Table 3 Results of two-sided binomial tests on the first transfer trial

From: Action repetition biases choice in context-dependent decision-making

Task

Comparison

p̂ (stimulus)

95% binomial CI

p (two-sided)

n

p1(p1.1–p.1.3)

CHC vs ALC

0.73 (CHC)

[0.63–0.82]

p < 0.0001

n = 94

p2

CHC vs ALC

0.63 (CHC)

[0.48–0.77]

p = 0.08

n = 49

p3

CHC vs ALC

0.29 (CHC)

[0.16–0.43]

p = 0.004

n = 49

p4.1

CHG vs ALG

0.5 (CHG)

[0.31–0.6]

p = 1

n = 30

p4.2

CHG vs ALG

0.83 (CHG)

[0.64–0.94]

p < 0.001

n = 29

g1

DHC vs ALC

0.74 (DHC)

[0.59–0.85]

p < 0.001

n = 50

g2

DHC vs ALC

0.75 (DHC)

[0.60–0.86]

p < 0.001

n = 48

  1. For each task, we test whether the proportion of participants choosing stimulus C (tasks p1–p4.2) or stimulus D (tasks g1and g2) over stimulus A differs from chance (H₀: p = 0.5; the two stimuli have either equal absolute values in experiments p1, p2, p3, g1, and g2 or equal relative values in experiments p4.1 and p4.2). For each task, we show p̂, the observed choice proportions and the 95% binomial confidence interval. A p value < 0.05 (italic) indicates a significant group-level bias in favor of one stimulus.
Back to article page