Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Pre-transplant azacitidine does not improve survival in allogeneic HSCT for higher-risk MDS

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Outcomes following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in higher-risk MDS with pre-transplant azacitidine.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Decisions regarding data sharing will be made on a case-by-case basis, considering data protection and other applicable regulations.

References

  1. Tentori CA, Gregorio C, Robin M, Gagelmann N, Gurnari C, Ball S, et al. Clinical and genomic-based decision support system to define the optimal timing of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42:2873–86. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02175.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alessandrino EP, Porta MG, Malcovati L, Jackson CH, Pascutto C, Bacigalupo A, et al. Optimal timing of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Am J Hematol. 2013;88:581–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.23458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Voso MT, Leone G, Piciocchi A, Fianchi L, Santarone S, Candoni A, et al. Feasibility of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation after azacitidine bridge in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and low blast count acute myeloid leukemia: results of the BMT-AZA prospective study. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1547–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schroeder T, Wegener N, Lauseker M, Rautenberg C, Nachtkamp K, Schuler E, et al. Comparison between upfront transplantation and different pretransplant cytoreductive treatment approaches in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2019;25:1550–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.03.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Modi D, Kim S, Singh V, Ayash L, Alavi A, Ratanatharathorn V, et al. Pre-transplant hypomethylating agents do not influence post-transplant survival in myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60:2762–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2019.1605070.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:2391–405. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F, et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2012;120:2454–65. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-03-420489.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Schanz J, Tuchler H, Sole F, Mallo M, Luno E, Cervera J, et al. New comprehensive cytogenetic scoring system for primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and oligoblastic acute myeloid leukemia after MDS derived from an international database merge. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:820–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6394.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2005;11:945–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Della Porta MG, Alessandrino EP, Bacigalupo A, van Lint MT, Malcovati L, Pascutto C, et al. Predictive factors for the outcome of allogeneic transplantation in patients with MDS stratified according to the revised IPSS-R. Blood. 2014;123:2333–42. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-12-542720.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Platzbecker U, Bornhauser M, Germing U, Stumpf J, Scott BL, Kroger N, et al. Red blood cell transfusion dependence and outcome after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Biol Blood Marrow Transpl. 2008;14:1217–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.08.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD, et al. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood. 2006;108:419–25. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-10-4149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH: data collection, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting and accessed and verified the underlying data reported in the manuscript. MRD: concept and design, statistical analysis and interpretation of data. AB: concept and design, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript drafting and project administration. BL, RN, MR, CM, AC, SH, LCYC, APS, DSR, DH, DP, ABh and GAK: data collection, analysis and interpretation of data and manuscript drafting. All authors reviewed, revised and approved the final manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashish Bajel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

MRD has patents and royalties with AbbVie and received consultancy fees from Kite/Gilead and Novartis. LCYC received honoraria and served on advisory boards for Novartis and Otsuka and received consultancy fees and honoraria from Keros Therapeutics. DSR received research funding from BMS, Novartis and Takeda, received consultancy fees from Novartis and served on advisory boards for Novartis, Takeda and Amgen. DH received honoraria from AbbVie, Otsuka and Astellas Pharma. AB received honoraria and served on advisory boards for AbbVie, Amgen and Astellas; received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer and Takeda; and served on advisory boards for Glaxo-Smith-Kline. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Ethics approval and informed consent

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Melbourne Health with a waiver of informed consent (2023.094) with governance approval of the review boards of participating sites. This work was conducted under the Declaration of Helsinki and Australian data regulations.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horton, M., Leung, B., Nelles, R. et al. Pre-transplant azacitidine does not improve survival in allogeneic HSCT for higher-risk MDS. Bone Marrow Transplant (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-026-02874-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-026-02874-5

Search

Quick links