Introduction

Valacyclovir is the l-valine ester of acyclovir. It is classified as a nucleoside analog DNA polymerase enzyme inhibitor. These analogues are structurally identical to the nucleosides that are composed of DNA. In the viral DNA, they are inserted, thereby terminating the growing viral DNA chain1. Valacyclovir has a high binding affinity for DNA-CT and its inhibitory function is highly selective because of its affinity for the thymidine kinase enzyme2,3,4. Valacyclovir shows varying levels of inhibition towards herpes simplex virus types 1 (HSV-1), 2 (HSV-2), Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV). Moreover, Valacyclovir is the most effective antiviral medication used to treat FHV1 feline herpes virus infections5,6,7.

Recently, complexation has often been used to influence biological processes that are metal dependent8,9. The application of diagnostic metal complexes to medicine is a rapidly developing therapeutic field10. Cu(II) complex of Valacyclovir (VAL) with a formula [Cu(VAL)Cl2] has a cytotoxic effect against bovine herpes virus type I (BHV-1)11. Moreover, a binuclear Cu(II) complex of Valacyclovir (VAL) with a formula [Cu2(VAL)3(H2O)4] has high antifungal activity against the yeast cultures12.

Schiff bases and their complexes have variety of applications in biological and physiological activities including antimycobacterial, antifungal, anticonvulsant, antiallergenic, antiviral, antihypertensive and anticancer13,14. The green synthesis of nano coordination particles, using the natural ingredients present in plant extracts, offers an alternative, efficient, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly method to produce well-defined geometries of nanoparticles15.

In this study, we focus on the preparation of a new Schiff base ligand of valacyclovir and 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyd, and its novel Cr(III), Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) complexes. Numerous methods, including elemental analysis, FTIR, ESR, UV–Vis, 1HNMR, and mass spectra in addition to thermal and magnetic studies, were used to characterize the produced Schiff base and its complexes. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to determine the particle size and morphology of the complexes. The antimicrobial and antitumor capabilities of the newly synthesized compounds were investigated. The AC electrical conductivity in solid state at various temperatures for the Schiff base ligand and its complexes were tested. Computational studies including DFT, and molecular docking have been carried out. Additionally, DNA cleavage for the ligand and its complexes was examined.

Experimental

Materials

All materials used were provided by Sigma or Aldrich. They included valacyclovir (VACV), 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyd, LiOH·H2O, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), EDTA, CrCl3·6H2O, MnCl2·4H2O, CoCl2·6H2O, NiCl2·6H2O, CuCl2·2H2O, ZnCl2, and nitric acid. The solvents used, ethanol, methanol, dimethylformamide (DMF) and diethyl ether, were either spectroscopically pure or had undergone prescribed purification processes16 and tested for their spectral purity.

Instrumentation and methods

The instruments that were employed in this study were those that previously discussed elsewhere17. The size and morphology of the complexes were examined under a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL 1010 Japan) using a standard protocol after loading on carbon-coated copper grides. The antimicrobial activities were screened against Gram positive (Staphylococcus aureus, ATCC 25923) and Gram negative (Escherichia coli, ATCC 25922) bacteria beside the unicellular fungus (Candida albicans, ATCC 10231) by applying the standardized disc—agar diffusion method18,19. Gaussian 09 W program was used to study the 3D-optimized molecular structures of the Schiff base ligand and its complexes by density functional theory (DFT) with Becke’s three-parameter exchange, and Lee–Yang–Parr correlation functional (B3LYP) with a combination of 6-311G++ (2d, p) basis set for the ligand, and LanL2DZ basis set for the complexes20,21. To evaluate the binding mode of the synthesized compounds on DNA, which is related to their activity, a molecular docking procedure was performed. Utilizing the Molecular Operating Environment (MOE, 2015.10) software22, all molecular modeling studies were carried out. All minimizations were carried out with MOE until an RMSD gradient of 0.05 kcal mol−1 Å−1 with MMFF94x force field and the partial charges were automatically determined. Gel electrophoresis experiment is used to perform DNA cleavage. Gel electrophoresis is a common technique for examining the interactions of compounds with nucleic acids: separation of molecules depending on their relative rate of movement through a gel when subjected to an electric field. A wide range of frequency, from 100 to 8 × 106 Hz, and temperature, from 308 to 418 K, were used to study the AC conductivity (σac) of Schiff base ligand and its complexes.

In vitro antitumor activity

Antitumor activities of the investigated compounds were recorded towards Hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, HepG-2 cells (ATCC No. HB-8064), on microplate reader (Sunrise, Tecan, Inc, USA) using 490 nm filters, and compared with the standard drug cis-platin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinium). The cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA). The experiments were performed in the tissue culture unit at Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. Graphed prism software23,24 (San Diego, CA.USA) was used to calculate the 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50).

Synthesis of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB

The Schiff base ligand, 2-{(2-[(2,3-dihydroxy-benzylidene)-amino]-6-oxo-1H-purine-9-yl)methoxy}ethyl-2-amino-3-mehyl butanoate, DBAPB was synthesized using the suggested procedure as previously reported elsewhere25, Fig. 1. After being allowed to cool to room temperature, the product was filtered out, recrystallized from ethanol, and then dried under vacuum to give yellow crystals, with a yield of 70% and a melting point of 170 °C. Evidence for the suggested structure of the ligand, DBAPB, is provided by 1HNMR spectra. Figure 2a,b illustrates the 1HNMR spectral data (δ ppm) of the ligand in DMSO-d6 with and without D2O. The data revealed signals at 0.84–0.86 [d, 6H, 2CH3], 2.21 [m, 1H, –CH(CH3)2], 3.73 [t, 2H, –OCH2], 3.93 [d, 1H, –CH–NH2], 4.28 [t, 2H, CH2OCO], 5.36 [s, 2H, NCH2O], 6.54 [s, 2H, –NH2], 6.70–6.92 [m, 3H, Ar–H], 7.83 [s, 1H, Ar–H 5-membered ring], 8.50 [s, 1H, CH=N], 9.04 [s, 1H, NH (disappeared on adding D2O)], 10.67 [s, 1H, OH (disappeared on adding D2O)], 13.54 [s, 1H, OH (completely disappeared on adding D2O)26.

Figure 1
figure 1

Synthesis of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB.

Figure 2
figure 2

The 1HNMR spectra of the ligand, DBAPB, with D2O (a), without D2O (b), and Zn(II) complex 6 (c).

Synthesis of the metal complexes

Novel metal complexes of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB, have been prepared in EtOH in a 1:1 (M:L) molar ratio, in addition of CTAB (3 × 10–2 M), Malva parviflora extract (MP) (20%), or Spinacia oleracea extract (SO) (20%) in EtOH. [where, M = Cr(III), Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) or Zn(II)] By using the experimental procedures that previously reported27. The solid complexes obtained (in EtOH, CTAB/EtOH, SO/EtOH, MP/EtOH): Cr(III) complexes 1, 7, 8, 9, Mn(II) complexes 2, 11, 12, 13, Co(II) complexes 3, 15, 16, 17, Ni(II) complexes 4, 19, 20, 21, Cu(II) complexes 5, 23, 24, 25 and Zn(II) complexes 6, 29, 30, 31 were filtered off, ethanol-washed and finally vacuum-dried over anhydrous CaCl2. Table 1 contains the analytical and physical data for the metal complexes.

Table 1 Physicochemical properties of the metal complexes of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB.

Results and discussion

Characterization of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB

The results of elemental analysis, IR, 1HNMR, UV–Vis, and mass spectra studies confirmed the purity of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB. The findings confirmed the percentage of net chemical composing. Anal. Calcd % C, 54.05; H, 5.41; N, 18.92. Found %: C, 53.24; H, 5.10; N, 18.81. The formula weight (F.W. = 444.44) was confirmed by the molecular ion peak at m/z = 444.80 amu in the mass spectrum of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB, Fig. 3. The mass fragmentation pattern, Fig. 3, supported the DBAPB 's proposed structure. The typical bands for υ(OH) phenolic at 3453, 3413, υ(NH) at 3191, υ(C=O)ester at 1728, υ(C=O)amide at 1690, δ(NH) at 1632, υ(C=N)azomethine at 1603 cm−128, were observed in the IR spectrum (cm−1) of the ligand, DBAPB, Table 2. The electronic spectrum, λmax (nm), of the ligand (10−3 M in DMF) at room temperature showed three absorption bands at 293, 346, and 427 nm corresponded to the intramolecular charge transfer (CT) transitions within the entire molecule.

Figure 3
figure 3

Mass spectrum and mass fragmentation of the ligand, DBAPB.

Table 2 IR spectral data (cm−1) of the Schiff base ligand, DBAPB, and its metal complexes.

Characterization of the metal complexes

The compositions and chemical formulae listed in Table 1 were ascribed to the metal complexes 16 of the ligand, DBAPB. The results of the elemental analysis showed that all complexes formed with a 1:1 (M:L) stoichiometry. The molar conductance values (Ω) of the complexes 16, Table 1, in DMF (10–3 M) at room temperature ranged from 4.0 to 11.0 Ω−1cm2 mol−1. These values indicated that these complexes were non-electrolytes29 and that the chloride ions were contained within the coordination sphere.

Infrared spectra

The IR spectrum of the ligand, DBAPB, was compared to those of the metal complexes. The characteristic infrared spectral bands of the free ligand and its metal complexes, together with their assignments, are listed in Table 2. All the complexes 16 showed a broad band in the 3425–3455 cm−1 range that was attributed to the υ(OH) of the H2O and/or EtOH molecules associated with the complexes. The IR spectrum of the free ligand revealed two distinctive bands at 3453 and 3413 cm−1 which are attributed to the OH– phenolic frequencies. One of the υ(OH) phenolic bands was disappeared in the IR spectra of all metal complexes and the other band was almost coincident with the corresponding one of the free ligand indicating that one of the phenolic OH groups is deprotonated by the coordination phase, while the other phenolic-OH group was not involved in complex formation. In the IR spectra of the metal complexes, the band corresponding to υ(C=N) which was present at 1603 cm−1 in the IR spectrum of the free ligand, was shifted to a lower wave number by 8–17 cm−1, indicating the presence of the azomethine group's nitrogen atom in bonding with the metal ion30. The distinctive vibrations of the purinone moiety's (C=O)amide and the aliphatic side chain's (C=O)ester were essentially unaltered by the complexation, indicating that these groups were not involved in coordination. According to the IR spectral data we can conclude that the ligand, DBAPB, act as a bidentate and coordinated with the metal ions through the azomethine-N and the phenolic-O centers, in a mono-deprotonated form. The newly formed bands at 501–507 and 417–459 cm−1 in the IR spectra of the complexes were attributed to the metal–oxygen and the metal-nitrogen vibrations, respectively31, and confirmed the metal–ligand bonding.

1HNMR spectra

In order to confirm the bonding mode between the ligand, DBAPB, and the Zn(II) ion. The 1HNMR spectrum of Zn(II) complex 6, Fig. 2c, was recorded. The signals detected at δ 1.22, 2.41 and 3.63 ppm characteristic for the specific protons of coordinated EtOH in the Zn(II) complex. The singlet detected at δ 13.54 ppm due to the phenolic-OH proton in the free ligand, is not present in the Zn(II) complex, indicating that the phenolic-OH group was deprotonated through coordination with the metal ion. While the singlet (δ 10.67 ppm) for proton of the other phenolic-OH group appearing approximately in the same position as in the free ligand, suggesting the other phenolic-OH group was not involved in complex formation. A chelation of the azomethine-N atom with the metal ion is indicated by the shifting of the band of the azomethine proton (–CH=N–) from δ 8.50 ppm in the 1HNMR spectrum of free ligand to δ 8.40 ppm in the 1HNMR spectrum of Zn(II) complex 6. These findings coincide with the conclusions drawn from IR spectral studies.

Thermal analysis

Thermal analysis is used extensively to study the stability and decomposition characteristics of the metal complexes. The thermal behavior of the synthesized complexes 16 have been investigated to create various decomposition processes and to validate the proposed stoichiometry. TGA was performed in the nitrogen environment between room temperature and 900 °C. The results of the TGA investigation of complexes 16, Table 3, showing a strong correlation with the weight loss values measured and found.

Table 3 Results of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of metal complexes of the ligand, DBABP.

The novel complexes 16 prepared in EtOH, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 30 prepared in SO/EtOH, and 10, 14, 18, 22, 27, 32 produced after heating the corresponding complexes 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30, respectively, at 200 °C for 1 h displayed different thermal decomposition behavior (thermal stabilities). The TG curves, Fig. 4, of the Cu(II) complexes 5, 24 and 27 were described in detail as illustrative examples. Five decomposition steps were showed in the thermogram of complex 5 with midpoint temperatures of 137, 277, 428, 611 and 772 °C, respectively. Four decomposition stages were showed in the thermogram of complex 24 with midpoint temperatures of 61, 145, 250 and 422 °C, respectively. While the thermogram of complex 27 showed three decomposition steps at midpoint temperatures of 76, 267, and 422 °C, respectively, indicating their thermal stability in the following order: Complex 5 > Complex 27 > Complex 24.

Figure 4
figure 4

TGA–Dr TGA curves of the Cu(II) complexes 5, 24 and 27.

Electronic spectra and magnetic moment measurements

The magnetic moments of the examined metal complexes as well as the electronic absorption spectra in DMF (10–3 M) were measured at room temperature. Table 4 displayed the electronic spectral data and the magnetic moment values (B.M.) of the Cr(III), Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Cu(II) complexes. The Cr(III) complex 1 displayed two absorption bands at 605 and 665 nm corresponded to the transitions 4A2g(F) → 4T2g(F) and 4A2g(F) → 4T1g(P), respectively, in an octahedral configuration. The octahedral geometry around the Cr(III) ion was confirmed by the Cr(III) complex's magnetic moment value of 3.35 B.M.32. One absorption band was exhibited in the electronic spectrum of Mn(II) complex 2 at 586 nm as a result of the 6A1g → 4T2g(G) transition in an octahedral geometry. The octahedral geometry of the Mn(II) complex was confirmed by the Mn(II) complex's magnetic moment value of 5.22 B.M.33. Co(II) complex 3 displayed a distinctive band at 580 nm, which may be attributed to 4T1g(F) → 4A2g(F) transition in an octahedral configuration. The magnetic moment value = 4.42 B.M., which indicated the presence of three unpaired electrons in an octahedral arrangement34. Electronic spectrum of the Ni(II) complex 4 revealed two bands at 597 and 650 nm corresponded to the 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(F) and 3A2g(F) → 3T1g(P) transitions, respectively, in an octahedral stereochemistry. The magnetic moment value is found to be 3.19 B.M., indicating the octahedral geometry around the Ni(II) ion35. The electronic spectrum of Cu(II) complex 5 contains two bands at 605 and 673 nm attributed to 2B1g → 2Eg and 2B1g → 2B2g transitions, respectively. The magnetic moment value = 2.14 B.M. which pointing to the presence of one unpaired electron in an octahedral configuration36. The magnetic moment value of the present Cu(II) complex was found to be 2.14 B.M.; which is quite high. This finding suggest spin–spin ferromagnetic coupling interaction, moments of the two unpaired electrons in the two adjacent Cu(II) ions are parallel to each other (↑ ↑), and the spins of the two electrons are in the same direction, which increases the magnetic moment value and become higher than the expected value.

Table 4 Electronic absorption spectral data (in 10–3 M DMF solution) and magnetic moment values of the metal complexes of the ligand, DBABP.

ESR spectra

The ESR spectra of powder Mn(II), Co(II), and Cu(II) complexes 2, 3, and 5, respectively, were recorded at room temperature and represented in Fig. 5. The ESR spectrum of Mn(II) complex 2, Fig. 5a, showed a single isotropic signal split into six hyperfine signals due to interaction with the nuclear spin of 55Mn37. The geff -value (2.1137) of Mn(II) complex is greater than that of a free electron (2.0023), indicating that the ligand and Mn(II) ion are bound together covalently. The ESR spectrum of Co(II) complex 3, Fig. 5b, displayed one signal divided into 8 lines due to the hyperfine interaction with nuclear spin of 59Co. The geff-value of Co(II) complex is 2.0129. The positive deviation from the free electron value (2.0023), suggesting the covalent character of the bond between the Co(II) ion and the ligand38. The X-band ESR spectrum of Cu(II) complex 5, Fig. 5c, showed two signals with two different g-values, 2.113 and 2.059 for g׀׀ and g, respectively, and gav = 2.095. The shape of the ESR spectrum with the g-tensor values revealed that the examined Cu(II) complex 5 possesses octahedral geometry39. g׀׀ > g > 2.0023, suggesting the unpaired electron lies in the dx2-y2 orbital giving 2B1g as the ground state40. The g׀׀ value < 2.3, indicating covalent nature for Cu-L bond41. The exchange interaction term (G) can be calculated using the formula G = (g׀׀ − 2.0023)/(g − 2.0023). The local tetragonal axes are parallel or just slightly misaligned if G > 4.0, while a substantial exchange coupling and misalignment is noticeable if G < 4.042. The estimated G-value for the Cu(II) complex 5 was 1.94, indicating that the exchange coupling effects were operative between Cu(II) centers in the current Cu(II) complex43.

Figure 5
figure 5

X-band ESR spectra of Mn(II) complex 2 (a), Co(II) complex 3 (b), Cu(II) complex 5 (c), and the standard (DPPH) (d).

Powder XRD studies

X-ray diffraction of the Cr(III) complexes 7, 8, 9, Mn(II) complexes 11, 12, 13, Co(II) complexes 15, 16, 17, Ni(II) complexes 19, 20, 21, Cu(II) complexes 23, 24, 25 and Zn(II) complexes 29, 30, 31, which prepared in (CTAB/EtOH, SO/EtOH, and MP/EtOH), respectively, have been studied, Fig. 6. According to X-ray diffractograms, the complexes 7, 12, 15, 23, and 30 have crystalline nature, whereas the complexes 8, 9, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, 29, and 31 are amorphous. Debye Scherrer equation (d = Kλ/βCosθ) can be used to determine the particle size44. Where: D, K, λ, β, and θ are the particle size, the dimensionless shape factor, the X-ray wavelength, the full width at half maximum of the diffraction peak, and the diffraction angle, respectively. The crystalline nature complexes 7, 12, 15, 23, and 30 had average crystallite sizes of 21.10, 19.95, 3.00, 13.83 and 22.70 nm, respectively, indicating that the particles of these complexes were in nano scale.

Figure 6
figure 6

X-ray diffraction patterns of the nano Cr(III) 7, Mn(II) 12, Co(II) 15, Cu(II) 23 and Zn(II) 30 complexes.

TEM studies

Transmission electron microscope (TEM) is widely used technique for detecting the particle size and form of solid materials, it is frequently used to reveal numerous nano metal complexes45. TEM analysis was conducted on Cr(III), Mn(II), Co(II), and Cu(II) complexes 1, 2, 3, and 5 prepared in EtOH, 8, 12, 16, and 24 prepared in SO/EtOH, 10, 14, 18, and 27 produced after heating the corresponding complexes 8, 12, 16, and 24, respectively, at 200 °C for 1 h, as well as Cu(II) complexes 23 and 25 prepared in CTAB/EtOH and MP/EtOH, respectively, 26 and 28 produced after heating the corresponding complexes 23 and 25 respectively, at 200 °C for 1 h, to study the morphology and particle size of them. TEM images of the Co(II) complexes 3, 16, 18, and Cu(II) complexes 5, 23, 24, 25 were showed in Fig. 7. The micrographs represent distinct particle forms in nanocrystalline matrices. All the samples analyzed show a consistent and homogeneous surface morphology. The images show the uniformity and proximity of particle shapes, which supports the existence of identical matrices. The inclusion of strongly symmetrical spherical anions in the complexation sphere typically results in the existence of the spherical character. The particle sizes of complexes 1, 2, 3 and 5 were 11.87, 45.15, 28.6 and 18.06 nm, respectively. The particle size of complexes 8, 12, 16, 24 decreased from 10.05, 16.90, 15.10 and 14.48 nm to 4.33, 3.22, 5.11 and 7.77 nm in their resulting residues 10, 14, 18 and 27, respectively. Additionally, the TEM images, Figs. 10 and 11, demonstrated decrease in particle size of Cu(II) complexes 23 and 25 from 14.28 and 8.6 nm to 3.14 and 3.51 nm in their resulting residues 26 and 28, respectively.

Figure 7
figure 7

TME images of the nano Co(II) complexes 3, 16, 18 and the nano Cu(II) complexes 5, 23, 24, 25.

Molecular modeling and DFT calculation studies

Geometrical optimization

The structures of the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cr(III), Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) complexes 16, respectively, were optimized. The optimized molecular structures of the ligand, DBAPB, its Ni(II) and Zn(II) complexes 4 and 6, respectively, were shown in Figs. 8, 9 and 10. The bond lengths and bond angles were evaluated and listed in Tables 5 and 6. The data showed that the bond lengths in the ligand, DBAPB, were somewhat changed upon complexation, particularly for the coordinated azomethine-N, C(11)-N(18) = 1.295 Å, and phenolate-O C(17)-O(18) = 1.348 Å, atoms. The computed azomethine (C=N) and phenolate (C–O) bond lengths in the complexes were in the ranges 1.284–1.371 and 1.323–1.356 Å, respectively, revealing slightly elongation of these bonds due to coordination with the metal ions. The M–N and M–O bond lengths were found to be in the range 1.948–2.198 and 1.852–2.199 Å, respectively. Also, the bond angles of the ligand were changed due to coordination. A greater change occurs for the angles that involving the coordinated azomethine N- and phenolate O- atoms, demonstrating their bonding with the metal ions. The estimated bond angles around the metal ions were found to be in the ranges of 76.103–171.099, 85.769–173.087, 78.7234–175.299 and 79.025–176.931° for Cl–M–O, Cl–M–N, O–M–O and N–M–O, angles (in all complexes except complex 6), respectively, in addition Cl–Cr–Cl angle was found to be 171.477° (in the complex 1). The values of bond angles indicated the octahedral configuration around the metal ions with d2sp3 or sp3d2 hybrid orbitals46. In contrast, the assessed bond angles around Zn(II) ion in the complex 6 were 87.195–125.806, 126.280, 121.355, and 93.815–102.508° for O-Zn-Cl, N-Zn-Cl, O–Zn–O and O-Zn-N angles, respectively. This suggests the tetrahedral geometry around Zn(II) ion47, which are consistent with the obtained experimental results.

Figure 8
figure 8

The optimized geometry and HOMO–LUMO energies for the ligand DBAPB.

Figure 9
figure 9

The optimized geometry and HOMO–LUMO energies for the Ni(II) complex 4.

Figure 10
figure 10

The optimized geometry and HOMO–LUMO energies for the Zn(II) complex 6.

Table 5 Evaluated bond lengths of the ligand, DBAPB, and its metal complexes.
Table 6 Evaluated bond angles of the ligand, DBAPB, and its metal complexes.

Frontier molecular orbitals HOMO–LUMO

The HOMO and LUMO values of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes 16, were extracted from 3D plots of HOMO and LUMO, Figs. 8, 9 and 10, and the (HOMO–LUMO) gap energies (∆E) were calculated and listed in Table 7. The HOMO–LUMO energy gap explains the concluding charge transfer interaction within the molecule and is useful in determining molecular electrical transport properties. A molecule with a high frontier orbital gap (HOMO–LUMO energy gap) has low chemical reactivity and high kinetic stability because it is energetically unfavorable to add an electron to the high-lying LUMO in order to remove electrons from the low-lying HOMO. The compounds that have a high HOMO–LUMO energy gap are stable, and hence are chemically harder than compounds having a small HOMO–LUMO energy gap48. The sequence of the exact energy gap values of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes is as follows: Complex 2 < Complex 4 < Complex 1 < Complex 6 < Complex 5 < DBAPB < Complex 3, which demonstrates that all metal complexes (except complex 3) are more reactive than the free ligand, DBAPB, and the Mn(II) complex 2 exhibits the highest chemical reactivity in comparison to other complexes48. Also, the chemical reactivity values of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes: electronegativity (χ), chemical hardness (η), chemical potential (μ), electrophilicity (ω), and softness (S) were calculated and tabulated in Table 7. It was reported that a molecule is thought to be softer and more chemically reactive when its energy gap is small48. The softness (S) value of Mn(II) complex 2 was higher than that of the free ligand, DBAPB, and other complexes, which confirmed the higher chemical reactivity of this complex. Moreover, the values of the dipole moments were evaluated and shown in Table 7. The computed dipole moment (D) for the free ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes taking the following sequence: Complex 3 > Complex 2 > Complex 5 > DBAPB > Complex 6 > Complex 1 > Complex 4, revealing that the Co(II) complex 3 has the highest polarity. According to the results of computational molecular properties, the examined metal complexes may therefore exhibit high bio-efficiency due to their high chemical reactivity than the free ligands, which is consistent with the reported experimental data.

Table 7 Evaluated quantum chemical parameters of the ligand, DBAPB, and its metal complexes.

Biological activity studies

Antimicrobial activity

By using the disc diffusion method, the antimicrobial activity of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes was examined in vitro against a variety of pathogenic bacteria and fungi including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans, and compared to the well-known standard medications: chloramphenicol (40 mm), cefoxitin (15 mm), and fluconazole (30 mm), respectively. The results obtained, Table 8, showed that the ligand, DBAPB, is inactive against all tested species except for E. coli with an inhibition zone 20 mm. The majority of the tested metal complexes showed potent antibacterial activity against both E. coli and S. aureus. The higher activity toward S. aureus appeared by complexes Co(II) and Cu(II), 15 and 23, with inhibition zone values 29 and 30 mm, respectively, and higher than the standard drug cefoxitin (15 mm), revealing the high efficiencies of these complexes as antibacterial agents against S. aureus. The higher efficiency against E. coli was shown in the complexes Ni(II) and Zn(II), 20 and 29, with inhibition zone values 30 and 25 mm, respectively. None of the metal complexes under investigation demonstrated antifungal activity against C. albicans with the exception of the complexes Cr(III), Mn(II) and Ni(II) 7, 11 and 19, which exhibited high activities with inhibition zone values 20, 20 and 25 mm, respectively. The antimicrobial activity results suggested that there is enhancement in activity of the free ligands upon coordination with the metal ions which can be explained based on chelation theory. Liposolubility is an important factor that controls the antimicrobial activity. On chelation the polarity of the metal ion will be reduced due to overlap of ligand orbital and partial sharing of the positive charge of the metal ion with donor groups. The increasing of delocalization of π-electrons over the whole chelate ring, resulting in an increase in the lipophilicity of the metal complexes. This improved lipophilicity enhances the concentration of complexes in the lipid membrane and limits the multiplicity of microorganisms. It is suggested that the antimicrobial activity of the complexes is due to either by killing the microbes or inhibiting their multiplication by blocking their active sites49.

Table 8 In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of the ligand, DBAPB, and its metal complexes.

Antitumor activity

To study the antitumor effect, the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cu(II) complex 5 prepared in EtOH, in addition of its Cu(II) complexes 23, 24, 25 prepared in CTAB/EtOH, SO/EtOH, MP/EtOH, respectively, and their residues 26, 27, 28 produced after heating at 200 °C for 1 h, have been tested against Hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG-2 cells). The common drug cis-platin was utilized for comparison (IC50 = 3.27 μg mL−1 against HepG-2 cell line). The IC50 value, which refers to the compound concentration that suppresses tumor cell growth by 50%, was used to specify the antitumor activity. Strong, moderate, and weak antitumor agents are classified as compounds with IC50 values less than 5.00, in the range of 5.00–10.00, and in the range of 10.00–25.00 μg mL−1, respectively50. The data obtained revealed that all screened compounds displayed an inhibition of cell viability and their IC50 (μg mL−1) values demonstrated in Fig. 11. While the ligand, DBAPB, and other tested complexes 5, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27 showed weak antitumor activities, with IC50 values in the range 24–211 μg mL−1 against HepG-2 cells., the residue 28, which produced after heating the complex 25 at 200 °C for 1 h, exhibited strong antitumor activity with IC50 value 4.85 μg mL−1. The enhancement in antitumor activity after thermal treatment for nano-scale Cu(II) complex 25 may be explained due to the decrease in particle size of this complex under influence of heating, which facilitates the penetration of Cu(II) complex particles into the tumor cell and inhibits its growth. The highest cytotoxic activity of nano Cu(II) complex may be due to the high affinity of Cu(II) ions to bind DNA than any other divalent cation, thus promoting DNA oxidation50.

Figure 11
figure 11

In vitro antitumor activity (IC50) of the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cu(II) complexes and their restudies against HepG-2 cells.

DNA cleavage study

Two experimental procedures-fixed DNA concentration with various complex concentrations and fixed complex concentration with various DNA concentrations- were used to examine the ability of Cu(II) complex 24 to cleave DNA. Figure 12 depicts the electrophoretic separation of DNA induced by the complex 24. The findings demonstrated the ability of examined Cu(II) complex 24, at the concentration of 1 mg mL−1, to degrade DNA at the concentration of 800 ng, indicating that this complex may function as antitumor agent and prevent the growth of tumor cells, because of its DNA-binding capacity.

Figure 12
figure 12

Electrophoretic separation of DNA induced by Cu(II) complex 24. (A) Fixed concentration of DNA with different concentrations of the complex (lane L- marker 1 kb DNA Ladder, lane 1: DNA control, lane 2: DNA + DMSO, lane 3: 400 ng DNA + 2 mg mL−1 of the complex, lane 4: 400 ng DNA + 1 mg ml−1 of the complex, lane 5: 400 ng DNA + 0.5 mg mL−1 of the complex). (B) Fixed concentration of complex with different concentrations of DNA (lane L-marker 1 kb DNA Ladder, lane 1: DNA control, lane 2: DNA + DMSO, lane 3: 200 ng DNA + 1 mg mL−1 of the complex, lane 4: 400 ng DNA + 1 mg mL−1 of the complex, lane 5: 800 ng DNA + 1 mg mL−1 of the complex).

Molecular docking

Molecular Operating Environment (MOE, 2015.10) software22 was used to conduct a computational molecular docking analysis of the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cu(II) complex 5 using DNA duplex of the dodecamer sequence (PDB ID: 1BNA). All minimizations were carried out with MOE until an RMSD gradient of 0.05 kcal mol−1 Å−1 with MMFF94x force field and the partial charges were automatically estimated. The synthetic DNA dodecamer d(CpGpCpGpApApTpTpCpGpCpG) crystal structure has been refined to 1.9-A resolution. The molecule forms slightly more than one full turn of right- handed double-stranded B helix. The two ends of the helix overlap and interlock minor grooves with nearby molecules up and down, producing a 19° bend in helix axis over the 11-base-pair steps of the dodecamer51. The data obtained, Table 9, showed that the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cu(II) complex 5 interact with DNA helix at the nucleotides DG-A4, DT-A7, DT-B20, DC-B21, DG-B22 and DG-A10, DG-B16, DT-B19 with binding energies (docking scores) of − 7.9549 and − 6.8852 kcal mol−1, respectively. The interacting groups with DNA were NH2, OH(phenolic), CH2, O=C–O, and NH2, O=C–O, azomethine (C=N), H2O for the ligand, H3L, and its Cu(II) complex 5, respectively, by hydrogen bonding, as shown in Fig. 13. The docking results demonstrated strong interactions of both the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cu(II) complex 5, revealing their capacity to cleave DNA and their potent inhibitory effects on tumor cells.

Table 9 Results of docking interactions to DNA of the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cu(II) complex 5.
Figure 13
figure 13

2D & 3D diagrams showing interaction between the ligand, DBAPB, (A), and its Cu(II) complex 5 (B) with DNA by molecular docking.

Electrical conductivity measurements

The electrical conductivity (σac) of the ligand, DBAPB, and its solid complexes was measured as a function of temperature (T) over the range of 308–408 K, and a frequency range 0.1 kHz- 8 MHz using thin-film samples. Table 10 showed that as the temperature increases, the σac of the ligand, DBAPB, and its Cu(II) complexes 5, 24, 27, as well as its Mn(II), Co(II), and Ni(II) complexes, 12, 16, and 20, respectively, increases. This suggests that the conduction process is thermally activated. In fact, several models were suggested to explain the conduction mechanisms in the materials of semiconductive behavior. For the compounds under consideration, the temperature dependence of the electrical conductivity is good described by the Arrhenius model52. This model assumes that the conduction mechanism is thermally activated, and it represents the relationship between electrical conductivity and temperature, shown in Fig. 14, by the equation: σ = σoexp(− Ea/kBT), where σo, Ea, and kB are the pre-exponential factor, the activation energy for electrical conduction, and the Boltzmann's constant, respectively. The observed linear relationship between lnσac and 1/T showed that there was an increase in σac with temperature, which indicated that the compounds under investigation act as semiconductors. The mobility (μ) values, which are given by the formula: μ = σ/ne, (where e is the electron charge), and the charge carrier concentration (n) values, which given by the formula: n = 2(2πm*kBT/h2)3/2exp(− Ea/kBT), (where m* is the effective mass of the charge carrier and assumed to be the rest mass of electron), were calculated and listed in Table 11 in order to characterize the mechanism of the conduction process. The compounds under study had mobility (μ) values in the 10–23–10–37 cm2 V−1 s−1 range, which are less than 1 cm2 V−1 s−1, indicated that the conduction process occurs through a hopping mechanism. The temperature dependence of the charge carrier concentration (n) in the low and high temperature ranges, Table 12, revealed that as the temperature increases, more charge carriers participate to the conduction process, confirming that the conduction process is of the thermally activated type.

Table 10 Variation of AC conductivity (σac) of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes 5, 12, 16, 20, 24, 27 with temperature, at frequency = 10 kHz.
Figure 14
figure 14

Temperature dependence of σac of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes 5, 12, 16, 20, 24, 27.

Table 11 Electrical properties of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes 5, 12, 16, 20, 24, 27 at 308 K.
Table 12 Variation of charge carrier concentration (n) of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes 5, 12, 16, 20, 24, 27 with temperature.

Conclusion

[Cr(DBAPB)(H2O)2Cl2], [Mn(DBAPB)(EtOH)3Cl], [Co(DBAPB)(EtOH)2(H2O)Cl].H2O, [Ni(DBAPB)(EtOH)3Cl]. EtOH, [Cu(DBAPB)(H2O)3Cl] and [Zn(DBAPB)(EtOH)Cl] were synthesized by the reaction of Cr(III), Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II) with the Schiff base ligand, (2-{(2-[(2,3-dihydroxy-benzylidene)-amino]-6-oxo-1H-purine-9-yl)methoxy}ethyl-2-amino-3-mehylbutanoate), DBAPB. Thermal, magnetic, spectroscopic, and analytical methods were used to characterize all reported complexes. The ligand, DBAPB, behaves as bidentate towards the metal ions. Except for the Zn(II) complex, which had tetrahedral structure, all the examined complexes were suggested to have octahedral geometry. The findings of the thermal decomposition showed that the newly synthesized complexes have a high thermal stability. According to the XRD and TEM data, the particles of the examined complexes were situated in nano range. The data obtained from the theoretical study agreed with the experimental results. Biological activity of the ligand, DBAPB, and its complexes concluded that the metal ion in the complexes enhanced the antimicrobial activity compared to the free ligand. Additionally, all compounds under investigation showed an inhibition of HEPG-2 cell growth, and the antitumor activity of the complexes was improved after heating of them at 200 °C for 1 h. Moreover, the DNA cleavage investigation demonstrated the capacity of the examined Cu(II) complex to degrade DNA. The molecular docking study indicated that the ligand, DBAPB, and its investigated Cu(II) complex are capable of cleaving DNA. The electrical conductivity studies indicated the semiconducting character for the ligand, DBAPB, and its investigated complexes within the temperature range 308–408 K, and the conduction process is carried out via the hopping mechanism. The obtained results showed the suggested structures of the complexes under investigation, as demonstrated in Fig. 15.

Figure 15
figure 15

Suggested coordination of the investigated complexes 1–6.