Abstract
Morganella morganii is an opportunistic pathogen that infects a variety of tissues. The increasing resistance of M. morganii to fluoroquinolones is a global public health concern. Hence, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii clinical isolates. We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases up to July 10, 2024, to identify studies on fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii. Studies that encompassed clinical isolates with fluoroquinolone susceptibility data were included. The prevalence of resistance was determined using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. Subgroup analyses were performed based on geographic region, study period, antibiotic susceptibility testing method, sample size, and study quality. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s funnel plots and Egger’s test. A total of 54 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 45,440 clinical isolates. The pooled global prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii was 21% (95% CI [16, 27]), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 99.48%, p < 0.01). The resistance rate varied by region, with the highest rates observed in West Asia (62%) and Africa (55%) and the lowest in Australia (4%). The resistance rate also differed according to the type of fluoroquinolone, with the highest resistance recorded against the earlier-generation pefloxacin (88%), followed by nalidixic acid (27%), levofloxacin (25%), and ciprofloxacin (22%). There was no or lower resistance to newer fluoroquinolones, such as garenoxacin (0%). A temporal analysis revealed a trend of increasing resistance from 1993 to 2024, which peaked at 37% between 2018 and 2022 before declining slightly to 33% in recent years. Our findings highlight the need for continuous surveillance, improved antimicrobial stewardship, and the consideration of alternative treatment options to combat the rising resistance. However, the high heterogeneity among studies might be due to differences in study design, regions, antibiotic usage, and guidelines. Therefore, the pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution. Despite this variability, the results remain robust. Further studies are needed to explore the molecular mechanisms driving this resistance and potential therapeutic interventions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Morganella morganii is an emerging Gram-negative bacterium in the Enterobacteriaceae family. It is a crucial opportunistic pathogen that causes many clinical and community-acquired infections, including wound, bloodstream, and urinary tract infections. M. morganii infections can be life threatening, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, such as people with diabetes, renal disorders, or chronic liver disease1,2. The global distribution of M. morganii infections reveals a concerning trend. In Israel, a study documented 136 adult cases of M. morganii bacteraemia admitted to a large university hospital3. In Canada, the bacterium was associated with an overall incidence rate of 77 cases per million population4. Similarly, in Australia, 709 cases of M. morganii bloodstream infections (BSIs) were identified between 2000 and 2019, corresponding to an annual incidence of 9.2 cases per million population. M. morganii infections have been reported, such as Taiwan, Japan, the United States, and Spain have higher numbers of reported cases5.
M. morganii exhibits intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotic classes including ampicillin, first- and second-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, and clindamycin due to its natural AmpC β-lactamase production and other resistance mechanisms6. Although, most strains are naturally susceptible to third-generation and fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, aztreonam, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, and chloramphenicol. The clinical significance of M. morganii is increasingly recognized, largely due to its emerging acquired resistance to additional antibiotic classes, including extended-spectrum β-lactams, fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides.1,7,8. Fluoroquinolones represent one of the few remaining oral antibiotic options with reliable activity against M. morganii. The resistance to fluoroquinolones is an emerging global concern, as it complicates treatment strategies and leads to higher mortality rates, particularly in vulnerable populations, such as elderly patients with comorbidities such as cancer, dementia, and heart failure5. The main mechanisms underlying fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii are chromosomal mutations and plasmid-mediated resistance mechanisms that cause target enzyme mutations and efflux pump overexpression9,10. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) has emerged as a significant mechanism of antimicrobial resistance involves three main mechanisms: The first mechanism is target protection by Qnr proteins that protect target enzymes (DNA gyrase and type IV topoisomerase) from quinolone inhibition. The discovery of ciprofloxacin resistance led to the identification of a second PMQR mechanism: The modification of certain quinolones by a specific aminoglycoside acetyltransferase, AAC(6′)-Ib-cr. A third mechanism was later identified with the discovery of plasmid-mediated quinolone efflux pumps, namely QepA and OqxAB. Over the past decade, PMQR genes have been detected in bacterial isolates worldwide, contributing to the global spread of quinolone resistance11.
Sheng et al.12 reported that M. morganii isolates were susceptible to fluoroquinolones until 1996, and that two years later, 20% of M. morganii isolates were resistant to fluoroquinolones in Taiwan. More recent studies have shown that the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii varies significantly across healthcare settings and geographic regions. For instance, a study conducted in China from 2014 to 2020 reported that the rate of ciprofloxacin resistance ranged from 14 to 19% across three hospitals13, while data from the USA indicated that the rate of ciprofloxacin resistance was approximately 31.7% in 201914.
Given that antibiotic resistance in M. morganii is increasing and has negative impacts on clinical outcomes, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compile and analyze data on the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii. We considered various factors that may influence the severity of antibiotic resistance (e.g., geographic location and healthcare setting). The findings provide critical information on the prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii, aiding the effective selection and development of antibiotics for treating M. morganii infections and potentially reducing antibiotic resistance rates in the future.
Methods
Search strategy and selection criteria
The protocol of this systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024562013). This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines15. A comprehensive search was conducted across the PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases using various keyword combinations related to M. morganii and antimicrobial resistance. The search strategy included the following terms: (Morganella morganii OR M. morganii) AND (antibiotic resistance OR disk diffusion OR microdilution OR drug sensitivity OR susceptibility OR multidrug resistant) AND (fluoroquinolones OR ciprofloxacin OR ofloxacin OR levofloxacin OR norfloxacin OR nalidixic acid) (Supplementary Data 1). Articles published up to July 10, 2024 were included, without any restriction on the earliest publication date. Citation management and duplicate removal were performed using EndNote X9.0 software. Two independent reviewers conducted the title and abstract screening using the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. This was followed by a full-text assessment by two separate investigators. Discrepancies in the study selection process were resolved by a third investigator.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Studies were included if they reported the prevalence of M. morganii isolates among patients and the antibiotic resistance rates of the isolates, or if they provided only antibiotic resistance data. Studies that focused on M. morganii clinical isolates were considered, while those that investigated environmental isolates were excluded. Conference proceedings were omitted due to insufficient data for quality assessment, and dissertations and theses were not considered. Duplicate articles were excluded, as were reviews, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, case reports, brief reports, notes, editorials, correspondence, short communications, and letters to the editor. Studies published in languages other than English or for which the full text was unavailable were also excluded. Studies that examined bacterial species other than M. morganii or that included < 10 isolates were not assessed16. Studies that reported antibiotic resistance as MIC90 or that evaluated the synergistic effects of antibiotics were excluded. Furthermore, studies that categorized M. morganii as part of a broader Gram-negative bacterial group and reported only overall antibiotic resistance rates in Gram-negative bacteria were not considered. Finally, studies that tested only resistant isolates or reported only the prevalence of M. morganii infection were removed. The included articles comprised prevalence studies, retrospective studies, cross-sectional studies, and studies reporting the resistance rates of M. morganii to fluoroquinolones.
Study selection and data extraction
Two independent researchers thoroughly reviewed the full-text articles and extracted key data, including the first author’s name, study period, year of publication, geographic location (country and region), sample size, resistant isolate, and specimen type. In addition, the antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) method was recorded (i.e., agar dilution, broth microdilution, E-test, disk agar diffusion, or the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) test strips, a VITEK system, a Phoenix system, or a MicroScan system). Additionally, data on the antibiotic resistance rates of the studied M. morganii isolates were collected. Any discrepancies between the two reviewers during the data extraction process were resolved through consensus.
Quality assessment
Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data17. Each criterion was evaluated on a scale of 0–1, with a maximum possible score of 10. Studies with a score ≥ 5 were categorized as high quality.
Meta-analysis
The meta-analysis was conducted using the STATA 18 software package (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). A forest plot was generated to proportion of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii; the estimated prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) are shown. The Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation helps stabilize variance and prevent negative proportions, especially in cases involving extremely small or large proportions18,19. This transformation was used to calculate the weighted pooled estimate, which was then reverse-transformed. The heterogeneity among the studies was assessed using I2 statistics, with 0–25% indicating low heterogeneity, 25–50% indicating moderate heterogeneity, 50–75% indicating substantial heterogeneity, and 75–100% indicating considerable heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used when the I2 statistic indicated substantial heterogeneity (> 50%) and was statistically significant (p < 0.10) based on the χ2 test (Cochran’s Q test). To assess the risk of publication bias, Egger’s test was performed, and Begg’s funnel plots were generated. A p-value < 0.05 indicated the presence of statistically significant publication bias. A meta-regression analysis was conducted using a significance level of p < 0.05 to assess whether covariates (including publication year, sample size, geographic location, AST method, antibiotic, and quality score) could account for the observed between-study heterogeneity.
Subgroup meta-analysis
A subgroup comparative analysis was conducted to examine the prevalence of M. morganii based on its resistance to specific antibiotics, including nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, fleroxacin, pefloxacin, lomefloxacin, levofloxacin, garenoxacin, gemifloxacin, and trovafloxacin. Additional subgroup comparative analyses were performed based on the geographic region, publication year (five-year intervals), testing method, sample size, study design, and guideline for AST interpretation, quality score of the studies. We also analyzed the antibiotic resistance of the M. morganii isolates found specifically in Asia. To evaluate the risk of publication bias, Egger’s weighted regression method was applied, and funnel plots were generated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered indicative of statistically significant publication bias20.
Results
Characteristics of the included studies
A total of 2730 studies were initially identified by systematically searching four electronic databases. After 523 duplicates were removed, the remaining 2207 articles were screened based on their titles and abstracts. This led to the exclusion of 1978 articles. Among the remaining 229 articles, 26 could not be retrieved, leaving 203 for full-text assessment. Most (n = 149) of these studies were excluded because they did not meet the eligibility criteria. Hence, 54 studies comprising 45,440 clinical isolates were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. (Fig. 1).
The characteristics of the studies were systematically documented to capture key information, including the study period, geographic location, and institutional sources of samples. The specimen sources and diagnoses were also recorded to provide context for the isolates analyzed, and the AST methods used and range of antibiotics tested were noted. Additionally, the quality assessment scores assigned to each study were calculated. A summary of the publication year, geographic region, AST method, sample size, and study design data is presented in Table 1, and a comprehensive overview of all variables is presented in Table 2 and Supplementary Table 2.
As shown in Table 1, the included studies were published between 1993 and 2024. The majority were reported during 2018–2022, followed by 2008–2012 and 1998–2002, respectively. Most studies were conducted in Asia, followed by Europe and North America, with only one study conducted in Australia. Regarding the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) methods, broth dilution was the most commonly used, followed by disk diffusion, while a few studies employed alternative methods. Most studies included fewer than 100 isolates. In terms of study design, the majority were retrospective or cross-sectional. A few studies employed other designs, such as cohort, prospective cohort, or surveillance studies. With respect to study quality, four studies were classified as low quality (score: 1–4), while 50 studies were rated as moderate to high quality (score: 5–9) (see Supplementary Table 1).
Overall prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance among M. morganii clinical isolates
The pooled prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii was estimated to be 21% (95% CI [16, 27]; p < 0.01) (Fig. 2 and Table 3). The Egger’s test results revealed that there was no publication bias among the 54 studies. As depicted in Supplementary Fig. 1, the Begg’s funnel plot analysis showed that the data were distributed in a qualitatively symmetrical manner. Additionally, there was high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.48%; p < 0.01) among the studies (Table 3). To determine the factors that may have influenced the reported prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in the clinical isolates of M. morganii and the heterogeneity, we performed a subgroup analysis based on the antibiotics tested, geographic regions, study periods, AST methods, sample sizes, and quality assessment scores.
Resistance of M. morganii clinical isolates to different generations of quinolones
Among the included studies, ciprofloxacin was the most frequently reported antibiotic, appearing in 49 articles, followed by levofloxacin in 23 articles, ofloxacin in 5 articles, norfloxacin in 4 articles, nalidixic acid in 3 articles, and trovafloxacin in 2 articles. The remaining quinolones—fleroxacin, garenoxacin, gemifloxacin, lomefloxacin, and pefloxacin—were each reported in only 1 article.
In the first subgroup analysis, we examined the resistance of the M. morganii clinical isolates to different generations of quinolones. Among the first-generation quinolones, resistance to nalidixic acid was tested in 197 isolates, and a 27% resistance rate was found (95% CI [13, 43]; p < 0.01), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 51.92%). Resistance to norfloxacin was tested in 2,036 isolates, and a resistance rate of 11% was observed (95% CI [0, 95]; p < 0.01), with heterogeneity (I2 = 99.70%). For the second-generation fluoroquinolones, the resistance rate for ciprofloxacin (n = 38,520) was 22% (95% CI [16, 28]; p < 0.01), with heterogeneity (I2 = 99.40%). As depicted in Supplementary Fig. 2, qualitatively symmetrical funnel plots were observed. The rate of ofloxacin resistance (n = 866) was 9% (95% CI [1, 22]), with heterogeneity (I2 = 94.89%). The resistance rates for lomefloxacin and fleroxacin (each n = 390) were 3% (95% CI [2, 5]) and 2% (95% CI [1, 4]), respectively. The highest resistance rate (88%) was associated with pefloxacin (n = 17; 95% CI [68, 100]). Among the third-generation fluoroquinolones tested, the rate of resistance to levofloxacin (n = 9,166) was 25% (95% CI [13, 38]; p < 0.01), with heterogeneity (I2 = 99.31%). Finally, the rates of resistance to the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones were as follows: 11% for gemifloxacin (n = 94; 95% CI [5, 18]), 8% for trovafloxacin (n = 104; 95% CI [2, 18]), and 0% for garenoxacin (n = 10; 95% CI [0, 17]), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 23.27%) (Fig. 2).
Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii by geographic region
Fluoroquinolone resistance varied notably across the geographic regions included in the studies (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). In Asia, 2464 isolates were analyzed, the overall resistance rate was 35% (95% CI [22, 45]; p < 0.01), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.00%). When we performed a subregional analysis of the data obtained in Asia, the results showed that the resistance rate was 22% in East Asia (95% CI [13, 34]; I2 = 93.28%; p = 0.66), 1% in Southeast Asia (95% CI [0, 10]; I2 = 0.00%; p = 1.00), and 62% in West Asia (95% CI [45, 65]; I2 = 96.66%; p < 0.01). In Africa, 89 isolates were analyzed, the resistance rate was 55% (95% CI [45, 65]), with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0.00%). The resistance rate was 36% in South America, 151 isolates were found, (95% CI [17, 56]), 11% in North America (30,233 isolates) (95% CI [7, 16]; p = 0.63), 9% in Europe (10,209 isolates) (95% CI [7, 13]; p = 0.42), and 4% in Australia (680 isolates) (95% CI [3, 6]). Across the studies with global sampling (1,614 isolates), the resistance rate was 43% (95% CI [27, 59]; p = 0.36).
The studies conducted in Asia provided a considerable volume of data, and this allowed us to analyze the resistance to specific fluoroquinolones in the isolates in this dataset (Supplementary Fig. 5). The overall resistance rate was 35% (95% CI [22, 48]; p < 0.01), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.00%). The isolates showed similar resistance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, with resistance rates of 34% (95% CI [12, 61]; I2 = 98.80%) and 33% (95% CI [8, 62]; I2 = 96.99%), respectively. The resistance rate for norfloxacin was 19% (95% CI [0, 100]; p = 0.57), with heterogeneity (I2 = 99.75%), which reflected variable data. The isolates showed less resistance to ofloxacin, with a resistance rate of 8% (95% CI [5, 12]; p < 0.01), while they showed the highest resistance to pefloxacin at 88% (95% CI [68, 100]; p < 0.01), which was likely influenced by selective use or limited data.
Prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii by study period, AST method, sample size, quality score, study design, and guideline for AST interpretation
Temporal trends in fluoroquinolone resistance among M. morganii clinical isolates were determined by categorizing the studies by publication year (five-year intervals) and analyzing the resistance recorded in each period. For the five studies published between 1993 and 1997, the resistance rate was 2% (95% CI [0, 10]; p = 0.15; I2 = 99.39%). For the seven studies published between 1998 and 2002, the rate increased to 11% (95% CI [8, 15]; p < 0.01; I2 = 84.89%), and a similar rate was observed for the four studies published between 2003 and 2007 (I2 = 96.90%). The resistance rate increased to 21% (95% CI [10, 33]; p < 0.01; I2 = 96.49%) for the studies published between 2008 and 2012, and further rose to 30% (95% CI [16, 47]; p < 0.01; I2 = 87.03%) for those published between 2013 and 2017. The peak resistance rate of 37% (95% CI [22, 52]; p < 0.01; I2 = 99.34%) was associated with the studies published between 2018 and 2022, with evidence of publication bias (p = 0.03). For the four studies published in 2023–2024, the resistance rate was 33% (95% CI [22, 45]; p < 0.01; I2 = 90.26%) (Supplementary Fig. 6).
The level of fluoroquinolone resistance also varied according to the AST method used. When the disk diffusion method was used, the rate of resistance was 15% (95% CI [9, 23]; I2 = 84.98%), whereas the microdilution method was associated with a resistance rate of 24% (95% CI [16, 34]; I2 = 99.67%). When both methods were used, the resistance rate was 11% (95% CI [7, 16]; I2 = 97.54%). The use of alternative methods was associated with a resistance rate of 18% (95% CI [7, 33]; I2 = 97.66%) or 22% (95% CI [0, 61]; I2 = 93.21%), depending on the method, and no publication bias was observed (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Studies that included ≤ 100 isolates reported a 21% resistance rate (95% CI [13, 30]; I2 = 99.82%), and those with > 100 isolates reported a 22% resistance rate (95% CI [16, 28]; I2 = 88.93%) (Supplementary Fig. 8). Resistance was found to vary with the study quality: Low-quality studies (score of 1–4) reported a resistance rate of 10% (95% CI [0, 28]; I2 = 92.64%), and higher-quality studies (score of 5–9) reported a resistance rate of 22% (95% CI [17, 28]; I2 = 99.42%) (Supplementary Fig. 9). Based on the guidelines used in the included studies, resistance rates varied accordingly. Studies using CLSI reported a resistance rate of 18% (95% CI [15, 21]; I2 = 98.21%), while those using CLSI combined with EUCAST and EUCAST alone reported rates of 23% (95% CI [1, 56]; I2 = 98.16%) and 21% (95% CI [7, 39]; I2 = 95.40%), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 10). Regarding study design, cross-sectional studies reported a resistance rate of 10% (95% CI [6, 15]; I2 = 82.98%), whereas retrospective studies showed a higher rate of 28% (95% CI [21, 36]; I2 = 99.59%) (Supplementary Fig. 11).
Determination of the sources of heterogeneity
We performed a meta-regression to identify the potential sources of heterogeneity in the resistance rates among the included studies (Supplementary Table 4). The model explained 68.92% of the between-study variance, with a residual I2 of 97.42%. Among the covariates analyzed, the publication year showed a significant positive association with the resistance rate (β = 0.038, p < 0.001), suggesting an increase in fluoroquinolone resistance over time. The sample size also showed a significant positive association with the resistance rate (β = 0.001, p = 0.022), indicating a slight increase in resistance with the sample size. In addition, countries in Asia tended to have higher resistance rates than those in other regions (β = 0.255, p = 0.007), which indicated that the Asian region was a significant predictor of resistance. The use of the MIC method (β = 0.300, p < 0.001) was also significantly associated with resistance compared to other methods, highlighting the influence of methodological variability. In contrast, the type of fluoroquinolone (β = − 0.053, p = 0.511) and the study quality (β = 0.024, p = 0.449) were not significantly associated with the heterogeneity in the resistance rates.
Discussion
M. morganii is a Gram-negative bacterium and opportunistic pathogen associated with various nosocomial infections70. The increasing resistance of M. morganii to fluoroquinolones is a significant concern, particularly in hospital settings5,71. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the global prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii and to identify associated trends and contributing factors by analyzing data spanning multiple periods and regions.
When we analyzed M. morganii resistance to specific antibiotics, the results revealed that the clinical isolates were most resistant to pefloxacin (88%), followed by nalidixic acid (27%), levofloxacin (25%), and ciprofloxacin (22%). Lower resistance rates were observed for gemifloxacin (11%), ofloxacin (9%), trovafloxacin (8%), and garenoxacin (0%). Pefloxacin is a broad-spectrum second-generation fluoroquinolone that can be administered both orally and intravenously, making it a versatile option in clinical settings72. Although the isolates showed the highest resistance to pefloxacin, the limited sample size (17 isolates) affects the generalizability of this result (i.e., the extent to which this result can be applied to broader populations). There was moderate resistance among the clinical isolates to nalidixic acid (first generation), ciprofloxacin (second generation), and levofloxacin (third generation). No publication bias was observed for levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin is often considered to be more potent and to have broader activity against Gram-negative organisms than levofloxacin73. In some statistical findings, small differences in resistance rates between antibiotics—such as 1–2%—may reach statistical significance due to the large sample size. However, these differences may have limited clinical relevance. It is less susceptible to certain resistance mechanisms; for example, the AAC(6′)-Ib-cr enzyme can inactivate levofloxacin but not ciprofloxacin74. In addition, ciprofloxacin has been used to successfully treat several types of M. morganii infection72,74, while levofloxacin use is less frequently reported in the context of M. morganii infections. The relatively lower resistance to the newer fluoroquinolones (i.e., garenoxacin, trovafloxacin, and gemifloxacin) suggests that these may still be viable treatment options, although their use should be guided by local resistance patterns.
Geographically, the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii was highest in Africa (55%), followed by South America (36%), Asia (35%), North America (11%), Europe (9%), and Australia (4%). The global prevalence was 21%. The high level of resistant isolates in Africa may be attributed to lower public hygiene standards, varying attitudes toward antimicrobial treatment, high population densities facilitating microbial transmission, and widespread fluoroquinolone use75. In Asia, the prevalence of resistant isolates was higher in West Asia (62%) than in East Asia (22%) and Southeast Asia (1 with the studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and Iraq recording the highest prevalences of resistant isolates. These results indicate that the data obtained from the Asian region are biased toward two countries and that the emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii isolates in Saudi Arabia and Iraq warrants active microbiological surveillance. The geographic differences may be explained by the laboratory methods used to detect and identify fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii isolates. In addition, the trends found in the levels of resistant isolates align with antibiotic consumption patterns and regulatory policies76. In West Asia, high fluoroquinolone use in both human and veterinary medicine has been shown to contribute to increased resistance77, whereas East Asia’s relatively lower rates of resistant isolates may reflect the stricter antimicrobial stewardship programs employed in China, Japan, South Korea, and other countries78. Similarly, the lower rates of resistant isolates recorded in Europe (9%) and Australia (4%) were likely due to the antibiotic stewardship programs and regulatory frameworks enforced by agencies such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA)79 and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration. In North America (11%), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration have implemented fluoroquinolone restriction policies, which have led to lower prescribing rates and reduced resistance80. However, in South America (36%), resistance remains high due to inadequate antimicrobial stewardship, widespread over-the-counter antibiotic sales, and inconsistent regulatory enforcement81.
Our temporal analysis of fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii revealed a significant increase over time. In the studies published between 1993 and 1997, the prevalence of fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates was low (2%), likely due to limited exposure to these antibiotics and their selective use. During this period, fluoroquinolones were introduced into clinical practice and used primarily as targeted therapeutic agents for treating severe infections rather than as an empirical treatment option82. The limited exposure to fluoroquinolones likely resulted in lower selection pressure, slowing the development of resistance83. Between 1998 and 2007, as fluoroquinolones became widely used for treating urinary tract and intra-abdominal infections, the rate of resistant isolates rose to 11%84. A more substantial increase (to 21%) occurred between 2008 and 2012, coinciding with the widespread adoption of fluoroquinolones in human and veterinary medicine, as well as the emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes, such as qnrD, in M. morganii11. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) in M. morganii is primarily associated with mechanisms such as Qnr proteins, which protect DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV; the fluoroquinolone-modifying enzyme AAC(6′)-Ib-cr; and plasmid-encoded efflux pumps like QepA and OqxAB. The presence of these determinants in M. morganii and other Gram-negative bacteria underscores the risk of horizontal gene transfer and regional spread of resistance11. Between 2013 and 2017, the rate of fluoroquinolone resistance reached 30%, and between 2018 and 2022, it peaked at 37%. The most recent data, obtained in 2023–2024, indicated that the prevalence of resistant isolates was 33%. This prevalence aligns with the global rise in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The increased use of fluoroquinolones for empirical therapy, along with the horizontal transfer of PMQR genes among M. morganii and other Enterobacterales species, has further contributed to the surge in resistance85. These findings suggest that despite ongoing efforts to curb resistance, fluoroquinolone resistance in M. morganii is a persistent challenge that necessitates continued surveillance and the development of alternative treatment strategies86.
This study has several limitations. The asymmetrical distribution of data observed in some of the funnel plots in the subgroup analysis indicates potential publication bias. As a result, the subgroup analysis results should be interpreted with caution. Significant heterogeneity was observed across the included studies. To address this, we conducted a meta-regression to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. The variability was likely attributed to differences in study design. Additionally, variations in the types of antibiotics used across different regions in the treatment of M. morganii infections may have contributed to resistance development over time, thereby influencing the results. Another contributing factor was the wide range of sample sizes, which likely affected the overall estimates. Furthermore, as the included studies spanned from 1993 onwards, changes in resistance interpretation guidelines—such as updates from CLSI and EUCAST—along with differences in the antibiotic discs used by various manufacturers87, may have influenced the AST results, as supported by previous literature. Taken together, these factors likely contributed to the heterogeneity, which is to some extent unavoidable. Therefore, the pooled estimates should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, data availability was limited for certain regions, which may have introduced geographic bias. Furthermore, differences in research priorities and reporting practices among countries may have led to the underrepresentation of the prevalence of resistant isolates in some countries and, thus, potential publication bias. Variability in the laboratory techniques used to detect fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii isolates may also have contributed to inconsistencies in reported resistance rates.
Conclusion
In this comprehensive global assessment of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. morganii, we determined that there are significant geographic and temporal variations. Our findings support the use of ciprofloxacin over levofloxacin in the treatment of M. morganii infections and suggest that later-generation fluoroquinolones are more effective, possibly due to structural modifications that reduce their susceptibility to common resistance mechanisms, such as efflux pumps and target site mutations.
The trend of rising resistance, particularly in high-burden regions such as Africa, Asia, and South America, underscores the urgent need for more stringent antimicrobial stewardship programs, stricter regulatory policies, and enhanced surveillance efforts. Future research should focus on elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying fluoroquinolone resistance, evaluating alternative therapeutic strategies, and assessing the impact of targeted interventions to mitigate the spread of resistance. Clinicians should consider local resistance patterns when selecting empirical therapeutic measures for M. morganii infections to ensure optimal treatment outcomes.
Data availability
The datasets associated with this research are included in Supplementary Table 3.
References
Alsaadi, A. et al. Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of Morganella morganii infections: A multicenter retrospective study. J. Infect. Public Health 17, 430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2023.12.013 (2024).
Ghosh, S., Bal, A. M., Malik, I. & Collier, A. Fatal Morganella morganii bacteraemia in a diabetic patient with gas gangrene. J. Med. Microbiol. 58, 965–967. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.008821-0 (2009).
Erlanger, D., Assous, M. V., Wiener-Well, Y., Yinnon, A. M. & Ben-Chetrit, E. Clinical manifestations, risk factors and prognosis of patients with Morganella morganii sepsis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 52(3), 443–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.010 (2019).
Laupland, K. B., Parkins, M. D., Ross, T. & Pitout, J. D. Population-based laboratory surveillance for tribe Proteeae isolates in a large Canadian health region. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 13(7), 683–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01715.x (2007).
Laupland, K. B., Paterson, D. L., Edwards, F., Stewart, A. G. & Harris, P. N. A. Morganella morganii, an emerging cause of bloodstream infections. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, 0056922. https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.00569-22 (2022).
Xiang, G. et al. Clinical molecular and genomic epidemiology of Morganella morganii in China. Front. Microbiol. 28(12), 744291. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2021.744291 (2021).
Al-Muhanna, A. S., Al-Muhanna, S. & Alzuhairi, M. A. Molecular investigation of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes and potential drug resistance in clinical isolates of Morganella morganii. Ann. Saudi Med. 36, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2016.223 (2016).
Sheng, W. H., Badal, R. E. & Hsueh, P. R. Distribution of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, AmpC beta-lactamases, and carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae isolates causing intra-abdominal infections in the Asia-Pacific region: Results of the study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trends (SMART). Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 57, 2981–2988. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00971-12 (2013).
Nasri Yaiche, M. et al. Type II and type IV topoisomerase mutations in clinical isolates of Morganella morganii harbouring the qnrD gene. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 13, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-014-0034-4 (2014).
Behera, D. U. et al. Sequencing and characterization of M. morganii strain UM869: A comprehensive comparative genomic analysis of virulence, antibiotic resistance, and functional pathways. Genes 14, 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061279 (2023).
Rodriguez-Martinez, J. M., Cano, M. E., Velasco, C., Martinez-Martinez, L. & Pascual, A. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: An update. J. Infect. Chemother. 17, 149–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10156-010-0120-2 (2011).
Sheng, W. H. et al. Emerging fluoroquinolone-resistance for common clinically important Gram-negative bacteria in Taiwan. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 43, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00381-4 (2002).
Xiang, G. et al. Clinical molecular and genomic epidemiology of Morganella morganii in China. Front. Microbiol. 12, 744291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.744291 (2021).
Ince, D. et al. Epidemiology of Gram-negative bloodstream infections in the United States: Results from a cohort of 24 hospitals. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 10, ofad265. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad265 (2023).
Liberati, A. et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 6, 1000100. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 (2009).
Banar, M. et al. Global prevalence and antibiotic resistance in clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Med. 10, 1163439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1163439 (2023).
Joanna Briggs Institute. Checklist for analytical cross sectional studies. (2017).
Xu, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, G. & Abbasi Tadi, D. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in cystic fibrosis infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 36, 419–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2023.05.006 (2024).
Droz, N. et al. Bacterial pathogens and resistance causing community acquired paediatric bloodstream infections in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 8, 207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0673-5 (2019).
Higgins, J. P. & Thompson, S. G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 21, 1539–1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 (2002).
Ahmed, N. J., Abdalla, M., Alahmadi, H., Haseeb, A. & Khan, A. H. Prevalence of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria and antibiotic resistance rates at a military hospital in Riyadh region. J. Young Pharm. 13, 392–395. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2021.13.95 (2021).
Alamri, A. et al. Trend analysis of bacterial uropathogens and their susceptibility pattern: A 4-year (2013–2016) study from Aseer region Saudi Arabia. Urol. Ann. 10, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_68_17 (2018).
Alamri, A., Hassan, B. & Hamid, M. E. Susceptibility of hospital-acquired uropathogens to first-line antimicrobial agents at a tertiary health-care hospital Saudi Arabia. Urol. Ann. 13, 166–170. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_109_20 (2021).
Alavudeen, S. S. et al. Distribution of multi-resistant bacterial isolates from clinical specimens in a hospital environment of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. J. Young Pharm. 9, 347–351. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2017.9.69 (2017).
Albornoz, E. et al. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance genes in clinical enterobacteria from Argentina. Microb. Drug Resist. 23, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2016.0033 (2017).
da Cunha Ferreira, T. & Martins, I. S. Risk factors of death in bloodstream infections caused by AmpC beta-lactamase-producing enterobacterales in patients with neoplasia. Infect. Drug Resist. 14, 3083–3097. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S312920 (2021).
Flores-Paredes, W. et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of non-ESKAPE-Ec Enterobacteriales in a IV-level hospital in Lima Peru. Acta Microbiologica. Hellenica 66, 155–165 (2021).
Fuchs, P. C., Barry, A. L. & Brown, S. D. In vitro activity of gemifloxacin against contemporary clinical bacterial isolates from eleven North American medical centers, and assessment of disk diffusion test interpretive criteria. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 38, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-8893(00)00198-X (2000).
Guan, H. et al. Distribution and antibiotic resistance patterns of pathogenic bacteria in patients with chronic cutaneous wounds in China. Front. Med. 8, 609584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.609584 (2021).
Guermazi-Toumi, S. et al. Susceptibility profiles of bacteria causing urinary tract infections in Southern Tunisia. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 12, 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.004 (2018).
Hawser, S. et al. In vitro activity of eravacycline and comparators against Gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial isolates collected from patients globally between 2017 and 2020. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 33, 304–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2023.04.017 (2023).
Hoban, D. J., Bouchillon, S. K., Hawser, S. P. & Badal, R. E. Trends in the frequency of multiple drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and their susceptibility to ertapenem, imipenem, and other antimicrobial agents: Data from the study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trends 2002 to 2007. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 66, 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.06.009 (2010).
Hoban, D. J. et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae, including molecular characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing species, in urinary tract isolates from hospitalized patients in North America and Europe: Results from the SMART study 2009–2010. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 74, 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.05.024 (2012).
Hombach, M., Bloemberg, G. V. & Böttger, E. C. Effects of clinical breakpoint changes in CLSI guidelines 2010/2011 and EUCAST guidelines 2011 on antibiotic susceptibility test reporting of Gram-negative bacilli. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 622–632. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr524 (2012).
Hrbacek, J., Cermak, P. & Zachoval, R. Current antibiotic resistance patterns of rare uropathogens: Survey from Central European urology department 2011–2019. BMC Urol. 21, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-021-00821-8 (2021).
Hsueh, P. R. Study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trends (SMART) in the Asia-Pacific region, 2002–2010. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 40, S1–S3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(12)00244-0 (2012).
Jain, N. et al. Antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial isolates of gram-negative bacteria: Public health implications in the Latvian context. Antibiotics 10, 791. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10070791 (2021).
Jean, S. S. et al. Epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of pathogens causing urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region: Results from the study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trends (SMART), 2010–2013. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 47, 328–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.01.008 (2016).
Jean, S. S. et al. Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among Enterobacteriaceae in intensive care units in Taiwan. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28, 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-008-0610-7 (2009).
Jia, P. et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline, ceftazidime-avibactam, and comparators against Gram-positive and -negative organisms in China: The 2018 results from the ATLAS program. BMC Microbiol. 22, 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02644-5 (2022).
Jiménez-Guerra, G. et al. Susceptibility evolution to antibiotics of Enterobacter cloacae, Morganella morganii, Klebsiella aerogenes and Citrobacter freundii involved in urinary tract infections: An 11-year epidemiological surveillance study. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 38, 166–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimce.2019.07.003 (2020).
Jing, Y. et al. A genomic and bioinformatics view of the classification and evolution of Morganella species and their chromosomal accessory genetic elements harboring antimicrobial resistance genes. Microbiol. Spectr. 10, 0265021 (2022).
Jones, M. E. et al. Emerging resistance among bacterial pathogens in the intensive care unit–a European and North American surveillance study (2000–2002). Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 3, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-3-14 (2004).
Karlowsky, J. A. et al. In vitro activity of ceftaroline-avibactam against Gram-negative and Gram-positive pathogens isolated from patients in Canadian hospitals from 2010 to 2012: Results from the CANWARD surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 5600–5611. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01485-13 (2013).
Karlowsky, J. A. et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli collected in Morocco by the ATLAS global surveillance program from 2018 to 2020. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 30, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2022.04.011 (2022).
Karlowsky, J. A., Jones, M. E., Mayfield, D. C., Thornsberry, C. & Sahm, D. F. Ceftriaxone activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens isolated in US clinical microbiology laboratories from 1996 to 2000: Results from the surveillance network® (TSN®) database-USA. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 19, 413–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-8579(02)00010-9 (2002).
Karlowsky, J. A. et al. Antimicrobial resistance in urinary tract pathogens in Canada from 2007 to 2009: CANWARD surveillance study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 55, 3169–3175. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00066-11 (2011).
Ko, K. S. et al. Prevalence and characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Korean hospitals. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 61, 453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.03.005 (2008).
Lai, C. C. et al. Susceptibility rates of clinically important bacteria collected from intensive care units against colistin, carbapenems, and other comparative agents: Results from surveillance of multicenter antimicrobial resistance in taiwan (SMART). Infect. Drug Resist. 12, 627–640. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S194482 (2019).
Lepelletier, D. et al. Risk-factors for gastrointestinal colonisation with resistant Enterobacteriaceae among hospitalised patients: A prospective study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12, 974–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01474.x (2006).
Liao, J. X. et al. Decreasing antibiotic resistance trends nationally in Gram-negative bacteria across United States Veterans affairs medical centers, 2011–2020. Infect. Dis. Ther. 12, 1835–1848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-023-00827-9 (2023).
Lin, T. Y. et al. Clinical manifestations and prognostic factors of Morganella morganii bacteremia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 34, 231–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-014-2222-8 (2015).
Livermore, D. M. et al. In vitro activity of piperacillin/tazobactam and other broad-spectrum antibiotics against bacteria from hospitalised patients in the British Isles. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 22, 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-8579(03)00108-0 (2003).
Low, D.E., de Azavedo, J., Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network & Davidson, R. In vitro activity of cefepime against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, viridans group streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae from a cross-Canada surveillance study. Can. J. Infect. Dis. 10, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1155/1999/172031 (1999).
Lu, P. L. et al. Epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Gram-negative bacteria causing urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region: 2009–2010 results from the study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trends (SMART). Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 40, S37–S43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-8579(12)70008-0 (2012).
Mirelis, B. et al. Increased resistance to quinolone in Catalonia Spain. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16, 137–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(93)90009-v (1993).
Murray, P. R., Jones, R. N., Washington, J. A., Gerlach, E. H. & Allen, S. D. In vitro comparison of E4868, a new trifluoroquinolone, with ciprofloxacin and temafloxacin tested against 5192 recent clinical isolates from five medical centers. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 17, 307–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(93)90040-e (1993).
Ngo, N. D. et al. Clinical features, bacteriology, and antibiotic treatment among patients with presumed Naja bites in Vietnam. Wilderness Environ. Med. 31, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2020.01.002 (2020).
Pitout, J. D., Wei, Y., Church, D. L. & Gregson, D. B. Surveillance for plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants in Enterobacteriaceae within the Calgary health region, Canada: The emergence of aac(6′)-Ib-cr. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 61, 999–1002. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn068 (2008).
Prosser, B. L. & Beskid, G. Multicenter in vitro comparative study of fluoroquinolones against 25,129 Gram-positive and Gram-negative clinical isolates. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 21, 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(94)00087-d (1995).
Reeves, D. S., Bywater, M. J. & Holt, H. A. The activity of cefpirome and ten other antibacterial agents against 2858 clinical isolates collected from 20 centres. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/31.3.345 (1993).
Rolston, K. V., Frisbee-Hume, S., LeBlanc, B. M., Streeter, H. & Ho, D. H. Antimicrobial activity of a novel des-fluoro (6) quinolone, garenoxacin (BMS-284756), compared to other quinolones, against clinical isolates from cancer patients. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 44, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00433-9 (2002).
Schaumburg, F. et al. Chronic wounds in Sierra Leone: Pathogen spectrum and antimicrobial susceptibility. Infection 50, 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01762-6 (2022).
Schmitz, F. J., Verhoef, J. & Fluit, A. C. Comparative activities of six different fluoroquinolones against 9,682 clinical bacterial isolates from 20 European university hospitals participating in the European SENTRY surveillance programme. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 12, 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-8579(99)00091-6 (1999).
Senel, S., Karacan, C., Erkek, N. & Gol, N. A single-center experience of antimicrobial resistance patterns in pediatric urinary tract infection. Med. Princ. Pract. 19, 359–363. https://doi.org/10.1159/000316373 (2010).
Siegrist, H. H., Nepa, M. C. & Jacquet, A. Susceptibility to levofloxacin of clinical isolates of bacteria from intensive care and haematology oncology patients in Switzerland: A multicentre study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 43, 51–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/43.suppl_3.51 (1999).
Wenzel, R. P. et al. In vitro susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from hospitalized patients in four European countries, Canada, and the United States in 2000–2001 to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins and comparator antimicrobials: Implications for therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47, 3089–3098. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.10.3089-3098.2003 (2003).
Yee, Y. C. & Thornsberry, C. A survey of ciprofloxacin and 11 other antimicrobial agent susceptibility data of United States bacterial isolates from 1990 to 1992. Antimicrob. Infect. Dis. Newsl. 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/1069-417X(95)80001-8 (1995).
Yefou, M. D. et al. Bacterial profile of diabetic foot infections and antibiotic susceptibility in a specialized diabetes centre in Cameroon. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 42, 52. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.42.52.31042 (2022).
Liu, H., Zhu, J., Hu, Q. & Rao, X. Morganella morganii, a non-negligent opportunistic pathogen. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 50, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2016.07.006 (2016).
Zhu, W. et al. Genomic epidemiology and antimicrobial resistance of Morganella clinical isolates between 2016 and 2023. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 14, 1464736. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2024.1464736 (2024).
Keskar, V., Biyani, M., Amin, S. O. & Knoll, G. Successful treatment of PD peritonitis due to Morganella morganii resistant to third-generation cephalosporins — A case report. Perit. Dial. Int. 37, 241–242. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2016.00268 (2017).
Hansen, G. T. & Blondeau, J. M. Comparison of the minimum inhibitory, mutant prevention and minimum bactericidal concentrations of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and garenoxacin against enteric Gram-negative urinary tract infection pathogens. J. Chemother. 17, 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2005.17.5.484 (2005).
Luzzaro, F. Fluoroquinolones and Gram-negative bacteria: Antimicrobial activity and mechanisms of resistance. Infez. Med. 16, 5–11 (2008).
Van, T. T. H., Yidana, Z., Smooker, P. M. & Coloe, P. J. Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 20, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031 (2020).
Klein, E. Y. et al. Global trends in antibiotic consumption during 2016–2023 and future projections through 2030. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 121, 2411919121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2411919121 (2024).
Kuppusamy, S., Venkateswarlu, K. & Megharaj, M. Tetracycline and fluoroquinolone antibiotics contamination in agricultural soils fertilized long-term with chicken litter: Trends and ravages. Sci. Total Environ. 946, 174286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174286 (2024).
Lee, C. F. et al. Impact of antibiotic stewardship programmes in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 73, 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx492 (2018).
Gehring, R., Mochel, J. P. & Schmerold, I. Understanding the background and clinical significance of the WHO, WOAH, and EMA classifications of antimicrobials to mitigate antimicrobial resistance. Front. Vet. Sci. 10, 1153048. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1153048 (2023).
Chin, J. et al. Restriction-free antimicrobial stewardship initiative targeting fluoroquinolone reduction across a regional health-system. Infect. Prev. Pract. 1, 100019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2019.100019 (2019).
Pallares, C. J. et al. Antimicrobial stewardship programs in seven Latin American countries: Facing the challenges. BMC Infect. Dis. 23, 463. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-023-08398-3 (2023).
Maris, A. S., Mody, P., Brewer, D. J. & Humphries, R. M. The fluoroquinolones: An update for the clinical microbiologist. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 43, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2021.06.001 (2021).
Redgrave, L. S., Sutton, S. B., Webber, M. A. & Piddock, L. J. Fluoroquinolone resistance: Mechanisms, impact on bacteria, and role in evolutionary success. Trends Microbiol. 22, 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2014.04.007 (2014).
Hooper, D. C. & Jacoby, G. A. Topoisomerase inhibitors: fluoroquinolone mechanisms of action and resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6, 025320. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a025320 (2016).
Lomovskaya, O. et al. Vaborbactam: Spectrum of beta-lactamase inhibition and impact of resistance mechanisms on activity in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e01443-e1517. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01443-17 (2017).
Swingler, E. A. et al. Fluoroquinolone stewardship at a community health system: A decade in review. Antimicrob. Steward. Healthc. Epidemiol. 2, 186. https://doi.org/10.1017/ash.2022.326 (2022).
Åhman, J., Matuschek, E. & Kahlmeter, G. The quality of antimicrobial discs from nine manufacturers-EUCAST evaluations in 2014 and 2017. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25, 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.05.021 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the Chulabhorn Royal Academy (Project code PSCM2568/003). We thank Dr. Kristen Sadler from Scribendi (www.scribendi.com) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NL, KT, SS, TK, and WM designed the study. NL, KT, SS, TK, JW, and SK performed the study retrieval, screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation. WM performed the formal data analysis and data visualization. NL, KT, SS, TK, and WM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tasanapak, K., Sitthisak, S., Kitti, T. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the global prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistant Morganella morganii clinical isolates. Sci Rep 15, 34746 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18294-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18294-2