Advanced search

Filter By:

Journal Check one or more journals to show results from those journals only.

Choose more journals

Article type Check one or more article types to show results from those article types only.
Subject Check one or more subjects to show results from those subjects only.
Date Choose a date option to show results from those dates only.

Custom date range

Clear all filters
Sort by:
Showing 1–5 of 5 results
Advanced filters: Author: Sarah Psutka Clear advanced filters

  • This article provides consensus-based statements from an international panel of bladder cancer experts on the use of active surveillance in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Consensus statements cover several aspects of active surveillance, including terminology, eligibility criteria and treatment triggers, providing a framework to guide clinical practice and trial design in this space.

    • Roberto Contieri
    • Paolo Gontero
    • Laura S. Mertens
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Urology
    P: 1-6

  • This Review discusses the potential benefits of prehabilitative interventions in patients with and survivors of testicular cancer. Although there are few studies in the field, available data suggest a benefit of prehabilitation in improving mental health and quality of life in these patients, highlighting the need for additional research in this field.

    • Logan G. Briggs
    • Sarah P. Psutka
    • Sara C. Parke
    Reviews
    Nature Reviews Urology
    Volume: 23, P: 174-183

  • Oligometastatic bladder cancer, defined as a cancer with limited metastases, is a potential target for curative metastasis-directed therapy in a multidisciplinary framework. The consensus definition of oligometastatic bladder cancer is a valuable starting point for clinical trials, but challenges remain in accurately characterizing metastatic burden with current imaging modalities and determining optimal strategies to treat patients with lymph node involvement.

    • Laura S. Mertens
    • Sarah P. Psutka
    • Maria Carmen Mir
    Comments & Opinion
    Nature Reviews Urology
    Volume: 20, P: 701-702