Abstract
Nanophotonics has revolutionized the control of light-matter interactions in various fields of fundamental science and technology. In this work, we propose Implosion Fabrication (ImpFab) as a versatile nanophotonics fabrication platform providing the highest spatial resolution, material versatility, and full volumetric control. ImpFab uniquely combines top-down lithography with bottom-up nanoparticle assembly within a hydrogel scaffold, enabling precise control over optical material properties, such as refractive index, by adjusting printing parameters. We showcase the potential of ImpFab by fabricating three-dimensional photonic crystals and quasicrystals, as well as demonstrating optical structures with spatially modulated unit cell material properties. Our results highlight the potential of ImpFab in producing nanostructures with tailored optical functionalities, which are crucial for applications in sensing, imaging, and information processing, and opening new avenues in developing non-Hermitian photonic systems with spatially controlled gain and loss.

Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nanophotonics has emerged as a powerful paradigm to manipulate and control light-matter interactions at the nanoscale1,2,3, opening new avenues for fundamental research and technological advancements in various fields, including sensing, imaging, and information processing4. Three-dimensional (3D) optical structures, such as photonic crystals, offer unique opportunities for enriching nanophotonics, as they can provide enhanced light-matter coupling5, as well as tunable photonic bands to explore topological physics, notably Weyl and Dirac points6,7,8,9. Likewise, multilayer moiré crystals have recently been shown for enhanced light localization10, optical singularities11, as well as interfacial nonlinear responses12. Furthermore, photonic quasicrystals have been garnering considerable attention, primarily due to their distinct physical properties and promising potential in realizing new photonic devices13,14.
Among exciting frontiers in nanoscale light-matter interactions, non-Hermitian nanophotonics has emerged as a rapidly growing research area, driven by the intriguing possibilities of manipulating gain and loss in optical systems to achieve novel functionalities and performance enhancements15,16. Such optical systems require advanced fabrication methods, capable of integrating materials with controlled properties with high spatial precision17. Yet, the vast majority of implementations have focused on coupled resonator systems, such as waveguide arrays18,19,20 or ring resonators21,22, due to fabrication challenges in creating 3D structures with spatially varying material properties.
Among the most popular approaches in 3D nanofabrication, two-photon polymerization (TPP), which relies on the photoactivation of a resin by a high-power laser23,24, has been a prominent method due to its versatility. Yet, TPP suffers from several major drawbacks for photonic applications, such as low-refractive-index contrast, single-material structures, limited resolution, and geometrical constraints, which impede the creation of arbitrary 3D shapes at optical wavelength scales25. Alternatively, bottom-up approaches have demonstrated the potential for realizing 3D crystals with various lattice geometries and materials26,27. Recently, an innovative approach has emerged – Implosion Fabrication (ImpFab) – employing hydrogels as 3D scaffolds for the volumetric deposition of various materials, enabling the creation of complex 3D nanostructures with nanoscale precision28,29.
Here, we explore the potential of ImpFab’s ability to directly assemble silver particles inside hydrogels for complex 3D nanophotonic structures with modulated optical properties. We demonstrate the nanofabrication and analyze diffraction patterns of 2D and 3D photonic crystals with diverse lattice structures. We also demonstrate aperiodic structures such as moiré crystals and quasicrystals, which lack periodicity but can have rotational symmetries forbidden in conventional crystals. A distinctive aspect of our method is its ability to manipulate the effective optical properties of the deposited material continuously in three dimensions. This paves the way for new directions in nanophotonics research, in particular, the development of sophisticated non-Hermitian nanophotonic systems with spatially controlled optical functionalities such as gain and loss.
Results
Implosion fabrication: 3D nanoprinting
The nanofabrication process we present in this paper, ImpFab, is depicted in Fig. 1. The approach combines top-down lithography for full control of the geometry, and bottom-up nanoparticle conjugation for the deposition and growth of various materials28,29. A hydrogel scaffold serves as both the 3D matrix for the incorporation of functional materials, and as a scalable structure, capable of expansion and shrinkage, facilitating the achievement of truly nanoscale (~ 50 nm) features28.
a Casting of hydrogel precursor into the desired composition. Infiltrated dye molecules are covalently bound to the polymer matrix by two-photon excitation (purple voxel). Cy3: Sulfo-Cyanine3 Amine dyes. b Nanoparticle conjugated with the functional group of the patterned fluorescent on the backbone. NSH: Biotin-NHS; Au: Streptavidin Fluoronanogold. c The pattern is intensified by an oxidation-reduction process to grow larger silver particles at the gold nucleation sites. d Isotropic shrinkage of the hydrogel matrix and patterned 3D structure
The process begins with the preparation of the hydrogel composed of a solution of sodium acrylate, acrylamide, and bisacrylamide28. Weight concentrations of each component are optimized for a volume shrink ratio of 1000 x (10 x per side). The gel is then washed in water (dH2O) to reach full expansion. Subsequently, the gel is immersed in a solution containing fluorescent Sulfo-Cyanine3 Amine (Cy3) dyes (250 μM) for 1 h, ensuring full diffusion of dyes throughout the porous hydrogel, see Fig. 1a. Next, a laser scanning microscope is employed to selectively photo-activate a chemical binding between the fluorescent dyes and the hydrogel backbone. Infiltrated dye molecules within the laser beam voxel (highest intensity volume) are covalently bound to the polymer matrix by two-photon excitation: see inset of Fig. 1a. Additional information about the photopatterning system can be found in the Supplementary Information Section S3. Upon completion of the patterning process, the gel is thoroughly washed in water to remove the unexposed dyes, leaving behind the optically patterned 3D structure composed of the fluorescent molecules with a functional group. We then proceed with a series of molecule-nanoparticle nanoconjugation steps to introduce desired optical functionality.
In the following, we describe the process for silver nanoparticles28. This procedure can be generalized to a much greater library of materials of interest, including quantum materials, oxides, diamond, upconversion materials, and semiconductors29. The gel is first washed in a solution of 100 μM N-hydroxysuccinimido biotin (NHS-Biotin) molecules, and subsequently immersed for > 8 h in a solution of streptavidin-fluoronanogold particles, see Fig. 1b. After each chemical process, the gel is thoroughly washed in deionized water (dH2O) to minimize unintended particles in the gel background. After a wash in 50 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt dihydrate (EDTA) for 30 min, we follow with silver intensification through an oxidation-reduction reaction at the gold nucleation sites, see Fig. 1c. In addition to dH2O, the gel is washed in 50 mM sodium citrate for 1 h. Finally, the gel is subjected to a controlled shrinking process, during which the embedded structures undergo an isotropic volumetric reduction, leading to the formation of the final 3D heterostructure with nanoscale features, see Fig. 1d. For the shrinking process, the gel is washed in a two-step salt solution of 0.1 M magnesium dichloride (MgCl2) and 0.1 M calcium chloride (CaCl2), each for about 20 min.
To experimentally validate the structural controllability and optical performance, we fabricated silver diffraction gratings with groove periods ranging from 520 nm to 1700 nm. Figure 2a shows an optical microscopy image of a representative grating with a period of 850 nm. Optical characterization using a custom-built Fourier microscopy system revealed distinct first-order diffraction under narrow-band illumination, as shown in inset of Fig. 2a. The measured diffraction angles closely match the expected theoretical predictions, confirming both the accuracy of the patterned periodicity and the isotropic shrinking process. Further details on the structural integrity and process optimization can be found in the Supplementary Information Sections S1 and S2.
a Optical microscopy image of a silver grating with a pitch of 850 nm. The overlapping inset shows a representative first-order optical diffraction pattern obtained under narrow-band illumination at 520 nm. Scale bar is 10 μm (b). Measured diffraction angle as a function of the normalized ratio between wavelength (λ) and grating pitch (d). The black line indicates prediction based on the grating equation, showing good agreement with experimental data
The method described above offers unprecedented design freedom and material versatility28, enabling the creation of complex 3D photonic devices for a wide range of applications. In particular, incorporating fluorescent dyes and metallic particles in combined structures enables the introduction of gain and lossy elements, an essential aspect of non-Hermitian photonics.
Modulated optical properties
We first demonstrate how the optical properties of the printed structures can be modulated through variations in printing parameters. We printed embedded square patches with an approximate thickness of 20 μm under different settings of laser power and scan speed. The left panel of Fig. 3a shows a fluorescence image of the hydrogels post-printing, where a clear gradient in the patterned molecule density can be identified. The activation of chromophores is maximized with increased laser energy, which is directly proportional to the laser power and printing dwell time. This correlation is translated to the silver density of the final structure, as observed by the pronounced contrast in the right panel of Fig. 3a, showing a wide-field microscope transmission image of the gel. This underscores our control over the optical properties of silver through adjustment of the printing parameters. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), shown in Fig. 3b, revealed densely packed and interconnected gold nanoparticles, indicating efficient chromophore activation and uniform material deposition within the patterned regions.
a Square patches patterned with different laser power and dwell time. Fluorescent image of square patches post-print (left panel). The bright-field image shows the same patches after silver intensification (right panel). Scale bars are 10 μm. b SEM images showing patterned regions with dense, uniform gold nanoparticles. (Right) High-magnification SEM image reveals interconnected nanoparticles within the patterned area, confirming high chromophore activation and efficient material deposition. Scale bar: left = 10 μm, middle = 1 μm, right = 50 nm
A quantitative characterization of the final silver composition is obtained by reflection and transmission spectroscopy. To facilitate the characterization of the material properties, we printed a set of silver patches at the gel surface, exposing the silver-air interface. To ensure adequate area coverage, we printed four square patterns adjacent to one another (a visible stitch can be observed in the inset of Fig. 4a). The reflectivity was measured using a custom Fourier space microscope system. Figure 4a shows the measured absolute reflectivity of the printed silver under normal incidence across the visible spectrum, at its highest density. A mean absolute reflectivity of about 33% is measured, in contrast to the roughly 90% reflectivity of bulk silver. Using the expression for the normal reflection at an interface R = ∣(1 − neff)/(1 + neff)∣2, we can estimate the effective refractive index of the printed silver as neff = 3.697 + 0.126i at a wavelength of 532 nm.
a Absolute reflectivity of a high-density silver patch printed at the gel-air interface (left axis). The inset shows a stitched region of adjacent square patterns used for characterization. Relative reflectivity spectra for patches printed with varying laser energies (right axis), demonstrating relative reflectivity tunable over more than 50%. b Transmission spectrum of a low-density silver patch exhibiting Fabry-Pérot interference
Furthermore, we can identify the volume fraction of silver in the fabricated devices by applying the Maxwell-Garnett effective medium model30. This model describes the effective permittivity of a dielectric material with metallic inclusions using the formula εeff = εg[εg + 1 + 2f/3(εs − εg)]/[εg + 1 − f/3(εs − εg)]. Here, εg and εs are the bulk permittivities of the gel and silver, respectively, and f denotes the volume fraction of the silver particles. We find a volume fraction of f = 0.39, which suggests that a slightly higher volume fraction (up to ~ 0.74), and therefore reflectivity, is possible.
Additionally, Fig. 4b shows the measured relative reflectivity of square patches printed with different laser energies (60 nJ to 190 nJ), corresponding to laser power (75−120 mW) and scanning speeds (15−30 mm/s). The optical reflection is clearly affected by the printing energy, which allows us to control the relative reflection down to ~40%.
For low densities, losses become low enough to measure an appreciable transmission. Figure 4b shows the transmission for a low-density silver patch. A clear Fabry-Pérot interference pattern emerges from the silver thin-film. We estimate the effective index of the low-density silver for a narrowband spectral width \(T={(1-R)}^{2}/[{(1-R)}^{2}+4R{\sin }^{2}(\delta /2)]\exp (-\alpha {L}_{\mathrm{fi}lm})\), where \(R=[{({n}_{{\rm{gel}}}-{n}_{\mathrm{fi}lm})}^{2}+{k}_{\mathrm{fi}lm}^{2}]/[{({n}_{{\rm{gel}}}+{n}_{\mathrm{fi}lm})}^{2}+{k}_{\mathrm{fi}lm}^{2}]\) is the Fresnel reflection, δ/2 = ω/c0nfilmLfilm is the accumulated phase shift, α = 4πkfilm/λ is the absorption coefficient, λ is the wavelength, Lfilm the silver patch thickness, c0 the speed of light in vacuum, ngel = 1.35 the gel index, and neff = nfilm + ikfilm the thin film complex index of refraction. Fitting for the index and thickness, we find neff = 2.14 + i0.0009 for a film thickness Lfilm = 21 μm. Having characterized the basic optical properties of nanomaterials fabricated with ImpFab, we now turn our attention to the realization of nanophotonic devices.
2D and 3D photonic crystals
In this section, we show how ImpFab can realize 2D and 3D photonic crystals formed by silver meta-atoms with various crystal lattices. Figures 5 and 6 show the fluorescence and optical microscope images of fabricated photonic crystals, alongside their corresponding diffraction patterns. The diffraction measurements were performed under narrow-band illumination at 520 nm, derived from a spectrally filtered supercontinuum laser.
a 2D square lattice with periodicity a = 700 nm and cube width 0.5 a. Fluorescence image taken after conjugating the printed area with biotin-NHS particles and partial shrinking with MgCl2 (3-4x shrink ratio). The inset shows a bright field image of a crystal with a = 2.4 μm and cube width 0.4 a. The right panel shows the corresponding diffraction pattern. Scale bar for fluorescence image is 2 μm, and 5 μm for the bright field image. b 3D body-centered cubic (bcc) crystal with a = 2.4 μm
Figure 5a left panel shows the fluorescence image of a fabricated 2D photonic crystal with square lattice, with periodicity a = 700 nm and width 0.5 a. The inset of Fig. 5a shows a bright field microscope image of a crystal structure consisting of silver cubes arranged in a lattice with periodicity a = 2.4 μm and width 0.4 a. The corresponding diffraction pattern is shown in the right panel of Fig. 5a, demonstrating a clear fourfold symmetry. This symmetry reflects the equidistant arrangement of meta-atoms along two perpendicular axes in the lattice. Diffraction peaks manifest at locations corresponding to the reciprocal lattice vectors, affirming the characteristic periodicity and integrity of the square lattice structure. The three-dimensional body-centered cubic (bcc) crystal shown in Fig. 5b yields a similar diffraction pattern, stemming from its three-dimensional nature and the specific meta-atom arrangement of the bcc structure. The right panel of Fig. 5b shows the diffraction pattern projected along the [001] plane.
Figure 6a shows a single-layer hexagonal lattice, displaying a sixfold symmetry in its diffraction pattern. This pattern offers a direct visualization of the inherent hexagonal arrangement of the meta-atoms within the lattice structure. The ImpFab method’s versatility and precision make it possible to create more complex structures such as twisted bilayer hexagonal “moiré” crystals. This is achieved by printing a stack of two separate hexagonal lattices with a twist angle. The interference of the two twisted layers effectively introduces a new length scale into the system, the moiré wavelength, giving rise to a larger superlattice moiré structure, seen in Fig. 6b. The moiré wavelength31 can be expressed as Λm = a/[2sin(θ/2)], where a is the lattice period and θm is the relative rotation between layers. The interaction between layers provides opportunities for complex band engineering, such as photonic flat bands32, as well as strong light localization and chirality10,33.
a 2D hexagonal lattice crystal with primitive translation vector a = 4.5 μm. The right panel shows the corresponding diffraction pattern. b Twisted bi-layer hexagonal lattice forming a moiré crystal. Diffraction pattern with characteristic 12-fold symmetry of quasicrystal (right panel). Scale bars are 20 μm
The realized structure, shown in Fig. 6b, has a twist angle θm = 30∘, a = 20 μm and z spacing of ~1 μm, resulting in a moiré wavelength of approximately Λm = 8.7 μm. For this angle, an intriguing phenomenon is observed: the diffraction pattern displays a twelve-fold symmetry, analogous to quasicrystals, materials known for their unique diffraction patterns and lack of periodicity34,35. This is in stark contrast to the single layer shown in 6a. The additional Bragg peaks in the diffraction pattern originate from the second twisted layer and are positioned according to the inverse of the moiré wavelength, yielding the observed twelve-fold symmetry. The emergence of this quasicrystalline-like diffraction pattern from a bilayer system with crystalline layers demonstrates the fascinating possibilities presented by the control and manipulation of layered nanophotonic structures10.
Quasicrystals
Quasicrystals lack periodicity but do exhibit long-range orientational order. This unique property of quasicrystals, marked by non-repetitive patterns that still maintain a certain degree of order, poses a challenge for most conventional 3D fabrication techniques. However, ImpFab, with its nanoscale precision and flexibility of 3D structure and material density, is well-equipped to handle such complexity.
Figure 7 shows an optical Penrose quasicrystal, a canonical example of a 2D quasicrystal, consisting of an aperiodic two-tiling structure exhibiting fivefold rotational symmetry. Silver meta-atoms of distinct densities were placed at the center of each of the two tiles, as illustrated in the inset of Fig. 7. This serves as an example of an optical structure assembled from constituents with precisely controlled loss. In future experiments, using an optically patterned fluorescent dye, one could pump the dye to obtain gain within the same structure. By printing two sets of dyes, one set can be used as gain, while the other, with an overlapping spectral profile can be used as loss, effectively creating a non-Hermitian optical structure.
2D Penrose quasicrystal with unit cells having two distinct material densities (e.g., gain/loss). White scale bar is 20 μm, black scale bar is 6 μm
Figure 8 shows 2D projections of a fabricated 3D icosahedral quasicrystal along different symmetry axes (two- and five-fold), with characteristic spacing a = 1.4 μm and width 0.5 a. Such noncrystallographic symmetries naturally arise from the interpretation of quasicrystals as projections of higher-dimensional cubic lattices onto irrationally oriented hyperplanes, known as the cut-and-project method36,37. The Penrose and icosahedral quasicrystals are projections from 5D and 6D cubic lattices onto 2D and 3D, respectively, with orientations related to the golden ratio, which introduces the fivefold rotational symmetry. Constraints in our printing system resulted in a periodic z-layer stack, necessitating artificial compression of the 3D fluorescence image along z to discern the symmetry patterns more efficiently.
Reconstructed 3D icosahedral quasicrystal. The left and right panel shows fluorescence projection images for twofold- and fivefold-symmetric axes, respectively. Scale bars are 50 μm
Discussion
In this work, we employed the versatility and spatial controllability of ImpFab to nanofabricate photonic crystals and quasicrystals in 2D and 3D. These results pave the way for the exploration of a new realm of multi-dimensional photonic structures with non-trivial symmetries and their associated properties, offering vast potential for innovative applications.
Unlike periodic structures, which are marked by their long-range translational symmetry, quasicrystals are highly isotropic, owing to their non-crystalline symmetries. Consequently, they have been shown to host complete photonic band gaps at lower dielectric contrasts, potentially enabling more efficient control and manipulation of light with comparatively relaxed material constraints38. Moreover, photonic quasicrystals often exhibit interesting localization physics, such as strongly localized states, localization/delocalization transitions and mobility edges39,40,41, which hold practical implications for manipulating light flow in complex photonic systems. This includes the formation of high Q/V nanocavities42 and enhancing light transport in the presence of disorder43. Additionally, the unique properties of photonic quasicrystals can be harnessed to mitigate crosstalk in fiber arrays, a major challenge in both optical communications and endoscopy44, and to open up new avenues for lasing applications45. A method to realize three-dimensional photonic crystals and quasicrystals and twisted multilayer systems with arbitrary material properties would enable the exploration of new frontiers in photonics inspired by condensed matter physics34,35,46,47.
Gain and loss are ubiquitous in photonics, with the former being essential for light generation and amplification, and the latter typically viewed as a detrimental property. However, recent explorations in non-Hermitian photonics have revealed the potential to harness unique properties by judiciously distributing gain and loss within a photonic system17,48,49. Non-Hermitian photonic systems exhibit exceptional points and novel topological effects50 which have been proposed for a variety of applications, including quantum information processing51, sensing52, lasing22,53, and robust light transport54,55. ImpFab may enable the fabrication of a new class of non-Hermitian devices based on photonic crystals, which are anticipated to exhibit several unique properties, including all-angle supercollimation, the PT-superprism effect, and threshold-less PT transitions56,57. As such, this fabrication technique has the potential to significantly expand the capabilities of photonic devices. We note that the experimental realization and performance testing of photonic structures incorporating gain and loss using fluorescent dyes, such as PT-symmetric systems, represent an important future direction for extending the capabilities of Implosion Fabrication.
Materials and methods
Two-Photon photopatterning
The photopatterning of all structures was carried out using a custom-built two-photon lithography system based on a Mai Tai Ti:sapphire femtosecond laser (Spectra-Physics). The laser operated at a center wavelength of 780 nm, with a pulse width of 100 fs and a repetition rate of 80 MHz. The beam was expanded to fill the back aperture of a 20 × water-immersion objective (numerical aperture = 1.00, working distance = 2.80 mm), ensuring optimal focusing and resolution. The optical power delivered to the sample ranged from 75 mW to 120 mW, adjusted according to the desired feature size and nanoparticle deposition density. The system provided a 600 μm field of view at 2048 pixels, corresponding to a pixel size of 293 nm. A dwell time of 0.8 μs per pixel yielded an effective scan speed of approximately 370 mm/s. Photopatterning parameters, including average laser power, dwell time, and z-step size, were optimized to achieve high structural fidelity.
The three-dimensional structures were defined digitally as a stack of two-dimensional binary masks, each corresponding to a planar cross-section of the desired geometry. These masks were discretized and translated into position and amplitude modulation commands for the laser scanning system during two-photon lithography (TPL). The femtosecond laser is tightly focused into the hydrogel at specific depths and scanned through the hydrogel to activate photochemical reactions. The patterning voxel, the smallest addressable volume pixel, is determined by the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective, laser power, and scanning speed. These parameters were experimentally calibrated to ensure high patterning fidelity and consistent material deposition across layers.
Fluorescence Imaging
All fluorescence imaging was performed using a Perkin Elmer spinning disk confocal microscope (CSU-10 Yokogawa) equipped with a Hamamatsu Orca-ER cooled CCD camera. Excitation was provided by continuous-wave (CW) laser lines chosen according to the fluorophore under study. Imaging was carried out using a Nikon N40XLWD-NIR 40 × water-immersion objective (NA = 1.15, working distance = 0.59–0.61 mm). The illumination power was adjusted to maximize fluorescence signal while avoiding photobleaching, and polarization control was not required for these measurements. For Cy3, the excitation wavelength was 561 nm, and fluorescence emission was collected in the range of 570-650 nm using appropriate bandpass filters.
Data availability
The data and codes that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to Y. S. (yannick.salamin@ucf.edu).
References
Joannopoulos, J. D., Villeneuve, P. R. & Fan, S. H. Photonic crystals: putting a new twist on light. Nature 386, 143–149 (1997).
Novotny, L. & Van Hulst, N. Antennas for light. Nat. Photonics 5, 83–90 (2011).
Pelton, M. Modified spontaneous emission in nanophotonic structures. Nat. Photonics 9, 427–435 (2015).
Khorasaninejad, M. & Capasso, F. Metalenses: Versatile multifunctional photonic components. Science 358, eaam8100 (2017).
Vogler-Neuling, V. V. et al. Large-scale bottom-up fabricated 3D nonlinear photonic crystals. Adv. Photonics Res. 5, 2400058 (2024).
Lu, L. et al. Experimental observation of Weyl points. Science 349, 622–624 (2015).
Lu, L., Fu, L., Joannopoulos, J. D. & Soljačić, M. Weyl points and line nodes in gyroid photonic crystals. Nat. Photonics 7, 294–299 (2013).
Vaidya, S. et al. Observation of a charge-2 photonic Weyl point in the infrared. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 253902 (2020).
Lu, L. et al. Symmetry-protected topological photonic crystal in three dimensions. Nat. Phys. 12, 337–340 (2016).
Tang, H. et al. Modeling the optical properties of twisted bilayer photonic crystals. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 157 (2021).
Ni, X. Q. et al. Three-dimensional reconfigurable optical singularities in bilayer photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 073804 (2024).
Kim, B. et al. Three-dimensional nonlinear optical materials from twisted two-dimensional van der Waals interfaces. Nat. Photonics 18, 91–98 (2024).
Segev, M., Silberberg, Y. & Christodoulides, D. N. Anderson localization of light. Nat. Photonics 7, 197–204 (2013).
Vardeny, Z. V., Nahata, A. & Agrawal, A. Optics of photonic quasicrystals. Nat. Photonics 7, 177–187 (2013).
Miri, M. A. & Alù, A. Exceptional points in optics and photonics. Science 363, eaar7709 (2019).
Li, A. D. et al. Exceptional points and non-Hermitian photonics at the nanoscale. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 706–720 (2023).
Wang, C. Q. et al. Non-Hermitian optics and photonics: from classical to quantum. Adv. Opt. Photonics 15, 442–523 (2023).
Guo, A. et al. Observation of PT-symmetry breaking in complex optical potentials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 093902 (2009).
Xu, Y. L. et al. Experimental realization of Bloch oscillations in a parity-time synthetic silicon photonic lattice. Nat. Commun. 7, 11319 (2016).
Cerjan, A. et al. Experimental realization of a Weyl exceptional ring. Nat. Photonics 13, 623–628 (2019).
Parto, M. et al. Edge-mode lasing in 1D topological active arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 113901 (2018).
Feng, L. et al. Single-mode laser by parity-time symmetry breaking. Science 346, 972–975 (2014).
Deubel, M. et al. Direct laser writing of three-dimensional photonic-crystal templates for telecommunications. Nat. Mater. 3, 444–447 (2004).
Schulz, J., Vaidya, S. & Jörg, C. Topological photonics in 3d micro-printed systems. APL Photonics 6, 080901 (2021).
Cersonsky, R. K. et al. The diversity of three-dimensional photonic crystals. Nat. Commun. 12, 2543 (2021).
von Freymann, G. et al. Bottom-up assembly of photonic crystals. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 2528–2554 (2013).
Zhou, W. J. et al. Colloidal quasicrystals engineered with DNA. Nat. Mater. 23, 424–428 (2024).
Oran, D. et al. 3d nanofabrication by volumetric deposition and controlled shrinkage of patterned scaffolds. Science 362, 1281–1285 (2018).
Han, F. et al. Three-dimensional nanofabrication via ultrafast laser patterning and kinetically regulated material assembly. Science 378, 1325–1331 (2022).
Markel, V. A. Introduction to the Maxwell Garnett approximation: tutorial. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 33, 1244–1256 (2016).
Kim, K. et al. Tunable moiré bands and strong correlations in small-twist-angle bilayer graphene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3364–3369 (2017).
Yang, Y. et al. Photonic flatband resonances for free-electron radiation. Nature 613, 42–47 (2023).
Lou, B. C. et al. Theory for twisted bilayer photonic crystal slabs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 136101 (2021).
Ahn, S. J. et al. Dirac electrons in a dodecagonal graphene quasicrystal. Science 361, 782–786 (2018).
Uri, A. et al. Superconductivity and strong interactions in a tunable moiré quasicrystal. Nature 620, 762–767 (2023).
Senechal, M. Quasicrystals and Geometry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Jeon, J. & Lee, S. Unveiling multipole physics and frustration of icosahedral magnetic quasicrystals. npj Quantum Mater. 9, 5 (2024).
Rechtsman, M. C. et al. Optimized structures for photonic quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 073902 (2008).
Sinelnik, A. D. et al. Experimental observation of intrinsic light localization in photonic icosahedral quasicrystals. Adv. Opt. Mater. 8, 2001170 (2020).
Lahini, Y. et al. Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 013901 (2009).
Vaidya, S. et al. Reentrant delocalization transition in one-dimensional photonic quasicrystals. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033170 (2023).
Simbula, A. et al. Realization of high-Q/V photonic crystal cavities defined by an effective Aubry-André-Harper bichromatic potential. APL Photonics 2, 056102 (2017).
Levi, L. et al. Disorder-enhanced transport in photonic quasicrystals. Science 332, 1541–1544 (2011).
Guglielmon, J. & Rechtsman, M. C. Inducing maximal localization with fractal waveguide arrays. Phys. Rev. A 99, 063807 (2019).
Vitiello, M. S. et al. Photonic quasi-crystal terahertz lasers. Nat. Commun. 5, 5884 (2014).
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
Fonseca, A. G. et al. Quasicrystalline Weyl points and dense Fermi–Bragg arcs. Phys. Rev. B 108, L121109 (2023).
Feng, L., El-Ganainy, R. & Ge, L. Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity–time symmetry. Nat. Photonics 11, 752–762 (2017).
Parto, M. et al. Non-Hermitian and topological photonics: optics at an exceptional point. Nanophotonics 10, 403–423 (2020).
Bergholtz, E. J., Budich, J. C. & Kunst, F. K. Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021).
Klauck, F. et al. Observation of PT-symmetric quantum interference. Nat. Photonics 13, 883–887 (2019).
Yu, S. et al. Experimental investigation of quantum PT-enhanced sensor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240506 (2020).
Hodaei, H. et al. Parity-time–symmetric microring lasers. Science 346, 975–978 (2014).
Feng, L. et al. Experimental demonstration of a unidirectional reflectionless parity-time metamaterial at optical frequencies. Nat. Mater. 12, 108–113 (2013).
Longhi, S., Gatti, D. & Valle, G. D. Robust light transport in non-Hermitian photonic lattices. Sci. Rep. 5, 13376 (2015).
Mock, A. Parity-time–symmetry breaking in two-dimensional photonic crystals: Square lattice. Phys. Rev. A 93, 063812 (2016).
Cerjan, A., Raman, A. & Fan, S. H. Exceptional contours and band structure design in parity-time symmetric photonic crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 203902 (2016).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge stimulating conversations with Shiekh Zia Uddin and Jonghwa Shin. Y. S. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through the Early Postdoc Mobility Fellowship No. P2EZP2-188091. C.R.-C. is supported by a Stanford Science Fellowship. M.d.M received support from CFIS-UPC. This work was supported by the U.S. Army Research Laboratory and the U.S. Army Research Office through the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-23-2-0121, and the U.S. Office of Naval Research (ONR) Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative (MURI) under Grant No. N00014-20-1-2325, and ONR Grant no. N00014-17-1-2977. ESB acknowledges Fujikura, HHMI, Lisa Yang, John Doerr, and NIH 1R01EB024261 for funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.S., G.Y., E.S.B. and M.S. conceived the concept. Y.S., B.M., A.G.F. designed the optical structures, with help from G.Y., K.M., S.V. and A.A.E.E.; G.Y. developed the materials and chemistry for the fabrication process, with help from Y.S., B.M., Q.Y., D.O., C.S., Y.Su. and S.M.; J.B., S.E.K. built custom two-photon lithography system, with help from Y.Su., S.M. J.S. and J.J.L.; Y.S., G.Y., B.M. Q.Y., M.M.C., K.M., C.S., Y.Su., S.M., J.J.L. performed the photo-patterning; G.Y., Q.Y. conceived the structural characterization methods (fluorescence, SEM) for structures and functions. Y.S., B.M. built optical characterization methods for optical structures, with help from M.M.C., K.M. and J.S.; Y.S., B.M., and C.R.-C. analyzed the optical material responses; E.S.B. and M.S. supervised the project. Y.S. wrote the paper with contributions and edits from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
D.O. and E.S.B. are inventors on a patent filed on implosion fabrication.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Salamin, Y., Yang, G., Mills, B. et al. Three-dimensional nanophotonics with spatially modulated optical properties. Light Sci Appl 15, 145 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-025-02166-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-025-02166-5










