Abstract
We evaluated the addition of Hermetia illucens larvae (BSFL) fat to broiler diets compared to that of soybean oil (SO), rapeseed oil (RO), palm oil (PO), palm kernel fatty acid distillate (PKFD), poultry fat (PF), pig lard (PL), and beef tallow (BT) on performance, meat quality, and cecal microbiota abundance. BSFL addition reduced the feed conversion ratio compared to PO, PF, and BT addition and improved nutrient digestibility at 14 days and 28 days of age. BSFL addition enhanced broiler immune responses compared with SO, PO, and PL by increasing IgA levels; compared to PO by increasing IgG levels; and compared to PL by increasing IgY and IL-6 levels. Moreover, broiler free triiodothyronine levels increased when BSFL was added. Reduced drip loss after 7 days was observed in the RO, PO, PF, PL, and BT groups, while the salt-induced water uptake in the PL group was greater than that in the BSFL group. Compared with the SO group, BSFL addition increased C18:3 and overall n-3 FAs in breast meat. BSFL fat in broiler diets leads to outcomes that are more similar to those of plant oils than to those of animal fats, particularly regarding nutrient digestiblity and immune response.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Insects are increasingly being recognized as sustainable feed alternatives for animal nutrition because of their nutrient content and relatively low environmental impact1. Their biomass is rich in crude protein (30–70%) and crude fat (10–50%)2, rendering them viable substitutes for conventional feed materials3. Specifically, the dietary fat derived from black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae (BSFL) is favored because of its substantial metabolizable energy level4 and noteworthy concentration of medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs), specifically lauric acid (C12:0)3. MCFAs are known for their simple digestibility and efficient absorption5, and they are directly absorbed through simple diffusion by intestinal enterocytes6 independent of bile secretion7. Moreover, MCFAs, especially lauric acid, have antimicrobial properties and support overall gut health1,6.
Dietary fats sourced from plants and animals significantly affect broiler performance, including immune function, meat quality, and the gut microbiota8,9. Additionally, numerous studies have investigated the effects of various levels of BSFL dietary fats on poultry, collectively revealing that its incorporation into broiler diets has substantial potential for enhancing growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, and gut microbiota composition without any detrimental impact on gut histology10,11,12,13. Furthermore, the implementation of BSFL fats significantly impacts the fatty acid (FA) profile of breast muscle, including a pronounced effect on n-3 FA deficiency14.
There is a limited understanding regarding how fats from BSFL compare with other common dietary fats in broiler nutrition. Therefore, the present study focused on the direct comparison of BSFL fat as a reference group to eight selected dietary fats in broiler nutrition. In the available literature, the differences between dietary fats (of plant and animal origin) have frequently been studied; however, BSFLs have not been compared with a wide spectrum of energy source ingredients. On the basis of our knowledge, the current study is the first to evaluate the effects of BSFL dietary fat inclusion in broiler chicken diets, emphasizing comparisons with a broad range of commonly used plant oils and animal fats in terms of growth performance, nutrient utilization, internal organ morphometry, liver histomorphology, selected serum biochemical and immunological indices, hormone concentrations, cecal microbiota populations, carcass characteristics, breast muscle and liver quality, and sensory meat analyses.
Results
Growth performance
In general, no significant (P > 0.05) change in body weight gain (BWG) was observed throughout the entire experiment (Table 1), except in the first week, when feeding PKFD increased (P = 0.006) the BWG compared with that in the broilers fed BSFL fat. For the feed intake (FI), no differences (P > 0.05) were found between animals fed BSFL and those fed other selected dietary fat sources. The feed conversion ratios (FCRs) displayed significant (P < 0.05) variations during the 1st (1–7 days), 3rd (15–21 days), and 5th (28–35 days) weeks, and throughout the entire period (1–35 days). During the first week, the FCR was lower (P = 0.016) in the PKFD treatment compared to the BSFL group. By the third week, the FCR increased (P < 0.001) in the PF and BT groups. Similarly, in the fifth week, the FCR increased (P < 0.001) in the RO, PO, and PF groups, whereas no significant changes (P > 0.05) were observed in the other treatments compared with BSFL during these periods. Over the entire 35-day period, broilers fed PO, PF, or BT presented a significant increase in FCR (P < 0.001). In contrast, FCR in the SO, RO, PKFD, and PL groups remained comparable (P > 0.05) to that of BSFL treatment.
Nutrient retention and digestibility
Calculations performed on the 14th day indicated an increase (P < 0.001) in dry matter (DM) digestibility in broiler fed SO, which decreased with BT feeding (Table 2). However, nitrogen retention decreased (P < 0.001) in the BT group, and the apparent metabolizable energy corrected to zero nitrogen balance (AMEN) decreased (P < 0.001) for both the PL and BT groups compared with the BSFL group. Additionally, on the 28th day, differences were observed for the ether extract (EE) (P < 0.001), which was decreased in the SO group, and the AMEN value (P = 0.008) was reduced by the PL and BT treatments, in contrast to that of the BSFL group. By the end of the experiment (35th day), there was no notable change (P > 0.05) in the coefficient of ileal digestibility (CAID) values of DM, EE, CP, and apparent ileal digestible energy (AIDE). Furthermore, no differences (P > 0.05) were detected in the total tract amino acid digestibility coefficient (35 day) between animals fed BSFL and those fed other selected dietary fat sources (Supplementary Table S1). The activity of each selected pancreatic enzyme (trypsin, lipase, or amylase) did not change (P > 0.05) between the reference group and the experimental treatment groups.
Selected organ weights and lengths
The selected organ weights, expressed as percentages of body weight (% of BW), along with the immune organ indexes (% of BW), and selected gastrointestinal tract (GIT) segment lengths (cm kg−1 BW) were calculated (Supplementary Table S2). The only differences (P < 0.001) were observed in the jejunum, where PKFD feeding decreased the jejunal weight compared with that following BSFL feeding.
Liver histomorphology
No differences were detected in parenchymal eclipse (P = 0.201), the presence of vacuoles (P = 0.157), the number of congestions (P = 0.506), the number of necrotic lesions (P = 0.012 ANOVA, P > 0.05 post hoc test), or the number of fibrotic lesions (P = 0.146) between animals fed BSFL and those fed other dietary fat sources (Supplementary Table S3). Fat vacuolization was not detected in any treatment group; thus, the table does not show this parameter. Figure 1 provides visual examples of the analyzed samples.
Selected serum biochemical and physiological indices
The administration of dietary fats in broiler diets had effects on selected serum biochemical parameters in the animals, with significant differences detected for aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P = 0.022) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (P = 0.001). The AST concentration was reduced by PF group, whereas the ALP level was lower in the PO and PKFD treatment than in the BSFL group (Table 3). Additionally, differences were observed for all the selected immune indices except TNF-α (P = 0.426). A decrease in IgA (P = 0.022) in the SO, PO, and PL groups was noted; however, a reduced level of IgG (P = 0.007) in the PO group and lower values of IgY (P = 0.002) and IL-6 (P = 0.008) in the PL group were observed in contrast to those in the BSFL treatment. However, regarding hormone levels, a difference was noted only for free triiodothyronine (FT3) (P < 0.001) in the BSFL group (Table 3). Additionally, in contrast to those in the BSFL group, the FT3 concentrations of animals fed each of the tested fats (SO, PO, RO, PKFD, PF, PL, and BT) decreased significantly.
Cecal microbiota populations
The microbiota analysis revealed differences in the total number of microorganisms, as determined by 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining, with the PF and PL groups exhibiting a notable increase (P = 0.047) compared with the BSFL group in terms of the overall microbiota count. However, all of the selected microbial populations, including the Bacteroides‒Prevotella cluster, Clostridium leptum subgroup, Clostridium perfringens, Enterobacteriaceae, Clostridium coccoides‒Eubacterium rectale cluster, and Lactobacillus sp./Enterococcus sp., showed no changes in numbers (P > 0.05) between broilers fed BSFL and those fed the other selected dietary fat sources (Supplementary Table S4).
Carcass and meat quality traits
The administration of different dietary fats significantly affected carcass traits. Drumstick yield increased (P = 0.004) in animals fed BSFL compared with those fed BT, while thigh yield decreased (P = 0.010) in animals fed BSFL compared with those fed RO and PO (Supplementary Table S5). However, no differences (P > 0.05) were detected regarding other traits, such as final BW; carcass weight; and carcass, breast, leg quarter, wing, or giblet yields, among the broilers fed dietary fats relative to those fed BSFL.
The breast muscle pH in animals fed BT was lower immediately after slaughter (P = 0.002), 20 min (P < 0.001), and 2 h (P < 0.001) than that of broilers fed BSFL. The meat pH was lower (P < 0.001) in PF treatment compared to BSFL group only after 2 h (Table 4). However, no significant difference (P > 0.05) was recorded after 24 h in terms of the pH of the pectoralis majors in any group. The PF, PL, and BT treatments had reduced drip loss after 48 h (P = 0.021) than BSFL group. Furthermore, the treatments where animal fats were applied, along with those fed RO and PO, presented lower drip loss (P < 0.001) after 7 days than did the BSFL group. The PL group presented greater (P < 0.001) salt-induced water uptake (SALT) than did the BSFL group. Changes in the color of the breast meat showed that a* index decreased (P = 0.006) in the PL group, whereas the b* index increased (P = 0.007) in the BT group compared with the reference group. There were no changes (P > 0.05) in liver color.
Breast meat and liver fatty acid profile
In contrast to the BSFL treatment, the SO group resulted in significantly less (P < 0.001) linolenic acid (C18:3 n3) and overall n-3 FAs in breast meat (Table 5). Unlike BSFL treatment, PKFD decreased PUFAs (P < 0.001) and increased the n6/n3 ratio (P = 0.002) and thrombogenic index (TI; P < 0.001). Compared with the BSFL group, the PL treatment showed significantly lower levels of palmitic acid (C16:0), saturated fatty acids (SFAs), atherogenic index (AI), and thrombogenic index (TI) (P < 0.001). Additionally, the PL group had significantly higher levels of oleic acid (C18:1 n9; P = 0.029), unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs; P < 0.001), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs; P = 0.027), and the PUFA/SFA ratio (P < 0.001). Compared with BSFL, feeding PF increased (P < 0.001) SFA and TI levels, while decreasing (P < 0.001) UFA levels, PUFA levels, and the PUFA/SFA ratio.
Palmitic acid levels were lower (P < 0.001) in the BSFL group than in the SO, PO, or PF treatments, whereas palmitoleic acid levels were lower in the PKFD, PF, and PL groups in liver (Supplementary Table S6). Conversely, alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and n-3 FA levels increased (P < 0.001) in the SO, PKFD, and PF groups compared to in the BSFL group. In terms of SFA levels, a decrease was seen in the SO and PF groups (P < 0.001), whereas they were increased in the PL group compared with the BSFL group. The UFA concentration increased (P < 0.001) in the SO and PF groups but decreased in the PL group relative to the BSFL group. Compared with those in the BSFL group, MUFA levels in the SO group increased (P < 0.001), but those in the PKFD group decreased. The PUFA concentration increased (P < 0.001) in the SO, PKFD, and PF groups relative to that in the BSFL treatment. The AI decreased (P < 0.001) in the SO, PO, and PF groups, whereas the TI decreased (P < 0.001) in the SO, PKFD, and PF groups in contrast to the BSFL group. Moreover, no significant changes (P > 0.05) were observed in the following SFAs (C14:0, C18:0, C20:0, and C22:0) and UFAs (C14:1, C18:1 n9, C18:2 n6, C18:3 n6, C20:2, and C20:4) between the experimental treatments and the reference group.
Sensory analyses
The sensory traits of the broiler breast fillets are shown in Supplementary Table S7. The cooked odor of the broiler meat decreased (P = 0.008) in the PF and BT groups compared with that in the BSFL group. All the other sensory traits, including appearance, smell, texture, and taste parameters, were not different (P > 0.05).
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the characteristics of broilers fed BSFL fat with those fed a wide range of selected plant oils or animal fats, as previous research has focused primarily on the effects of replacing SO with BSFL fat (summarized by Benzertiha et al.3). This study confirmed that BSFL fat was rich in SFAs, particularly C12:0, followed by myristic and palmitic acids, with the lauric acid content influenced by the rearing substrate15. In this study, a mixture of vegetable and fruit waste (in accordance with the GMP + system) was used as a rearing substrate for H. illucens larvae. The primary feed materials included apples, carrots, potatoes, cabbage, and the wheat bran, the latter being added to achieve 25% susbtrate dry matter. The use of the diet in invertebrate production resulted in a lauric acid concentration of 41.1% in the larvae biomass. In contrast, oleic acid was the primary FA in BSFL when mitigating mussels, rapeseed cake, and shrimp waste were used as substrates, possibly due to differences in carbohydrate content16. Regarding the plant oils, SO was rich in PUFAs, RO and PKFD were rich in MUFAs, and PO had more SFAs than UFAs, which is consistent with the literature17. In contrast to our findings, previous research has shown that PKFD had higher amount of SFAs; however, the FA profile changed according to the temperature used during palm kernel oil distillation18. PF and PL contained more UFAs than SFAs, whereas BT had a slightly greater quantity of SFAs than UFAs, which agrees with the findings of a previous study19. While BSFL fat shares similarities with fats such as PO and animal fats in terms of SFA content, its distinct FA profile, especially its C12:0 level, sets it apart. These variations in FA composition provide a foundation for exploring the effects of BSFL in comparison with those of commonly used dietary fat sources on broiler performance, nutrient digestibility, liver histomorphology, selected physiological and immunological indices, cecal microbiota shifts, carcass yield, final product quality and, ultimately, consumer acceptance.
The performance results align with those of previous studies indicating that substituting SO with BSFL fat had no effect on BWG, FI or FCR20,21. However, compared with broilers fed BSFL, those fed PKFD had increased BWGs during the 1st week, which was supported by a reduced FCR during the same period. Despite the high SFA content of BSFL fat, the FCR of the broilers fed BSFL was lower than those fed fats rich in SFAs (PO, PF, BT), making it more similar to vegetable oils, which are known to support better growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers than animal fats22. This similarity between BSFL and plant oils can be attributed to the presence of MCFAs, which are absorbed more easily and can be directly used by enterocytes as an energy source, which is highly important in the first week when bile and lipase production is low6,23. The present study clearly shows that the administration of BSFL fat in broiler diets increased the diet AMEN value, in contrast to broilers fed BT and PL at 14 and 28 days of age. Moreover, compared with that of BT, BSFL feeding improved DM and CP retention on the 14th day. Additionally, feeding BSFL increased EE more than feeding SO did, possibly due to enhanced lipase activity24. However, no differences in pancreatic enzyme activity, nutrient digestibility or AIDE were observed between groups at the end of the experiment. These results are in line with those of the weights and lengths of GIT segments, in which PKFD treatment reduced jejunum weight, in contrast to BSFL treatment. Although this finding can be considered an exception, generally, BSFL treatment did not trigger alterations in selected organ or GIT weights or lengths in 35-day-old broilers.
Compared with plant-derived oils, animal-derived fats negatively affect the liver function of broilers via the accumulation of SFAs, leading to fatty liver and increased ALT and AST levels22. BSFL treatment resulted in higher AST and ALP levels than PF, PO, and PKFD did, possibly due to its lower UFA content, which might increase the demand for de novo lipogenesis in the liver, the main site for FA synthesis in broilers25. To date, BSFL treatment has not been found to impact levels of liver function markers such as AST and ALT, similar to SO11. Kierończyk et al.26 emphasized the positive effects on AST and cholesterol reduction in the plasma of partial or total SO replacement with BSFL fat in broiler diets. The liver fat concentration may be affected by the CIELab system values. The results of the liver colorimetric and histomorphological analyses were not significant, which is consistent with previous findings of a study in which SO administration was completely replaced with that of BSFL27. These results suggest that BSFL fat does not have any adverse effects on the liver.
In general, BSFL treatment significantly impacts immune status by increasing lymphocyte numbers, lysozyme activity, and survival rates while reducing energy expenditure on immune responses in poultry28. Dietary fats rich in UFAs are known to increase immune responses in broilers, improving disease resistance and antibody levels, whereas fats high in SFAs can impair immune function29,30. Moreover, studies have shown that dietary fat sources rich in UFAs can enhance the immune response in broilers, potentially increasing their abilities to resist diseases such as infectious bursal disease (IBD) and increasing antibody levels against pathogens29,31. The increase in IgA levels in broilers fed BSFL compared with those fed SO, PO, or PL was likely due to the immunomodulatory effects of C12:0 in BSFL fat32. The elevated IgA concentration in the BSFL group suggests a positive impact on mucosal immunity, a trait commonly associated with immune-modulating dietary components33. The increased IgG plasma level in the BSFL treatment was only noted relative to that in the PO group, reflecting the beneficial effects of BSFL fat. These results indicate that BSFL exhibits immunomodulating activities comparable to those observed in broilers fed dietary fats of plant origin, such as SO, RO, and PKFD.
Thyroid hormones play pivotal roles in nutrient and energy metabolism, as well as performance, especially under heat stress, by regulating body temperature in broilers. The notable increase in FT3 levels following BSFL consumption suggests potential alterations in the protein binding dynamics of thyroid hormone, leading to a greater release of bound T3. Research has indicated that higher levels of FT3 may be a sign of hyperthyroidism and could have negative implications for health34. However, total T3 levels (both bound and free) were not significant. Moreover, BSFL treatment tended to increase T4 levels more than treatment with plant oils or animal fats. Elevated T4 levels are often associated with improved growth performance due to increased energy and protein metabolism and increased insulin-like growth factor levels35. In contrast to our findings, BSFL treatment was found to decrease T4 and FT4 levels compared with SO treatment36. Nevertheless, elevated serum concentrations of T3 and T4 were also revealed in hens when fish meal was substituted with BSFL meal37. Furthermore, the high variability of the results was confirmed by a previous study38, in which it was reported that thyroid hormone levels vary significantly among experiments. In general, thyroid hormones are positively correlated with the growth of the bursa of Fabricius, the primary site for B-cell development in birds, which plays a role in humoral immunity via the production of antibodies39. However, further research is needed to fully understand the effect of BSFL fat on the humoral responses of birds.
BSFL showed no significant differences in cecal bacterial populations, except for a lower total bacterial count compared with those of the PL and PF groups. However, this significance is not physiologically or practically relevant because of the minimal variation in fat percentages. These findings align with previous research on the cecal microbiota of broilers when BSFL was replaced with SO21,26. However, the lack of significance results in broilers fed BSFL compared with those fed SFA-rich fat sources was unexpected given the role of SFAs in promoting the growth of lipopolysaccharide-producing bacteria and pathogenic bacteria such as C. perfringens and lactic acid-producing bacteria reported in previous studies30,40. Moreover, the lower total microorganism count in the BSFL treatment than in the PF and PL groups is difficult to explain, particularly when broilers fed the other dietary fats, i.e., those of plant or animal origin, exhibited no changes. Thus, the obtained results cannot be associated with high or low concentrations of UFAs or SFAs.
BSFL treatment showed minimal differences in broiler carcass yield (CY), part yield (PY), and giblet yield (GY) compared to plant and animal fat sources, except for drumstick and thigh yields. Diets with plant oils typically result in better carcass quality than diets including animal fats such as tallow or lard, which tend to increase lipid accumulation41,42. The improved drumstick yield in the BSFL group compared with the BT group may be due to the long-chained SFAs in BT, as BT treatment increased fat deposition in the abdomen instead of in meat compared with than in animals fed plant oils, which was related to differences in fatty acid composition. Compared with long-chain FAs, which can affect broiler growth, MCFAs are generally more easily absorbed by enterocytes and are more digestible6 compared to long-chain FAs, which can affect broiler growth. Moreover, SFAs promote abdominal fat deposition rather than muscle tissue development43. However, compared with the other treatments, the BSFL treatment did not affect CY, PY, or GY. Interestingly, the thigh yield for the BSFL group was lower than that for the PO and RO groups. These results suggest differences, but further research is needed. Previous studies have shown that replacing SO with BSFL had no effect on the thigh, breast, or wing mass (% of CW) of poultry10,27,44. Consistent with these findings, our study also revealed no effect of BSFL on the pH of broiler meat relative to the SO group14,27,44. BSFL treatment increased the meat pH compared with BT (at slaughter, 20 min, and 2 h after slaughter) and PF (2 h after slaughter), likely due to lactic acid accumulation from muscle glycolysis45. No significant difference in meat pH was observed between the BSFL treatment and other groups after 24 h. In addition to pH, the effect of BSFL on meat color, drip loss and salt uptake was also evaluated. Regarding meat color, our findings align with a previous study, which also reported no significant effect on the L*, a*, or b* values when substituting SO with BSFL46. However, contrasting results were found in another study, where BSFL treatment reduced meat redness and increased yellowness compared with SO14. Furthermore, the difference in a* and b* between broilers fed BSFL and those fed PL or BT could be attributed to oxidative changes induced by animal fats, affecting meat color via myoglobin interactions47. Although lower meat pH and greater lightness are commonly associated with increased drip loss and reduced salt-induced water uptake48, the differences in drip loss and salt-induced water uptake observed in this study were an exception, with no difference in pH and yellowness between BSFL and these fat sources. Additionally, our results with SO were inconsistent with those of previous studies, which reported reduced drip loss and increased SALT when BSFL replaced SO14.
The FA composition of the breast meat of broilers fed BSFL did not align with the FA composition of the experimental diet. Despite BSFL being high in SFAs, breast meat presented higher levels of UFAs than SFAs, ultimately changing the overall UFA/SFA ratio. This finding contrasts with previous findings in which BSFL decreased PUFAs while increasing SFAs and MUFAs in poultry meat44,46. However, another study supports our results, showing that including more BSFL (up to 9%) in the diet can lead to increased UFAs rather than increased SFAs and PUFA/SFA ratios14. However, the increased ALA and n-3 FA contents in broilers fed BSFL compared with those fed SO were unexpected, as previous studies had reported that BSFL negatively affects the presence of n-3 FAs in meat12,14. Furthermore, the TI and AI indices, which are important for assessing cardiovascular health, were similar to those of birds fed plant oils and aligned with studies in which BSFL treatment replaced that of SO in poultry diets14,44. The liver FA profiles of the broilers fed BSFL differed from those of broilers fed plant oils (SO, PKFD, PO) or animal fats (PF, PL), which is consistent with previous findings in which BSFL treatment reduced abundance of UFAs, especially of n-3, and increased the abundance of SFAs when used to replace SO treatment21. Although the liver is a site of de novo synthesis25, we observed a lower concentration of n-3 FAs in the liver compared to the breast muscle, which suggests that n-3 FAs were transported through the bloodstream, and was incorporated into the breast meat. Consumer acceptance of BSFL in poultry nutrition relies heavily on the sensory traits of the final products, such as flavor, texture, and appearance, which are crucial for marketability. Plant oils, which are rich in UFAs, generally increase the sensory appeal of poultry meat, making it more acceptable than meat from broilers fed animal fats. However, higher n-3 and PUFA levels can negatively impact taste and storage quality due to increased oxidation risks49. The increased odor in BSFL treatment compared with PF or BT group could be due to the oxidation of UFAs to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during cooking50. This aligns with our findings that breast meat from BSFL-fed broilers had a higher UFA content than did that from birds fed animal fat. Nevertheless, other sensory traits, such as texture, taste, color, and smell, remained unaffected. Moreover, our results are consistent with those of previous experiments in which birds fed BSFL fat presented a sensory profile similar to that of birds fed SO12,46. This finding is supported by the FA composition of breast meat, in which UFAs were more abundant in the muscles of the broilers fed BSFL than in those fed animal fats.
In conclusion, this study demonstrated that the inclusion of BSFL fat in broiler diets results in outcomes closely resembling those of plant oils rather than animal fats in terms of growth performance, cecal microecosystem, meat quality, and sensory attributes. Surprisingly, BSFL-fed birds presented greater levels of n-3 FAs and alpha-linolenic acid in their breast meat than SO-fed broilers did, improving their nutritional profile. However, more focus should be placed on FA profile of H. illucens larvae. Additionally, our findings revealed that, compared with that of plant oils (SO and PO), BSFL treatment also increased IgA or IgG levels, indicating an improved immune response. Furthermore, insect fat may tend to induce a positive increase in thyroid hormone levels in bird plasma. Overall, H. illucens larval fat did not adversely affect carcass traits except for thigh yield, which was greater in RO and PO. These results suggest the promising potential of BSFL fat as a sustainable feed ingredient.
Methods
Birds and housing
One thousand two hundred 1-day-old male Ross 308 chicks (initial weight 40 g ± 0.5 g) were obtained from a commercial hatchery. The birds were randomly divided into eight dietary groups comprising 10 replicate pens and 15 birds (for 14 days) or 10 birds (for 35 days) per pen. The broilers were housed in 1 m × 1 m floor pens with chopped wheat straw (7–15 cm) as litter. The experiment was conducted in a broiler house (number 0161) located in Olszowa, Poland. To simulate intensive conditions, the pens were surrounded by 9000 unsexed broilers of the same origin. The greater number of birds observed at 14 days was related to the need for enough excreta sampling for further nutrient retention examination. After 2 weeks, 5 randomly chosen broilers per pen were excluded from the experiments to obtain the correct animal density in the replicate pen and were transferred to the main flock. The housing conditions were in accordance with the Aviagen: Ross Broiler Management Handbook51 and the Council Directive (2007/43/EC)52. The broilers were vaccinated in a hatchery against infectious bronchitis (Nobilis IB Ma5 and Nobilis IB 4/91; Intervet International B.V., Boxmeer, Netherlands). On days 12 and 20 after hatching, the chicks were vaccinated against Gumboro disease (AviPro PRECISE, Lohmann Animal GmbH, Cuxhave, Germany).
Diets
The compositions and nutritive values of the experimental diets are detailed in Tables 6 and 7. The study involved eight experimental diets over two dietary periods, i.e., starter (up to 14 days) and grower (from 15 to 35 days). This study was designed to enrich basal diets with selected plant oils and animal fats such as BSFL fat, soybean oil (SO), rapeseed oil (RO), palm oil (PO), palm kernel fatty acid distillate (PKFD), poultry fat (PF), pig lard (PL), or beef tallow (BT). BSFL fat was purchased from HiProMine S.A. (Robakowo, Poland), while the other dietary fats were obtained from Piast Pasze Sp. z o.o. (Lewkowiec, Poland). The formulation of the diets was conducted in accordance with ISO 9001:2008 guidelines. The diets were optimized to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements recommended by Aviagen for broilers53. The diets were isonitrogenous and isoenergetic and offered from 1 to 35 days of age. The apparent metabolizable energy (AME) level of BSFL fat for broilers was established according to the regression model proposed by Kierończyk et al.4. The AMEs of other dietary fats were adapted from INREA-CIRAD-AFZ (2021)54. The conditions for insect production and dietary fat extraction were maintained as previously described by Kierończyk et al.24. Using a laboratory-scale line, the diets were processed through roller mills (Skiold, Sæby, Denmark) and a horizontal double band mixer (Zuptor, Gostyń, Poland). The feeds were subsequently prepared in mashed form by grinding all the raw materials via a disc mill (Skiold A/S, Denmark) at a 2.5 mm disc distance. This mixture was blended without heat treatment and was free of any additional additive inclusions, such as exogenous enzymes or coccidiostats. Throughout the entire experimental period, broilers were provided ad libitum access to feed (one hopper per pen) and water (two nipple drinkers per pen).
FA composition of the diets
The BSFL fat presented a high abundance of saturated fatty acids (SFAs), particularly C12:0, which comprised 41.1% of the total fatty acids (Table 8). Soybean oil (SO) significantly contributed to the abundance of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), with linoleic acid (C18:2 n6) being a prominent constituent. Rapeseed oil (RO), palm kernel fatty acid distillate (PKFD), poultry fat (PF) and pig lard (PL) presented a prevalence of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), notably oleic acid (C18:1). Palm oil (PO) and beef tallow (BT) demonstrated a balance between SFAs and unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs), with significant amounts of palmitic acid (C16:0) and oleic acid (C18:1). Moreover, both PL and BT presented elevated levels of stearic acid (C18:0) compared with the other fat sources.
Data and sample collection
Throughout the trial (1–35 days), the body weights (BWs) and feed intakes (FIs) were monitored, and the body weight gains (BWGs) or feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated for the following periods: 1–7 days, 8–14 days, 15–21 days, 22–28 days, 29–35 days, and 1–35 days. The abovementioned traits were determined using a laboratory scale (NVL5101, OHAUS, Switzerland) with an accuracy of ± 0.5 g. For the growth performance results, the pen was defined as an experimental unit (n = 10). The excreta samples (1 pooled sample from 2 pens with 10 birds each, n = 5) were collected on days 14 and 28 in containers and immediately frozen on dry ice for further chemical analyses, nutrient retention and apparent metabolizable energy corrected to zero nitrogen balance (AMEN) calculations, described in detail in the following subheadings. During sample collection, the plastic mat at the bottom of the pen was unfolded to prevent contamination with feed, feathers, and litter. At the end of the experiment (35th day), a total of 80 broilers (1 randomly chosen broiler from each replicate pen, n = 10) underwent electrical stunning (STZ-6, PPHU KOMA, Poland), followed by a sequence of slaughtering (cervical dislocation), exsanguination, dissection, and evisceration. Blood was drawn shortly after decapitation, while serum was obtained by centrifugation (Micro 220 R, Hettich, Tuttlingen, Germany) at 1000×g and 8 °C for 10 min and stored at − 20 °C until further analysis. A laboratory balance (LPC-523i, VWR International, Belgium; accurate to ± 0.001 g) was used to determine the weight (% of BW) of empty selected gastrointestinal tract (GIT) segments and internal organs (proventriculus, gizzard, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, ceca, heart, liver, pancreas, spleen, bursa of Fabricius, and thymus), and a linear scale accurate to 1 mm was used to measure the lengths of GIT segments (cm kg−1 of BW) in relation to live body weights. The duodenal digesta samples were collected into Eppendorf tubes (8 randomly selected broilers per treatment, n = 8) and placed immediately on dry ice for further determination of activities of pancreatic enzymes (trypsin, lipase, and amylase). The jejunal section began at the end of the duodenum and ended at Meckel’s diverticulum. The ileum was defined as the small intestinal segment caudal to Meckel’s diverticulum. Liver samples were fixed by immersion in Bouin solution and stored at 4 °C for further histomorphological analyses. Furthermore, the cecal digesta samples were gently squeezed into segments directly into Eppendorf tubes (1 bird per pen, 10 broilers per treatment, n = 10) and directly frozen. The remaining portions of the ileal contents from two birds (n = 5) were pooled and immediately frozen on dry ice to estimate the coefficients of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID) and apparent ileal digestible energy (AIDE). On the 35th day, the body weights at slaughter were measured (1 broiler from each replicate pen, n = 10). After bleeding, the birds were placed in a scalding tank (approximately 2 min, 60 °C; Technologies 4All Group, Kępno, Poland) and defeathered via an automatic turning machine (Technologies 4All Group, Kępno, Poland). Next, the carcass weights (CWs) were determined by weighing the entire slaughtered bird, both before and after evisceration, encompassing the neck and feet but excluding the head. Afterward, the carcasses were dissected into the following parts: breasts, leg quarters, drumsticks, thighs, and wings, and then weighed using a laboratory balance (NVL5101, OHAUS, Switzerland; accurate to ± 0.5 g). The carcass yield (CY), which represents the ratio of CW to body weight at slaughter, was calculated. The parts yield (PY), including the breast, leg quarters, drumsticks, thighs, and wings, was determined as the ratio of each selected part weight to the CW. The giblet yield (GY), consisting of heart, clean and empty gizzards, and liver, was calculated as the percentage of giblet weight (GW) relative to CW, with GW representing the sum of giblet weights. The breast meat samples and liver samples were sealed in flex–grip bags, immediately placed on dry ice, and stored at − 20 °C for further chemical analyses.
Chemical analysis
The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), and amino acid contents of the experimental feed, excreta and ileal digesta were examined via the 934.01, 976.05, 920.39, and 994.12 (AOAC) methods, respectively55. The DM, CP, and EE analyses were performed via an ED-56 air drier (Binder 9010–0333, Tuttlingen, Germany), a Kjel-Foss automatic 16 210 analyzer (A/S N. Foss Electric, Hillerød, Denmark), and a Soxtec System HT-1043 extraction unit (Foss Tecator, Hillerød, Denmark), respectively. The gross energy (GE) was measured via an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (KL 12 Mn, Precyzja-Bit PPHU, Bydgoszcz, Poland) standardized with benzoic acid (Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland). Furthermore, titanium dioxide (TiO2) was added ‘on top’ of the experimental diets and used as an internal marker to estimate the digestibility of nutrients. The sample preparation and estimation of the TiO2 concentration were performed as described by Myers et al.56 and Short et al.57. The FA profiles of the experimental diets, breast muscles, and liver tissues were analyzed via the methods outlined by Stuper-Szablewska et al.58.
Histomorphological examination
Histological analysis of the hepatic tissues was performed as described by Rawski et al.59. Briefly, broiler chicken liver samples were preserved by immersion in Bouin’s solution and storing at 4 °C for 24 h. Liver samples were subjected to histological examination using the paraffin method and were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). A semiquantitative scoring system was used to assess the severity of histopathological changes, considering factors such as parenchymal eclipse, the presence of vacuoles in hepatocytes, the number of congestions, necrosis, fibrosis, and the amount of fat vacuolization. The scoring system employed a 5-point (0–4) scale: 0 indicated no changes, 1 indicated slight histopathology in less than 25% of the fields, 2 represented mild histopathology in less than 50% of the fields, 3 signified moderate histopathology in less than 75% of the fields, and 4 indicated severe histopathology in more than 75% of the fields.
Selected blood serum parameters and pancreatic enzymes
Selected serum parameters, including glucose, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol, total protein, albumin, aspartate transaminase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, were assessed following the manufacturer’s instructions for commercially available kits (Pointe Scientific, Warsaw, Poland). The immunological indices, i.e., immunoglobulin Y (IgY), immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) concentrations, as well as levels of selected metabolic hormones, i.e., insulin, triiodothyronine (T3), thyroxine (T4), free triiodothyronine (FT3) and free thyroxine (FT4), were determined in the collected plasma on the basis of the manufacturer’s instructions for available commercial kit reagents (Shanghai Sunred Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China or Abnova Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan). For the absorbance measurements, a Synergy 2 multidetection microplate reader (Biotek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, Vt., USA) was used. The endogenous enzyme activities were measured via commercially available colorimetric assay kits (BioVision, Milpitas, CA, USA) as described by Kierończyk et al.60.
Cecal microbiota populations
All details of sample preparation and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses for bacterial enumeration from the cecal digesta were described by Sypniewski et al.61. In brief, 100 μL of digesta was diluted in PBS, transferred onto 0.22 µm polycarbonate filters (Frisenette, Knebel, Denmark), and subjected to vacuum filtration (Vacuum Pump, KNF Neuberger, Trenton, NJ, USA). The filters were then placed on cellulose discs and dehydrated in ethanol. Hybridization was performed in 50 μL of hybridization buffer (0.9 M NaCl, 20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.2, 0.01% SDS) containing the oligonucleotide probes (Supplementary Table 8). The filters were subsequently washed with washing buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.2, 0.01% SDS, and 5 mM EDTA) for 20 min at 48 °C, rinsed with distilled water, dried, and mounted on slides with VectaShield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) anti-fading agent containing 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). To differentiate the total bacterial count from other particles in the samples, the filters were kept at 4 °C in the dark for 1 h before visualization via an Axio Imager M2 (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Carcass and meat quality traits
Postmortem (at slaughter, after 20 min, 2 h, and 24 h) pH measurements were taken via a ScienceLine Micro pH combination electrode N 6000 BNC (Schott SI Analytics, Mainz, Germany) inserted into the cranial end of the intact breast meat fillet. The pH meter used was a 1100 H pH meter (VWR International, Leuven, Belgium) with a ScienceLine Micro pH combination electrode N 6000 BNC (Schott SI Analytics, Mainz, Germany). Duplicate measurements were taken, and the mean value was used. Color measurements were performed according to the CIELab system62. The meat color analysis was performed at room temperature (20 °C), and the device was placed on the samples in a horizontal position. The color was measured three times on the internal side of each raw pectoral muscle or liver (lobus dexter) external side, and the mean of the triplicate determinations was used as an experimental unit (n = 10). Drip loss and salt-induced water uptake (SALT) were measured following the procedure described by Kierończyk et al.14. The evaluation of selected sensory attributes of the broiler chicken breast fillets was performed in accordance with the methods of Altmann et al.63. The color intensity, smell (overall odor, animal/barn odor, metallic odor, and cooked chicken odor), texture (juiciness, hardness, adhesiveness), and taste (bitter taste, sour taste, sweet taste, metallic flavor, and chicken flavor) were measured via a 5-point scale. The scale ranged from 0 to 5 for visual attributes, such as color, and from 1 to 5 for olfactory, textural, and taste attributes.
Calculations
The calculation of total tract nitrogen retention (NR) and CAID for ether extract (EE) was performed via the internal marker technique, which involves comparing values with TiO2 as a reference via the following formula:
On the basis of the GEs of the feed and ileal digesta, the AIDE was computed via the following equation:
An adjustment for zero nitrogen balance (8.22 kcal/N retained) was applied64, and the following formula was used to measure the AMEN of the experimental diets or excreta:
Using FA composition data, the following formulas were used to derive the atherogenic index (AI) and thrombogenic index (TI)14:
Statistical analysis
The experimental design employed complete randomization, designating the replicate pen (n = 10) as the experimental unit for growth performance results. In contrast, for various parameters, such as selected organ measurements, liver histomorphology, meat quality, and sensory traits, the experimental unit comprised 10 broilers, specifically one broiler randomly selected from each replicate pen (n = 10). Notably, CAID or nutrient retention determination for DM, CP, EE, AIDE, and AMEN utilized pooled digesta from two randomly chosen birds per replicate as the experimental unit (n = 5). For the biochemical and physiological serum indices as well as selected pancreatic enzymes, 8 randomly chosen broilers from each treatment were used (n = 8). Microbiota analyses were performed via digesta samples pooled from two broilers, and five photos were taken during microscopy. The mean bacterial count obtained from five photos was defined as the experimental factor (n = 5). RStudio (ver. 2024.04.0 + 735 RStudio, Inc., Boston, USA) facilitated the statistical analyses with the following packages: FSA (ver. 0.9.4), DescTools (ver. 0.99.48), rcompanion (ver. 2.4.21), and stats (ver. 4.2.2). The Shapiro‒Wilk test was used to assess the normality of the data distribution, whereas Bartlett’s test was used to evaluate variance homogeneity. The effects of BSFL fat administration (as a reference group) to broiler diets in comparison with those of selected plant or animal dietary fats were assessed through one-way ANOVA and Dunnets’ post hoc test for comparing several treatments with a reference group (BSFL). For nonnormally distributed data, Kruskal‒Wallis test, followed by the Dunn’s test was used with Benjamini‒Hochberg adjustment. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
Data availability
All the raw data obtained in this study are deposited in an official repository (https://doi.org/10.18150/IOUQUS).
References
Kierończyk, B. et al. Available for millions of years but discovered through the last decade: Insects as a source of nutrients and energy in animal diets. Anim. Nutr. 11, 60–79 (2022).
Shah, A. A. et al. Nutritional composition of various insects and potential uses as alternative protein sources in animal diets. Anim. Biosci. 35, 317–331 (2022).
Benzertiha, A. et al. Insect fat in animal nutrition: A review. Ann. Anim. Sci. 20, 1217–1240 (2020).
Kierończyk, B., Rawski, M., Stuper-Szablewska, K. & Józefiak, D. First report of the apparent metabolisable energy value of black soldier fly larvae fat used in broiler chicken diets. Animal 16, 100656 (2022).
Amer, S. A. et al. Effect of dietary medium-chain α-monoglycerides on the growth performance, intestinal histomorphology, amino acid digestibility, and broiler chickens’ blood biochemical parameters. Animals 11, 57 (2020).
Jia, M., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y. & Ma, X. Effects of medium chain fatty acids on intestinal health of monogastric animals. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 21, 777–784 (2020).
Çenesiz, A. A. & Çiftci, İ. Modulatory effects of medium chain fatty acids in poultry nutrition and health. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 76, 234–248 (2020).
Long, S., Liu, S., Wu, D., Mahfuz, S. & Piao, X. Effects of dietary fatty acids from different sources on growth performance, meat quality, muscle fatty acid deposition, and antioxidant capacity in broilers. Animals 10, 508 (2020).
Pan, D. & Yu, Z. Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes 5, 108–119 (2014).
Dabbou, S. et al. Modified black soldier fly larva fat in broiler diet: effects on performance, carcass traits, blood parameters, histomorphological features and gut microbiota. Animals 11, 1837 (2021).
Kim, Y. B. et al. Black soldier fly larvae oil as an alternative fat source in broiler nutrition. Poult. Sci. 99, 3133–3143 (2020).
Cullere, M., Schiavone, A., Dabbou, S., Gasco, L. & Zotte, A. D. Meat quality and sensory traits of finisher broiler chickens fed with black soldier fly (Hermetia Illucens L.) larvae fat as alternative fat source. Animals 9, 140 (2019).
Kierończyk, B. et al. From waste to sustainable feed material: the effect of Hermetia illucens oil on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and gastrointestinal tract morphometry of broiler chickens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 20, 157–177 (2020).
Kierończyk, B. et al. Black soldier fly larva fat in broiler chicken diets affects breast meat quality. Animals 13, 1137 (2023).
Suryati, T., Julaeha, E., Farabi, K., Ambarsari, H. & Hidayat, A. T. Lauric acid from the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) and its potential applications. Sustainability 15, 10383 (2023).
Eggink, K. M., Lund, I., Pedersen, P. B., Hansen, B. W. & Dalsgaard, J. Biowaste and by-products as rearing substrates for black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae: Effects on larval body composition and performance. PLoS ONE 17, e0275213 (2022).
Han, K., Willams, K. J. & Goldberg, A. C. Plant-based oils. In Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease: Nutritional and Dietary Approaches (eds Wilkinson, M. J. et al.) 115–127 (Humana, 2021).
Thio, C. W., Lim, W. H., Md. Shah, U. K. & Phang, L.-Y. Palm kernel fatty acid distillate as substrate for rhamnolipids production using Pseudomonas sp. LM19. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 15, 83–92 (2022).
Nizar, N. N. A., Marikkar, J. M. N. & Hashim, D. M. Differentiation of lard, chicken fat, beef fat and mutton fat by GCMS and EA-IRMS techniques. J. Oleo Sci. 62, 459–464 (2013).
Kim, B. et al. Effects of dietary supplementation of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae oil on broiler health. J. Poult. Sci. 58, 222–229 (2021).
Schäfer, L. et al. Effect of replacement of soybean oil by Hermetia illucens fat on performance, digestibility, cecal microbiome, liver transcriptome and liver and plasma lipidomes of broilers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 20 (2023).
Huo, W. et al. On growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood T lymphocyte subsets, and cardiac antioxidant status of broilers. Anim. Nutr. 5, 68–73 (2019).
Ravindran, V., Tancharoenrat, P., Zaefarian, F. & Ravindran, G. Fats in poultry nutrition: Digestive physiology and factors influencing their utilisation. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 213, 1–21 (2016).
Kierończyk, B. et al. Replacement of soybean oil with cold-extracted fat from Hermetia illucens in young turkey diets: effects on performance, nutrient digestibility, selected organ measurements, meat and liver tissue traits, intestinal microbiota modulation, and physiological and immunological status. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 286, 115210 (2022).
Chen, P. et al. Liver fat metabolism of broilers regulated by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens TL via stimulating IGF-1 secretion and regulating the IGF signaling pathway. Front. Microbiol. 13, 958112 (2022).
Kierończyk, B., Rawski, M., Mikołajczak, Z., Leciejewska, N. & Józefiak, D. Hermetia illucens fat affects the gastrointestinal tract selected microbial populations, their activity, and the immune status of broiler chickens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 22, 663–675 (2022).
Schiavone, A. et al. Black soldier fly larva fat inclusion in finisher broiler chicken diet as an alternative fat source. Animal 12, 2032–2039 (2018).
de Souza Vilela, J. et al. Black soldier fly larvae in broiler diets improve broiler performance and modulate the immune system. Anim. Nutr. 7, 695–706 (2021).
Świątkiewicz, S., Arczewska-Włosek, A. & Józefiak, D. The relationship between dietary fat sources and immune response in poultry and pigs: an updated review. Livest. Sci. 180, 237–246 (2015).
Xiang, M. S. W., Tan, J. K. & Macia, L. Fatty acids, gut bacteria, and immune cell function. In The Molecular Nutrition of Fats (ed. Patel, V. B.) 151–164 (Elsevier, 2019).
Vakili, R. & Ebrahimnezhad, Y. Impact of dietary supplementation of unsaturated and saturated fatty acids on bone strength, fatty acids profile of thigh muscle and immune responses in broiler chickens under heat stress. Vet. Med. Sci. 9, 252–262 (2023).
Koutsos, E., Modica, B. & Freel, T. Immunomodulatory potential of black soldier fly larvae: Applications beyond nutrition in animal feeding programs. Transl. Anim. Sci. 6(3), txac84 (2022).
Min, Y. N., Yang, H. L., Xu, Y. X. & Gao, Y. P. Effects of dietary supplementation of synbiotics on growth performance, intestinal morphology, sIgA content and antioxidant capacities of broilers. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 100, 1073–1080 (2016).
Garasto, S. et al. Thyroid hormones in extreme longevity. Mech. Ageing Dev. 165, 98–106 (2017).
Amer, S. A. et al. Dietary frankincense (Boswellia serrata) oil modulates the growth, intestinal morphology, the fatty acid composition of breast muscle, immune status, and immunoexpression of CD3 and CD20 in broiler chickens. Animals 13, 971 (2023).
Kierończyk, B. et al. Implementation of a metabolizable energy regression model for black soldier fly larvae fat in broiler chicken diets: effect on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and selected physiological indices. J. Anim. Feed Sci. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/187805/2024 (2024).
Attivi, K. et al. Effect of fish meal replacement by black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae meal on serum biochemical indices, thyroid hormone and zootechnical performance of laying chickens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 31, 100275 (2022).
Skomorucha, I. & Sosnówka-Czajka, E. Physiological parameters in broiler chickens reared under different housing systems during a period of high temperatures. Acta Sci. Pol. Zootech. 16, 25–34 (2017).
Ko, K. et al. Changes in bursal B cells in chicken during embryonic development and early life after hatching. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 16905 (2018).
Zhang, J.-M. et al. SCFAs-induced GLP-1 secretion links the regulation of gut microbiome on hepatic lipogenesis in chickens. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2176 (2019).
Long, S. et al. Effects of dietary supplementation with a combination of plant oils on performance, meat quality and fatty acid deposition of broilers. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 31, 1773–1780 (2018).
Kamran, J., Mehmood, S., Mahmud, A. & Saima,. Influence of thermally oxidized vegetable oil and animal fats on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass parameters and meat quality of broilers. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 22, eRBCA-2020 (2020).
Poorghasemi, M., Seidavi, A., Qotbi, A. A. A., Laudadio, V. & Tufarelli, V. Influence of dietary fat source on growth performance responses and carcass traits of broiler chicks. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 705–710 (2013).
Schiavone, A. et al. Partial or total replacement of soybean oil by black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) fat in broiler diets: effect on growth performances, feed-choice, blood traits, carcass characteristics and meat quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 16, 93–100 (2016).
Baldi, G. et al. Exploring the factors contributing to the high ultimate pH of broiler pectoralis major muscles affected by wooden breast condition. Front. Physiol. 11, 343 (2020).
Kim, B. et al. Evaluation of black soldier fly larvae oil as a dietary fat source in broiler chicken diets. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 62, 187–197 (2020).
Bianchi, M., Ferioli, F., Petracci, M., Caboni, M. F. & Cavani, C. The influence of dietary lipid source on quality characteristics of raw and processed chicken meat. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 229, 339–348 (2009).
Bowker, B. & Zhuang, H. M. Relationship between water-holding capacity and protein denaturation in broiler breast meat. Poult. Sci. 94(7), 1657–1664 (2015).
Rymer, C. & Givens, D. I. n−3 fatty acid enrichment of edible tissue of poultry: A review. Lipids 40, 121–130 (2005).
Mancinelli, A. C. et al. Fatty acid profile, oxidative status, and content of volatile organic compounds in raw and cooked meat of different chicken strains. Poult. Sci. 100, 1273–1282 (2021).
ROSS. Aviagen ross broiler management handbook. https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-BroilerHandbook2018-EN.pdf (2018).
European Union (EU). Council directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production (text with EEA relevance)text with EEA relevance. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2007/43/2019-12-14 (2007).
ROSS. Aviagen ross broiler nutrition specifications. https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-BroilerNutritionSpecifications2022-EN.pdf (2022).
INRAE-CIRAD-AFZ. Tables of composition and nutritional values of feed materials INRA CIRAD AFZ. https://www.feedtables.com/
Latimer, G. W. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL (Oxford University Press, 2023).
Myers, W. D., Ludden, P. A., Nayigihugu, V. & Hess, B. W. A procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. J. Anim. Sci. 82, 179–183 (2004).
Short, F. J., Gorton, P., Wiseman, J. & Boorman, K. N. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 59, 215–221 (1996).
Stuper-Szablewska, K., Buśko, M., Góral, T. & Perkowski, J. The fatty acid profile in different wheat cultivars depending on the level of contamination with microscopic fungi. Food Chem. 153, 216–223 (2014).
Rawski, M., Mazurkiewicz, J., Kierończyk, B. & Józefiak, D. Black soldier fly full-fat larvae meal is more profitable than fish meal and fish oil in Siberian sturgeon farming: The effects on aquaculture sustainability, economy and fish GIT development. Animals 11, 604 (2021).
Kierończyk, B. et al. The physiological response of broiler chickens to the dietary supplementation of the bacteriocin nisin and ionophore coccidiostats. Poult. Sci. 96, 4026–4037 (2017).
Sypniewski, J. et al. Replacement of soybean oil by Hermetia illucens fat in turkey nutrition: Effect on performance, digestibility, microbial community, immune and physiological status and final product quality. Br. Poult. Sci. 61, 294–302 (2020).
Robertson, A. R. et al. CIE recommendations on uniform color spaces, color-difference equations, and metric color terms. Color Res. Appl. 2, 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1520-6378.1977.tb00102.x (1977).
Altmann, B. A., Neumann, C., Velten, S., Liebert, F. & Mörlein, D. Meat quality derived from high inclusion of a micro-alga or insect meal as an alternative protein source in poultry diets: A pilot study. Foods 7, 34 (2018).
Hill, F. W. & Anderson, D. L. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determinations with growing chicks. J. Nutr. 64, 587–603 (1958).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by an OPUS-20 grant titled “The role of Hermetia illucens larvae fat in poultry nutrition—from the nutritive value to the health status of broiler chickens” (no. 2020/39/B/NZ9/00237), which was financed by the National Science Center (Poland), and by statutory funding (no. 506.533.04.00) from the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Department of Animal Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MRA, BK, and DJ designed the study; MRA and BK conducted the research; MRA, BK, PS, KS-S, PK, and AD analyzed the data; MRA interpreted and wrote the manuscript; MRA and AD prepared figures; BK, DJ, RM, and MR revised the manuscript; MRA, BK, and DJ had primary responsibility for the final contents; all the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
In accordance with Polish law and the European Union directive (no. 2010/63/EU), the trial conducted in this study did not require approval from the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments in Poznań. All procedures adhered to the guidance for animal experimentation and the care of the animals included in the study. No action involving pain or suffering was practiced, and all analyses were performed on samples collected postmortem. Sacrificing animals solely for the use of their organs or tissues is not a procedure. The directive states the requirements for protecting animals used for experimental purposes. Therefore, these rules do not apply to agricultural activities or animal husbandry. The experiment was conducted under commercial conditions, so the farmers were responsible for rearing. The study adhered to the ARRIVE guidelines, ensuring ethical conduct and compliance with relevant regulations, with all methods, experimental design, sampling, and results analysis reported accordingly.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Aslam, M.R., Kierończyk, B., Rawski, M. et al. Insect fat influences broiler performance, meat quality, and the cecal microbiota similarly to plant oils rather than animal fats. Sci Rep 15, 18086 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02820-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-02820-3