuring fishermen security–global perspectives and Indian initiatives. Curr. Sci. 116, 561–567 (2019).
Olsen, E. et al. Integration at the round table: marine spatial planning in multi-stakeholder settings. PloS ONE 9, e109964 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their sincere thanks to the Indo-Norwegian Task Force for their encouragement in extending our research towards the preparation of MSP Puducherry as the first area for collaboration. The authors also thank the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India; the Royal Norwegian Embassy, New Delhi and the Government of Puducherry for their valuable support and contribution in the development of Puducherry MSP. The Ocean Services obtained from INCOIS is gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge the utilization of AI, specifically ChatGPT, to enhance the readability and language of the text. The application of this advanced technology has significantly contributed to refining and improving the overall quality of the content.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.A., R.M.M.V., T.U., D.S.K., E.O., and R.M. conceived and led the project. R.S.K., R.K., P.U.S., S.S., M.T., G.G., S.K.S., A.G., I.A., N.S.K., S.P.K., and V.B.P collected and contributed data. R.S.K., S.S., M.T., G.G., S.K.S., A.G., I.A., and N.S.K. processed and analyzed data. S.K.S, S.S., and G.G developed the SAHAV Portal. T.U., S.S., and E.O. drafted the manuscript. All authors edited and proof read the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ammavasai, M., Usha, T., Dash, S.K. et al. Framework for developing marine spatial plans for Indian regions: towards a resilient and inclusive blue economy. npj Ocean Sustain 4, 55 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00160-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44183-025-00160-3

