Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–15 of 15 results
Advanced filters: Author: Jeantine E. Lunshof Clear advanced filters
  • Scientific breakthroughs can change how we understand and live in the world, disrupting long-held assumptions and concepts and raising new questions for philosophy and science. To address these challenges, we describe a model for collaboration of scientists with philosophers and ethicists, and its benefits to the research process and outcomes.

    • Jeantine E. Lunshof
    • Julia Rijssenbeek
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Methods
    Volume: 21, P: 1571-1574
  • The use of genome-modification tools in wild species must be properly governed to avoid irreversible damage to ecosystems, says Jeantine Lunshof.

    • Jeantine Lunshof
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 521, P: 127
  • Is it time to reassess the 14-day rule for human embryo research?

    • J Benjamin Hurlbut
    • Insoo Hyun
    • Laurie Zoloth
    Special Features
    Nature Biotechnology
    Volume: 35, P: 1029-1042
  • The unprecedented amount of data in biomedical sciences is putting the well-known ethical issues such as privacy, confidentiality and consent for research under pressure. These authors propose that an open-consent framework, as implemented in the Personal Genome Project, might help avoid the constraints that are inherent in the current concepts of genetic privacy.

    • Jeantine E. Lunshof
    • Ruth Chadwick
    • George M. Church
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Reviews Genetics
    Volume: 9, P: 406-411
  • Nature Biotechnology asks a selection of leaders from across biotech to look at the future of the sector and make some predictions for the coming years.

    • Katrine Bosley
    • Charlotte Casebourn
    • Bowen Zhao
    News
    Nature Biotechnology
    Volume: 39, P: 654-660
  • By integrating ongoing bioethical collaboration, neuroscientists can create a positive effect on their research and the knowledge it produces. To this end, we offer our experiences with an interdisciplinary model for the ethical advancement of a promising area of neuroscience — human neural organoid research.

    • Insoo Hyun
    • J. C. Scharf-Deering
    • Jeantine E. Lunshof
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Neuroscience
    Volume: 25, P: 1399-1401
  • Personal-genome tests are blurring the boundary between experts and lay people. Barbara Prainsack, Jenny Reardon and a team of international collaborators urge regulators to rethink outdated models of regulation.

    • Barbara Prainsack
    • Jenny Reardon
    • Jeantine E. Lunshof
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 456, P: 34-35
  • Difficult questions will be raised as models of the human brain get closer to replicating its functions, explain Nita A. Farahany, Henry T. Greely and 15 colleagues.

    • Nita A. Farahany
    • Henry T. Greely
    • Hongjun Song
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature
    Volume: 556, P: 429-432
  • Gurwitz and colleagues propose that consortia dedicated to archiving and analysing data on associations between genotypes and drug-response phenotypes could allow the potential of personalized medicine to be realized, and discuss the associated practical and ethical issues that need to be addressed.

    • David Gurwitz
    • Jeantine E. Lunshof
    • Russ B. Altman
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
    Volume: 5, P: 23-26
  • Careful and responsible microbiome management is a critical strategy to counter biodiversity loss, but practical and regulatory hurdles must be addressed to maximize its utility.

    • Raquel S. Peixoto
    • Christian R. Voolstra
    • Gabriele Berg
    Reviews
    Nature Microbiology
    Volume: 7, P: 1726-1735