Key Points
-
Highlights the evidence-based effect of instrument fracture on endodontic outcome.
-
Illustrates the role of apical disease in dictating treatment choice.
-
Emphasises the lack of quality evidence in relation to fractured files and outcome.
-
Considers the difficulties in carrying out meaningful research in the area of fractured files and outcome.
Abstract
Instrument fracture complicates the endodontic procedure by obstructing debridement, delaying treatment completion and affecting the patient's dental experience. When a file fractures there are several treatment options that could be selected, however, the future management should be based on the effect of the fractured instrument on treatment outcome. The aim of the following review was to analyse the literature assessing the impact of endodontic instrument fracture, focusing on its influence on endodontic prognosis and treatment outcome. A comprehensive MEDLINE search including various keywords identified several publications that considered the variables. Analysis of the publications highlighted a paucity of quality long-term clinical outcome studies relating specifically to the influence of instrument fracture. The available studies demonstrated a wide variety of methodologies reporting conflicting findings; therefore, meaningful conclusions were difficult. Within the confines of the literature it appears that retained fractured instruments do not reduce the prognosis of endodontically treated teeth if apical periodontitis is absent, however, if disease is present healing is significantly reduced. Therefore, the stage at which an instrument fractures in infected cases appears likely to be significant as canal disinfection will be compromised accordingly. Considering the risks associated with file removal, perhaps this should only be attempted if apical disease is present. Although it is accepted that the nature of file fracture precludes integration into randomised prospective trials, there is a need for well designed long-term outcome studies investigating the influence of fractured files.
Similar content being viewed by others
Log in or create a free account to read this content
Gain free access to this article, as well as selected content from this journal and more on nature.com
or
References
Spili P, Parashos P, Messer H H . The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2005; 31: 845–850.
Panitvisai P, Parunnit P, Sathorn C, Messer H H . Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010; 36: 775–780.
Sjögren U, Hagglund B, Sunqvist G, Wing K . Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990; 16: 498–504.
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K . Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 6–31.
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Gulabivala K . Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 1026–1046.
Walia H M, Brantley W A, Gerstein H . An initial investigation of bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 1988; 14: 346–351.
Glosson C R, Haller R H, Dove S B, del Rio C E . A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 1995; 21: 146–151.
Haïkel Y, Serfaty R, Bateman G, Senger B, Alleman C . Dynamic and cyclic fatigue of engine-driven nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 1999; 25: 434–440.
Parashos P, Messer H H . Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists. Int Endod J 2004; 37: 249–259.
Ward J R, Parashos P, Messer H H . Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium instruments from root canals: clinical cases. J Endod 2003; 29: 764–767.
Ankrum M T, Hartwell G R, Truitt J E . K3 Endo, ProTaper and ProFile systems: breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars. Int Endod J 2004; 30: 234–237.
Parashos P, Messer H H . Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006; 32: 1031–1043.
Cheung G S . Instrument fracture: mechanisms, removal of fragments, and clinical outcomes. Endod Topics 2009; 16: 1–26.
Yared G M, Kulkarni G K . Failure of ProFile Ni-Ti instruments used by an inexperienced operator under access limitations. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 536–541.
Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer H H . Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2004; 30: 722–725.
Gutmann J L, Gao Y . Alterations in the inherent metallic and surface properties of nickel-titanium root canal instruments to enhance performance, durability and safety: a focused review. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 113–128.
Crump M C, Natkin E . Relationship of a broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 1970; 80: 1341–1347.
Ruddle C J . Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30: 827–845.
Lin L M, Rosenberg P A, Lin J . Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure? J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 187–193.
Friedman S, Löst C, Zarrabian M, Trope M . Evaluation of success and failure after endodontic therapy using a glass ionomer cement sealer. J Endod 1995; 21: 384–390.
Østavik D . Time-course and risk analyses of the development and healing of chronic apical periodontitis in man. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 150–155.
European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment; consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 921–930.
Pettiette M T, Delano O, Trope M . Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless-steel K-files and nickel-titanium hand files. J Endod 2001; 27: 124–127.
Smith C S, Setchell D J, Harty F J . Factors influencing the success of conventional root canal therapy - a five-year retrospective study. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 321–333.
Calişkan M K, Sen B H . Endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis using calcium hydroxide: a long-term study. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996; 12: 215–221.
Paik S, Sechrist C, Torabinejad M . Levels of evidence for outcome of endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30: 745–750.
Bergenholtz G, Lekholm U, Milthon R, Heden G, Odesjö B, Engström B. Retreatment of endodontic fillings. Scand J Dent Res 1979; 87: 217–224.
Gorni F G, Gagliani M M . The outcome of endodontic treatment: a 2-yr follow-up. J Endod 2004; 30: 1–4.
Sackett D L, Rosenberg W M, Gray J A, Haynes R B, Richardson W S . Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ 1996; 13: 71–72.
Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K . Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature – part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 921–939.
Chugal N M, Clive J M, Spångberg L S . A prognostic model for assessment of the outcome of endodontic treatment: effect of biologic and diagnostic variables. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91: 342–352.
Hoskinson S E, Ng Y L, Hoskinson A E, Moles D R, Gulabivala K . A retrospective comparison of outcome of root canal treatment using two different protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 93: 705–715.
Sjögren U, Figdor D, Persson S, Sundqvist G . Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 297–306.
Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S . Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phases I and II: orthograde retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30: 627–633.
Cvek M, Granath L, Lundberg M . Failures and healing in endodontically treated non-vital anterior teeth with posttraumatically reduced pulpal lumen. Acta Odontol Scand 1982; 40: 223–228.
Danin J, Strömberg T, Forsgren H, Linder L E, Ramsköld L O . Clinical management of nonhealing periradicular pathosis. Surgery versus endodontic retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 213–217.
Hargreaves K M . From consent to CONSORT: clinical research in the 21st century. J Endod 2005; 31: 1–3.
Nair P N, Sjögren U, Figdor D, Sundqvist G . Persistent periapical radiolucencies of root-filled human teeth, failed endodontic treatments and periapical scars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 87: 617–627.
Siqueira J F Jr. Aetiology of root-canal treatment failure: why well treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 1–10.
Spångberg L S . Systematic review in endodontics - examples of GIGO? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007; 103: 723–724.
Friedman S . Expected outcomes in the prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. In Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford T (eds) Essential endodontology: prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. 2nd ed. pp 408–469. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008.
Strindberg L Z . The dependence of the results of pulp therapy on certain factors: an analytical study based on radiographic and clinical follow-up examination. Acta Odontol Scand 1956; 14: 1–175.
Kerekes K, Tronstad L . Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod 1979; 5: 83–90.
Grossman L I . Guidelines for the prevention of fracture of root canal instruments. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969; 28: 746–752.
Fox J, Moodnik R M, Greenfield E, Atkinson J S . Filling root canals with files: radiographic evaluation of 304 cases. N Y State Dent J 1972; 38: 154–157.
Fu M, Zhang Z, Hou B . Removal of broken files from root canals by using ultrasonic techniques combined with dental microscope: a retrospective analysis of treatment outcome. J Endod 2011; 37: 619–622.
Souter N J, Messer H . Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J Endod 2005; 31: 450–452.
Madarati A A, Qualtrough A J, Watts D C . Vertical fracture resistance of roots after ultrasonic removal of fractured instruments. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 424–429.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Refereed Paper
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGuigan, M., Louca, C. & Duncan, H. The impact of fractured endodontic instruments on treatment outcome. Br Dent J 214, 285–289 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.271
Accepted:
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.271
This article is cited by
-
Evaluation of usage-induced degradation of different endodontic file systems
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Evaluation of the usage-induced degradation of Genius and Reciproc nickel–titanium reciprocating instruments
Odontology (2019)
-
Analysis of Mtwo Rotary Instrument Separation During Endodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Clinical Study
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics (2014)
