Introduction
Fetal MRI (fMRI) is now recognized as the standard imaging when abnormalities are detected on the routine US [1]. Prior research focusing on decreasing anxiety during the MRI screening, found that parental anxiety also largely stemmed from anticipation of how the MRI results would be interpreted [2, 3]. Although it was shown that the fMRI images were found valuable by the expectant couples [4] there is a paucity of data exploring parental experiences while viewing their baby’s MRI images in an interdisciplinary fetal care conference setting, the way increasingly used to counsel parents at fetal centers [5]. In this study, we aimed to explore parental experiences while viewing fMRI images as part of fetal care conferences, specifically how viewing MRI images has affected parents’ emotions, feelings of attachment to their baby, and decision-making for their baby.
Methods
A web-based survey was created using a literature review, expert opinion, and parent input (Supplement 1). Parental responses were asked using a Likert scale (1–5 scoring). Inclusion criteria were 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, and having the fMRI images reviewed at a care conference with a group of specialists, including the pediatric radiologist at a Midwest Maternal-Fetal Center. Each woman received the survey via email 3 days after her care conference, with a single follow-up reminder sent 5 days after the initial survey invitation over a 6-month period in 2023. To understand whether emotional responses to the baby’s MRI differed as a function of the mother’s age, race, ethnicity, or education, correlations were performed using Kendall’s tau-b (τb). For each set of correlations, p values were adjusted using the Holm-Bonferroni method.
Free text responses were qualitatively analyzed using thematic analysis [6].
Results
74 mothers received the survey, 21 responded (28% response rate). Participants were 18–44 years old, and all had completed at least high school (Supplement. 2). Overall, most parents agreed that viewing their baby’s images with the radiologist made them feel relieved, happy, and more connected to the baby (Fig. 1). While most mothers did not report that viewing the MRI images had affected their attachment to the baby, responses to decision-making varied (Supplement 3). No parent, even a subset of parents whose babies carried a lethal diagnosis, wished not to see the MRI images of their baby. Older age was associated with less relief/happiness and more anxiety/confusion upon seeing the baby’s images (each p < 0.05, Kendall’s tau-b). These correlations were no longer significant after correcting for multiple comparisons, likely because of the small sample size. No correlation was observed between emotional responses to viewing the MRI images with maternal age, educational level, race, or ethnicity. Qualitative analysis of 14 free text responses yielded three themes (Supplement 4): 1. Viewing the images provides clarity. 2. The expert explanation is impactful. 3. Appreciating having a choice for viewing the images.
Discussion
This is the first study exploring parental experiences viewing fMRI images with the radiologist at a fetal interdisciplinary care conference. As shown by others [7], radiologists’ communication skills at the care conference and also hearing the interpretations of other specialists might have helped women navigate the information provided by the fMRI images, made them feel relieved, and actually made most mothers feel more connected to their baby [3] Several parents commented on how seeing what was going on with their baby provided clarity and helped them make a plan for the baby. This is consistent with other research showing the fMRI imaging being helpful in experiences of uncertainty [4] Although most parents do not find viewing the images to be a stressful, confusing, or anxiety-increasing event, nor do they express any regret, older parents may be experiencing less relief/happiness and more anxiety/confusion upon seeing their baby’s images, thus requiring a different approach to their emotive needs. Viewing the MRI images had varying effects on parental decision-making, which had not been reported in previous research. It requires further studies to understand how viewing the MRI images in an interdisciplinary care setting affects parental decision-making.
Our study’s main limitations are the low response rate and the inclusion of only English-speaking parents, which might have led to bias in the responses. Further research, using qualitative interview methods, should include a diverse group of participants and fathers to explore their met and unmet needs, especially emotive and decision-making needs, while viewing fMRI images in a fetal care conference setting and how clinicians could improve their counseling accordingly.
References
Chartier AL, Bouvier MJ, McPherson DR, Stepenosky JE, Taysom DA, Marks RM. The safety of maternal and fetal MRI at 3 T. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213:1170–3.
Plunkett S, Dobeli K, Prior M, Tusek X. Survey of maternal anxiety and perceptions towards foetal MRI and pre-scan education. J Med Radiat Sci. 2024;71:10–20.
Skelton E, Webb R, Malamateniou C, Rutherford M, Ayers S. The impact of antenatal imaging on parent experience and prenatal attachment: a systematic review. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2022;42:1–23.
Lie M, Graham R, Robson SC, Griffiths PD. “He looks gorgeous” - iuMR images and the transforming of foetal and parental identities. Socio Health Illn. 2019;41:360–77.
Lorenz RP, Kuhn MH. Multidisciplinary team counseling for fetal anomalies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:263–6.
Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42:846–54.
Reed K, Kochetkova I, Whitby E. Visualising uncertainty: Examining women’s views on the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in late pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:19–26.
Acknowledgements
We thank all parents who completed the survey. We acknowledge the support of IUH Riley Fetal Center in completion of this research and Dr. Edgardo Szyld for his expert review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Nicholas D O’Connor contributed to the web-based survey development, participated in data analysis and interpretation and drafted the manuscript. Louis J. Martin carried out the statistical analysis, interpretation of data and participated in manuscript writing. Rachel L. Tullar helped with data collection, data analysis and participated in manuscript writing. Brandon P. Brown conceptualized the research question, contributed to the web-based survey development, and data analysis. Zeynep N.I. Salih conceptualized the research question, contributed to the web-based survey development, obtained IRB approval, and participated in data analysis, interpretation, and manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
IRB approval is granted by IU Human Research Protection Program under exempt category and written consent was not required.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
O’Connor, N.D., Martin, L.J., Tullar, R.L. et al. A survey of parental experiences while viewing MRI images at a fetal care center. J Perinatol 45, 1300–1301 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02319-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02319-9
