Abstract
The long-standing growth-versus-environment debate has centered on national and global scales, devoting little attention to cities despite steadily increasing urban concentrations of population, activities and emissions. This Perspective clarifies how this debate plays out for cities by relating four urban growth dimensions—economic, population, spatial and environmental—to the narratives of green growth, degrowth and post-growth. To this end, we review theoretical and empirical insights about links between growth dimensions. Specific issues addressed include horizontal spillovers among cities, vertical policy integration and local experiments. Thus we connect the abstract growth-versus-environment debate to evidence regarding urban environmental policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens, W. W. III The Limits to Growth—Club of Rome (Universe, 1972).
Jakob, M., Lamb, W. F., Steckel, J. C., Flachsland, C. & Edenhofer, O. Understanding different perspectives on economic growth and climate policy. WIREs Clim. Change 11, e677 (2020).
Smulders, S., Toman, M. & Withagen, C. Growth theory and ‘green growth’. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 30, 423–446 (2014).
Hickel, J. et al. Degrowth can work—here’s how science can help. Nature 612, 400–403 (2022).
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. Environment versus growth—a criticism of “degrowth” and a plea for “a-growth”. Ecol. Econ. 70, 881–890 (2011).
Lwasa, S. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) 861–952 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).
Seto, K. C. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 923–1001 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
LSE Cities. Old Cities New Ambitions: the Future of Urban Europe (LSE Cities, 2023).
Kaika, M., Varvarousis, A., Demaria, F. & March, H. Urbanizing degrowth: five steps towards a radical spatial degrowth agenda for planning in the face of climate emergency. Urban Stud. 60, 1191–1211 (2023).
Khmara, Y. & Kronenberg, J. Urban degrowth economics: making cities better places for living, working, and playing. Local Environ. 28, 304–321 (2023).
Savini, F. Towards an urban degrowth: habitability, finity and polycentric autonomism. Environ. Plan. Econ. Space 53, 1076–1095 (2021).
Alexander, S. & Gleeson, B. Degrowth in the Suburbs: a Radical Urban Imaginary (Springer Nature, 2019).
Wu, T., Yi, M. & Zhang, Y. Towards cities’ green growth: the combined influence of economic growth targets and environmental regulations. Cities 146, 104759 (2024).
Global Cities Index (Oxford Economics, 2024).
Balland, P.-A. et al. Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 248–254 (2020).
Khmara, Y. & Kronenberg, J. On the road to urban degrowth economics? Learning from the experience of C40 cities, doughnut cities, Transition Towns, and shrinking cities. Cities 136, 104259 (2023).
Güneralp, B., Reba, M., Hales, B. U., Wentz, E. A. & Seto, K. C. Trends in urban land expansion, density, and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: a global synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044015 (2020).
Frolking, S., Mahtta, R., Milliman, T., Esch, T. & Seto, K. C. Global urban structural growth shows a profound shift from spreading out to building up. Nat. Cities 1, 555–566 (2024).
Mahtta, R., Mahendra, A. & Seto, K. C. Building up or spreading out? Typologies of urban growth across 478 cities of 1 million+. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 124077 (2019).
Moran, D. et al. Carbon footprints of 13 000 cities. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064041 (2018).
Swilling, M. et al. The Weight of Cities: Resource Requirements of Future Urbanization (IRP, 2018).
Krugman, P. What’s new about the new economic geography? Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 14, 7–17 (1998).
Richardson, H. W. in Urban Agglomeration and Economic Growth (ed. Giersch, H.) 123–155 (Springer, 1995).
Grazi, F., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. & Rietveld, P. Spatial welfare economics versus ecological footprint: modeling agglomeration, externalities and trade. Environ. Resour. Econ. 38, 135–153 (2007).
World Bank. World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography (World Bank, 2008).
Rosenthal, S. S. & Strange, W. C. in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics Vol. 4 (eds. Henderson, J. V. & Thisse, J.-F.) 2119–2171 (Elsevier, 2004).
McCann, P. & Acs, Z. J. Globalization: countries, cities and multinationals. Reg. Stud. 45, 17–32 (2011).
Frick, S. A. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. Big or small cities? On city size and economic growth. Growth Change 49, 4–32 (2018).
Turner, M. & Weil, D. N. Are big cities important for economic growth? Preprint at SSRN https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=5083774 (2025).
Castells-Quintana, D. Malthus living in a slum: urban concentration, infrastructure and economic growth. J. Urban Econ. 98, 158–173 (2017).
Ganau, R. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. Does urban concentration matter for changes in country economic performance? Urban Stud. 59, 1275–1299 (2022).
Frick, S. A. & Rodríguez-Pose, A. Change in urban concentration and economic growth. World Dev. 105, 156–170 (2018).
Davis, J. C. & Henderson, J. V. Evidence on the political economy of the urbanization process. J. Urban Econ. 53, 98–125 (2003).
Neves, A., Godina, R., Azevedo, S. G. & Matias, J. C. O. A comprehensive review of industrial symbiosis. J. Clean. Prod. 247, 119113 (2020).
Mattioli, G., Morton, C. & Scheiner, J. Air travel and urbanity: the role of migration, social networks, airport accessibility, and ‘rebound’. Urban Plan. 6, 232–245 (2021).
Gifford, R. & Nilsson, A. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int. J. Psychol. 49, 141–157 (2014).
Liotta, C., Viguié, V. & Creutzig, F. Environmental and welfare gains via urban transport policy portfolios across 120 cities. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1067–1076 (2023).
Jedwab, R., Loungani, P. & Yezer, A. Comparing cities in developed and developing countries: population, land area, building height and crowding. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 86, 103609 (2021).
Liu, Z. & Yu, L. Stay or leave? The role of air pollution in urban migration choices. Ecol. Econ. 177, 106780 (2020).
Kaczan, D. J. & Orgill-Meyer, J. The impact of climate change on migration: a synthesis of recent empirical insights. Clim. Change 158, 281–300 (2020).
Stern, D. I. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev. 32, 1419–1439 (2004).
Haberl, H. et al. A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: synthesizing the insights. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 065003 (2020).
Hubacek, K., Chen, X., Feng, K., Wiedmann, T. & Shan, Y. Evidence of decoupling consumption-based CO2 emissions from economic growth. Adv. Appl. Energy 4, 100074 (2021).
Jackson, T. & Victor, P. A. Unraveling the claims for (and against) green growth. Science 366, 950–951 (2019).
Chen, H., Zhang, X., Wu, R. & Cai, T. Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve for city-level CO2 emissions: based on corrected NPP-VIIRS nighttime light data in China. J. Clean. Prod. 268, 121575 (2020).
Shan, Y. et al. Chinese cities exhibit varying degrees of decoupling of economic growth and CO2 emissions between 2005 and 2015. One Earth 4, 124–134 (2021).
Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Chapman, A., Kagawa, S. & Managi, S. An analysis of urban environmental Kuznets curve of CO2 emissions: empirical analysis of 276 global metropolitan areas. Appl. Energy 228, 1561–1568 (2018).
Rizzati, M. C. P., Florenzio, N., Guastella, G. & Pareglio, S. Kuznets and the cities: urban level EKC evidence from Europe. Ecol. Indic. 148, 110143 (2023).
Wang, Z. & Ye, X. Re-examining environmental Kuznets curve for China’s city-level carbon dioxide emissions. Spat. Stat. 21, 377–389 (2017).
Kim, Y. & Lee, J. Unveiling urban spatial dynamics in climate and air quality indicators: a local estimation of the environmental Kuznets curve and the impact of green infrastructure. Ann. Reg. Sci. 74, 38 (2025).
Hao, Y. et al. How harmful is air pollution to economic development? New evidence from PM2.5 concentrations of Chinese cities. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 743–757 (2018).
Hammer, S., Kamal-Chaoui, L., Robert, A. & Plouin, M. Cities and Green Growth: a Conceptual Framework Vol. 2011/08 https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/cities-and-green-growth_5kg0tflmzx34-en (2011).
OECD. Urban Green Growth in Dynamic Asia (OECD, 2016).
Economics of Green Cities Programme at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Copenhagen Green Economy Leader Report (LSE Cities, 2014).
Krähmer, K. Are green cities sustainable? A degrowth critique of sustainable urban development in Copenhagen. Eur. Plan. Stud. 29, 1272–1289 (2021).
Martin, C. et al. Smart-sustainability: a new urban fix? Sustain. Cities Soc. 45, 640–648 (2019).
Xue, J. Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner’s perspective. Ecol. Econ. 105, 130–138 (2014).
Kronenberg, J. et al. Cities, planetary boundaries, and degrowth. Lancet Planet. Health 8, e234–e241 (2024).
Kallis, G. et al. Research on degrowth. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 43, 291–316 (2018).
Schindler, S., Kanai, J. M. & Diaz Bay, J. Deindustrialisation and the politics of subordinate degrowth: the case of Greater Buenos Aires, Argentina. Urban Stud. 60, 1212–1230 (2023).
Savini, F., Ferreira, A. & von Schönfeld, K. Post-Growth Planning: Cities Beyond the Market Economy (Routledge, 2022).
Miller, B. & Mössner, S. Urban sustainability and counter-sustainability: spatial contradictions and conflicts in policy and governance in the Freiburg and Calgary metropolitan regions. Urban Stud. 57, 2241–2262 (2020).
Feng, T., Du, H., Lin, Z. & Zuo, J. Spatial spillover effects of environmental regulations on air pollution: evidence from urban agglomerations in China. J. Environ. Manag. 272, 110998 (2020).
Rodríguez-Pose, A. & Bartalucci, F. The green transition and its potential territorial discontents. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 17, 339–358 (2024).
Green, F. & Gambhir, A. Transitional assistance policies for just, equitable and smooth low-carbon transitions: who, what and how? Clim. Policy 20, 902–921 (2020).
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. Systemic assessment of urban climate policies worldwide: decomposing effectiveness into 3 factors. Environ. Sci. Policy 114, 35–42 (2020).
Krähmer, K. Degrowth and the city. City 26, 316–345 (2022).
Ehnert, F. Review of research into urban experimentation in the fields of sustainability transitions and environmental governance. Eur. Plan. Stud. 31, 76–102 (2023).
Fuenfschilling, L., Frantzeskaki, N. & Coenen, L. Urban experimentation & sustainability transitions. Eur. Plan. Stud. 27, 219–228 (2019).
Hodson, M., Geels, F. W. & McMeekin, A. Reconfiguring urban sustainability transitions, analysing multiplicity. Sustainability 9, 299 (2017).
Mocca, E. The local dimension in the degrowth literature. A critical discussion. J. Polit. Ideol. 25, 78–93 (2020).
Dittmer, K. Local currencies for purposive degrowth? A quality check of some proposals for changing money-as-usual. J. Clean. Prod. 54, 3–13 (2013).
Stein, A. J. & Santini, F. The sustainability of ‘local’ food: a review for policy-makers. Rev. Agric. Food Environ. Stud. 103, 77–89 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Bellanca, O. Hansen, A. Huhtala, L. King, J. Morrison, P. Núñez Yebra and D. Torren Peraire for comments and discussion. ERC grant 101097924 (CLIMGROW) in EU Horizon-ERC provided financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.L. and J.v.d.B. conceptualized the paper, wrote the first draft and revised the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Cities thanks Andrés Rodríguez-Pose and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liotta, C., van den Bergh, J. The debate on growth versus environment at the urban scale. Nat Cities 2, 685–692 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00269-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-025-00269-z


