Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Continuities and transformations in the studies of urban politics and governments

Nature Cities volume 1, pages 22–29 (2024)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Cities are paramount nowadays. They host most of the world’s population in increasingly heterogeneous urban contexts. Local governments are mainly responsible for facing some of our most important social and political challenges. This Review discusses the rich analytical tradition that focused on city governments and politics following two of its underlying analytical threads—the political autonomy of city governments and the relationships between cities and democracy, in light of their durable social and political inequalities. Recent scholarship has been advancing in understanding city governments by considering them as political arenas populated by heterogeneous local institutions, dynamic processes and interconnected actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Presence of selected concepts in books published in English (1960–2019).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Urbanization Prospects (United Nations, 2018).

  2. 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects (United Nations, 2018).

  3. Post, A. Cities and politics in the developing world. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 21, 115–133 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bekker, S. & Fourchard, L. Governing Cities in Africa: Politics and Policies (HSRC Press, 2013).

  5. Auerbach, A., LeBas, A., Post, A. & Weitz-Shapiro, R. State, society, and informality in cities of the Global South. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 53, 261–280 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lidström, A., Sellers, J. M. & Bae, Y. Multilevel Democracy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2020).

  7. Borraz, O. & Galès, P.L. Urban governance in Europe: the government of what? Pôle Sud 32, 137–151 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baiocchi, G., Heller, P. & Silva, M. Bootstraping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil (Stanford Univ. Press, 2011).

  9. Portney, K. & Berry, J. Participation and the pursuit of sustainability in U.S. cities. Urban Aff. Rev. 46, 119–139 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boudreau, J.-A. Global Urban Politics: Informalization of the State (Polity, 2017).

  11. Magnusson, W. in Critical Urban Studies (eds Davies, J. & Imbroscio, D.) 41–53 (Suny Press, 2010).

  12. Davies, J. & Imbroscio, D. Theories of Urban Politics (Sage, 2005); https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279298

  13. Mossberger, K., Clarke, S. E. & John, P. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2012).

  14. van Heur, B. What, where and who is urban studies? On research centres in an unequal world. Dialogues Urban Res. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541258231179214 (2023).

  15. Judd, D. Everything is always going to hell: urban scholars as end-times prophets. Urban Aff. Rev. 41, 119–131 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trounstine, J. All politics is local: the reemergence of the study of city politics. Perspect. Polit. 7, 611–618 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sapotichne, J., Jones, B. & Wolfe, M. Is urban politics a black hole? Analyzing the boundary between political science and urban politics. Urban Aff. Rev. 43, 76–106 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marques, E. Em busca de um objeto esquecido: a política e as políticas do urbano no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Cir. Soc. 32, e329509 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leitner, H., Peck, J. & Sheppard, E. Urban Studies Inside/Out: Theory, Method, Practice (Sage, 2019).

  20. Roy, A. Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory? Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 40, 200–209 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brenner, N. & Ghosh, S. Between the colossal and the catastrophic: planetary urbanization and the political ecologies of emergent infectious disease. Environ. Plan. A 54, 867–910 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roy, A. What is urban about critical urban theory? Urban Geogr. 37, 810–823 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bryce, V. J. The American Commonwealth Vol. I (Cosimo Classics, 1888).

  24. Wolfinger, R. E. Why political machines have not withered away and other revisionist thoughts. J. Polit. 34, 365–398 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Trounstine, J. in The City in American Political Development (ed. Dilworth, R.) 77–97 (Routledge, 2009).

  26. Weber, M. Economy and Society: A New Translation (Harvard Univ. Press, 2019).

  27. Le Galès, P. European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002).

  28. Hunter, F. Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers (Univ. North Carolina Press, 1953).

  29. Dahl, R. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City (Yale Press, 1961).

  30. Castells, M. The Urban Question (MIT Press, 1979).

  31. Topalov, C. Les Promoteurs Immobiliers: Contribution à l’analyse de la Production Capitaliste du Lodgement en France (Univ. René Descartes, 1973).

  32. Preteceille, E. Collective consumption, urban segregation, and social classes. Environ. Plan. D 4, 145–154 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Harvey, D. The Urbanization of Capital (Basil Blackwell, 1985).

  34. Molotch, H. The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. Am. J. Sociol. 82, 309–332 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peterson, P. City Limits (Univ. Chicago Press, 1981).

  36. Stone, C. Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: a political economy approach. J. Urban Aff. 15, 1–28 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mollenkopf, J. A Phoenix in the Ashes (Princeton Univ. Press, 1994).

  38. Kumar, T. & Stenberg, M. Why political scientists should study smaller cities. Urban Aff. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780874221124610 (2022).

  39. Davies, J. & Trounstine, J. Urban politics and the new institutionalism. SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2072057 (2009).

  40. Dilworth, R. The City in American Political Development (Routledge, 2009).

  41. Lucas, J. Urban governance and the american political development approach. Urban Aff. Rev. 53, 338–361 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lascoumes, P. & Galès, P. L. Sociologie de l’action Publique (Armand Colin, 2007).

  43. Le Galès, P. The rise of local politics: a global review. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 24, 345–363 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. John, P. in Theories of Urban Politics (eds Davies, J. & Imbroscio, D.) 17–24 (Sage, 2005).

  45. Robinson, J. Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 35, 1–23 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Le Galès, P. & Robinson, J. The Routledge Handbook of Comparative Global Urban Studies (Routledge, 2024).

  47. Ferman, B. Governing the Ungovernable City: Political Skill, Leadership and the Modern Mayor (Temple Univ. Press, 1985).

  48. Yates, D. The Ungovernable City: The Politics of Urban Problems and Policy Making (MIT Press, 1977).

  49. Deleon, R. Left Coast City: Progressive Politics in San Francisco, 1975–1991 (Univ. Press of Kansas, 1992).

  50. Griggs, S., Howarth, D. & Feandeiro, A. The logics and limits of ‘collaborative governance’ in Nantes: myth, ideology, and the politics of new urban regimes. J. Urban Aff. 42, 91–108 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Flanagan, R. M. Opportunities and constraints on mayoral behavior: a historical-institutional approach. J. Urban Aff. 26, 43–65 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pelissero, J. Cities, Politics, and Policy: A Comparative Analysis (CQ Press, 2003).

  53. Sweeting, D. & Hambleton, R. The dynamics of depoliticisation in urban governance: introducing a directly elected mayor. Urban Stud. 57, 1068–1086 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hajnal, Z. & Trounstine, J. Who or what governs? The effects of economics, politics, institutions, and needs on local spending. Am. Polit. Res. 38, 1130–1163 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Einstein, K. & Glick, D. Mayors, partisanship, and redistribution: evidence directly from U.S. mayors. Urban Aff. Rev. 54, 74–106 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Heinelt, H. & Hlepas, N.-K. in The European Mayor: Political Leaders in the Changing Context of Local Democracy (eds Bäck, H. et al.) 21–42 (VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2006); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90005-6_2

  57. John, P. & Cole, A. Models of local decision making: networks in Britain and France. Policy & Politics 23, 303–312 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wollmann, H. Urban leadership in German local politics: the rise, role and performance of the directly elected (Chief Executive) Mayor. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 28, 150–165 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Burnett, C. M. Parties as an organizational force on nonpartisan city councils. Party Polit. 25, 594–608 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Krebs, T. & Pelissero, J. Urban managers and public policy: do institutional arrangements influence decisions to initiate policy? Urban Aff. Rev. 45, 391–411 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ledyaev, V. G. & Chirikova, A. Power in local Russian communities: patterns of interaction between legislative and executive branches of local government. Urban Aff. Rev. 53, 990–1024 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Marques, E. The Politics of Incremental Progressivism: Governments, Governances and Urban Policy Changes in São Paulo (Wiley Blackwell, 2021).

  63. Zhang, Y. The Fragmented Politics of Urban Preservation: Beijing, Chicago, and Paris (Univ. Minnesota Press, 2013).

  64. Freemark, Y., Steil, J. & Thelen, K. Varieties of urbanism: a comparative view of inequality and the dual dimensions of metropolitan fragmentation. Polit. Soc. 48, 235–274 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Scott, J. Corruption, machine politics, and political change. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 63, 1142–1158 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Auyero, J. The logic of clientelism in Argentina: an ethnographic account. Latin Am. Res. Rev. 35, 55–81 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Weitz-Shapiro, R. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty and Social Policy (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  68. Herrera, V. From participatory promises to partisan capture: local democratic transitions and Mexican water politics. Comp. Polit. 49, 479–499 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Bussell, J. Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies (Oxford Univ. Press, 2029).

  70. Auerbach, A. Clients and communities: the political economy of party network organization and development in India’s urban slums. World Polit. 68, 111–148 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Holland, A. & Palmer-Rubin, B. Beyond the machine: clientelist brokers and interest organizations in Latin America. Comp. Polit. Stud. 48, 1186–1223 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Álvarez-Rivadulla, M. Clientelism or something else? Squatter politics in Montevideo. Latin Am. Polit. Soc. 54, 37–63 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hoyler, T. & Marques, E. Política local e coordenação intrapartidária nas dobradas eleitorais paulistanas. Revista Braisileira de Ciências Sociais 38, e3811001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. King, D. & Pierre, J. Challenges to Local Government (Sage, 1991).

  75. Judd, D. & Smith, J. in Governing Cities in a Global Era: Urban Innovation, Competition, and Democratic Reform (eds Hambleton, R. & Gross, J.) 151–160 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).

  76. Lorrain, D. Urban capitalisms: European models in competition. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 29, 231–267 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Davies, J. Partnerships and Regimes: The Politics of Urban Regeneration in the UK (Ashgate, 2001).

  78. Therborn, G. Cities of Power (London, 2017).

  79. Lorrain, D., Lee, S. & Stoker, G. The Privatization of Urban Services in Europe (Routledge, 1997).

  80. Raco, M. Delivering flagship projects in an era of regulatory capitalism: state-led privatization and the London Olympics 2012. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 38, 176–197 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sarue, B. in The Politics of Incremental Progressivism: Governments, Governances and Urban Policy Changes in São Paulo (ed. Marques, E.) 256–277 (Wiley Blackwell, 2020).

  82. Dewey, O. & Davis, D. Planning, politics, and urban mega-projects in developmental context: lessons from Mexico City’s airport controversy. J. Urban Aff. 35, 531–551 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Smith, J. M. ‘Re-stating’ theories of urban development: the politics of authority creation and intergovernmental triads in postindustrial Chicago. J. Urban Aff. 32, 425–448 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Silvestre, G. & Jajamovich, G. The dialogic constitution of model cities: the circulation, encounters and critiques of the Barcelona model in Latin America. Plann. Perspect. 38, 305–327 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Davies, J. & Imbroscio, D. Critical Urban Studies: New Directions (Sunny Press, 2000).

  86. Vainer, C. in The Routledge Handbook of Cities of the Global South (eds Parnell, S. & Oldfield, S.) 48–56 (Routledge, 2014).

  87. Lowndes, V. Rescuing Aunt Sally: taking institutional theory seriously in urban politics. Urban Stud. 38, 1953–1971 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Pierre, J. The Politics of Urban Governance (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).

  89. Ward, K. Policy mobilities, politics and place: the making of financial urban futures. Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 25, 266–283 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Peck, J. & Theodore, N. Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum 41, 169–174 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Uitermark, J., Nicholls, W. & Loopmans, M. Cities and social movements: theorizing beyond the right to the city. Environ. Plan. A 44, 2546–2554 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Nicholls, W. & Vijay, A. in The Routledge Handbook of Comparative Global Urban Studies (ed. Le Galès, P. & Robinson, J.) 156–167 (Routledge, 2023).

  93. Gurza Lavalle, A. & Bueno, N. S. in Democratization (ed. Grugel, J.) 235–272 (Sage, 2013).

  94. Bradlow, B. H. Urban social movements and local state capacity. World Dev. 173, 106415 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Herrera, V. & Post, A. Can developing countries both decentralize and depoliticize urban water services? Evaluating the legacy of the 1990s reform wave. World Dev. 64, 621–641 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Palmer, I., Moodley, N. & Parnell, S. Building a Capable State: Service Delivery in Post-Apartheid South Africa (Zed Books, 2017).

  97. Post, A., Bronsoler, V. & Salman, L. Hybrid regimes for local public goods provision: a framework for analysis. Perspect. Polit. 15, 952–966 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Harding, A. Urban regimes in a Europe of the cities? Eur. Urban Reg. Stud. 4, 291–314 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Levi-Faur, D. The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 598, 12–32 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Brenner, N. & Theodore, N. in Spaces of Neoliberalism (eds Theodore, N. & Brenner, N.) 2–32 (Blackwell, 2002).

  101. Le Galès, P. Neoliberalism and urban change: stretching a good idea too far? Territ. Polit. Gov. 4, 154–172 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Governance and Development (World Bank, 1992).

  103. Grindle, M. S. Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance 17, 525–548 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Stoker, G. Governance as theory: five propositions. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 68, 15–24 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Lowndes, V. & Skelcher, C. The dynamics of multi-organizational partnerships: an analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Adm. 76, 313–333 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Lascoumes, P. & Galès, P. Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments—from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance 20, 1–21 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Marques, E. Public policies, power and social networks in Brazilian urban policies. Latin Am. Res. Rev. 47, 27–50 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Lund, C. Twilight institutions: public authority and local politics in Africa. Dev. Change 37, 685–705 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Garrido, M., Ren, X. & Weinstein, L. Toward a global urban sociology: keywords. City Community 20, 4–12 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Marques, E. Continuity and change of urban policies in São Paulo: resilience, latency, and reanimation. Urban Aff. Rev. 59, 337–371 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Le Galès, P. & Prat, P. La Gouvernance de la Metrópole Parisienne (Presses de Sciences Po, 2018).

  112. Andreotti, A. Governare Milano nel Nuovo Millennio (Il Mulino, 2019).

  113. Ugalde, V. & Le Galès, P. Que se Gobierna? El Caso de la Ciudad de Mexico (Colegio de Mexico, 2017).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Political Science Department and Center for Metropolitan Studies (CEM), University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil

    Eduardo Cesar Leão Marques

Authors
  1. Eduardo Cesar Leão Marques
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Cesar Leão Marques.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Cities thanks Julie-Anne Boudreau and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marques, E.C.L. Continuities and transformations in the studies of urban politics and governments. Nat Cities 1, 22–29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-023-00004-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-023-00004-6

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing