Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The evolving landscape of BPH surgical treatments: considering semen parameters in clinical decision-making

Subjects

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Kim J, Polchert M, Chacko B, Tannenbaum J, Raheem O. Do minimally invasive benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments preserve sexual function? A contemporary review of the literature. Curr Urol Rep. 2021;22:56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Abolazm AE, El-Hefnawy AS, Laymon M, Shehab-El-Din AB, Elshal AM. Ejaculatory hood sparing versus standard laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate: sexual and urodynamic assessment through a double blinded, randomized trial. J Urol. 2020;203:792–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gild P, Dahlem R, Pompe RS, Soave A, Vetterlein MW, Ludwig TA, et al. Retrograde ejaculation after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP)-Impact on sexual function and evaluation of patient bother using validated questionnaires. Andrology. 2020;8:1779–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sibona M, Destefanis P, Vercelli E, Secco S, Gontero P, Cindolo L. Ejaculation physiology and dysfunction after BPH surgery: the role of the new MISTs. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;26:475–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gemma L, Pecoraro A, Sebastianelli A, Spatafora P, Sessa F, Nicoletti R, et al. Impact of minimally invasive surgical procedures for male lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia on ejaculatory function: a systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024;27:404–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Busetto GM, Lombardo R, De Nunzio C, Santoro G, Tocci E, Schiavone N, et al. Ejaculation sparing of classic and minimally invasive surgical treatments of LUTS/BPH. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00834-y.

  7. Mason MM, Schuppe K, Weber A, Gurayah A, Muthigi A, Ramasamy R. Ejaculation: the process and characteristics from start to finish. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2023;15:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Annese P, d’Altilia N, Falagario UG, Tocci E, Mirone V, Simone G, et al. UroLift to preserve seminal parameters in young male with LUTS from BPH. World J Urol. 2024;42:486.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Manfredi C, Garcia-Gomez B, Arcaniolo D, Garcia-Rojo E, Crocerossa F, Autorino R, et al. Impact of surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia on sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of erectile function and ejaculatory function. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8:1711–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mcvary K, Padron O, Kaminetsy J. (122) Preservation of sexual function: 12-month outcomes from a randomized, double-blind, sham controlled study evaluating the optilume BPH system, a novel drug coated balloon. J Sex Med. 2024;21(Supplement_1):qdae001-116.

  11. Kaltsas A, Kratiras Z, Zachariou A, Dimitriadis F, Sofikitis N, Chrisofos M. Evaluating the impact of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatments on sexual health. Biomedicines. 2024;12:110.

  12. Couteau N, Duquesne I, Frederic P, Thiounn N, Timsit MO, Mejean A, et al. Ejaculations and benign prostatic hyperplasia: an impossible compromise? A comprehensive review. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5788.

  13. Chakraborty A, Elterman D, Corsi N, Bouhadana D, Bailly G, Patel P, et al. An analysis of benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment reimbursement trends across Canada Examining provincial changes over the recent decade with comparison to cost of living changes. Can Urol Assoc J. 2024;18:268–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Shang Y, Liu C, Cui D, Han G, Yi S. The effect of chronic bacterial prostatitis on semen quality in adult men: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7233.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MVA: wrote the original draft of the manuscript. OO: analyzed the qualitative data. GS: analyzed the qualitative data. AM: edited and provided critical feedback on the manuscript. KK: edited and provided critical feedback on the manuscript. RRG: conceived and conceptualized the hypothesis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kajal Khodamoradi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valdivia y Alvarado, M., Obuekwe, O., Saffati, G. et al. The evolving landscape of BPH surgical treatments: considering semen parameters in clinical decision-making. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-00939-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-00939-y

Search

Quick links