Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Targeting WIP1 reprograms immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to potentiate immunotherapy response in colorectal cancer

Abstract

While immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) shows limited efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC) due to its immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, strategies to activate innate immunity remain underexplored. Here, we identified wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (WIP1/PPM1D) as a critical immunosuppressive driver in CRC, with its expression significantly upregulated in tumor tissues. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of WIP1 robustly suppressed tumor growth by remodeling the tumor immune microenvironment, marked by increased infiltration of anti-tumor macrophages and cytotoxic T cells. Mechanistically, WIP1 inhibited type I interferon (IFN) signaling by reducing cytoplasmic dsDNA accumulation to inactivate the cGAS-STING-TBK1 axis, and by directly dephosphorylating TBK1 at Ser172 to suppress its kinase activity. Strikingly, combining a WIP1 inhibitor with a STING agonist synergistically enhanced anti-tumor efficacy by amplifying IFNβ production to activate anti-tumor immune response. This combination further potentiated anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. In summary, this study uncovers WIP1 as a pioneering dual-functional suppressor of tumor-intrinsic STING activation and establishes a rationally designed “STING-WIP1 co-targeting” strategy to reverse immunotherapy resistance. Our findings bridge genomic instability with adaptive immune evasion, offering a roadmap for precision immunotherapy in CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Upregulation of WIP1 in CRC.
Fig. 2: WIP1 promoted CRC via remodeling tumor microenvironment.
Fig. 3: WIP1 inhibition augmented type I IFN signaling to engage macrophages.
Fig. 4: WIP1 inhibition increased cytoplasmic dsDNA to activate cGAS-STING-TBK1 signaling.
Fig. 5: WIP1 directly dephosphorylated TBK1 to inactivate type I IFN signaling for immunosuppression.
Fig. 6: WIP1 inhibition enhanced the anti-cancer efficacy of STING agonist.
Fig. 7: Combination of WIP1 inhibitor and STING agonist sensitized anti-PD-1 immunotherapy.
Fig. 8: Working model.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Upon inquiry to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heemskerk B, Kvistborg P, Schumacher TN. The cancer antigenome. Embo J. 2013;32:194–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Maleki Vareki S. High and low mutational burden tumors versus immunologically hot and cold tumors and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6:157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang H, Wang Y, Chlewicki LK, Zhang Y, Guo J, Liang W, et al. Facilitating T cell infiltration in tumor microenvironment overcomes resistance to PD-L1 blockade. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:285–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature. 2014;515:568–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bortolomeazzi M, Keddar MR, Montorsi L, Acha-Sagredo A, Benedetti L, Temelkovski D, et al. Immunogenomics of colorectal cancer response to checkpoint blockade: analysis of the KEYNOTE 177 trial and validation cohorts. Gastroenterology. 2021;161:1179–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Li A, Yi M, Qin S, Song Y, Chu Q, Wu K. Activating cGAS-STING pathway for the optimal effect of cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Urban-Wojciuk Z, Khan MM, Oyler BL, Fåhraeus R, Marek-Trzonkowska N, Nita-Lazar A, et al. The role of TLRs in anti-cancer immunity and tumor rejection. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mills KH. TLR-dependent T cell activation in autoimmunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:807–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramanjulu JM, Pesiridis GS, Yang J, Concha N, Singhaus R, Zhang SY, et al. Design of amidobenzimidazole STING receptor agonists with systemic activity. Nature. 2018;564:439–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu N, Palmer DC, Robeson AC, Shou P, Bommiasamy H, Laurie SJ, et al. STING agonist promotes CAR T cell trafficking and persistence in breast cancer. J Exp Med. 2021;218:e20200844.

  12. Margolis SR, Wilson SC, Vance RE. Evolutionary origins of cGAS-STING signaling. Trends Immunol. 2017;38:733–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ng KW, Marshall EA, Bell JC, Lam WL. cGAS-STING and cancer: dichotomous roles in tumor immunity and development. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:44–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Motwani M, Pesiridis S, Fitzgerald KA. DNA sensing by the cGAS-STING pathway in health and disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2019;20:657–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tao J, Zhou X, Jiang Z. cGAS-cGAMP-STING: the three musketeers of cytosolic DNA sensing and signaling. IUBMB life. 2016;68:858–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Klinakis A, Karagiannis D, Rampias T. Targeting DNA repair in cancer: current state and novel approaches. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020;77:677–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uyanik B, Grigorash BB, Goloudina AR, Demidov ON. DNA damage-induced phosphatase Wip1 in regulation of hematopoiesis, immune system and inflammation. Cell Death Discov. 2017;3:17018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Harding SM, Benci JL, Irianto J, Discher DE, Minn AJ, Greenberg RA. Mitotic progression following DNA damage enables pattern recognition within micronuclei. Nature. 2017;548:466–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Mackenzie KJ, Carroll P, Martin CA, Murina O, Fluteau A, Simpson DJ, et al. cGAS surveillance of micronuclei links genome instability to innate immunity. Nature. 2017;548:461–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen M, Wang W, Hu S, Tong Y, Li Y, Wei Q, et al. Co-targeting WIP1 and PARP induces synthetic lethality in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Commun Signal. 2022;20:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Cha H, Lowe JM, Li H, Lee JS, Belova GI, Bulavin DV, et al. Wip1 directly dephosphorylates gamma-H2AX and attenuates the DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4112–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. DeNardo DG, Brennan DJ, Rexhepaj E, Ruffell B, Shiao SL, Madden SF, et al. Leukocyte complexity predicts breast cancer survival and functionally regulates response to chemotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:54–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee PY, Li Y, Kumagai Y, Xu Y, Weinstein JS, Kellner ES, et al. Type I interferon modulates monocyte recruitment and maturation in chronic inflammation. Am J Pathol. 2009;175:2023–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ma W, Oliveira-Nunes MC, Xu K, Kossenkov A, Reiner BC, Crist RC, et al. Type I interferon response in astrocytes promotes brain metastasis by enhancing monocytic myeloid cell recruitment. Nat Commun. 2023;14:2632.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Q, Green MD, Lang X, Lazarus J, Parsels JD, Wei S, et al. Inhibition of ATM increases interferon signaling and sensitizes pancreatic cancer to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Cancer Res. 2019;79:3940–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Guan J, Lu C, Jin Q, Lu H, Chen X, Tian L, et al. MLH1 deficiency-triggered DNA hyperexcision by exonuclease 1 activates the cGAS-STING pathway. Cancer cell. 2020;39:109–121.

  27. Seo J, Kim SC, Lee HS, Kim JK, Shon HJ, Salleh NL, et al. Genome-wide profiles of H2AX and gamma-H2AX differentiate endogenous and exogenous DNA damage hotspots in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:5965–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bose D. cGAS/STING pathway in cancer: Jekyll and Hyde story of cancer immune response. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2456.

  29. Parkes EE, Walker SM, Taggart LE, McCabe N, Knight LA, Wilkinson R, et al. Activation of STING-dependent innate immune signaling by S-phase-specific DNA damage in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:djw199.

  30. Araujo JM, Gomez AC, Aguilar A, Salgado R, Balko JM, Bravo L, et al. Effect of CCL5 expression in the recruitment of immune cells in triple negative breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mulligan AM, Raitman I, Feeley L, Pinnaduwage D, Nguyen LT, O’Malley FP, et al. Tumoral lymphocytic infiltration and expression of the chemokine CXCL10 in breast cancers from the Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:336–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lugrin J, Martinon F. The AIM2 inflammasome: sensor of pathogens and cellular perturbations. Immunol Rev. 2018;281:99–114.

  33. Unterholzner L, Keating SE, Baran M, Horan KA, Jensen SB, Sharma S, et al. IFI16 is an innate immune sensor for intracellular DNA. Nat Immunol. 2010;11:997–1004.

  34. Zhao Y, Liang L, Fan Y, Sun S, An L, Shi Z, et al. PPM1B negatively regulates antiviral response via dephosphorylating TBK1. Cell Signal. 2012;24:2197–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Xiang W, Zhang Q, Lin X, Wu S, Zhou Y, Meng F, et al. PPM1A silences cytosolic RNA sensing and antiviral defense through direct dephosphorylation of MAVS and TBK1. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1501889.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Li Z, Liu G, Sun L, Teng Y, Guo X, Jia J, et al. PPM1A regulates antiviral signaling by antagonizing TBK1-mediated STING phosphorylation and aggregation. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004783.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Garcia-Diaz A, Shin DS, Moreno BH, Saco J, Escuin-Ordinas H, Rodriguez GA, et al. Interferon receptor signaling pathways regulating PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression. Cell Rep. 2017;19:1189–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. André T, Shiu KK, Kim TW, Jensen BV, Jensen LH, Punt C, et al. Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability-high advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2207–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Le DT, Kim TW, Van Cutsem E, Geva R, Jager D, Hara H, et al. Phase II open-label study of pembrolizumab in treatment-refractory, microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: KEYNOTE-164. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Kemberling H, Eyring AD, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2509–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Overman MJ, McDermott R, Leach JL, Lonardi S, Lenz HJ, Morse MA, et al. Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:1182–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wei B, Xu L, Guo W, Wang Y, Wu J, Li X, et al. SHP2-mediated inhibition of DNA repair contributes to cGAS-STING activation and chemotherapeutic sensitivity in colon cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81:3215–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lu C, Guan J, Lu S, Jin Q, Rousseau B, Lu T, et al. DNA sensing in mismatch repair-deficient tumor cells is essential for anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:96–108.e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Moon SH, Nguyen TA, Darlington Y, Lu X, Donehower LA. Dephosphorylation of gamma-H2AX by WIP1: an important homeostatic regulatory event in DNA repair and cell cycle control. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:2092–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Shreeram S, Demidov ON, Hee WK, Yamaguchi H, Onishi N, Kek C, et al. Wip1 phosphatase modulates ATM-dependent signaling pathways. Mol Cell. 2006;23:757–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Fujimoto H, Onishi N, Kato N, Takekawa M, Xu XZ, Kosugi A, et al. Regulation of the antioncogenic Chk2 kinase by the oncogenic Wip1 phosphatase. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1170–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sun L, Wu J, Du F, Chen X, Chen ZJ. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is a cytosolic DNA sensor that activates the type I interferon pathway. Science. 2013;339:786–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Corrales L, McWhirter SM, Dubensky TW Jr., Gajewski TF. The host STING pathway at the interface of cancer and immunity. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:2404–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Almine JF, O’Hare CA, Dunphy G, Haga IR, Naik RJ, Atrih A, et al. IFI16 and cGAS cooperate in the activation of STING during DNA sensing in human keratinocytes. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Jameson MB, Thompson PI, Baguley BC, Evans BD, Harvey VJ, Porter DJ, et al. Clinical aspects of a phase I trial of 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA), a novel antivascular agent. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:1844–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lara PN Jr, Douillard JY, Nakagawa K, von Pawel J, McKeage MJ, Albert I, et al. Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without the vascular disrupting agent vadimezan (ASA404) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2965–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sen T, Rodriguez BL, Chen L, Corte CMD, Morikawa N, Fujimoto J, et al. Targeting DNA damage response promotes antitumor immunity through STING-mediated T-cell activation in small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:646–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Liang Y, Tang H, Guo J, Qiu X, Yang Z, Ren Z, et al. Targeting IFNalpha to tumor by anti-PD-L1 creates feedforward antitumor responses to overcome checkpoint blockade resistance. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Benci JL, Xu B, Qiu Y, Wu TJ, Dada H, Twyman-Saint Victor C, et al. Tumor interferon signaling regulates a multigenic resistance program to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell. 2016;167:1540–54.e12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Benci JL, Johnson LR, Choa R, Xu Y, Qiu J, Zhou Z, et al. Opposing functions of interferon coordinate adaptive and innate immune responses to cancer immune checkpoint blockade. Cell. 2019;178:933–48.e14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82203071 to J X), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LY23H160018 to J S), the Huadong Medicine Joint Fund of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (HDMY26H160069 to P Y), the Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province (2024KY1143 to DC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HJ, LF, and XW designed the study; HJ and LF analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; LC, MC, SY, YW, HW, LZ, CSW, JX, JS, DC, PY, CW, and CL performed the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xian Wang, Lifeng Feng or Hongchuan Jin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The mice xenograft study was approved by the animal ethics committee of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. Animal care and experiments were conducted in compliance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and NIH guidelines.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, L., Chen, M., Yuan, S. et al. Targeting WIP1 reprograms immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment to potentiate immunotherapy response in colorectal cancer. Cell Death Differ (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-026-01710-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-026-01710-z

Search

Quick links