Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic represents one of the most significant public health events of the last century. As with other coronaviruses (SARS, MERS) the role of animals is of intense interest. Believed to have originated in bats, the role of other animals in the epidemiology of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is still unclear, as is the range of susceptible hosts. American bison were intranasally infected with SARS-CoV-2 and monitored for seroconversion and the presence of viral RNA in oronasal secretions and feces. Although clinical signs were not seen, permissiveness of bison to infection with SARS-CoV-2 was manifest by seroconversion, the presence of viral RNA in oronasal secretions, persistence of viral RNA in lymphoid tissue, and viral associated interstitial pneumonia. Retrospective sequencing of the inoculum revealed a common in vitro adaptation in the furin cleavage site of the spike protein that may have reduced in vivo viral fitness. As such, we cannot exclude the possibility that use of an isolate with an intact furin cleavage motif would more efficiently infect bison.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a novel coronavirus, is the cause of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) in humans. Originating in Wuhan, China in December 2019, SARS-CoV-2 resulted in a worldwide pandemic causing over 775 million cases of COVID-19 and over 7 million deaths (https://covid19.who.int/). Believed to have originated in bats, it is hypothesized that other unidentified animal host(s) served as possible intermediaries between bats and humans. However, a specific intermediate host has not been identified. A recent analysis of environmental qPCR and sequencing data collected from the Huanan market suggests that likely intermediate hosts include raccoon dogs (Nyctereutes procyonoides), masked palm civets (Paguma larvata) and hoary bamboo rats (Rhizomys pruinosis)1.
Case reports and serological surveys have identified a number of wild and domestic animal species naturally susceptible to infection with SARS-CoV-2, albeit to varying degrees. These include American mink (Neovison vison)2, rats (Rattus norvegicus)3, otters (Lutra lutra)4, ferrets (Mustela putorius furo)5, Syrian hamsters6, gorillas7, cats, dogs8, lions, tigers9, fallow deer (Dama dama), red deer (Cervus elaphus)10, and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) 11,12,13; however, the complete range of susceptible domestic animals and wildlife is still unclear. Of concern is the possibility of animals becoming a reservoir of SARS-CoV-2 where new variants could arise and be transmitted back to humans. Of all these susceptible species, it is believed that only white-tailed deer in North America represent a wildlife reservoir of SARS-CoV-2, however on-going research strives to identify if others exist.
SARS-CoV-2 infection involves binding of the viral spike (S) protein to the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor14. The specificity of the interaction between virus and receptor is believed to reflect the range of susceptible hosts15. In one analysis, all species within the order Artiodactyla, except American bison (Bison bison), sheep (Ovis aries), and swine (Sus scrofa) had more than 80% probability of SARS-CoV-2 cell entry via the ACE2 receptor16. In a separate study examining the predicted ACE2 receptor-S binding affinity, bison were similar in binding probability to cattle, cats, and white-tailed deer17. Separately, based on a logistic regression model constructed using the spike binding parameters of ACE2, bison had a 0.0036 probability of virus entry, a lower probability than that predicted for domestic cattle (0.917)16. Further investigation found that ACE2 proteins from Primates, Bovidae and Cricetidae should recognize the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 and matched more amino acids than Suidae ACE218.
Notwithstanding these predictions, subsequent experimental studies showed that cattle and swine had a low susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 (ancestral B.1 lineage) with limited viral replication and limited seroconversion 19,20,21,22,23,24. However, when more recent variants were examined, cattle were more permissive to infection with the Delta variant than the Omicron variant23. Serological surveys of cattle in several different regions of the world have demonstrated either an absence of seropositivity or a low level of seropositivity 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32.
American bison have not been examined experimentally for susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Surveillance of captive and free-ranging bison showed as much as 14% of bison had neutralizing antibody titers33. Bison represent both a wildlife species and an important agricultural commodity as alternative livestock. In North America, bison commercially raised for meat are considered livestock, meanwhile bison found on public lands are considered wildlife. Bison represent an important religious and cultural symbol among many North American indigenous peoples and are the National Mammal of the United States34. Once found in numbers greater than 60 million across North America35, indiscriminate killing, habitat loss, human encroachment, and disease had a devastating effect on their numbers during the nineteenth century36.
Several important diseases affect farmed and free-ranging bison in North America, including mycoplasmosis, anthrax, malignant catarrhal fever, tuberculosis, brucellosis, and paratuberculosis37,38,39,40,41,42,43. The objective of the present study was to determine the susceptibility of bison to experimental infection with SARS-CoV-2. Although one of several variants could have been used for the challenge inoculum, an ancestral variant was chosen as it was believed to be less human adapted than more recent variants, such as Delta or Omicron.
Results
Viral RNA detection in nasal, oral, and rectal swabs
Nasal, oral and rectal swabs were collected on days 0-, 2-, -3, 4-, 5-, 7-, 10-, 14-, and 21-days post-infection (p.i.) and analyzed for the presence of viral RNA by RT-qPCR. Viral RNA was most frequently detected on nasal swabs, with positive swabs from all bison on days 2 or 3 p.i., and from one bison (#9) on day 5 p.i. (Table 1). All but one bison (#311) had viral RNA on oral swabs from at least one time point between days 2 to 5 p.i. (Table 2). No viral RNA was detected on nasal or oral swabs after day 5 p.i. and at no time point was viral RNA detected on rectal swabs. Viral RNA was not detected at any time from nasal, oral or rectal swabs of non-infected control bison.
Development of neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2
Serum samples were collected on days 0, 2, 5, 7, 10, 14 and 21 days p.i. to evaluate the development of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. Using the surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), neutralizing antibodies were detected as early as 10 days p.i. in 3 of 5 bison and by 14 days p.i. all bison had neutralizing antibodies, which were sustained through day 21 p.i. (Fig. 1). Virus neutralizing (VN) assays were also performed showing peak titers of 1:16 to 1:128 at days 10–21 p.i. (Table 3). Serum samples collected prior to the experiment and at necropsy of the non-infected control bison did not show evidence of seroconversion.
Presence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in serum from bison examined by the sVNT at various time points after intranasal inoculation with SARS-CoV-2. Data are represented as mean percent inhibition ± SEM. Dotted line represents assay cut-off for positive results. Red circles correspond to results from non-infected control bison.
Gross and microscopic lesions
Both bison (#194, #308) examined at day 2 p.i. had focal to multifocal areas of congestion and hemorrhage < 1.5 cm in size limited to the right cranial lobe (#194) or the left and right caudal lobes (#308). One of the bison (#304) examined at day 5 p.i. had similar lesions in the right and left cranial lobes and right caudal lobe. Medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes of all bison examined at days 2 and 5 p.i. were characterized by multifocal to diffuse congestion and petechia. Gross lesions were not seen in any bison examined at day 21 p.i. or in non-infected control bison.
Microscopically, in bison #304 examined at day 5 p.i. there were multifocal areas in the lung of expanded alveolar interstitium due to infiltrates of lymphocytes, neutrophils and macrophages with multifocal hemorrhages and free erythrocytes in alveolar lumens (Fig. 2A). Within effected areas, homogenous eosinophilic to amphophilic proteinaceous fluid (pulmonary edema) filled multiple alveoli, which also contained irregular aggregates of flocculent and fibrillar eosinophilic material consistent with fibrin (Fig. 2B, D). Some alveoli were lined by cuboidal type II pneumocytes (type II hyperplasia). Within regions of cellular infiltrate multiple vessels were surrounded by increased numbers of lymphocytes (Fig. 2C). Microscopic lesions were not seen in other infected bison or in non-infected control bison.
Photomicrographs of lung from bison #304 intranasally infected with SARS-CoV-2 and examined 5 days later. (A) Note expanded alveolar interstitium in left side of image. Multifocally, interstitial infiltrates included numerous neutrophils (inset). Bar = 200 µm. (B) Amphophilic to eosinophilic proteinaceous material (arrows) fills multiple alveolar lumens consistent with pulmonary edema. Bar = 100 µm. (C) Note perivascular infiltrates of lymphocytes (arrow). Bar = 100 µm. (D) Some alveolar lumens contain irregular aggregates of fibrillar and flocculent eosinophilic material consistent with fibrin (arrows). Bar = 20 µm. H&E.
Viral RNA detection by RT-qPCR in lymphoid tissues
The selection of tissues examined for the presence of viral RNA was based on previous studies using cattle, white-tailed deer, and elk20,44,45,46. Viral RNA was detected by RT-qPCR in medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes from all animals at all time points. At day 2 p.i., viral RNA was also detected in palatine tonsils and lung (Table 4). Palatine tonsils were positive for viral RNA in a single animal at 2, 5 and 21 days p.i. At no time point beyond day 2 p.i. was viral RNA detected in samples of lung. Similarly, viral RNA was not detected in any tissues examined (lung, tonsil, medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes) from non-infected control bison.
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA via in situ hybridization (ISH)
The most common tissue in which ISH revealed viral RNA was the medial retropharyngeal lymph node (Table 5). All infected bison had detectable viral RNA in 1 or more tissues. Bison examined at 2 and 5 days p.i. had labeling in a low number of germinal centers (Fig. 3A) while labeling in germinal centers of bison examined 21 days p.i. was less intense and characterized by labeling of individual cells within germinal centers (Fig. 3B). In the lung, 6 of 9 bison had labeling in one or more lung lobes examined.Labeling within the lung was most notable in areas of cellular infiltrate (Fig. 3C), as described above at 5 days p.i., as well as within alveolar, bronchial, and bronchiolar epithelial cells at all time points (Fig. 3D). No viral RNA was detectable by ISH in tissues collected from non-infected control bison.
Photomicrographs of ISH labeling for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in sections of medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes (A; Bison #9, B; Bison #190) and lung (C; Bison #304, D; Bison #191) of bison inoculated intranasally with SARS-CoV-2 and examined 5 days (A, C) and 21 days (B, D) p.i.. Red labeling indicates presence of viral RNA. Labeling 5 days p.i. (A, C) was greater and more intense than labeling at 21 days p.i. (B, D), which was generally characterized by individual cells containing one to several dots each (arrows). Viral RNA was not detected in tissues of non-infected control bison. Bar = 200 µm (A, B, C), Bar = 20 µm (D). GC = germinal center; ISH SARS-CoV-2.
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 protein via immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Immunoreactivity to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein was seen in a single bison (#304) examined at 5 days p.i. in the lung (Fig. 4A) amongst inflammatory cell infiltrate and in the medial retropharyngeal lymph node within and around germinal centers (Fig. 4B). No immunoreactivity was seen in bison examined at 2 or 21 days p.i. or in the other bison examined 5 days p.i. or non-infected control bison.
Photomicrographs of IHC labeling for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in lung (A) and medial retropharyngeal lymph node (B) of bison #304 inoculated intranasally with SARS-CoV-2 and examined 5 days later. Note brown labeling of nucleocapsid protein in cellular infiltrate of lung (A) and lymph node germinal center (GC) (B). No labeling was detected in tissues from non-infected control bison. Bar = 20 µm. IHC SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid.
Discussion
The initial outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in a wholesale seafood market in Wuhan, China pointed to zoonotic transmission, as many cases were linked to humans with exposure to live animals sold at the market. This prompted studies to investigate the susceptibility of various animal species to infection with SARS-CoV-2 and their potential to act as sources of infection for other animals or humans. Various experimental infection studies have identified susceptible mammalian species in the Felidae, Canidae, Mustelidae, Cricetidae and Cervidae families.
In the present study, bison were moderately permissive to infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-like variant, and developed neutralizing antibodies as measured by sVNT and VN. Moreover, viral RNA persisted in the medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes of all animals as detected by RT-qPCR, and lungs by ISH in 2 of 5 animals to the termination of the experiment at day 21 p.i. This contrasts with the minimal susceptibility of other large ruminants such as cattle in experimental settings where replication and seroconversion were limited20,21,23,47. More recently some surveys of cattle have demonstrated neutralizing antibody titers or viral RNA in nasal, oral or rectal swab samples suggesting a limited level of exposure and susceptibility28,29,48. Experimental infection studies using other domestic ruminant species such as sheep and goats have shown a low susceptibility to infection albeit with slightly greater levels of seroconversion and higher levels of viral replication in tissues than cattle49,50.
Gross or microscopic lesions have been absent or minimal in experimental infection studies using domestic and wild ruminants such as cattle, sheep, goats or elk20,23,46,49,50,51. Experimental infection studies using white-tailed deer resulted in microscopic pulmonary lesions with similarities to those seen in humans with COVID such as acute alveolar damage, pulmonary edema, and hyaline membranes, although ISH did not demonstrate viral RNA associated with such lesions. Bison in the current study are the first ruminant species to demonstrate lesions associated with the presence of viral RNA and/or nucleocapsid protein following experimental infection, which were seen in a single bison at 5-days post-infection.
The level of susceptibility of bison was similar to that seen in North American elk experimentally infected with the same Wuhan-like variant46. However, the detection of viral RNA in oronasal secretions in bison was not as great as that seen in white-tailed deer44,45. Similar to elk and white-tailed deer viral RNA was still detectable by RT-qPCR and ISH in retropharyngeal lymph nodes 21-days p.i.44,45,46. Unlike elk and white-tailed deer viral RNA was detectable by ISH and/or RT-qPCR in lungs of all bison examined 2- and 5- days p.i. and 2 of 5 bison examined 21-days p.i.
Persistence of viral RNA or viral proteins has been recognized in various human tissues including lymph nodes and has been proposed as an hypothesis for Long Covid52. Likewise, both adults and children that develop post-acute sequela of COVID-19 may not fully clear the virus and maintain viral RNA or replicating virus in various tissues including lung and lymph nodes53 for prolonged periods of time up to 303 days54. It is possible that, as with some other viruses, a reservoir of viral antigen, either RNA or protein, is present for extended periods after the acute infection and modulates the adaptive immune response55.
Limitations of the present study include only the presence of viral RNA was shown by RT-qPCR in swabs and tissues and does not identify replicating virus. Likewise, the probes used for ISH detected all viral RNA and were not specific for replicating virus. Additionally, as experimental infection consisted of intranasal instillation of a relatively large amount of virus, the detection of viral RNA in oronasal secretions up to 5 days p.i. could be due to residual inoculum and may not constitute true viral RNA shedding. Finally, sequencing of the inoculum after passage on Vero E6 cells revealed a mutation of the furin cleavage site of the spike protein (R682W) that has been reported as a common in vitro adaptation57,58. Adaptations at the furin cleavage site have been shown to limit infectivity of mammalian model hosts such as hamsters, where reduced weight loss, decreased replication in the respiratory tract and more rapid clearance have been observed compared to SARS-CoV-2 isolates with intact furin cleavage site motifs59,60. As such, we cannot exclude the possibility that use of an isolate lacking this mutation may have more efficiently infected bison.
There is no information on circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants in bison as no natural cases have been reported. As such we chose to use an ancestral variant, which circulated in humans early in the pandemic as it would likely be less human adapted. Results presented here demonstrate a limited level of permissiveness of bison to experimental infection with an ancestral SARS-CoV-2, evidenced by the development of virus neutralizing antibodies and persistence of viral RNA in tissues out to 21 days p.i. Although no clinical signs were seen, microscopic lesions with intralesional viral RNA in the lung suggest that infection in bison can be accompanied by limited virus induced pathology. The level of susceptibility demonstrated in the present study suggests that bison are not likely to infect other animals and are not likely to become a reservoir of infection and a source of infection for other animals or humans.
Materials and methods
Cells and virus
Vero E6 (ATCC® CRL-1586™) cells were cultured in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM, ATCC) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antibiotic–antimycotic 100X (Gibco™, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The lineage A SARS-CoV-2 isolate (USA-WA1/2020) was provided by BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate hCoV-19/USA-WA1/2020, NR-52281, Lot#70036318). Isolate USA-WA1/2020 originated from an oropharyngeal swab from a patient with a respiratory illness who had recently returned from travel to the affected region of China and developed clinical COVID-19 on January 19, 2020, in Washington, USA. The stock virus was passaged 3 times in Vero E6 cells, clarified by centrifugation (1000 rpm for 5 min) and stored at − 80 °C. Viral titer was determined by the Reed and Muench method61. A viral suspension containing 106 tissue culture infectious dose 50 per ml (TCID50/ml) was used for inoculations.
As repeated propagation of SARS-CoV-2 on Vero E6 cells may lead to changes in the spike glycoprotein57, the inoculum was sequenced and compared back to the original stock from BEI resources. Two amino acid substitutions were found in the spike glycoprotein, D215G in the N-terminal domain, and R682W at the furin cleavage site.
Animal infection and sampling
All experimental animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the recommendations in the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health and the Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching62,63. All work and procedures were approved prior to the experiment by the National Animal Disease Center (NADC) Institutional Animal and Care Use Committee (IACUC) (protocol #ARS-23–1154). All procedures and animal work were in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines and carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Male bison calves (~ 6 months old; n = 9) and 3 young adult males (~ 2 years old;) were obtained from a captive herd in central Iowa, USA. Although, it would have been preferred to use bison of the same age, bison for research purposes are difficult to acquire, as such, it was necessary for us to include 3 young adult males in the study. We aimed to distribute these young males evenly, with one euthanized at 5 days p.i., one euthanized at 21 days p.i. and one assigned to the non-infected control group. All animals were sampled and screened for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in oronasal secretions and by the surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) and virus neutralization (VN) assays prior to infection. Upon arrival (25 days prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection) all bison were treated once with tulathromycin (Draxxin; Zoetis Animal Health, Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ, USA), injected subcutaneously at the dose recommended for cattle. Seven calves and 2 adult males were housed in an agriculture biosafety level 3 (ABSL-3) facility at the NADC and allowed to acclimate for a minimum of 2 weeks. As non-infected controls, 2 calves and 1 adult male were housed outside on pasture.
Seven calves and 2 young bulls were intranasally infected using an atomization device (LMA MAD Nasal™, Teleflex; Morrisville, NC, USA) delivering approximately 2.5 ml of inoculum into each nostril for a total of 5 ml. On days 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 14 and 21 post-infection (p.i.) nasal, oral and rectal swabs were collected for RT-qPCR. Blood was collected on days 0, 7, 14 and 21 days p.i. for serologic assays. For sampling, manual restraint in a squeeze chute, without chemical restraint was used.
Serology
The cPASS SARS-CoV-2 neutralization antibody detection kit (GenScript Biotech,
Amsterdam, Netherlands) was used as described64,65 and according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The assay detects the presence of specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies against the S-protein in serum of all species and in an isotype-independent manner by blocking the interaction between the RBD of the viral spike glycoprotein with the ACE2 cell surface receptor. The absorbance at 450 nm of the sample is inversely dependent on the titer of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in tested samples. To confirm the sVNT results, serum samples were submitted to the Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA for VN testing.
Necropsy and sample collection
Animals were humanely euthanized by sedation with a combination of intravenous xylazine and ketamine followed by intravenous pentobarbital sodium to achieve euthanasia. Two inoculated calves and an inoculated calf and young bull were euthanized on days 2 and 5 p.i., respectively, while the remaining animals were euthanized on day 21 p.i.. Similarly, non-infected controls were euthanized and examined at the termination of the study. Following euthanasia, multiple tissues (palatine tonsil, nasal turbinate, medial retropharyngeal, tracheobronchial and mediastinal lymph nodes, lung (right and left caudal lobes), heart, liver, spleen, and kidney were collected. Samples were individually bagged, placed on dry ice, and transferred to a -80 °C freezer until testing by RT-qPCR. The tissues listed above plus samples from 4 lung lobes (right and left cranial, right and left caudal) were also collected and processed for standard microscopic examination. A subset of tissues, based on prior experience with experimental infection of cattle, elk, and white-tailed deer, was also processed by in situ hybridization (ISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). For this, tissue sections of approximately ≤ 0.5 cm in width were fixed by immersion in 10% neutral buffered formalin (≥ 20 volumes fixative to 1 volume tissue) for approximately 24 h, and then transferred to 70% ethanol, followed by standard paraffin embedding techniques. Slides for standard microscopic examination were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE). Adjacent or near adjacent unstained sections were used for ISH and IHC. Slides were examined by light microscopy using a Nikon Eclipse Ci microscope (Nikon Instruments Inc, Melville, NY, USA) equipped with a Nikon DS-Ri2 digital camera (Nikon Instruments Inc). Images were captured using Nikon Elements D software (Nikon Instruments, Inc). Images were sized and annotated using Adobe Photoshop 2025 (Adobe, San Jose, CA, USA).
Real-time quantitative RT-qPCR on swabs and tissues
To assess viral RNA on nasal, oral and rectal samples, swabs were submitted to the National Wildlife Research Center, Ft. Collins, CO, USA for RT-qPCR analysis. To determine the presence of viral RNA in tissue samples, tissues were thawed, cut into an approximately 50–100 mg piece, and resuspended in 1–2 mL of TRI-Reagent® (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in individual gentle MACS™ M tubes (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). Tissues were dissociated using a gentle MACS™ Octo-Dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA was extracted from tissue homogenate samples using the MagMAX™-96 for Microarrays Total RNA Isolation Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Samples were run on a MagMAX™ Express Magnetic Particle Processor (Applied Biosystems) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Next, 15 µl of extracted product was added to 5 µl of the AgPath-ID™ One step RT-qPCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). Samples were run in duplicate, The RT-qPCR reactions were performed on an ABI 7500 Fast instrument (Applied Biosystems) run in standard mode with the following conditions: 1 cycle at 45 °C for 10 min, followed by 1 cycle at 95 °C for 10 min, 1 cycle at 95 °C for 3 s, and 45 cycles at 55 °C for 30 s. The forward primer sequence was 5′-GACCCCAAAATCAGCGAAAT-3′, the reverse primer sequence was 5′-TCTGGTTACTGCCAGTTGAATCTG-3’, and the probe sequence was 5′-FAM-ACCCCGCATTACGTTTGGTGGACC-BHQ1-3’. A positive control (2019-nCoV_N_Positive Control, Integrated DNA Technologies IDT, Coralville, IA, USA) and a negative control were run on every plate.
In situ hybridization (ISH)
Paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at 5 µm and subjected to ISH using the RNAscope ZZ probe technology (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Newark, CA). In situ hybridization was performed to visually detect tissue distribution of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in tissues. Nasal turbinate, palatine tonsil, medial retropharyngeal lymph node, and lung were tested using the RNAscope 2.5 HD Reagents–RED kit (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) as previously described45. Proprietary ZZ probes targeting SARS-CoV-2 RNA (V-nCoV2019-S probe Cat # 848561) were used for detection of viral RNA. A positive control probe targeted the Bos taurus –specific cyclophilin B (PPIB Cat # 3194510) or ubiquitin (UBC Cat # 464851) housekeeping genes, while a probe targeting dapB of Bacillus subtilis (Cat # 312038) was used as a negative control.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining for SARS-CoV-2 was performed on sections of palatine tonsil, nasal turbinate, medial retropharyngeal lymph node, and lung. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues were prepared for staining by baking at 57 °C for 45 min. Tissues were then deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated through a series of graded alcohol solutions. To perform epitope retrieval, slides were submerged in a 1X citrate unmasking solution (Antigen Retrieval Buffer; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) until boiling was initiated and then maintained in the unmasking solution at a sub-boiling temperature (95–98 °C) for 10 min. A 3% hydrogen peroxide solution (Fisher Bioreagents, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to quench endogenous peroxidases. Slides were then immersed in a blocking solution of Tris Buffered Saline (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and Tween20® (Sigma-Aldrich; St Louis, MO, USA) with 5% normalized goat serum. A rabbit monoclonal antibody targeting the SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein (HL344) at a concentration of 1:800 was used as the primary antibody (Cell Signaling Technologies, Boston, MA, USA). Tissues were then incubated in SignalStain® Boost IHC Detection Reagent (HRP, Rabbit, Cell Signaling Technologies) followed by SignalStain® 3,3’ diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate to produce a brown reaction product (Cell Signaling Technologies). Finally, counterstaining was performed using hematoxylin stain solution and Bluing Reagent (Ventana Medical Systems; Santa Clara, CA, USA). Sections of nasal turbinate tissue from a single American mink (Neovison vison) inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 served as positive control samples.
References
Crits-Christoph, A. et al. Genetic tracing of market wildlife and viruses at the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic. Cell 187, 5468-5482 e5411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.010 (2024).
Munnink, B. B. O. & Koopmans, M. Tranmission of SARS-CoV-2 on mink farms between humans and mink and back to humans. Science 371, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe5901 (2021).
Wang, Y. et al. SARS-CoV-2 exposure in Norwegian rats (Rattus norvegicus) from New York city. MBio 14, e03621. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.18.517156 (2022).
Padilla-Blanco, M. et al. The finding of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in a wild Eurasian river otter (Lutra lutra) highlights the need for viral surveillance in wild mustelids. Front. Vet. Sci. 9, 826991. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.826991 (2022).
Racnik, J. et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from human to domestic ferret. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 2450–2453. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2709.210774 (2021).
Yen, H.-L. et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 delta variant (AY.127) from pet hamsters to humans, leading to onward human-to-human transmission: A case study. Lancet 399, 1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00326-9 (2022).
Cano-Terriza, D. et al. SARS-CoV-2 in captive nonhuman primates, Spain, 2020–2023. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 30, 1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3006.231247 (2024).
Dileepan, M. et al. Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) exposure in pet cats and dogs in Minnesota, USA. Virulence 12, 1597–1609. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2021.1936433 (2021).
McAloose, D. et al. From people to Panthera: Natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in tigers and lions at the Bronx zoo. MBio 11, e02220-02220. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.213959 (2020).
Purves, K. et al. SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in urban population of wild fallow deer, Dublin, Ireland, 2020–2022. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 30, 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3008.231056 (2024).
Hale, V. L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in free-ranging white-tailed deer. Nature 602, 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04353-x (2022).
Chandler, J. C. et al. SARS-CoV-2 exposure in wild white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2114828118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114828118 (2021).
Encinas, P. et al. SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in free-ranging fallow deer (Dama dama) and red deer (Cervus elaphus) in suburban and rural areas in Spain. Transbound Emerg. Dis. 2023, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3324790 (2023).
Wan, Y., Shang, J., Graham, R., Baric, R. S. & Li, F. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from Wuhan: An analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J. Virol. 94, 10–1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00127-20 (2020).
Damas, J. et al. Broad host range of SARS-CoV-2 predicted by comparative and structural analysis of ACE2 in vertebrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 22311–22322. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2010146117 (2020).
Praharaj, M. R. et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and ACE2 interaction reveals modulation of viral entry in wild and domestic animals. Front. Med. 8, 775572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.775572 (2021).
Huang, X., Zhang, C., Pearce, R., Omenn, G. S. & Zhang, Y. Identifying the zoonotic origin of SARS-CoV-2 by modeling the binding affinity between the spike receptor-binding domain and host ACE2. J. Proteome Res. 19, 4844–4856. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00717 (2020).
Luan, J., Jin, X., Lu, Y. & Zhang, L. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein favors ACE2 from bovidae and cricetidae. J. Med. Virol. 92, 1649–1656. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25817 (2020).
Buckley, A. et al. Intravenous, intratracheal, and intranasal Inoculation of swine with SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 13, 1506. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13081506 (2021).
Falkenberg, S. et al. Experimental inoculation of young calves with SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 13, 441. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030441 (2021).
Ulrich, L., Wernike, K., Hoffmann, D., Mettenleiter, T. C. & Beer, M. Experimental infection of cattle with SARS-CoV-2. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 26, 2979–2981. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2612/203799 (2020).
Pickering, B. S. et al. Susceptibility of domestic swine to experimental infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 27, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2701.203399 (2021).
Cool, K. et al. Experimental co-infection of calves with SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants of concern. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 13, 2281356. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2281356 (2024).
Haddock, E. et al. Three-week old pigs are not susceptible to productive infection with SARS-COV-2. Microorganisms 10, 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10020407 (2022).
Ardalan, M. et al. Cattle, sheep, and goat humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Vet. Anim. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2024.100408 (2024).
Bae, D. Y. et al. Demonstration of SARS-CoV-2 exposure in Korean native cattle and Korean native black goats in Korea. Animals (Basel) 13, 3498. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13223498 (2023).
El Masry, I. et al. Serological evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in dromedary camels and domestic bovids in Oman. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 12, 2220577. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2023.2220577 (2023).
Fiorito, F. et al. First description of serological evidence for SARS-CoV-2 in lactating cows. Animals (Basel) 12, 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12111459 (2022).
Hüttl, J. et al. Serological and molecular investigation of SARS-CoV-2 in horses and cattle in Switzerland from 2020 to 2022. Viruses 16, 224. https://doi.org/10.3390/v16020224 (2024).
Wernike, K. et al. Serological screening suggests single SARS-CoV-2 spillover events to cattle. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.17.476608 (2022).
Wernike, K. et al. Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 suggestive of single events of spillover to cattle, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 28, 1916–1918. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2809.220125 (2022).
Ramasamy, S. et al. Serological assays reveal no evidence of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in US cattle. Microorganisms 13, 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030600 (2025).
Ardalan, M. et al. Bison, elk, and other captive wildlife species humoral immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. Animals (Basel) 14, 2829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14192829 (2024).
Stroupe, S., Forgacs, D., Harris, A., Derr, J. N. & Davis, B. W. Genomic evaluation of hybridization in historic and modern North American Bison (Bison bison). Sci Rep 12, 6397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09828-z (2022).
Ranglack, D. H., Plumb, G. E. & Rogers, L. R. in Rangeland Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (eds L. B. McNew, J. L. Beck, & D. K. Dahlgren) Ch. 23, 791–827 (Springer, 2023).
Koucky, R. W. The buffalo disaster of 1882. North Dakota History 50, 23–30 (1983).
Wobeser, G. Bovine tuberculosis in Canadian wildlife: An updated history. Can. Vet. J. 50, 1169–1176 (2009).
Haigh, J. C., Mackintosh, C. & Griffin, F. Viral, parasitic and prion diseases of farmed deer and bison. Rev. Sci. Tech. 21, 219–248 (2002).
Epp, T., Waldner, C. & Woodbury, M. An observational study of mortality on bison farms in Saskatchewan wiith special emphasis on malignant catarrhal fever. Can. Vet. J. 57, 37–45 (2016).
Buergelt, C. D. et al. The pathology of spontaneous paratuberculosis in the North American bison (Bison bison). Vet. Pathol. 37, 428–438 (2000).
Olsen, S. C. Brucellosis in the United States: Role and significance of wildlife reservoirs. Vaccine 28(Suppl 5), F73-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.059 (2010).
Register, K. B. et al. Serological evidence for historical and present-day exposure of North American bison to Mycoplasma bovis. BMC Vet. Res. 17, 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02717-5 (2021).
Dragon, D. C., Elkin, B. T., Nishi, J. S. & Ellsworth, T. R. A review of anthrax in Canada and implications for research on the disease in northern bison. J. Appl. Microbiol. 87, 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00872.x (1999).
Martins, M. et al. From deer-to-deer: SARS-CoV-2 is efficiently transmitted and presents broad tissue tropism and replication sites in white-tailed deer. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010197. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1010197 (2022).
Palmer, M. V. et al. Susceptibility of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to SARS-CoV-2. J. Virol. 95, e00083-e121. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.13.426628 (2021).
Boggiatto, P. M. et al. Persistence of viral RNA in North American elk experimentally infected with an ancestral strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sci. Rep. 14, 11171. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61414-7 (2024).
Bosco-Lauth, A. M. et al. Susceptibility of livestock to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 10, 2199–2201. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.2003724 (2021).
Kumar, D. et al. Surveillance and molecular characterization of SARS-CoV-2 infection in non-human hosts in Gujarat, India. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 14391. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114391 (2022).
Fernández-Bastit, L. et al. Susceptibility of domestic goat (Capra aegagrus hircus) to experimental infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) B.1.351/beta variant. Viruses 14, 2002. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14092002 (2022).
Gaudreault, N. N. et al. Susceptibility of sheep to experimental co-infection with the ancestral lineage of SARS-CoV-2 and its alpha variant. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 11, 662–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2022.2037397 (2022).
Bold, D. et al. Development of an indirect ELISA for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in cats. Front. Vet. Sci. 9, 864884. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.864884 (2022).
Zaidi, A. K. & Dehgani-Mobaraki, P. Immunology of Covid-19. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, Vol. 202 (ed A. Saidi) 121–133 (Academic Press, 2024).
Buonsenso, D. et al. Viral persistence in children infected with SARS-CoV-2: Current evidence and future research strategies. Lancet Microb. 4, e745–e756. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00115-5 (2023).
Proal, A. D. & VanElzakker, M. B. Long COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): An overview of biological factors that may contribute to persistent symptoms. Front. Microbiol. 12, 698169. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.698169 (2021).
Kim, T. S., Hufford, M. M., Sun, J., Fu, Y. X. & Braciale, T. J. Antigen persistence and the control of local T cell memory by migrant respiratory dendritic cells after acute virus infection. J. Exp. Med. 207, 1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20092017 (2010).
McDaneld, T. G. et al. Detection of Mycoplasma bovirhinis and bovine coronavirus in an outbreak of bovine respiratory disease in nursing beef calves. Front. Microb. 1, 1051241. https://doi.org/10.3389/frmbi.2022.1051241 (2022).
Funnell, S. G. P. et al. A cautionary perspective regarding the isolation and serial propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cells. NPJ Vaccines 6, 83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41541-021-00346-z (2021).
Cele, S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 prolonged infection during advanced HIV disease evolves extensive immune escape. Cell Host Microbe 30, 154-162.e155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2022.01.005 (2022).
Ren, W. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron variants resist spike cleavage by human airway trypsin-like protease. J. Clin. Invest. 134, e174304. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI174304 (2024).
Fischer, R. J. et al. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) protects Syrian hamsters against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 and B.1.1.7. Nat. Commun. 12, 5868. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26178-y (2021).
Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Epidemiol. 27, 493–497 (1938).
FASS. Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching. Third edn, (Federation of Animal Science Societies, 2010).
Garber, J. C. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Eighth edn, (The National Academies Press, 2011).
Tan, C. W. et al. A SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test based on antibody-mediated blockage of ACE2-spike protein-protein interaction. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1073–1078. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0631-z (2020).
Jemersic, L. et al. Investigating the presence of SARS CoV-2 in free-living and captive animals. Pathogens 10, 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10060635 (2021).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the National Animal Disease Center (NADC) Animal Resources Unit (ARU) for the care of animals used in this study. Specifically, the authors thank Dr. Rebecca Cox, Derek Vermeer, Jonathan Gardner, Tiffany Williams, Emma Hay, Emma Pratt and Jared Peterson for their animal husbandry, care, and assistance. Additionally, we would like to thank Sarah Anderson, Sue Osorio, and Shelly Zimmerman for excellent technical assistance. We would also like to thank the Animal Health Diagnostic Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA for their technical assistance with sample processing and virus neutralizing titer testing, and the National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, IA, USA for sequencing.
Funding
This work was funded by the American Rescue Plan (ARP), through an interagency agreement #60-5030-3-013, between Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Veterinary Services (VS); and USDA ARS CRIS #3625-32000-232-00D; and the Research Participation Program administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664. All opinions expressed in this paper are the author's and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of USDA, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.P., P.B., A.B, E.C., and S.O. designed the experiment. M.P. collected samples, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. P.B. led animal work, collected samples, analyzed data, assisted with writing the manuscript, and reviewed the manuscript. A.B. prepared the virus for infections, collected samples, processed samples, analyzed data, and reviewed the manuscript. E.C. analyzed data and reviewed the manuscript. S.O. and E.J.P. assisted with animal work, collected samples, and reviewed the manuscript. J. C. performed the RT-qPCR and sVNT testing and reviewed the manuscript. H. S. performed IHC and reviewed the manuscript. D.W.N. analyzed viral sequence data.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
All animal work presented in this manuscript was performed under approval of the National Animal Disease Center (NADC) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The study is reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Data availability
The genome of the SARS-CoV-2 strain used in this study is available from NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), accession PV714139.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Palmer, M.V., Buckley, A., Cassmann, E.D. et al. Permissiveness of American bison to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. Sci Rep 15, 33636 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10100-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-10100-3