Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

News & Comment

Filter By:

  • In this Comment, the authors argue that misplaced distrust leads citizens to dismiss legitimate leaders, experts, or groups. This distrust may be fueled by prejudice or misinformation, and political rhetoric and has moral and democratic consequences.

    • Louisa Estadieu
    • Markus Langer
    CommentOpen Access
  • AI’s greatest strength—removing friction from work and relationships—is also a liability. Prioritizing outcome over process, it eliminates desirable difficulties that drive growth. By subtracting effort from life, AI risks removing the struggles that teach us, the loneliness that connects us, and the labor that makes life meaningful.

    • Emily Zohar
    • Paul Bloom
    • Michael Inzlicht
    CommentOpen Access
  • The rush to study generative AI is producing a feedback loop of topical and methodological convergence, flattening scientific imagination and crowding out the pluralism needed to keep research adaptive, resilient, and intellectually generative.

    • Cecilie Steenbuch Traberg
    • Jon Roozenbeek
    • Sander van der Linden
    CommentOpen Access
  • Economic inequality is on the rise, and children will bear its burden. Yet children’s perspectives are rarely considered. We urgently need interdisciplinary research to better understand how inequality gets into children’s heads and under their skins, and to inform policies that center children’s lived experiences.

    • Eddie Brummelman
    • Richard E. Ahl
    • Katherine McAuliffe
    CommentOpen Access
  • Prevailing interventions against misinformation emphasize truth detection, but offer no panacea. Research into decision-making suggests that strengthening people’s ability to estimate the plausibility of information and to calibrate their confidence under uncertainty might offer a complementary route.

    • Valentin Guigon
    • Lucille Geay
    • Caroline J. Charpentier
    CommentOpen Access
  • Online and offline, we are surrounded by recommendations on how to improve our health and extend our longevity. Ideally, this health advice is grounded in science. Health psychology plays a distinct role, complimenting research in public health and epidemiology to improve practical insights.

    EditorialOpen Access
  • LLM agents can now pass as human participants, threatening the validity of online social science. We urge a shift from ad-hoc checks to multi-layered, adaptive defenses, borrowing from internet anti-bot practice, and call for cooperation across researchers, platforms, and institutions, to guard against this challenge.

    • Gerrit Anders
    • Jürgen Buder
    • Markus Huff
    CommentOpen Access
  • Consciousness Science is entering an age of unprecedented opportunity, thanks to recent empirical and theoretical advances, increasing interest in the topic, and technological advances in neuroscience. The role theories will play in a maturing science of consciousness deserves a closer look.

    • Biyu J. He
    CommentOpen Access
  • Consciousness research has long been dominated by competing grand theories, yet consensus remains elusive. We propose shifting focus toward construct-based, data-driven, and iterative approaches that identify the empirical building blocks of conscious experience and provide a more cumulative, integrative path forward for the field.

    • Morten Overgaard
    • Peter Fazekas
    • Wanja Wiese
    CommentOpen Access
  • Self-promotional language may attract readers but is discouraged in Communications Psychology. Because style matters in fostering credibility.

    EditorialOpen Access
  • When communicating psychological intervention research, two pernicious tendencies have become prominent: using imprecise terms with lay meanings and sensationalizing outcome descriptions. This Comment examines the consequences of these communication styles and proposes strategies for effective communication, ensuring enthusiasm does not come at the cost of credibility.

    • Brooke N. Macnamara
    • Alexander P. Burgoyne
    • David Moreau
    CommentOpen Access
  • Widespread belief in unfounded conspiracy theories is a risk. Yet, academics also mustn’t commit the reverse error, in adopting a Protective Conspiracy Framing and labelling credible theories and proposals conspiracies when these would deserve scientific scrutiny.

    • Nicolas Vermeulen
    CommentOpen Access
  • Misinformation is often framed as a cognitive failure, focusing on the vulnerabilities of those who believe it. But misinformation often stems from deliberate disinformation campaigns—which should be considered proactive intergroup aggression.

    • Jais Adam-Troian
    CommentOpen Access
  • Dogs have worked and lived with humans for thousands of generations. Modern dogs’ looks and behaviour differ substantially from wolves’. A study in Journal of Neuroscience compares the behaviour and brains of modern and pre-modern dogs to understand the course of wolf-to-dog domestication.

    • Marike Schiffer
    Research HighlightOpen Access
  • Communications Psychology promotes psychological research that reaches beyond its boundaries. Empirical Work can speak to psychological theory and constructs or explore psychological processes using any of a vast array of data and analysis methods. Whether a study belongs in Communications Psychology does not depend on the type of data that are used; but on whether the data are of high quality, appropriately analyzed, and can answer the psychological research question.

    EditorialOpen Access

Search

Quick links