Table 3 Summary of embodied CO2 eq values per unit mass assigned to each constituent material for embodied carbon calculations

From: Recent advances in low-carbon ultra-high-performance concrete: materials, mechanisms, and sustainability perspectives

Material

Embodied carbon (kg CO2 eq/kg)

Ref.

Remark

OPC

0.84

304,354

Assumed CEM I OPC composition in accordance with the European norm (EN 192-1)57: 90.8% clinker, 5.05% gypsum, 5.21% limestone, and 0.2% additives by weight. The mixture proportions are based on sector-aggregated data for the United Kingdom.

Aggregate

0.00747

304

Based on average market composition in the United Kingdom, comprising 64.2% land-won, 27.5% recycled and secondary, and 8.3% marine aggregate, with the consumption statistics reported by British Marine Aggregates Producer Association355.

Quartz sand

0.0102

356

–

Quartz powder

0.0234

356

Quartz powder with particles size ranging from 0–0.22 mm.

Silica fume

0.052

357

Based on the EPD of a commercially available silica fume produced by Ferroglobe LC (UK); material is recovered as a by-product from the smelting of elemental silicon or ferrosilicon alloys in electric arc furnaces.

Superplasticiser

0.5722

358

Based on the average values reported in EPDs of 14 commercially available SP manufactured by Sika® (Switzerland).

Steel fibre

2.03

359

Based on the EPD of Dramix® steel fibre for fibre-reinforced concrete, produced by Bekaert (Belgium).

Water

0.000177

360

Estimation based on the UK Department of Energy Security and Net Zero government conversion factors for company greenhouse gas reporting; considers emissions from water supply only (excluding water treatment), assuming water is incorporated into the final product.

GGBFS

0.142

361

Upper limit as reported by Black115, with the estimate accounting for the emission required for rapid cooling, grinding, and transportation from the production site to the grinding facility.

FA

0.027

115,362

–

RHA

0.0314

363

Estimation based on rice husk, with 94% of emissions attributed to the agricultural phase and 5% to the transportation from paddy fields to mills.

LP

0.0172

356

–

GP

0.142

–

Estimation based on the processes required for sorting, cleaning, crushing, and grinding, including transportation of the raw material from the collection point to the processing facility and subsequent powder milling. The value is assumed to be the same as GGBFS.

SS

0.142

–

Estimation based on emissions from transportation (from the steel production site to the grinding facility) and the energy required to grind gravel-sized material into micrometers particles. Zhang et al.364 reported a value of 0.045 kg CO2 eq/kg excluding transportation; to ensure a fair comparison, this study conservatively assumes the same as that used for GGBFS.

CC (MK)

0.423

325

Comparisons by Habert and Ouellet-Plamondon326 highlighted the significant influence of the heating energy source; therefore, the value adopted herein accounts for clay extraction, the additional amount of unified clay required to achieve the final product’s unit weight (loss of ignition), and assumes a fossil-based energy source for heating.

NBP

0.143

–

Li et al.243 reported values ranging 0.009 to 0.013 kg CO2 eq/kg, considering only the emissions from energy consumption during sieving; However, in practice, the materials sourced from the waste excavation rocks (such as those from railway construction) required transportation and grinding. Therefore, to ensure a fair comparison, the value in this study is estimated to be same as that for GGBFS.

NB

0.435

325

Estimated by assuming the same energy consumption as for MK, with an adjustment for the increased mass loss associated with dehydroxylation during the formation of meta-clay.

NaOH

1.434

326

Estimated for alkaline solutions based on emissions per unit mass of the dry component, assuming production via the diaphragm cell process for conservatism. (For reference, the more commonly used membrane cell process yields a value of 1.26 kg CO2 eq/kg.) As the electricity mix strongly influences emissions, a global average value was used in this study.

Ca(OH)2/Hydrated lime

1.09

365,366

Based on the average values from EPDs for five commercial products manufactured by Adbri and Boral (Australia).

Na2SiO3/Waterglass

1.06

326

Assumed production via the furnace liqour route, with a global average value reflecting the choice of electricity mix.

nSiO2

1.69

367

Estimated based on the manufacturing process for sodium silicate solutions, as a proxy for the precipitated material.

  1. The energy expended due to elevated temperature curing was estimated by linear interpolation or extrapolation, accounting for the specific curing temperature and duration of each mix. This calculation is based on the value reported by Turner and Collins323 of 39.97 kg CO2 eq/m3 for 24 h of heat curing, with additional consideration for a 9-h gradual heating and cooling period as included in their assessment.