Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Trends in testosterone prescription during the release of society guidelines

Abstract

The American Urological Association and Endocrine Society published guidelines for the management of testosterone deficiency in 2018. Testosterone prescription patterns have varied widely recently, owing to increased public interest and emerging data on the safety of testosterone therapy. The effect of guideline publication on testosterone prescribing is unknown. Thus, we aimed to assess testosterone prescription trends using Medicare prescriber data. Specialties with over 100 testosterone prescribers from 2016–2019 were analyzed. Nine specialties were included (in order of descending prescription frequency): family practice, internal medicine, urology, endocrinology, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, general practice, infectious disease, and emergency medicine. The number of prescribers grew by a mean of 8.8% annually. There was a significant increase in average claims per provider from 2016 to 2019 (26.4 to 28.7, p < 0.0001), with the steepest increase occurring between 2017 and 2018 when the guidelines were released (27.2 to 28.1, p = 0.015). The largest increase in claims per provider was among urologists. Advanced practice providers comprised 7.5% of Medicare testosterone claims in 2016 and 11.6% in 2019. While no causation can be established, these results suggest that professional society guidelines are associated with increasing numbers of testosterone claims per provider, especially among urologists. The changing demographics of prescribers justifies targeted education and further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Testosterone prescribers by specialty from 2016 to 2019.
Fig. 2: Average testosterone claims per prescriber from 2016 to 2019.
Fig. 3: Average testosterone claims per prescriber by specialty from 2016 to 2019.
Fig. 4: Cumulative growth in testosterone claims.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data used in this study was extracted from the CMS Part D Prescriber Public Use File which is publicly available at https://data.cms.gov/.

References

  1. Harman SM, Metter EJ, Tobin JD, Pearson J, Blackman MR. Aging BLSo. Longitudinal effects of aging on serum total and free testosterone levels in healthy men. Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:724–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Auerbach JM, Moghalu OI, Das R, Horns J, Campbell A, Hotaling J, et al. Evaluating incidence, prevalence, and treatment trends in adult men with hypogonadism in the United States. Int J Impot Res. 2021;34:762–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00471-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar P, Kumar N, Thakur DS, Patidar A. Male hypogonadism: symptoms and treatment. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010;1:297–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou CK, Advani S, Chaloux M, Gibson JT, Yu M, Bradley M, et al. Trends and patterns of testosterone therapy among U.S. male medicare beneficiaries, 1999 to 2014. J Urol. 2020;203:1184–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Baillargeon J, Kuo YF, Westra JR, Urban RJ, Goodwin JS. Testosterone prescribing in the United States, 2002–2016. JAMA. 2018;320:200–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Corona G, Rastrelli G, Di Pasquale G, Sforza A, Mannucci E, Maggi M. Testosterone and cardiovascular risk: meta-analysis of interventional studies. J Sex Med. 2018;15:820–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carter IV, Callegari MJ, Jella TK, Mahran A, Cwalina TB, Muncey W, et al. Trends in testosterone prescription amongst medical specialties: a 5-year CMS data analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00497-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhasin S, Brito JP, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, Hodis HN, Matsumoto AM, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:1715–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulhall JP, Trost LW, Brannigan RE, Kurtz EG, Redmon JB, Chiles KA, et al. Evaluation and management of testosterone deficiency: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:423–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldstick JE, Guy GP, Losby JL, Baldwin G, Myers M, Bohnert AS. Changes in initial opioid prescribing practices after the 2016 release of the CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2116860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zucker IJ, Masterson TA. Comparison of American Urological Association and Endocrine Society guidelines on testosterone replacement. Int J Impot Res. 2022;34:626–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00477-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060. Population Estimates and Projections. Current Population Reports. P25-1143 [Internet]. US Census Bureau; 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 27]. Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED578934.

  13. Harman SM, Metter EJ, Tobin JD, Pearson J, Blackman MR. Longitudinal effects of aging on serum total and free testosterone levels in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:724–31. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.2.7219.

  14. Bandari J, Ayyash OM, Emery SL, Wessel CB, Davies BJ. Marketing and testosterone treatment in the USA: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3:395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kresch E, Patel M, Lima TF, Ramasamy R. An update on the available and emerging pharmacotherapy for adults with testosterone deficiency available in the USA. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22:1761–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. García LM, Sanabria AJ, Álvarez EG, Trujillo-Martín MM, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Kotzeva A, et al. The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: a survival analysis. CMAJ. 2014;186:1211–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McKibben MJ, Kirby EW, Langston J, Raynor MC, Nielsen ME, Smith AB, et al. Projecting the urology workforce over the next 20 years. Urology. 2016;98:21–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Iyeke LO, Richman MJ. Evaluating decreased libido: the lowdown on low T. J Urgent Care Med. 2021;16:33–4.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jesse E, Sellke N, Rivero MJ, Muncey W, Ghayda RA, Loeb A, et al. Practice comparison and cost analysis of direct-to-consumer telemedicine platforms offering testosterone therapy. J Sex Med. 2022;19:1608–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubin JM, Jesse E, Fantus RJ, Bennett NE, Brannigan RE, Thirumavalavan N, et al. Guideline-discordant care among direct-to-consumer testosterone therapy platforms. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182:1321–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors meet all four criteria for authorship, including. (1) Conceived and/or designed the work that led to the submission, acquired data, and/or played an important role in interpreting the results. (2) Drafted or revised the manuscript. (3) Approved the final version. (4) Agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas Sellke.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sellke, N., Omil-Lima, D., Sun, H.H. et al. Trends in testosterone prescription during the release of society guidelines. Int J Impot Res 36, 380–384 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00709-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00709-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links