Table 4 Contrasts for percentage explained NSS of the explainable NSS between all age bins.

From: Saliency models perform best for women’s and young adults' fixations

					95% CI
Comparison		Mean difference	t	p (Bonferroni)	95% CI (Lower)	95% CI (Upper)
6–11	12–17	−3.889	−2.548	0.424	−8.854	1.077
	18–23	−8.191	−5.367	<0.001	−13.157	−3.225
	24–29	−19.075	−12.499	<0.001	−24.041	−14.11
	30–35	−16.039	−10.509	<0.001	−21.004	−11.073
	36–41	−14.151	−9.272	<0.001	−19.117	−9.185
	42–47	−11.345	−7.434	<0.001	−16.311	−6.379
	48–53	−16.375	−10.73	<0.001	−21.341	−11.409
	54–59	−3.811	−2.497	0.487	−8.777	1.154
12–17	18–23	−4.302	−2.819	0.195	−9.268	0.663
	24–29	−15.187	−9.951	<0.001	−20.153	−10.221
	30–35	−12.15	−7.961	<0.001	−17.116	−7.184
	36–41	−10.262	−6.724	<0.001	−15.228	−5.296
	42–47	−7.457	−4.886	<0.001	−12.423	−2.491
	48–53	−12.487	−8.182	<0.001	−17.452	−7.521
	54–59	0.077	0.051	1	−4.889	5.043
18–23	24–29	−10.885	−7.132	<0.001	−15.85	−5.919
	30–35	−7.848	−5.142	< 0.001	−12.813	−2.882
	36–41	−5.96	−3.905	0.005	−10.926	−0.994
	42–47	−3.154	−2.067	1	−8.12	1.811
	48–53	−8.184	−5.363	<0.001	−13.15	−3.218
	54–59	4.379	2.87	0.168	−0.586	9.345
24–29	30–35	3.037	1.99	1	−1.929	8.003
	36–41	4.925	3.227	0.055	−0.041	9.891
	42–47	7.73	5.065	<0.001	2.764	12.696
	48–53	2.7	1.769	1	−2.265	7.666
	54–59	15.264	10.002	<0.001	10.298	20.23
30–35	36–41	1.888	1.237	1	−3.078	6.854
	42–47	4.693	3.075	0.089	−0.273	9.659
	48–53	−0.337	−0.221	1	−5.302	4.629
	54–59	12.227	8.012	<0.001	7.261	17.193
36–41	42–47	2.805	1.838	1	−2.16	7.771
	48–53	−2.224	−1.458	1	−7.19	2.741
	54–59	10.339	6.775	<0.001	5.373	15.305
42–47	48–53	−5.03	−3.296	0.044	−9.996	−0.064
	54–59	7.534	4.937	<0.001	2.568	12.5
48–53	54–59	12.564	8.233	<0.001	7.598	17.529

Contrasts are for data as given in Fig. 2c and Table 3 across age bins. Data distribution was assumed to be normal but this was not formally tested for these contrasts.

Back to article page

Table 4 Contrasts for percentage explained NSS of the explainable NSS between all age bins.

Search

Quick links