Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

Plural climate storylines to foster just urban futures

Abstract

Managing climate change-related risks requires robust and actionable insights into future climates. Here we develop the plural climate storylines framework to complement existing physical climate storylines, which have strengthened the usability of climate projections yet struggled to generate action for just climate futures. By taking urban adaptation as a case in point, we illustrate the plural climate storylines framework through four complementary methodological schools that bring together multiple knowledges on complex social and climatic processes: power-sensitive storylines, decolonizing storylines, co-producing storylines and aspirational storylines. Our framework generates storylines with the potential to advance transformative policies and new pathways towards climate-just futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Multiple approaches to generating climate information.
Fig. 2: Current and future heat and water stress in urban centers.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfahl, S., O’Gorman, P. A. & Fischer, E. M. Understanding the regional pattern of projected future changes in extreme precipitation. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 423–427 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marvel, K. et al. Twentieth-century hydroclimate changes consistent with human influence. Nature 569, 59–65 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiermeier, Q. Droughts, heatwaves and floods: how to tell when climate change is to blame. Nature 560, 20–23 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parmesan, C., Morecroft, M. D. & Trisurat, Y. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (GIEC, 2022).

  5. Hazeleger, W. et al. Tales of future weather. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 107–113 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff, C. J. & Ramprasad, V. Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 789–794 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dilling, L. & Lemos, M. C. Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob. Environ. Change 21, 680–689 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jasanoff, S. A new climate for society. Theory Cult. Soc. 27, 233–253 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cash, D. W. et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8086–8091 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nissan, H. et al. On the use and misuse of climate change projections in international development. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 10, e579 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shepherd, T. G. et al. Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change. Climatic Change 151, 555–571 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Baldissera Pacchetti, M. et al. Varieties of approaches to constructing physical climate storylines: a review. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 15, e869 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Neill, B. C. Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1074–1084 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baulenas, E., Versteeg, G., Terrado, M., Mindlin, J. & Bojovic, D. Assembling the climate story: use of storyline approaches in climate‐related science. Glob. Chall. 7, 2200183 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Harris, D. M. The trouble with modeling the human into the future climate. GeoHumanities 8, 382–398 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rusca, M., Messori, G. & Di Baldassarre, G. Scenarios of human responses to unprecedented social‐environmental extreme events. Earths Future 9, e2020EF001911 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cork, S. et al. Exploring alternative futures in the Anthropocene. Ann. Rev. Environ. Resour. 48, 25–54 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Whyte, K. P. Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environ. Plan. E 1, 224–242 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Farbotko, C. et al. Reclaiming open climate adaptation futures. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 750–751 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Milkoreit, M. Imaginary politics: climate change and making the future. Elementa 5, 62 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pelling, M. et al. Normative future visioning for city resilience and development. Clim. Dev. 16, 335–348 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cao, W. et al. Increasing global urban exposure to flooding: an analysis of long-term annual dynamics. Sci. Total Environ. 817, 153012 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuholske, C. et al. Global urban population exposure to extreme heat. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2024792118 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, W. et al. Global drought and severe drought-affected populations in 1.5 and 2 °C warmer worlds. Earth Syst. Dyn. 9, 267–283 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu, A., Sheriff, G., Chakraborty, T. & Manya, D. Disproportionate exposure to urban heat island intensity across major US cities. Nat. Commun. 12, 2721 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rusca, M., Savelli, E., Di Baldassarre, G., Biza, A. & Messori, G. Unprecedented droughts are expected to exacerbate urban inequalities in Southern Africa. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 98–105 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ajibade, I., McBean, G. & Bezner-Kerr, R. Urban flooding in Lagos, Nigeria: patterns of vulnerability and resilience among women. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1714–1725 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ranganathan, M. Storm drains as assemblages: the political ecology of flood risk in post‐colonial Bangalore. Antipode 47, 1300–1320 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ajibade, I. & McBean, G. Climate extremes and housing rights: a political ecology of impacts, early warning and adaptation constraints in Lagos slum communities. Geoforum 55, 76–86 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kayaga, S. M. et al. Cities and extreme weather events: impacts of flooding and extreme heat on water and electricity services in Ghana. Environ. Urban. 33, 131–150 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Early season heat waves strike India. NASA Earth Observatory https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/149766/early-season-heat-waves-strike-india (2022).

  32. Debnath, R., Bardhan, R. & Bell, M. L. Lethal heatwaves are challenging India’s sustainable development. PLoS Clim. 2, e0000156 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hardy, D. Flood risk as legacy vulnerability: reading the past into the present for environmental justice. Geoforum 142, 103757 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Benz, S. A. & Burney, J. A. Widespread race and class disparities in surface urban heat extremes across the United States. Earths Future 9, e2021EF002016 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nightingale, A. J. Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research. Area 48, 41–47 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pelling, M. Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation (Routledge, 2010).

  37. Sultana, F. Critical climate justice. Geogr. J. 188, 118–124 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ajibade, I. Can a future city enhance urban resilience and sustainability? A political ecology analysis of Eko Atlantic city, Nigeria. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 26, 85–92 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Anguelovski, I. et al. Why green ‘climate gentrification’ threatens poor and vulnerable populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 26139–26143 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Eriksen, S. et al. Adaptation interventions and their effect on vulnerability in developing countries: help, hindrance or irrelevance? World Dev. 141, 105383 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shi, L. et al. Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 131–137 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ajaps, S. & Forh Mbah, M. Towards a critical pedagogy of place for environmental conservation. Environ. Educ. Res. 28, 508–523 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gopal, P. On decolonisation and the university. Textual Pract. 35, 873–899 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Watson, V. Co-production and collaboration in planning—the difference. Plan. Theory Pract. 15, 62–76 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nalau, J. & Cobb, G. The strengths and weaknesses of future visioning approaches for climate change adaptation: a review. Glob. Environ. Change 74, 102527 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Garb, Y., Pulver, S. & VanDeveer, S. D. Scenarios in society, society in scenarios: toward a social scientific analysis of storyline-driven environmental modeling. Environ. Res. Lett. 3, 045015 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Savelli, E., Mazzoleni, M., Di Baldassarre, G., Cloke, H. & Rusca, M. Urban water crises driven by elites' unsustainable consumption. Nat. Sustain. 6, 929–940 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Chilisa, B. Indigenous Research Methodologies (Sage Publications, 2019).

  49. Mbah, M. F. & Bailey, M. in Indigenous Methodologies, Research and Practices for Sustainable Development (eds Mbah M. et al.) 21–48 (Springer, 2022).

  50. Romm, N. R. Reviewing the transformative paradigm: a critical systemic and relational (Indigenous) lens. Syst. Pract. Action Res. 28, 411–427 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sultana, F. The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality. Polit. Geogr. 99, 102638 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Watt-Cloutier, S. The Right to Be Cold: One Woman’s Story of Protecting Her Culture, the Arctic and the Whole Planet (Penguin, 2015).

  53. Acharya, A. & Prakash, A. When the river talks to its people: local knowledge-based flood forecasting in Gandak River Basin, India. Environ. Dev. 31, 55–67 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hernandez, J., Meisner, J., Jacobs, L. A. & Rabinowitz, P. M. Re-centering Indigenous knowledge in climate change discourse. PLoS Clim. 1, e0000032 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Dotson, K. Tracking epistemic violence, tracking practices of silencing. Hypatia 26, 236–257 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Chao, S. & Enari, D. Decolonising climate change: a call for beyond-human imaginaries and knowledge generation, ETropic 20, 32–54 (2021).

  57. Kushnir, I. in Indigenous Methodologies, Research and Practices for Sustainable Development (eds. Mbah M. et al.) 3–19 (Springer, 2022).

  58. Mukherjee, J. ‘Living systems infrastructure’ of Kolkata: exploring co-production of urban nature using historical urban political ecology (HUPE). Environ. Urban. 34, 32–51 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ghosh, D. Ecology and Traditional Wetland Practice: Lessons from Wastewater Utilisation in the East Calcutta Wetlands (Worldview, 2005).

  60. Paul, S. & Pal, S. Exploring wetland transformations in moribund deltaic parts of India. Geocarto Int. 35, 1873–1894 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Acharya, A. & Sanyal, S. Where there’s muck there’s brass: making money from sewage in Kolkata. The Economist (13 January 2021).

  62. Mitlin, D. et al. Knowledge matters: the potential contribution of the coproduction of research. Eur. J. Dev. Res. 32, 544–559 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mitlin, D. Beyond contention: urban social movements and their multiple approaches to secure transformation. Environ. Urban. 30, 557–574 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Fraser, A. et al. Meeting the challenge of risk-sensitive and resilient urban development in sub-Saharan Africa: directions for future research and practice. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 26, 106–109 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Patel, S., Baptist, C. & d’Cruz, C. Knowledge is power—informal communities assert their right to the city through SDI and community-led enumerations. Environ. Urban. 24, 13–26 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lines, K. & Makau, J. Taking the long view: 20 years of Muungano wa Wanavijiji, the Kenyan federation of slum dwellers. Environ. Urban. 30, 407–424 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Corburn, J., Njoroge, P., Weru, J. & Musya, M. Urban climate justice, human health, and citizen science in Nairobi’s informal settlements. Urban Sci. 6, 36 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Boonyabancha, S. & Kerr, T. Making people the subject: community-managed finance systems in five Asian countries. Environ. Urban. 30, 15–34 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Satterthwaite, D. et al. Building resilience to climate change in informal settlements. One Earth 2, 143–156 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Núñez Collado, J. R. & Wang, H.-H. Slum upgrading and climate change adaptation and mitigation: lessons from Latin America. Cities 104, 102791 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Sverdlik, A., Mitlin, D. & Dodman, D. Realising the Multiple Benefits of Climate Resilience and Inclusive Development in Informal Settlements (C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (2019).

  72. Weldeghebrael, E. H. How do you build an inclusive urban reform coalition? ACRC https://www.african-cities.org/how-do-you-build-an-inclusive-urban-reform-coalition/ (2023).

  73. Bainomugisha, B., Mbabazi, J., Kasaija, P. & Sseviiri, H. Co-producing knowledge to shape sustainable cities: insights from ACRC’s uptake workshop in Kampala. ACRC https://www.african-cities.org/co-producing-knowledge-to-shape-sustainable-cities-insights-from-acrcs-uptake-workshop-in-kampala/ (2023).

  74. Mitlin, D. The contribution of reform coalitions to inclusion and equity: lessons from urban social movements. Area Dev. Policy 8, 1–26 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Localising and decolonising ACRC: taking action. ACRC https://www.african-cities.org/localising-and-decolonising-acrc-taking-action/ (2024).

  76. Yusoff, K. & Gabrys, J. Climate change and the imagination. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 2, 516–534 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Shenk, L. & Gutowski, W. J.Jr Mind the gaps! Climate scientists should heed lessons in collaborative storytelling from William Shakespeare. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 13, e783 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Haraway, D. J. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Duke Univ. Press, 2016).

  79. Stengers, I. in The Cambridge Companion to Literature and Science (ed. Meyer, S.) 25–42 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).

  80. Wapner, P. in Reimagining Climate Change (eds Wapner P. K. & Elver H.) 1–13 (Routledge, 2016).

  81. Rusca, M., Mazzoleni, M., Barcena, A. & Savelli, E. Speculative political ecologies: (re)imagining urban futures of climate extremes. J. Polit. Ecol. 30, 581–608 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Comelli, T. et al. Normative future visioning: a critical pedagogy for transformative adaptation. Buildings Cities 5, 83–100 (2024).

  83. Menteşe, E. Y. et al. Future exposure modelling for risk-informed decision making in urban planning. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 90, 103651 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Gutierrez, J. M. et al. IPCC AR6-WGI Atlas, available from http://interactive-atlas.ipcc.ch/ (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).

  85. Iturbide, M. et al. Repository supporting the implementation of FAIR principles in the IPCC-WG1 Atlas. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5171760 (2021).

  86. He, C. et al. Future global urban water scarcity and potential solutions. Nat. Commun. 12, 4667 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Luck, M., Landis, M. & Gassert, F. Aqueduct Water Stress Projections: Decadal Projections of Water Supply and Demand Using CMIP5 GCMs (World Resources Institute, 2015).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.R. and G.M. conceptualized the study. All authors contributed to the formal analysis, writing the original draft, and reviewing and editing the paper. S.L., M.R. and E.R. developed the figures. M.R., A.S., T.C. and A.A. developed the table.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Rusca.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Cities thanks Eulàlia Baulenas, Cymene Howe and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rusca, M., Sverdlik, A., Acharya, A. et al. Plural climate storylines to foster just urban futures. Nat Cities 1, 732–740 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00133-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-024-00133-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing