Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Perioperative outcomes of ongoing antithrombotic therapy during endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Abstract

Background

The management of antithrombotic therapy in patients undergoing endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) remains challenging due to competing risks of thromboembolism and perioperative bleeding. This meta-analysis evaluated perioperative outcomes among patients undergoing endoscopic prostate procedures while continuing antiplatelet (APT) or anticoagulant (AC) therapy compared with patients not receiving antithrombotic treatment.

Methods

Literature search was conducted on 17th September 2025 including PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Scopus database, to identify comparative studies evaluating perioperative outcomes of endoscopic prostate procedures in patients on versus off APT/AC therapy were identified. Data were pooled using random-effects models to estimate mean differences (MD) or odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Fifteen studies comprising 6091 patients (1900 on APT/AC, 4191 controls) were included. Operative time, postoperative hemoglobin decrease, catheterization duration, and continuous bladder irrigation time were comparable between groups across all surgical modalities. However, bleeding-related complications were significantly more frequent among APT/AC users undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.05–3.41, p = 0.03) and enucleation (OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.71–4.93, p < 0.0001), particularly in the AC subgroup (OR 4.80, p = 0.0002). Enucleation also carried higher odds of bleeding requiring surgical hemostasis (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.73–7.84, p = 0.0007) and acute urinary retention (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.04–1.77, p = 0.02) among antithrombotic users. Conversely, photoselective vaporization (PVP) demonstrated comparable rates of transfusion, hemostasis, and urinary complications regardless of APT/AC therapy. Hospital stay was marginally longer after TURP and PVP among APT/AC users (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Continuation of antithrombotic therapy during PVP appears safe, with perioperative outcomes comparable to those of non-antithrombotic patients. Conversely, its ongoing use—especially AC—significantly increases bleeding risks following TURP and enucleation. PVP may therefore represent the preferred modality for high-risk patients requiring uninterrupted antithrombotic therapy. Clinical decision-making should balance individual thromboembolic risk against anticipated bleeding risk, with multidisciplinary input when appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Studies concerning Acute Urinary Retention.
Fig. 3: Studies concerning Blood Transfusion.
Fig. 4: Studies concerning Bleeding Requiring Surgical Haemostasis.
Fig. 5
Fig. 6: Studies concerning Operative Time.
Fig. 7: Studies concerning 1-day postoperative Change in Haemoglobin.
Fig. 8: Studies concerning the Continuous bladder washout duration.
Fig. 9: Studies concerning Hospital Stay.
Fig. 10: Studies concerning Length of catheterization.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset used in this study is available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Giulioni C, Falsetti F, Tallè M, Papaveri A, Mengoni F, Orciani R, et al. Impact of preoperative catheter duration on perioperative safety and functional outcomes following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for Benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from a single-center series. Low Urin Trac Symptoms. 2025;17:e70039 https://doi.org/10.1111/luts.70039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tallè M, Giulioni C, Papaveri A, Mengoni F, Orciani R, Pandolfo SD, et al. Influence of preoperative indwelling urinary catheter on outcomes of high-power holmium laser enucleation for very large prostate (≥ 200 mL). World J Urol. 2025;43:223 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05624-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sibona M, Destefanis P, Vercelli E, Secco S, Gontero P, Cindolo L. Ejaculation physiology and dysfunction after BPH surgery: the role of the new MISTs. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;26:475–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00686-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pirola GM, Castellani D, Naselli A, Fong KY, Biligere S, Dellabella M, et al. Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in men aged 80 years and older. Outcomes from a global, large, and multicenter series using different energy sources and techniques. World J Urol. 2025;43:344 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05699-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giulioni C, Tallè M, Papaveri A, Mengoni F, Orciani R, Pandolfo SD, et al. The implementation of trifecta score to assess the quality of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in elderly patients: an analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes and the impact of age. J Clin Med. 2025;14:3410 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Visseren, Mach FLJ, Smulders F, Carballo YM, Koskinas D, Bäck KC, et al. The 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:3227–3337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marchioni M, Cindolo L, Di Nicola M, Schips L, De Sio M, Lima E, et al. Major acute cardiovascular events after transurethral prostate surgery: a population-based analysis. Urology. 2019;131:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Castellani D, Yuen SK, Giulioni C, Fong KY, Doizi S, Moretto S, et al. To stop or not to stop. Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in patients on blood thinners: outcomes, a real-life prospective multicenter study of 932 cases. World J Urol. 2025;43:674 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-06072-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahyai SA, Gilling P, Kaplan SA, Kuntz RM, Madersbacher S, Montorsi F, et al. Meta‑analysis of functional outcomes and complications following surgical therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic enlargement. Eur Urol. 2010;58:384–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cornu JN, Gacci M, Hashim H, Herrmann TRW, Malde S, Netsch C, et al. EAU guidelines on the assessment and management of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris April 2024.

  11. Zheng X, Qiu Y, Qiu S, Tang L, Nong K, Han X, et al. Photoselective vaporization has comparative efficacy and safety among high-risk benign prostate hyperplasia patients on or off systematic anticoagulation: a meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2019;37:1377–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2530-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng X, Peng L, Cao D, Han X, Xu H, Yang L, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in benign prostate hyperplasia patients with or without oral antithrombotic drugs: a meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019;51:2127–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02278-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Axon E, Dwan K, Richardson R. Multiarm studies and how to handle them in a meta-analysis: a tutorial. Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023;1:e12033 https://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d5928.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument: methodological index for non-randomized studies. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ala-Opas MY, Grönlund SS. Blood loss in long-term aspirin users undergoing transurethral prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1996;30:203–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365599609181300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nielsen JD, Holm-Nielsen A, Jespersen J, Vinther CC, Settgast IW, Gram J. The effect of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid on bleeding after transurethral prostatectomy-a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2000;34:194–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655900750016580.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rühle A, Blarer J, Oehme F, Marini L, Mattei A, Stucki P, et al. Safety and effectiveness of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate in patients under ongoing oral anticoagulation with coumarins or antiplatelet drug therapy compared to patients without anticoagulation/antiplatelet therapy. J Endourol. 2019;33:455–62. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wierød FS, Frandsen NJ, Jacobsen JD, Hartvigsen A, Olsen PR. Risk of haemorrhage from transurethral prostatectomy in acetylsalicylic acid and NSAID-treated patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1998;32:120–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/003655998750014495.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu J, Li H, Tao R, Tang Q. The safety and efficacy of bipolar plasma-kinetic transurethral resection of the prostate in patients taking low-dose aspirin. Urol J. 2023;20:419–23. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Agarwal DK, Large T, Stoughton CL, Heiman JM, Nottingham CU, Rivera ME, et al. Real-world experience of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with patients on anticoagulation therapy. J Endourol. 2021;35:1036–41. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0886.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gild P, Lenke L, Pompe RS, Vetterlein MW, Ludwig TA, Soave A, et al. Assessing the outcome of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate by age, prostate volume, and a history of blood thinning agents: report from a single-center series of >1800 consecutive cases. J Endourol. 2021;35:639–46. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hammoudi Z, Descazeaud A, Pelette R, Bertherat W. Impact of antithrombotic medication on postoperative outcome of low-power HoLEP. Fr J Urol. 2025;35:102849 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun J, Shi A, Tong Z, Xue W. Safety and feasibility study of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP) on patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). World J Urol. 2018;36:271–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2129-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tyson MD, Lerner LB. Safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in anticoagulated patients. J Endourol. 2009;23:1343–6. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacquey H, Kleinclauss F, Balssa L, Guichard G, Frontczak A. Anticoagulation, photoselective vaporization of the prostate and safety : a propensity score-matched study. World J Urol. 2024;42:636 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05273-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Knapp GL, Chalasani V, Woo HH. Perioperative adverse events in patients on continued anticoagulation undergoing photoselective vaporisation of the prostate with the 180-W Greenlight lithium triborate laser. BJU Int. 2017;119:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meskawi M, Hueber PA, Valdivieso R, Karakiewicz PI, Pradere B, Misrai V, et al. Complications and functional outcomes of high-risk patient with cardiovascular disease on antithrombotic medication treated with the 532-nm-laser photo-vaporization Greenlight XPS-180 W for benign prostate hyperplasia. World J Urol. 2019;37:1671–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2560-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ruszat R, Wyler S, Forster T, Reich O, Stief CG, Gasser TC, et al. Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1031–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shao IH, Hou CP, Chen SM, Chen CL, Lin YH, Chang PL, et al. The safety and efficacy of aspirin intake in photoselective vaporization laser treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Clin Inter Aging. 2013;8:265–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S41270. Epub 2013 Mar 9. Erratum in: Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:431.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Marchioni M, Schips L, Greco F, Frattini A, Neri F, Ruggera L, et al. Perioperative major acute cardiovascular events after 180-W GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50:1955–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-018-1968-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kabalin JN. Holmium: YAG laser prostatectomy canine feasibility study. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;18:221–4. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)18:3<221::AID-LSM1>3.0.CO;2-U.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Elmansy H, Abbas L, Fathy M, Hodhod A, Shabana W, Alkandari A, et al. Top-down holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus traditional HoLEP for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): 1-year outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024;27:462–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00730-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gauhar V, Gilling P, Pirola GM, Chan VW, Lim EJ, Maggi M, et al. Does MOSES technology enhance the efficiency and outcomes of standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8:1362–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hsu YH, Hou CP, Weng SC, Tsai HY, Tsao SH, Juang HH, et al. Analysis of urinary retention after endoscopic prostate enucleation and its subsequent impact on surgical outcomes. World J Urol. 2024;42:305 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04918-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Di Maida F, Cadenar A, Grosso AA, Lambertini L, Giudici S, et al. Predictors of early catheter replacement after HoLEP. Results from a high-volume laser center. Int Braz J Urol. 2023;49:608–18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim SH, Yoo C, Choo M, Paick JS, Oh SJ. Factors affecting de novo urinary retention after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. PLoS One. 2014;9:e84938 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Kuo LY, Kuo J, Silverman J, Kim JJY, Letch C, McClintock S. Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate. BJU Int. 2024;134:30–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Deuker M, Rührup J, Karakiewicz PI, Welte M, Kluth LA, Banek S, et al. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: efficacy, safety and preoperative management in patients presenting with anticoagulation therapy. World J Urol. 2021;39:1219–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03272-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Culkin DJ, Exaire EJ, Green D, Soloway MS, Gross AJ, Desai MR, et al. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in urological practice: ICUD/AUA review paper. J Urol. 2014;192:1026–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. He Q, Yu Y, Gao F. Meta-analysis of the effect of antithrombotic drugs on perioperative bleeding in BPH surgery. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20:3807–15. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.9102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Elzayat EA, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1465–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.074.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cornu JN, Ahyai S, Bachmann A, de la Rosette J, Gilling P, Gratzke C, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from Benign prostatic obstruction: an update. Eur Urol. 2015;67:1066–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hao Y, Chen D, Shen X, Chen Y, Hao Z. No bladder irrigation versus continuous bladder irrigation after HoLEP: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Urol. 2023;23:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01187-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Adams F. Is continuous bladder irrigation after prostate surgery still needed? World J Clin Urol. 2015;4:108–14. https://doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v4.i3.108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Westhofen T, Schott M, Keller P, Tamalunas A, Stief CG, Magistro G. Superiority of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate over transurethral resection of the prostate in a matched-pair analysis of bleeding complications under various antithrombotic regimens. J Endourol. 2021;35:328–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Skolarus TA, Dauw CA, Fowler KE, Mann JD, Bernstein SJ, Meddings J. Catheter management after Benign transurethral prostate surgery: RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria. Am J Manag Care. 2019;25:e366–e372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CG: project development, manuscript writing, analysis, data collection, AC: project development. FF: Data collection and analysis. LSp: Data collection. AC: Data collection. CN: Data Analysis. VM: Manuscript editing. SKKY: Data analysis and Manuscript Editing. VG: Manuscript Writing. LC: Manuscript editing. MM: Manuscript editing. LSc: Manuscript editing. DC: Project development and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Giulioni.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giulioni, C., Cafarelli, A., Falsetti, F. et al. Perioperative outcomes of ongoing antithrombotic therapy during endoscopic surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01098-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-026-01098-4

Search

Quick links