Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a critical global health challenge. It arises from pathogens’ resistance to antibiotics due to misuse, overuse, and insufficient regulation. As new antibiotics emerge slowly, antibiotic potentiators can enhance existing treatments against resistant strains. Challenges such as toxicity and regulatory barriers necessitate further studies to optimize these agents. This review examines the mechanisms, sources, and recent advancements in antibiotic potentiation while highlighting its potential to combat AMR.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the most significant public health concerns of this century, causing approximately 4.95 million deaths globally each year. It is defined as the ability of pathogens to survive exposure to antibiotics that were once effective in killing them. Consequently, treatment becomes ineffective, leading to persistent infections1,2. Moreover, the overuse of antimicrobial agents and a lack of regulation in their supply may exacerbate the issue of AMR. Additionally, the use of antimicrobials for purposes such as growth promotion, coupled with increases in population and international travel, has contributed to the global spread of AMR. All these factors have placed immense pressure on bacteria to overcome the effects of antibiotics. This leads to phenotypic and genotypic modifications that enable their survival3,4. As a result, they have developed different mechanisms, such as reducing membrane permeability, efflux pump inhibition, modifying the target, and producing antibiotic-modifying enzymes that enhance their antimicrobial activity5. This situation is further aggravated by several other factors, including a lack of a proper drug development pipeline.
The development of new antimicrobial drugs is very slow, whereas AMR is steadily increasing6. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the newly developed antimicrobial agents are ineffective against severe bacterial infections. This indicates that sole reliance on novel antimicrobial agents cannot address the situation. Therefore, to overcome this challenge, it is necessary to develop strategies that can modify the resistance to currently ineffective antibiotics7. This includes restoring the efficacy of previously effective antibiotics and exploring alternative options for antibiotics. This can be achieved by using a combination of antibiotics, antibiotic potentiator molecules, and stimulating other host processes, such as defense mechanisms against pathogens7,8. To achieve this, understanding the mechanisms of action of the molecules in the host as well as in the bacteria is crucial.
Among the aforementioned strategies, antibiotic potentiation is one of the most promising methods. This approach makes antibiotics effective against resistant bacteria. A potentiator is a natural or synthetic compound with minimal or no antimicrobial activity. By combining a potentiator with an ineffective antibiotic molecule, the activity of antibiotics against resistant bacteria is enhanced9,10. This is achieved by either reducing or inhibiting the resistance mechanisms utilized by bacteria11. Based on their mechanism of action, antibiotic potentiators are classified as direct, indirect, and host-modulating. First, direct antibiotic potentiators target bacterial resistance mechanisms, such as enzyme inhibition and efflux pump inhibition11,12. Second, indirect antibiotic potentiators act on other interdependent factors that contribute to resistance. These include various cellular processes and can modify or inhibit the enzymes involved in supporting processes12,13,14. Finally, host-modulating potentiators target different cellular processes, such as the defense mechanism12,15. This pattern is observed among various potentiator molecules.
Both natural and synthetic compounds can act as antibiotic potentiators. However, their potential is often undermined or unexplored. Antibiotic potentiators include natural compounds such as alkaloids, phenolic compounds, stilbenes, and terpenes, and synthetic compounds such as synthetic peptidomimetics and nanoparticles16,17,18. Synthetic potentiator molecules are widely used alongside antibiotics in clinical settings and have demonstrated successful results; however, further research is needed on natural potentiator molecules19. Many previous studies have explored the capability of these agents as antibiotic potentiators. However, the exact mechanism of action needs to be identified for their safe and effective use. Therefore, this review article discusses the need for antibiotic potentiation, various potentiator molecules, and the potential mechanisms involved.
Global scenario of antibiotic resistance
Increased use and misuse of antibiotics have led to high antibiotic resistance patterns globally. Moreover, estimates suggest that AMR will push about 24 million people into poverty in the coming decade due to productivity losses and increased healthcare costs20,21. This severity suggests taking effective measures for AMR prevention by considering humans, animals, plants, and the environment as a single, inseparable entity, which is the core idea of One Health22,23. Recently, the One Health High-Level Expert Panel suggested that the health of people, animals, and ecosystems should be equally maintained to achieve a stable health status24. To achieve this, global communication, collaboration, coordination, and capacity building should be implemented among the various entities.
There are various economic analyses regarding the global antibiotic burden, including the impacts on finances and productivity. However, estimating the precise loss is very difficult25,26. The primary reason for this limitation in data stems from irregularities in the diagnosis and medical reports concerning the disease or cause of death. For instance, if a patient dies from sepsis associated with multidrug-resistant bacteria, the cause may be reported as sepsis more often than the involvement of the bacteria20,27. This could result in a significant reduction in the number of cases documented as AMR-involved deaths. Additionally, some incidents go unreported due to other underlying health conditions. Moreover, most research occurs in developed countries compared to low or middle-income countries28,29. Furthermore, AMR surveillance necessitates microbiologists and well-equipped clinical laboratories, which are scarce in low or middle-income countries25,26. Another important limitation is estimating the indirect costs associated with antibiotic resistance, which may include lost wages, decreased productivity, and related job losses. In fact, the impact of psychological changes, pain, and suffering should also be considered, but this is largely absent in most existing research30. According to Murray et al.21, western sub-Saharan Africa had the highest AMR burden in 2019, which should be regarded as a priority considering the earlier-discussed facts highlighting the limitations faced by low or middle-income countries.
Globally, the critical pathogens associated with AMR-based deaths include Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa31,32. Among these, E. coli and S. aureus are the major causes of death associated with AMR in high-income countries such as North America, Western Europe, and Australia. In contrast, sub-Saharan Africa has a different pattern. The reason is that many bacteria contributed to the AMR burden, and each accounted for a small share. Additionally, K. pneumoniae and S. pneumoniae caused comparatively increased death among these bacteria21. Similarly, beta-lactams and fluoroquinolones, the first-line antibiotics, have been found to play a significant role in the AMR burden globally33,34. Therefore, as stated earlier, collaborative efforts must be developed to address these challenges on a global scale. It is also crucial to support low-income countries. Figure 1 demonstrates an overview of the global antibiotic resistance burden.
The 2022 Report of GLASS by WHO indicated a reduction in the reporting of AMR data following the COVID-19 pandemic35. Despite this decline, some antibiotics showed an increase in AMR of up to 15% compared to previous reports. This rise is notably observed among E. Coli and Salmonella associated with bloodstream infections35. Additionally, most countries implemented strict measures to regulate antibiotic use; however, there remains a pressing need for alternative strategies to tackle this issue, as millions of deaths globally are attributable to antibiotic resistance27,36. Therefore, preventing AMR globally is a high priority. Rigorously adhering to One Health concepts and managing antibiotic resistance is a monumental task37,38. Nevertheless, efforts focusing on vaccines, immunotherapeutics, CRISPR, probiotics, microbial therapies, phage therapy, and fecal transplants are gaining attention. Furthermore, biotic nanoparticles, enzybiotics, antimicrobial peptides, and antibiotic adjuvants and potentiators have also received significant consideration39,40,41,42,43,44. Moreover, understanding the mechanisms involved in AMR is crucial. The four primary mechanisms involved include enzymatic degradation, target modification, prevention of drug entry, and efflux pump activation19,45. Antibiotic potentiators are a favorable choice as they help overcome antibiotic resistance. Moreover, these potentiators do not exhibit antimicrobial activity themselves, but they enhance the antibacterial efficacy of antibiotics when used in combination11. They can also be described as non-antibacterial active molecules that can be employed to increase antibiotic effectiveness9. Both natural and synthetic antibiotic potentiators have been evaluated for their contribution to the antibiotic potentiation effect, which will be discussed in subsequent sections. Some of these mechanisms focus on producing reactive oxygen species, glutathione depletion, plasmid curing inhibition, efflux pump inhibition, and resistance enzyme inhibition46,47. Greater emphasis should be placed on developing effective bacterial diagnostics alongside innovative drug delivery systems and antibiotic potentiators/ adjuvants19.
Brief history of antibiotic potentiation
During the 20th century, antibiotic therapy became an inevitable part of animal and human life. Penicillin mass production began in 1942; however, resistance was observed around 194748. Since then, it has reached a level where a patient can die from an infection caused by a K. pneumoniae strain, as this strain is resistant to every available antibiotic in the U S49. Therefore, the scientific community is curiously exploring alternatives to antibiotics. Some researchers have identified the importance of vaccines in limiting the need for antibiotics50,51, while others have observed the effects of bacteriophages in treatments52,53. Moreover, they have attempted to identify the synergy between antibiotics and both conventional and unconventional agents, including bacteriophages. Scientists named Neter and Clark54 were among the first to recognize such synergies. Another significant milestone was the use of drug combinations in prescriptions during the 1950s, despite limited knowledge about the mechanisms involved; nonetheless, it helped treat various diseases. This also contributed to advancements such as the use of clavulanic acid with beta-lactams and amoxicillin, leading to increased therapeutic efficiency when used in combination rather than alone49,55. Science began considering the combination of chemical entities, which could mark the beginning of the antibiotic potentiation concept. Additionally, WHO promotes combination therapy over monotherapy, especially in cases of severe infectious diseases14.
Scientists have discovered various synthetic and natural substances in the search for new compounds with antibacterial effects. Several plant-derived antibacterial agents have been part of traditional medicine practices in diverse countries, including India and China49,56,57. A recent study on research trends showed an increase in the number of PubMed articles from 2016 to 2020 related to antibiotic-potentiating agents of plant origin. The 2021 study revealed that there were more than 4000 articles discussing this concept, demonstrating the significance of this research area58. Most studies identified new agents from plant extracts, including classes such as phenolic acids, lignan, stilbene, tannin, alkaloid, flavonoid, terpene, and more. Additionally, complex mixtures or modified synthetic versions of these compounds are widely studied for their synergistic effects with antibiotics58,59,60,61. Amid various challenges, including pandemics, relying on the synergistic effects of natural and synthetic compounds with antibiotics could be beneficial in the fight against drug resistance.
Mechanisms of antibiotic potentiation
There are different mechanisms by which a bacterial community acquires antibiotic resistance; these can originate from intrinsic factors or from the acquisition of mobile genetic elements through processes such as horizontal gene transfer62,63. The four main mechanisms of antibiotic resistance are depicted in Fig. 2. In the first category, enzymatic inactivation, the antibiotic molecules are enzymatically modified by the bacteria, rendering them inactive. Methods such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and adenylation are employed to achieve this modification. The second category is increased efflux pump-mediated resistance, with tetracycline resistance through the major facilitator superfamily as a classic example. The third mechanism involves decreased drug uptake due to changes in membrane permeability, caused by alterations in the characteristics of the porin channel. Finally, the fourth mechanism entails target modification, which can occur through mutations, enzymatic alterations, and replacement19,64,65.
Overcoming these mechanisms presents a potential solution to the issues related to antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic potentiation can focus on tackling these mechanisms of resistance, which are discussed in detail below.
Inhibition of antibiotic-inactivating enzymes
Enzymatic activation of antibiotic molecules is one of the significant ways that bacteria achieve resistance, as discussed previously9. Therefore, serious efforts are being made to overcome this using antibiotic potentiators. The β-lactamase inhibitors still represent a major category of antibiotic potentiators that have been widely used to combat antibiotic resistance effects. One way they act is by serving as a substrate and forming acyl enzymes. These acyl enzymes are highly sterically unstable, resulting in unfavorable interactions. One example of this is the synthetic compound avibactam, which is used with ceftazidime66. In the second type, the enzyme is permanently inactivated by certain chemical reactions. Clavulanic acid, used with amoxicillin, is an example67. Liu et al.68 focused on aminoglycoside 3’-phosphotransferase, a major enzyme linked with resistance. The synthetic compound was created by the covalent linkage of 3-hydroxyl neamine and adenosine, which inhibits this enzyme. Another important enzyme associated with aminoglycoside resistance in bacteria is N-acetyltransferase. Some synthetic compounds are designed where acetyl-CoA is added to antibiotics as a bisubstrate analog to inhibit N-acetyltransferases such as AAC(6’)Ii and AAC(3)-I 969. Additionally, some studies focus on both the aforementioned enzymes using bovine antimicrobial peptides70 and a compound, Aronorosin, derived from the fungus Gymnascella aurantiaca against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)71. Similarly, a compound derived from Streptomyces, venturucidin, was found to interfere with ATP-Synthase and exhibited synergistic activities with gentamicin against Klebsiella, Pseudomonas, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE), and E. coli72. An enzyme, 6-o-adenyl transferase, linked to streptomycin resistance, was inhibited using a synthetic compound called streptidine, which acts as a decoy acceptor in E. coli73. Moreover, certain natural inhibitors of enzyme activity can effectively target enzymes that modify antibiotics. One such example is the copper leaf plant (Acalypha wilkesiana), a tropical plant previously used against various diseases, including malaria74. The antibacterial fraction of the ethyl extract interferes with PBP2a synthesis, a major transpeptidase in MRSA. Furthermore, this compound exhibited a synergistic effect with ampicillin against MRSA. Similar potentiation against MRSA was observed when using compounds like luteolin and apigenin along with antibiotics such as amoxicillin, affecting the mecA gene coding for PBP275. Plant extracts are used against Extended Spectrum β-lactamases producing E. coli (ESBL) by targeting the enzymes involved in resistance. For example, a compound from the plant, Sephora alopecuraides, demonstrates synergistic action with cephalosporins against ESBL E. coli76. Thus, studies using synthetic and natural compounds that affect the enzymes involved in antibiotic resistance may be a promising choice for antibiotic potentiators.
Inhibiting efflux pumps
Efflux pumps play an important role in transporting substrates involved in various functions from bacterial cells to the outside, and they participate significantly in the development of antibiotic resistance38,77. There are five superfamilies of proteins associated with these efflux pumps. In gram-positive bacteria, there are the ATP-Binding Cassette superfamily (ABC), Major Facilitator superfamily (MFS), Multidrug and Toxic Extrusion superfamily (MATE), and Small Multidrug Resistance family (SMR). In gram-negative bacteria, there is a Resistance-Nodulation-Division family (RND), along with ABC and MFS77. This represents one of the most critical intrinsic factors, rather than mobile genetic elements, associated with antibiotic resistance, usually resulting from their overexpression. Therefore, compounds that influence the functions of these efflux pumps may be a promising target for antibiotic potentiation.
There are many antibiotic potentiators used against the efflux pump of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. Synthetic compounds such as Verampil affect MATE pumps in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, resulting in an antibiotic-potentiating effect with Bedaquiline and Ofloxacin78. They bind with the pumps directly or indirectly. Similarly, Vargiu et al.79 found a synthetic compound, 1-(1-naphthyl methyl)-piperazine, inhibiting the ABC superfamily of various bacteria such as A. baumannii, E. coli, Enterobacter aerogens, and K. pneumoniae when used with various antibiotics such as oxacillin, rifampicin, clarithromycin, fluoroquinolones, clindamycin, and doxycycline. Some quinoline and chalcone derivatives inhibit the RND of E. aerogens and S. aureus, respectively, when used with Norfloxacin80. Additional studies focus on heterocyclic carboxamides such as TXA00182, an effective efflux pump inhibitor when used with monobactam, fluoroquinolones, sulfonamides, and tetracycline81. The efflux pumps can also be disrupted by decoupling available energy. A synthetic compound called carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP) was found to act as a decoupler that disrupts the proton motive force of the pump, resulting in an antibiotic-potentiating effect with tetracycline against Helicobacter pylori and Klebsiella, alleviating gastrointestinal tract-associated diseases82,83.
There are a large number of natural compounds effective against efflux pump-mediated antibiotic resistance. The plant alkaloid reserpine is isolated from Rauwolfia serpentina. This alkaloid affects the MFS and RND pumps in Bacillus subtilis and S. aureus with tetracycline and norfloxacin, respectively84. Plant-derived flavonoids such as baicalein, genistein, orobol, and biochanin A show potentiating effects by disrupting NorA pumps in S. aureus85,86. Polyphenol compounds isolated from Camellia sinensis include gallates such as epicatechin gallate and epigallocatechin gallate. Gibbons et al.87 found that these compounds had a synergistic effect with tetracycline, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus and Campylobacter by influencing the function of NorA and Tet (K) efflux pumps. The antibiotic-potentiating ability of ciprofloxacin against various organisms has been demonstrated by various scientists, most of whom targeted the efflux pumps. Some compounds that showed synergistic effects along with ciprofloxacin include Indirubin, Capsaicin, Silybin, and Kaempferol88,89,90,91. Most of the studies explored the effect of these compounds in inhibiting the overexpression of efflux pumps to generate antibiotic-potentiating effects. Moreover, rather than relying on mobile genetic elements that are unpredictable, this type of intrinsic target may be more effective in overcoming antibiotic resistance despite limitations such as toxicity9.
Changes in the bacterial cell membrane permeability
Based on the various classes of antibiotics, there are distinct mechanisms of action. However, the initial step towards their action is penetration through the cell membrane in most cases92. From previous discussions, it is clear that one intrinsic method of antibiotic resistance is the decreased permeability of the cell membrane. Therefore, potentiating agents that alter the permeability of the bacterial membrane offer a significant mechanism for synergy. WD 40 is a macromolecular potentiator found to be effective in producing synergy, alongside Rifampin, which increases membrane permeability93. Most polymyxins and their derivatives induce changes in the outer membrane of bacteria by displacing cations such as Mg2+ and Ca2+ 19. Additionally, various lysine-based peptidomimetics enhance the activity of rifampicin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin against different bacteria by disrupting membrane permeability17. Moreover, certain phytochemicals such as gallic acid and thymol produce synergy with antibiotics such as azithromycin, erythromycin, novobiocin, trimethoprim, and many others by causing membrane destabilization94. Extracts from numerous plants such as Albizia lebbeck, Baillonella toxisperma, Nauclea pobeguinii, and Aframomum sulcatum have shown potentiating effects with amoxicillin, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and norfloxacin by inducing changes in cell permeability95. Similar effects were also observed with various other plant extracts and essential oils. However, most of the mechanisms by which these compounds alter cell membrane permeability are still under investigation. Even so, some combinations of synergy yield promising results in the fight against antibiotic resistance.
Fighting plasmid-mediated resistance
Plasmids are mobile genetic elements that enable bacteria to achieve MDR through horizontal gene transfer. This is one of the major mechanisms by which resistance is spread among bacterial communities. Various compounds exhibit antibacterial effects through the inactivation of plasmids. For example, compounds such as rottlerin,1’acetoxychavicol acetate, and plumbagin have proven effective against plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in many bacteria, including Salmonella, Shigella, Bacillus, and Escherichia96,97,98. Additionally, a compound called 8-epidiosbulbin E acetate, obtained from the plant Dioscorea bulbifera, is used as a plasmid-curing agent. This agent has cured the AMR plasmids from major pathogens, including E. faecalis, Escherichia, and Shigella. Notably, these pathogens were isolated from clinical infections97. This plasmid curing resulted in a decrease in the Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), enhancing the effectiveness of antibiotics against these clinical isolates. The aforementioned researchers demonstrated a significant effect of phytochemicals in combating plasmid-mediated resistance. However, further exploration of the mechanisms of action is still required to utilize them as promising potentiators.
Inhibiting biofilms
Bacterial biofilms consist of groups of bacteria that attach to biotic or abiotic surfaces to form a community. This formation aids in better protection, stability adaptation, and communication for their survival. They are among the primary concerns for nosocomial infections and are prioritized for mitigation, as they contribute to the increase in AMR27. Various natural compounds, such as curcumin, piperine, plumbagin, thymol, quercetin, and sinapic acids, have been shown to affect Pseudomonas biofilm formation. These compounds potentiate antibacterial agents such as amikacin, paromomycin, streptomycin, neomycin, ceftazidime, and norfloxacin99. Among these, sinapic acid exhibited the highest antibiofilm activity and significant synergy with amikacin. Furthermore, the antibiotic tolerance of biofilms, especially due to reduced antibiotic penetration, can be addressed by the potentiators that modify cell membrane permeability, as discussed in the previous section. Additionally, previous literature has identified various mechanisms of action for the aforementioned compounds, which disrupt membranes and nucleic acid synthesis, ultimately reducing extracellular polymeric substance secretion and the formation of biofilms100. Moreover, 2-amino imidazole compounds such as oroidin and mauritiamine may serve as promising potentiating agents against a wide range of Enterobacteriaceae by affecting cell signaling and transcription in bacteria101. Therefore, there are still vast opportunities to explore the role of various natural and synthetic compounds in antibiotic potentiation against biofilms. Figure 3 summarizes all the major mechanisms of antibiotic potentiation discussed.
Natural agents for antibiotic potentiation
Plants possess intrinsic mechanisms to defend themselves against microbial threats, a feature that can be utilized to combat AMR. Natural plant-derived compounds such as gallic acid and tannic acid have demonstrated efficacy as potentiators of antibiotics, including novobiocin, rifampicin, and clorobiocin102. Phenolic compounds, a class of secondary plant metabolites, are particularly notable for their antimicrobial properties. Specific phenolic compounds, such as catechol and acetaldehydes, have shown strong synergistic effects when combined with ciprofloxacin against E. coli and Pseudomonas103. These compounds can potentiate the activity of existing antibiotics by enhancing their efficacy against a broad spectrum of pathogens. Moreover, given the large diversity of phenolic compounds under investigation and the possibilities yet to be discovered, their potential in combating AMR remains vast and unexplored.
Phenolic compounds are universally distributed in the plant kingdom and are particularly abundant in fruits, seeds, and leaves. These compounds are characterized by the presence of an aromatic ring that bears one or more hydroxyl groups. Interestingly, the number of hydroxyl groups varies among different phenolic structures. Furthermore, these phenolic compounds can be classified into two broad categories: flavonoids and non-flavonoids96. The non-flavonoids include phenolic acids, aldehydes, acetophenones, phenylacetic acids, cinnamic acids, coumarins, biflavonyls, benzophenones, xanthones, stilbenes, and tannins104.
Flavonoids are low molecular weight phenolic compounds predominantly found in plants. These compounds contribute to plant protection against biotic and abiotic stressors105. They serve various roles as signaling molecules, detoxifying agents, and UV filters within plants106. Additionally, they exhibit antibacterial properties often by modulating the activity of toll-like receptors (TLR)107. For instance, kaempferol, a member of the flavonoid class, has been shown to disrupt quorum sensing (QS) in bacteria. QS is a bacterial communication system essential for biofilm formation, and inhibiting this system can enhance the effectiveness of antibacterial agents108. Furthermore, baicalein, another flavonoid, exerts anti-QS activity against P. aeruginosa by inhibiting QS gene expression and the synthesis of acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs), which are signaling molecules integral to bacterial communication109. Moreover, baicalein enhances the antibacterial potency of antibiotics such as levofloxacin, ampicillin/clavulanic acid, and ceftazidime110. Similarly, the flavonoid 3,4,7-trihydroxyflavone has demonstrated synergy with PaβN, an efflux pump inhibitor, suggesting its potential as a substrate for efflux pumps in multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. coli and Providencia. stuartii111. Of interest is isoquercitrin, another flavonoid that induces oxidative stress and bacterial apoptosis by promoting DNA fragmentation and caspase activation, thus enhancing antibacterial activity112,113.
Stilbenes are plant metabolites found in fruits such as grapes, berries, and tree nuts. They exhibit antibacterial properties against Gram-positive bacteria like B. subtilis and S. aureus114. These compounds contain an aromatic ring with a phenolic group and can exist in cis and trans isomers due to the presence of a double bond adjacent to the phenolic group. Moreover, they reduce the virulence of S. aureus by hemolysis115. Stilbenes, such as resveratrol found in red wine, possess anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties58,116,117. Furthermore, resveratrol has been shown to potentiate the effects of antibiotics such as gentamicin, kanamycin, neomycin, and streptomycin against S. aureus118. Pterostilbene is another stilbene found in berries and grapes that enhances the efficacy of vancomycin against S. aureus119,120. Additionally, piceatannol, a stilbene compound that augments the activity of ciprofloxacin against S. aureus121.
Terpenes along with their oxygenated derivatives known as terpenoids are hydrocarbons derived from isoprene monomer units. The chemical structure of terpenoids can be altered by modifications to their functional groups, resulting in a diverse range of compounds122. Among these, sesquiterpene farnesol, which is present in many essential oils, has demonstrated the ability to potentiate the activity of beta-lactam antibiotics against Burkholderia pseudomallei. Specifically, farnesol reduces the MIC of amoxicillin and ampicillin, thereby enhancing their efficacy against this pathogen. It has shown an 8-fold reduction in MIC of amoxicillin and a 3-fold reduction in the case of ampicillin. Moreover, they have shown antibacterial activity against S. aureus and S. mutans123. The combination of another terpene, carvacrol, and oxacillin shows synergy against MRSA124. Apart from this, terpenes such as carvacrol and thymol exhibit synergistic effects with antibiotics like oxacillin and tetracycline, respectively, in combating S. aureus and E. coli125. Moreover, Eugenol is another terpene that has been shown to increase the antibacterial activity of antibiotics like cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin against E. coli and K. pneumoniae126. Furthermore, pinene, disrupts bacterial cell membranes by facilitating the influx of antibiotics such as gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin, thus potentiating their antimicrobial effects127.
Alkaloids are a diverse group of nitrogen-containing compounds characterized by their ring structures128. The presence of a nitrogen atom allows alkaloids to form hydrogen bonds with various biomolecules enhancing their biological activities129. They are widely distributed in plants including seeds, leaves, barks, fruits, and roots. Alkaloids are soluble in water at acidic pH and in organic solvents at basic pH making them versatile in different environments. Furthermore, they are widely distributed across several plant families including Amaryllidaceae, Burseraceae, Capparaceae, Mimosaeae, Vitaceae, and Tiliaceae130. Additionally, they exhibit significant antibacterial activity, particularly against multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella, and S. aureus16. The main mechanism of action for alkaloids in combating antibiotic resistance is through the inhibition of efflux pumps. Other compounds like squalamine and tomatidine have been shown to alter cell membrane permeability131,132. Piperine, an alkaloid, when given along with ciprofloxacin potentiates the activity of the antibiotic against S. aureus by inhibiting efflux pumps133. Similarly, combinations of tomatidine with antibiotics like ampicillin, cefepime, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin have been shown to potentiate antibiotic efficacy against pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and E. faecalis.
Microbial and fungal metabolites are known for their diverse biological activities, including antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer properties. Compounds like EA-371α and EA-371δ are fermentation products derived from microbes. They exhibit synergistic effects when combined with levofloxacin against P. aeruginosa. This potentiation is associated with their ability to inhibit efflux pumps134. Another interesting compound, aranorosin, isolated from Macella aurantiaca FKI-6588, shows synergy with aminoglycosides. The possible mechanism involves its inhibition of resistance-related enzymes like β-lactamase71. Additionally, depolymerase-Dpo71, a bacteriophage-encoded enzyme from A. baumannii phage, enhances the sensitivity of A. baumannii to colistin. Although the exact mechanism behind this synergy remains unclear, it may involve destabilization of the bacterial outer membrane through the depolymerase action135.
Synthetic agents for antibiotic potentiation
In the fight against MDR pathogens, drug combinations such as antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitors are some of the effective strategies. Synthetic peptides and peptidomimetics, which resemble natural antimicrobial peptides in their physical, chemical, and biological properties, have gained attention as potential antibiotic potentiators. These include peptoids, AApeptides, peptides with non-natural amino acids, and stapled peptides136. For example, polymyxin B nonapeptide, which is free of fatty acid chains, has demonstrated synergy with antibiotics like rifampicin, clarithromycin, and mupirocin. They act against E. coli, A. baumannii, and K. pneumoniae137. Furthermore, studies have shown that this potentiation is due to the perturbation of the bacterial outer membrane and the upregulation of stress response sensors138. Scientists have found that short peptides such as S, S1-Nal, and S1-Nal-Nal enhance the activity of vancomycin against E. faecium, A. baumannii, and E. coli. They can alter the membrane permeability to the antibiotic139. Additionally, another peptidomimetic, dUSTBP, potentiates novobiocin and rifampicin against A. baumannii and E. coli. It acts by modifying the outer membrane permeability and thus facilitating antibiotic uptake140. Moreover, CEP-136, which is a peptidomimetic, also modifies membrane permeability and helps to increase the effectiveness of clarithromycin and azithromycin against pathogens like E. coli, A. baumannii, and K. pneumoniae17.
Nanoparticles are solid particles with distinct properties compared to their metal counterparts, ranging in size from 10 to 1000 nm, and they have emerged as promising drug delivery systems with significant antibacterial activity141,142. Their antibacterial properties are attributed to several mechanisms, including gene expression modulation, metabolic pathway alteration, membrane structure modification, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and enzyme inhibition143. For instance, silver nanoparticles (AgNP) have been shown to reduce the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of amikacin against MDR pathogens such as K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli144. Moreover, zinc oxide nanoparticles exhibit synergistic effects with a broad range of antibiotics, including chloramphenicol, amikacin, tetracycline, and ampicillin. They are effective against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens like E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, S. typhimurium, B. cereus, B. subtilis, and S. aureus145. Recent studies have also explored the use of gold (AuNP) and copper nanoparticles (CuNP) as antibiotic potentiators. For example, CuNP derived from ginger and garlic showed synergistic effects with doxycycline against E. coli and P. aeruginosa146. AuNP has been found to enhance the activity of ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime against Salmonella species by promoting ROS production60.
Acids and their derivatives such as phthalic acid, succinic acid, and carboxylic acid have shown potential as antibiotic potentiators against MDR pathogens. Alkyl and amino-substituted phthalic acids, for example, possess β-lactamase inhibiting properties. Additionally, 3-amino phthalic acid has been shown to enhance the effectiveness of carbapenem antibiotics against P. aeruginosa. Similarly, substituted succinic acid reverses P. aeruginosa resistance to imipenem. Another example is cyclopropane, a carboxylic acid derivative that, when combined with colistin, potentiates the antibiotic against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria147,148,149.
Due to the recent approval of platinum-containing compounds as anti-cancer agents, there is a rising interest in the use of metals against MDR pathogens150. Metallopolymers, which are synthetic molecules composed of metals and polymers, have shown promise in this regard151. A recent study suggested that combinations of metallopolymers with ineffective antibiotics exhibit synergy against MDR pathogens like E. coli and P. aeruginosa. For example, the combination of cobaltocenium-based polymers with ceftazidime, rifampicin, and minocycline resulted in a significant reduction in antibiotic resistance. These reductions were about 2-fold, 18-fold, and 16-fold against E. coli, respectively. The potentiation mechanism involves inhibition of β-lactamase hydrolysis by ceftazidime, alteration of outer membrane permeability by rifampicin, and membrane perturbation by minocycline150. Another cobaltocenium polymer exhibits synergy with different beta-lactam antibiotics through the formation of ionic complexes152. Additionally, synthetic amphiphiles, which alter membrane permeability, have shown potential as antibiotic potentiators. Furthermore, the combinations of benzyl hydrophile with norfloxacin and tetracycline demonstrate synergistic effects against E. coli and S. aureus153. These findings highlight the diverse strategies employed to overcome MDR pathogens, underscoring the importance of combining natural and synthetic antibiotic potentiators in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. Various natural and synthetic antibiotic potentiators are discussed in Table 1.
Limitations and future perspectives
The use of an antibiotic potentiator in combination with antibiotics is still in the development stage. Candidates, such as SPR741 and pentamidine, are in clinical trials12. Moreover, since these involve the combination of two drugs, the potential side effects of drug-drug interactions remain unknown. For these reasons, a study on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the combination is needed154. Additionally, further studies should explore any off-target effects of the antibiotic potentiators that target cell membranes and efflux pumps12.
Additional limitations include toxicity, developed resistance, and the effect of the potentiator compound on the host cell. First, since most of the compounds are novel, their complete characteristics are not yet known, creating a need to understand their toxicology. Moreover, the combination of an antibiotic and its potentiator may produce some toxic byproducts. Combinations require optimal dispersion of the two compounds to achieve maximum efficacy; thus, any variation in dispersion at the target site can reduce the effectiveness of the combination155. Second, there is a chance that bacteria may develop resistance against the combination. Bacteria can develop chromosomal or acquired resistance to the new agents. For example, there have been reports of TEM-1 and SHV-2 ESBLs showing resistance to clavulanic acid156. Third, these compounds may impact the host cell, including its cellular metabolism. Therefore, more in vivo studies are needed to establish the effects on the host cell12. In addition, regulatory approval for clinical trials is challenging, as potentiators often lack inherent antibacterial activity157. Efforts should be taken to overcome these challenges in order to address AMR, as the combination of antibiotics and the antibiotic potentiator molecule can significantly contribute to combating AMR.
New and advanced technologies for antibiotic potentiation
Advancements in technology have significantly accelerated research on antibiotic potentiation. One important advancement is improved nanotechnology158. This cutting-edge technology will likely play a pivotal role in antibiotic potentiation research. For example, Khan et al.159 showed improved drug delivery and significant antibacterial activity with chitosan nanoparticles, a natural polymer typically found in the exoskeleton of crustaceans, such as shrimp. Anionic polysaccharides like alginates and various proteins, including albumin and ferritin, have also been identified as effective nanoparticles that can deliver either single or combinations of antimicrobial agents160,161. One key mechanism of action of this nanoparticle drug delivery system is its production of various reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may lead to a reduction in ATP levels and DNA damage. For instance, various metal-based nanoparticles, such as Zn and Ag, produce ROS by causing initial membrane damage162,163. Additionally, natural products with antibacterial properties are nanosized and used in drug delivery. For example, in wound healing, curcumin has been employed as a nano-drug delivery system and has proven to be highly effective164. Moreover, A. vera extracts and eucalyptol have also demonstrated effectiveness in drug delivery as nanoemulsions165,166. Most of these advanced technologies focus on ROS production as mentioned previously. Lv et al.167 identified the significance of heat shock and its role in antibiotic potentiation, particularly regarding aminoglycosides against E. coli, A. baumannii, and K. pneumoniae. CRISPR-based gene editing is gaining widespread acceptance, and various genomic approaches have demonstrated significant antibiotic potentiation effects. Otoupal et al.168 studied the synergistic interactions between different drugs and gene knockout models of an E. coli strain. The gene knockouts primarily targeted non-essential gene expressions based on CRISPR and found significant synergy with various combinations of antibiotics and knockouts. Another study identified the involvement of a transcriptional regulator, ampR, in β-lactamase overexpression. When this pathway was inhibited with an antibiotic potentiator, antibiotic resistance decreased, making the targeted P. aeruginosa population susceptible to the β-lactam antibiotic, Ceftazidime169. Furthermore, RecA is a critical factor in antibiotic resistance as it is involved in SOS-mediated DNA repair. Scientists have identified certain inhibitors, such as phthalocyanine tetra sulfonic acid, which inhibit RecA and enhance the effects of antibiotics on both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria170. Therefore, genomic approaches in identifying potentiating targets are significant.
Additionally, proteomics approaches, along with transcriptomics and metabolomics, have significant possibilities in this research area171. For example, the cell membrane remodeling of K. pneumoniae was studied using techniques such as tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling, which is a chemical labeling technique used in mass spectrometry to identify relative protein abundance, and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomics, which helps to separate, identify, and quantify metabolites. These techniques revealed possible mechanisms of polymyxin resistance172. Another study screened certain natural compounds showing anti-bacterial activity based on a chemical motif structure using the proteomics approach173. All the “omics” techniques provide a solid scientific foundation to pursue newer ideas regarding antibiotic potentiators or new targets.
Finally, machine learning and artificial intelligence are effective in medical research, including drug discovery174. Olcay et al.175 showed that a machine learning model called a hyperparameter-optimized light gradient-boosted machine classifier achieved an accuracy of 76.92% in predicting synergy between antimicrobial agents. This technology could save thousands of dollars per laboratory experiment. Moreover, machine learning-based screening has identified potentiators of β-lactams and other antibiotics against a wide variety of bacteria176,177,178. Artificial intelligence to predict drug targets is also a promising tool. Recently, new antibiotics were predicted against A. baumanii infections using a synergism prediction of demethoxycurcumin and colistin with a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) screening model179. Molecular docking is a very promising strategy in this aspect as it helps identify ligand-protein docking and predict the best interactions among the interacting compounds180,181,182. Overall, cutting-edge technologies have the potential to accelerate therapeutic drug discovery research, including antibiotic potentiators.
Conclusion
The rise in antibiotic resistance is a significant global issue that must be addressed urgently. Efforts should treat human and animal health as a single entity because antibiotic resistance has co-evolved alongside the introduction of newer antibiotics. New strategies to combat antibiotic resistance need to be implemented. Antibiotic potentiation presents a promising approach. A wide variety of natural and synthetic agents are effective in this area, including their action on biofilms. Additionally, most natural compounds have limited side effects and align with the concept of One Health. Meanwhile, technological advancements are facilitating the identification of new drug targets more efficiently and quickly. The capacity to identify new compounds that are safe and also produce synergistic effects with existing antibiotics against major bacterial pathogens will aid in controlling global antibiotic resistance and its associated increasing death toll.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Schrader, S. M., Vaubourgeix, J. & Nathan, C. Biology of antimicrobial resistance and approaches to combat it. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eaaz6992 (2020).
Nadeem, S. F. Antimicrobial resistance: more than 70 years of war between humans and bacteria. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 46, 578–599 (2020).
Michael, C. A., Dominey-Howes, D. & Labbate, M. The antimicrobial resistance crisis: causes, consequences, and management. Front. Public Health 2, 145 (2014).
Irfan, M., Almotiri, A. & AlZeyadi, Z. A. Antimicrobial resistance and its drivers—a review. Antibiotics 11, 1362 (2022).
Darby, E. M. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 21, 280–295 (2023).
MacGowan, A. & Macnaughton, E. Antibiotic resistance. Medicine 45, 622–628 (2017).
Chinemerem Nwobodo, D. Antibiotic resistance: The challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 36, e24655 (2022).
Berti, A., Rose, W., Nizet, V. & Sakoulas, G. Antibiotics and innate immunity: a cooperative effort toward the successful treatment of infections. OFID 7, 8–12 (2020).
Paul, D., Chawla, M., Ahrodia, T., Narendrakumar, L. & Das, B. Antibiotic potentiation as a promising strategy to combat macrolide resistance in bacterial pathogens. Antibiotics 12, 1715 (2023).
Zabawa, T. P., Pucci, M. J., Parr, T. R. Jr & Lister, T. Treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections by potentiation of antibiotics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 33, 7–12 (2016).
Wright, G. D. Antibiotic adjuvants: rescuing antibiotics from resistance. Trends Microbiol. 24, 862–871 (2016).
Dhanda, G., Acharya, Y. & Haldar, J. Antibiotic adjuvants: a versatile approach to combat antibiotic resistance. ACS Omega 8, 10757–10783 (2023).
Taylor, P. L., Rossi, L., De Pascale, G. & Wright, G. D. A forward chemical screen identifies antibiotic adjuvants in Escherichia coli. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 1547–1555 (2012).
Tyers, M. & Wright, G. D. Drug combinations: a strategy to extend the life of antibiotics in the 21st century. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 141–155 (2019).
Hancock, R. E., Nijnik, A. & Philpott, D. J. Modulating immunity as a therapy for bacterial infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 243–254 (2012).
Khare, T. et al. Exploring phytochemicals for combating antibiotic resistance in microbial pathogens. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 720726 (2021).
Mood, E. H. et al. Antibiotic potentiation in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria by a synthetic Peptidomimetic. ACS Infect. Dis. 7, 2152–2163 (2021).
Habash, M. B. et al. Potentiation of tobramycin by silver nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, 00415–00417 (2017).
Chawla, M., Verma, J., Gupta, R. & Das, B. Antibiotic potentiators against multidrug-resistant bacteria: discovery, development, and clinical relevance. Front. Microbiol. 13, 887251 (2022).
Buckley, Gillian J., Palmer, Guy H. & National Academies of Sciences. Combating Antimicrobial Resistance and Protecting the Miracle of Modern Medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. (2022).
Murray, C. J. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).
O’Neill, J. Why are we fighting against antibiotic resistance. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/antimicrobial-resistance-progress-and-hurdles-by-jim-o-neill-2018-05 (2018).
Velazquez-Meza, M. E., Galarde-López, M., Carrillo-Quiróz, B. & Alpuche-Aranda, C. M. Antimicrobial resistance: one health approach. Vet. World 15, 743 (2022).
Adisasmito, W. B. et al. One Health: A new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010537 (2022).
Pierce, J. R. & Denison, A. V. Accuracy of death certificates and the implications for studying disease burdens. Handbook of disease burdens and quality of life measures (ed. Preedy, V. R., Watson, R. R.), 329–344 (Springer, 2010).
Lopez, A. D., Mathers, C. D., Ezzati, M., Jamison, D. T. & Murray, C. J. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 367, 1747–1757 (2006).
CDC. 2019 Antibiotic Threat Reports. https://www.cdc.gov/antimicrobial-resistance/data-research/threats/index.html#:~:text=CDC’s%202019%20AR%20Threats%20Report,people%20die%20as%20a%20result (2019).
Luchen, C. C. et al. Impact of antibiotics on gut microbiome composition and resistome in the first years of life in low-to middle-income countries: A systematic review. PLoS Med. 20, e1004235 (2023).
Walsh, T. R., Gales, A. C., Laxminarayan, R. & Dodd, P. C. Antimicrobial resistance: addressing a global threat to humanity. PLoS Med. 20, e1004264 (2023).
Hay, S. I. et al. Measuring and mapping the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. BMC Med. 16, 1–3 (2018).
Limmathurotsakul, D. et al. Improving the estimation of the global burden of antimicrobial resistant infections. Lancet infect. Dis. 19, e392–e398 (2019).
Dunachie, S. J., Day, N. P. & Dolecek, C. The challenges of estimating the human global burden of disease of antimicrobial resistant bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 57, 95–101 (2020).
WHO, Antimicrobial Resistance. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance (2019).
Balasubramanian, R., Van Boeckel, T. P., Carmeli, Y., Cosgrove, S. & Laxminarayan, R. Global incidence in hospital-associated infections resistant to antibiotics: An analysis of point prevalence surveys from 99 countries. PLoS Med. 20, e1004178 (2023).
World Health Organization. Global antimicrobial resistance and use surveillance system (GLASS) report. 1–47 (World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2022).
Aguirre, E. An international model for antibiotics regulation. Food Drug LJ 72, 295 (2017).
Kumar, M. et al. Bioengineered probiotics as a new hope for health and diseases: an overview of potential and prospects. Fut. Microbiol. 11, 585–600 (2016).
Singh, S. B., Young, K. & Silver, L. L. What is an “ideal” antibiotic? Discovery challenges and path forward. Biochem. Pharmacol. 133, 63–73 (2017).
Aguilar-Toalá, J. E. et al. Postbiotics: An evolving term within the functional foods field. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 75, 105–114 (2018).
Baptista, P. V. et al. Nano-strategies to fight multidrug resistant bacteria—“A Battle of the Titans”. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1441 (2018).
Costello, S. P. et al. Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on 8-week remission in patients with ulcerative colitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 321, 156–164 (2019).
Harman, R. M., Yang, S., He, M. K. & Van de Walle, G. R. Antimicrobial peptides secreted by equine mesenchymal stromal cells inhibit the growth of bacteria commonly found in skin wounds. Stem Cell res. ther. 8, 1–14 (2017).
Pursey, E., Sünderhauf, D., Gaze, W. H., Westra, E. R. & van Houte, S. CRISPR-Cas antimicrobials: challenges and future prospects. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1006990 (2018).
Marx, C., Gardner, S., Harman, R. M. & Van de Walle, G. R. The mesenchymal stromal cell secretome impairs methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilms via cysteine protease activity in the equine model. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9, 746–757 (2020).
Murugaiyan, J. et al. Progress in alternative strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance: Focus on antibiotics. Antibiotics 11, 200 (2022).
Rudrapal, M. et al. Dietary polyphenols and their role in oxidative stress-induced human diseases: Insights into protective effects, antioxidant potentials and mechanism (s) of action. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 806470 (2022).
Moine, L., Rivoira, M., de Barboza, G. D., Pérez, A. & de Talamoni, N. T. Glutathione depleting drugs, antioxidants and intestinal calcium absorption. World J. Gastroenterol. 24, 4979 (2018).
Davies, J. & Davies, D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 74, 417–433 (2010).
Cheesman, M. J., Ilanko, A., Blonk, B. & Cock, I. E. Developing new antimicrobial therapies: are synergistic combinations of plant extracts/compounds with conventional antibiotics the solution?. Phcog. Rev. 11, 57 (2017).
Mishra, R. P., Oviedo-Orta, E., Prachi, P., Rappuoli, R. & Bagnoli, F. Vaccines and antibiotic resistance. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15, 596–602 (2012).
Stephens, D. S. et al. Incidence of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae after introduction of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine: population-based assessment. Lancet 365, 855–863 (2005).
Kochetkova, V. A. et al. Phagotherapy of postoperative suppurative-inflammatory complications in patients with neoplasms. Sov. Med. 23, 26 (1989).
d’Hérelle, F. On an invisible microbe antagonistic toward dysenteric bacilli: brief note by Mr. F. D’Herelle, presented by Mr. Roux. 1917. Res. Microbiol. 158, 553–554 (2007).
Neter, E. Effects of penicillin, clavacin and streptomycin upon tetanus toxin. J. Infect. Dis. 20–23 (1945).
Abate, G. & Miörner, H. Susceptibility of multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to amoxycillin in combination with clavulanic acid and ethambutol. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42, 735–740 (1998).
Duraipandiyan, V., Ayyanar, M. & Ignacimuthu, S. Antimicrobial activity of some ethnomedicinal plants used by Paliyar tribe from Tamil Nadu, India. BMC Comp. Alter. Med. 6, 1–7 (2006).
Srinivasan, D., Nathan, S., Suresh, T. & Perumalsamy, P. L. Antimicrobial activity of certain Indian medicinal plants used in folkloric medicine. J. Ethnopharmacol. 74, 217–220 (2001).
Álvarez-Martínez, F. J., Barrajón-Catalán, E., Encinar, J. A., Rodríguez-Díaz, J. C. & Micol, V. Antimicrobial capacity of plant polyphenols against gram-positive bacteria: A comprehensive review. Curr. Med. Chem. 27, 2576–2606 (2020).
Guimarães, A. C. et al. Antibacterial activity of terpenes and terpenoids present in essential oils. Molecules 24, 2471 (2019).
Lee, B. & Lee, D. G. Synergistic antibacterial activity of gold nanoparticles caused by apoptosis-like death. J. Appl. Microbiol. 127, 701–712 (2019).
Tagousop, C. N., Tamokou, J., Ekom, S. E., Ngnokam, D. & Voutquenne-Nazabadioko, L. Antimicrobial activities of flavonoid glycosides from Graptophyllum grandulosum and their mechanism of antibacterial action. BMC Comp. Alter. Med. 18, 1–10 (2018).
Paul, D., Verma, J., Banerjee, A., Konar, D. & Das, B. Antimicrobial resistance traits and resistance mechanisms in bacterial pathogens. Antimicro. Res. 1–27 (2022).
Bharadwaj, A., Rastogi, A., Pandey, S., Gupta, S. & Sohal, J. S. Multidrug-resistant bacteria: their mechanism of action and prophylaxis. BioMed. Res. Int. 2022, 5419874 (2022).
Munita, J. M. & Arias, C. A. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectr. 4, 481–511 (2016).
Thomas, C. M. & Nielsen, K. M. Mechanisms of, and barriers to, horizontal gene transfer between bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3, 711–721 (2005).
Drawz, S. M. & Bonomo, R. A. Three decades of β-lactamase inhibitors. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23, 160–201 (2010).
Adam, D., De Visser, I. & Koeppe, P. Pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid administered alone and in combination. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22, 353–357 (1982).
Liu, M. et al. Tethered bisubstrate derivatives as probes for mechanism and as inhibitors of aminoglycoside 3 ‘-phosphotransferases. J. Org. Chem. 65, 7422–7431 (2000).
Gao, F., Yan, X., Baettig, O. M., Berghuis, A. M. & Auclair, K. Regio-and chemoselective 6’-N-derivatization of aminoglycosides: bisubstrate inhibitors as probes to study aminoglycoside 6’-N-acetyltransferases. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 44, 6859–6862 (2005).
Boehr, D. D. et al. Broad-spectrum peptide inhibitors of aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance enzymes. Chem. Biol. 10, 189–196 (2003).
Suga, T. et al. Aranorosin circumvents arbekacin-resistance in MRSA by inhibiting the bifunctional enzyme AAC (6′)/APH (2 ″). J. Antibiot. 65, 527–529 (2012).
Yarlagadda, V., Medina, R., Wright, G. D. & Venturicidin, A. a membrane-active natural product inhibitor of ATP synthase potentiates aminoglycoside antibiotics. Sci. Rep. 10, 8134 (2020).
Latorre, M. et al. Rescue of the streptomycin antibiotic activity by using streptidine as a “decoy acceptor” for the aminoglycoside-inactivating enzyme adenyl transferase. Chem. Com. 4, 2829–2831 (2007).
Olukunle, J. O., Adenubi, O. T., Biobaku, K. T. & Sogebi, E. A. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of methanol extract and fractions of Acalypha wilkesiana leaves. J. Basic Clin. Physiol. Pharmacol. 26, 181–184 (2015).
Eumkeb, G. &Richards, R. Reversing beta-lactam antibiotic resistance with flavonoids in gram-positive bacteria (III WOCMAP Congress on Medicinal and Aromatic Plants-Volume 4: Targeted Screening of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Economics 678, 2003).
Zhou, X. et al. Total alkaloids from Sophora alopecuroides L. increase susceptibility of extended-spectrum β-lactamases producing Escherichia coli isolates to cefotaxime and ceftazidime. Chin. J. Int. Med. 19, 945–952 (2013).
Sharma, A., Gupta, V. K. & Pathania, R. Efflux pump inhibitors for bacterial pathogens: From bench to bedside. Indian J. Med. Res. 149, 129–145 (2019).
Gupta, S. et al. Efflux inhibition with verapamil potentiates bedaquiline in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 574–576 (2014).
Vargiu, A. V., Ruggerone, P., Opperman, T. J., Nguyen, S. T. & Nikaido, H. Molecular mechanism of MBX2319 inhibition of Escherichia coli AcrB multidrug efflux pump and comparison with other inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 6224–6234 (2014).
Leal, A. L. A. B. et al. Potentiating activity of Norfloxacin by synthetic chalcones against NorA overproducing Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Pathog. 155, 104894 (2021).
Yuan, Y. et al. Evaluation of heterocyclic carboxamides as potential efflux pump inhibitors in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotics 11, 30 (2021).
Anoushiravani, M., Falsafi, T. & Niknam, V. Proton motive force-dependent efflux of tetracycline in clinical isolates of Helicobacter pylori. J. Med. Microbiol. 58, 1309–1313 (2009).
Fenosa, A. et al. Role of TolC in Klebsiella oxytoca resistance to antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 63, 668–674 (2009).
Stavri, M., Piddock, L. J. & Gibbons, S. Bacterial efflux pump inhibitors from natural sources. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 59, 1247–1260 (2007).
Wang, Y. et al. Baicalein resensitizes multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens to doxycycline. Microbiol. Spect. 11, 4702 (2023).
Chan, B. C. et al. Synergistic effects of baicalein with ciprofloxacin against NorA over-expressed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and inhibition of MRSA pyruvate kinase. J. Ethnopharmacol. 137, 767–773 (2011).
Gibbons, S., Moser, E. & Kaatz, G. W. Catechin gallates inhibit multidrug resistance (MDR) in Staphylococcus aureus. Planta Med. 70, 1240–1242 (2004).
Wang, D., Xie, K., Zou, D., Meng, M. & Xie, M. Inhibitory effects of silybin on the efflux pump of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Med. Rep. 18, 827–833 (2018).
Ponnusamy, K., Ramasamy, M., Savarimuthu, I. & Paulraj, M. G. Indirubin potentiates ciprofloxacin activity in the NorA efflux pump of Staphylococcus aureus. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 42, 500–505 (2010).
Kalia, N. P. et al. Capsaicin, a novel inhibitor of the NorA efflux pump, reduces the intracellular invasion of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2401–2408 (2012).
Holler, J. G. et al. Novel inhibitory activity of the Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump by a kaempferol rhamnoside isolated from Persea lingue Nees. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 1138–1144 (2012).
Kapoor, G., Saigal, S. & Elongavan, A. Action and resistance mechanisms of antibiotics: A guide for clinicians. J. Anaesth. Clin. Pharmacol. 33, 300–305 (2017).
Chan, L. W. et al. Selective permeabilization of gram-negative bacterial membranes using multivalent peptide constructs for antibiotic sensitization. ACS Inf. Dis. 7, 721–732 (2021).
Farrag, H. A., Abdallah, N., Shehata, M. M. & Awad, E. M. Natural outer membrane permeabilizers boost antibiotic action against irradiated resistant bacteria. J. Biomed. Sci. 26, 1–14 (2019).
Njimoh, D. L. et al. Antimicrobial activities of a plethora of medicinal plant extracts and hydrolates against human pathogens and their potential to reverse antibiotic resistance. Int. J. Microbiol. 2015, 547156 (2015).
Vemuri, P. K., Dronavalli, L., Nayakudugari, P., Kunta, A. & Challagulla, R. Phytochemical analysis and biochemical characterization f terminalia chebula extracts for its medicinal use. Biomed. Pharm. J. 12, 1525–1529 (2019).
Shriram, V. et al. A potential plasmid-curing agent, 8-epidiosbulbin E acetate, from Dioscorea bulbifera L. against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 32, 405–410 (2008).
Chandra, H. et al. Antimicrobial resistance and the alternative resources with special emphasis on plant-based antimicrobials—a review. Plants 6, 16 (2017).
Chimi, L. Y., Bisso, B. N., Njateng, G. S. S. & Dzoyem, J. P. Antibiotic-potentiating effect of some bioactive natural products against planktonic cells, biofilms, and virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. BioMed. Res. Int. 2023, 9410609 (2023).
Miklasińska-Majdanik, M., Kępa, M., Wojtyczka, R. D., Idzik, D. & Wąsik, T. J. Phenolic compounds diminish antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains. Int. J. Env. Res. public health 15, 2321 (2018).
Rabin, N. et al. Biofilm formation mechanisms and targets for developing antibiofilm agents. Future Med. Chem. 7, 493–512 (2015).
Sadeer, N. B. & Mahomoodally, M. F. Antibiotic potentiation of natural products: a promising target to fight pathogenic bacteria. Curr. Drug Targets 22, 555–572 (2021).
Maisuria, V. B., Hosseinidoust, Z. & Tufenkji, N. Polyphenolic extract from maple syrup potentiates antibiotic susceptibility and reduces biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 3782–3792 (2015).
Vermerris, W. & Nicholson, R. In Phenolic compound biochemistry (Springer Science & Business Media, 2007).
Panche, A. N., Diwan, A. D. & Chandra, S. R. Flavonoids: an overview. J. Nut. Sci. 5, e47 (2016).
Samanta, A., Das, G. & Das, S. K. Roles of flavonoids in plants. Carbon 100, 12–35 (2011).
Jiang, N., Doseff, A. I. & Grotewold, E. Flavones: from biosynthesis to health benefits. Plants 5, 27 (2016).
Ilk, S., Sağlam, N., Özgen, M. & Korkusuz, F. Chitosan nanoparticles enhances the anti-quorum sensing activity of kaempferol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 94, 653–662 (2017).
Luo, J. et al. Baicalin inhibits biofilm formation, attenuates the quorum sensing-controlled virulence and enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa clearance in a mouse peritoneal implant infection model. PloS one 12, e0176883 (2017).
Peng, L. et al. Rutin inhibits quorum sensing, biofilm formation and virulence genes in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Microb. Pathog. 119, 54–59 (2018).
Dzotam, J. K. et al. In vitro antibacterial and antibiotic modifying activity of crude extract, fractions and 3′, 4′, 7-trihydroxyflavone from Myristica fragrans Houtt against MDR Gram-negative enteric bacteria. BMC Comp. Alt. Med. 18, 1–9 (2018).
Moreira, J. New diarylpentanoids and chalcones as potential antimicrobial adjuvants. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 67, 128743 (2022).
Yun, J., Woo, E. & Lee, D. G. Effect of isoquercitrin on membrane dynamics and apoptosis-like death in Escherichia coli. BBA 1860, 357–363 (2018).
Kumar, S. N., Siji, J. V., Rajasekharan, K. N., Nambisan, B. & Mohandas, C. Bioactive stilbenes from a Bacillus sp. N strain associated with a novel rhabditid entomopathogenic nematode. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 54, 410–417 (2012).
Lee, K., Lee, J., Ryu, S. Y., Cho, M. H. & Lee, J. Stilbenes reduce Staphylococcus aureus hemolysis, biofilm formation, and virulence. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 11, 710–717 (2014).
Vang, O. et al. What is new for an old molecule? Systematic review and recommendations on the use of resveratrol. PloS One 6, e19881 (2011).
Prabhu, S., Molath, A., Choksi, H., Kumar, S. & Mehra, R. Classifications of polyphenols and their potential application in human health and diseases. Int. J. Physiol. Nutr. Phys. Educ. 6, 293–301 (2021).
Nøhr-Meldgaard, K., Ovsepian, A., Ingmer, H. & Vestergaard, M. Resveratrol enhances the efficacy of aminoglycosides against Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 52, 390–396 (2018).
Rimando, A. M., Kalt, W., Magee, J. B., Dewey, J. & Ballington, J. R. Resveratrol, pterostilbene, and piceatannol in vaccinium berries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52, 4713–4719 (2004).
Kašparová, P., Vaňková, E., Fousková, E., Masák, J. & Maťátková, O. Stilbenes Can Enhance Sensitivity to Antibiotics, Permeabilize Cell Membrane, Inhibit Biofilm Formation and Staphyloxanthin Production in Staphylococcus Aureus. Permeabilize Cell Membrane, Inhibit Biofilm Formation and Staphyloxanthin Production in Staphylococcus Aureus. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4579722 (2023).
Shi, M. Mechanism of synergy between Piceatannol and Ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 15341 (2022).
Mahizan, N. A. et al. Terpene derivatives as a potential agent against antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pathogens. Molecules 24, 2631 (2019).
Brilhante, R. S. N. et al. Sesquiterpene farnesol contributes to increased susceptibility to β-lactams in strains of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 2198–2200 (2012).
Köse, E. O. & Özyurt, ÖK. In vitro evaluation of the combination activity of Carvacrol and oxacillin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. D.üzce Üniv. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüs.ü Derg. 10, 138–144 (2023).
Dhara, L. & Tripathi, A. The use of eugenol in combination with cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin to combat ESBL-producing quinolone-resistant pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae. J. Appl. Microbiol. 129, 1566–1576 (2020).
Bonetti, A., Tugnoli, B., Piva, A. & Grilli, E. Thymol as an adjuvant to restore antibiotic efficacy and reduce antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene expression in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains. Antibiotics 11, 1073 (2022).
Leite-Sampaio, N. F. et al. Potentiation of the activity of antibiotics against ATCC and MDR Bacterial Strains with (·)-α-Pinene and (-)-Borneol. BioMed. Res. Int. 2022, 8217380 (2022).
Khameneh, B., Iranshahy, M., Soheili, V. & Fazly Bazzaz, B. S. Review on plant antimicrobials: a mechanistic viewpoint. Antimicrob. Res. Inf. Con. 8, 1–28 (2019).
Othman, L., Sleiman, A. & Abdel-Massih, R. M. Antimicrobial activity of polyphenols and alkaloids in middle eastern plants. Front. microbiol. 10, 911 (2019).
Alibi, S., Crespo, D. & Navas, J. Plant-derivatives small molecules with antibacterial activity. Antibiotics 10, 231 (2021).
Chagnon, F. et al. Unraveling the structure–activity relationship of tomatidine, a steroid alkaloid with unique antibiotic properties against persistent forms of Staphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 80, 605–620 (2014).
Cushnie, T. T. & Lamb, A. J. Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 38, 99–107 (2011).
Kumar, A. et al. Novel structural analogues of piperine as inhibitors of the NorA efflux pump of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61, 1270–1276 (2008).
Lee, M. D. et al. Microbial fermentation-derived inhibitors of efflux-pump-mediated drug resistance. IL Farm. 56, 81–85 (2001).
Chen, X. et al. Cell membrane remodeling mediates Polymyxin B resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae: An integrated proteomics and metabolomics study. Front. Microbiol. 13, 810403 (2022).
Sierra, J. M. & Viñas, M. Future prospects for Antimicrobial peptide development: Peptidomimetics and antimicrobial combinations. Exp. Opin. Drug Dis. 16, 601–604 (2021).
Vaara, M. et al. Novel polymyxin derivatives carrying only three positive charges are effective antibacterial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52, 3229–3236 (2008).
French, S. et al. Potentiation of antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria by polymyxin B analogue SPR741 from unique perturbation of the outer membrane. ACS inf. Dis. 6, 1405–1412 (2019).
Wu, C., Peng, K., Yip, B., Chih, Y. & Cheng, J. Boosting synergistic effects of short antimicrobial peptides with conventional antibiotics against resistant bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 12, 747760 (2021).
Ramirez, D., Berry, L., Domalaon, R., Brizuela, M. & Schweizer, F. Dilipid ultrashort tetrabasic peptidomimetics potentiate novobiocin and rifampicin against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria. ACS infect. Dis. 6, 1413–1426 (2020).
Nikam, A. P., Ratnaparkhiand, M. P. & Chaudhari, S. P. Nanoparticles–an overview. Int. J. Res. Dev. Pharm. Life sci. 3, 1121–1127 (2014).
Biswas, P. & Wu, C. Nanoparticles and the environment. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 55, 708–746 (2005).
Agreles, M. A. A., Cavalcanti, I. D. L. & Cavalcanti, I. M. F. Synergism between metallic nanoparticles and antibiotics. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106, 3973–3984 (2022).
Lopez-Carrizales, M. et al. In vitro synergism of silver nanoparticles with antibiotics as an alternative treatment in multiresistant uropathogens. Antibiotics 7, 50 (2018).
Padalia, H., Moteriya, P. & Chanda, S. Synergistic antimicrobial and cytotoxic potential of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using Cassia auriculata leaf extract. Bionanoscience 8, 196–206 (2018).
Yaqub, A. et al. Novel biosynthesis of copper nanoparticles using Zingiber and Allium sp. with synergic effect of doxycycline for anticancer and bactericidal activity. Curr. Microbiol. 77, 2287–2299 (2020).
Toney, J. H. et al. Succinic acids as potent inhibitors of plasmid-borne IMP-1 metallo-β-lactamase. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 31913–31918 (2001).
Hiraiwa, Y., Morinaka, A., Fukushima, T. & Kudo, T. Metallo-β-lactamase inhibitory activity of 3-alkyloxy and 3-amino phthalic acid derivatives and their combination effect with carbapenem. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 21, 5841–5850 (2013).
Annunziato, G. et al. Investigational studies on a hit compound cyclopropane–carboxylic acid derivative targeting O-acetylserine sulfhydrylase as a colistin adjuvant. ACS infect. Dis. 7, 281–292 (2021).
Hwang, J. et al. Membrane-active metallopolymers: repurposing and rehabilitating antibiotics to gram-negative superbugs. Adv. Healthc. Mat. 12, 2301764 (2023).
Eloi, J., Chabanne, L., Whittell, G. R. & Manners, I. Metallopolymers with emerging applications. Mater. Today 11, 28–36 (2008).
Zhang, J. et al. Antimicrobial metallopolymers and their bioconjugates with conventional antibiotics against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 4873–4876 (2014).
Patel, M. B. et al. Synthetic ionophores as non-resistant antibiotic adjuvants. RSC Adv. 9, 2217–2230 (2019).
González-Bello, C. Antibiotic adjuvants–A strategy to unlock bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 27, 4221–4228 (2017).
Melander, R. J. & Melander, C. The challenge of overcoming antibiotic resistance: an adjuvant approach? ACS Infect. Dis. 3, 559–563 (2017).
Stapleton, P. et al. Incidence and mechanisms of resistance to the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 39, 2478–2483 (1995).
Vaara, M. Polymyxin derivatives that sensitize Gram-negative bacteria to other antibiotics. Molecules 24, 249 (2019).
Osman, N. et al. Surface modification of nano-drug delivery systems for enhancing antibiotic delivery and activity. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev.: Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 14, e1758 (2022).
Khan, F. et al. Chitosan and their derivatives: Antibiofilm drugs against pathogenic bacteria. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 185, 110627 (2020).
Tarhini, M., Greige-Gerges, H. & Elaissari, A. Protein-based nanoparticles: From preparation to encapsulation of active molecules. Int. J. Pharm. 522, 172–197 (2017).
Jana, S., Kumar Sen, K. & Gandhi, A. Alginate based nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 22, 3399–3410 (2016).
Abo-zeid, Y. & Williams, G. R. The potential anti-infective applications of metal oxide nanoparticles: A systematic review. NBM 12, e1592 (2020).
Sirelkhatim, A. et al. Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett. 7, 219–242 (2015).
El-Refaie, W. M., Elnaggar, Y. S., El-Massik, M. A. & Abdallah, O. Y. Novel curcumin-loaded gel-core hyaluosomes with promising burn-wound healing potential: development, in-vitro appraisal and in-vivo studies. Int. J. Pharm. 486, 88–98 (2015).
Kianvash, N. et al. Evaluation of propylene glycol nanoliposomes containing curcumin on burn wound model in rat: biocompatibility, wound healing, and anti-bacterial effects. Drug Del. Transl. Res. 7, 654–663 (2017).
Sugumar, S., Ghosh, V., Nirmala, M. J., Mukherjee, A. & Chandrasekaran, N. Ultrasonic emulsification of eucalyptus oil nanoemulsion: antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and wound healing activity in Wistar rats. Ultrason. Sonochem. 21, 1044–1049 (2014).
Lv, B. et al. Heat shock potentiates aminoglycosides against gram-negative bacteria by enhancing antibiotic uptake, protein aggregation, and ROS. PNAS 120, e2217254120 (2023).
Otoupal, P. B. et al. Potentiating antibiotic efficacy via perturbation of non-essential gene expression. Comm. Biol. 4, 1267 (2021).
Gifford, D. R. et al. Identifying and exploiting genes that potentiate the evolution of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1033–1039 (2018).
Alam, M. K., Alhhazmi, A., DeCoteau, J. F., Luo, Y. & Geyer, C. R. RecA inhibitors potentiate antibiotic activity and block evolution of antibiotic resistance. Cell Chem. Biol. 23, 381–391 (2016).
Peng, B., Li, H. & Peng, X. Proteomics approach to understand bacterial antibiotic resistance strategies. Expert Rev. Proteom. 16, 829–839 (2019).
Chen, X. et al. Phage-derived depolymerase as an antibiotic adjuvant against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 13, 845500 (2022).
Zhao, W. et al. The natural product elegaphenone potentiates antibiotic effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8581–8584 (2019).
Swanson, K. et al. Generative AI for designing and validating easily synthesizable and structurally novel antibiotics. Nat. Mach. Intell. 6, 338–353 (2024).
Olcay, B. et al. Prediction of the synergistic effect of antimicrobial peptides and antimicrobial agents via supervised machine learning. BMC Biomed. Eng. 6, 1 (2024).
Narendrakumar, L., Chakraborty, M., Kumari, S., Paul, D. & Das, B. β-Lactam potentiators to re-sensitize resistant pathogens: Discovery, development, clinical use and the way forward. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1092556 (2023).
Smani, Y. et al. Antibiotic discovery with artificial intelligence for the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections. (2023).
Li, M. et al. Discovery of Broad-Spectrum repurposed drug combinations against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) through Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven platform. Adv. Ther. 7, 2300332 (2024).
Boulaamane, Y. et al. Antibiotic discovery with artificial intelligence for the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Msystems, 325; https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.00325-24 (2024).
Morris, G. M. & Lim-Wilby, M. Molecular docking. Methods Mol. Biol. 443, 365–382 (2008).
Pagadala, N. S., Syed, K. & Tuszynski, J. Software for molecular docking: a review. Biophys. Rev. 9, 91–102 (2017).
Paggi, J. M., Pandit, A. & Dror, R. O. The art and science of molecular docking. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 93 (2024).
Fujita, M. et al. Remarkable synergies between baicalein and tetracycline, and baicalein and β-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol. Immunol. 49, 391–396 (2005).
Aparna, V., Dineshkumar, K., Mohanalakshmi, N., Velmurugan, D. & Hopper, W. Identification of natural compound inhibitors for multidrug efflux pumps of Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa using in silico high-throughput virtual screening and in vitro validation. PloS One 9, e101840 (2014).
Amin, M. U., Khurram, M., Khattak, B. & Khan, J. Antibiotic additive and synergistic action of rutin, morin and quercetin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Com. Alt. Med. 15, 1–12 (2015).
Abreu, A. C. Combinatorial activity of flavonoids with antibiotics against drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. D. Res. 21, 600–609 (2015).
Eumkeb, G., Siriwong, S., Phitaktim, S., Rojtinnakorn, N. & Sakdarat, S. Synergistic activity and mode of action of flavonoids isolated from smaller galangal and amoxicillin combinations against amoxicillin-resistant Escherichia coli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112, 55–64 (2012).
Zhou, H. et al. The antibacterial activity of kaempferol combined with colistin against colistin-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Microbiol. Spect. 10, 2265 (2022).
Buchmann, D. et al. Synergistic antimicrobial activities of epigallocatechin gallate, myricetin, daidzein, gallic acid, epicatechin, 3-hydroxy-6-methoxyflavone and genistein combined with antibiotics against ESKAPE pathogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 132, 949–963 (2022).
Chemmugil, P., Lakshmi, P. & Annamalai, A. Exploring Morin as an anti-quorum sensing agent (anti-QSA) against resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Microb. Pathog. 127, 304–315 (2019).
Morel, C., Stermitz, F. R., Tegos, G. & Lewis, K. Isoflavones as potentiators of antibacterial activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51, 5677–5679 (2003).
Morita, Y. et al. Berberine is a novel type efflux inhibitor which attenuates the MexXY-mediated aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1223 (2016).
Zhou, H., Wang, W., Cai, L. & Yang, T. Potentiation and Mechanism of Berberine as an Antibiotic Adjuvant Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Inf. D. Res. 7313–7326 (2023).
da Silva, A. R. P. et al. Potentiation of antibiotic action and Efflux pump inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus aureus Strains by Solasodine. Antibiotics 11, 1309 (2022).
Osei-Owusu, H. et al. In vitro selective combinatory effect of ciprofloxacin with nitroxoline, sanguinarine, and zinc pyrithione against diarrhea-causing and gut beneficial bacteria. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, 1063 (2022).
Hamoud, R., Reichling, J. & Wink, M. Synergistic antibacterial activity of the combination of the alkaloid sanguinarine with EDTA and the antibiotic streptomycin against multidrug resistant bacteria. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 67, 264–273 (2015).
Dwivedi, G. R. et al. Synergy of clavine alkaloid ‘chanoclavine’with tetracycline against multi-drug-resistant E. coli. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 37, 1307–1325 (2019).
Lee, J. et al. Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of prenylated flavanones from Macaranga tanarius. Phytomedicine 63, 153033 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted at the University of Delaware and funded by MSM’s startup fund from the University of Delaware. The authors acknowledge Dr. Poonam Gopika Vinaymohan and Dr. Abraham Pellissery for their valuable comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.S.M. conceptualized and provided the funding. J.J., S.B., S.M., and M.S.M. wrote the article. J.J. and M.S.M. illustrated the figures, while SB created them using BioRender. S.M. and M.S.M. reviewed the paper. All authors have read and approved the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Joseph, J., Boby, S., Mooyottu, S. et al. Antibiotic potentiators as a promising strategy for combating antibiotic resistance. npj Antimicrob Resist 3, 53 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44259-025-00112-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44259-025-00112-4
This article is cited by
-
Iterative discovery of potent polymeric antibiotics via multi-stage and multi-task learning against antimicrobial resistance
Nature Communications (2026)
-
Antibacterial and antibiofilm efficacy of ar-turmerone derived from Curcuma longa L. arrested multidrug-resistant pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria
Archives of Microbiology (2026)





