We thank the authors for their kind comments [1]. Given the notably higher rates of infection in penile prosthesis revision surgery (1—3 vs 10%), our aim with this study was to assess the integrity of the hydrophilic surface and its ability to bind and elute antimicrobial solutions for subsequent applications beyond initial implantation [2,3,4]. We utilized implant reservoirs and cylinders removed from patients, which went through a rigorous sterilization process, for the various aspects of this study. Congo Red staining and contact angle analysis was conducted to assess the integrity of the hydrophilic surface following the sterilization process. Fluorescent-labelled vancomycin was used to directly visualize antibiotic binding to the surface, while antibiotic-dip bacterial assays were conducted to assess the antibacterial efficacy of the previously-implanted surface. This study demonstrates that the surface coating of the pre-existing device has potential to have antibiotics rebind and elute in situ, which may have significant clinical applications; for instance, in cases of component repositioning, as mentioned in the comment by Chawareb et al., the in situ components may potentially re-bind antibiotics via irrigation, rendering the retained components safer [1, 5].
The adaptability and flexibility of the hydrophilic surface, both in primary surgery and subsequent revision cases, is promising, and our understanding of the hydrophilic surface is ever-expanding. Further studies are necessary to maximize the potential of the hydrophilic surface, including optimal concentrations and combinations of antimicrobial solutions (anti-bacterial and anti-fungal), both for primary and revision cases. Additionally, clinical data is necessary to corroborate the findings of our in vitro studies, both to better account for the complex environment in vivo and potential pre-existing biofilms, and to more accurately reflect patient outcomes, as mentioned by the authors of the response. Our knowledge and experience with penile implant infections is evolving as we continue to aim to reduce infection rates and improve outcomes.
References
Abou Chawareb E, Barham DW, Yafi FA. Comment on: Hydrophilic inflatable penile prosthesis surface coatings readily rebind antibiotics and maintain antimicrobial efficacy ex vivo. Int J Impot Res. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01205-4.
Barham DW, Pyrgidis N, Gross MS, Hammad M, Swerdloff D, Miller J, et al. AUA-recommended antibiotic prophylaxis for primary penile implantation results in a higher, not lower, risk for postoperative infection: a multicenter analysis. J Urol. 2023;209:399–409.
Gross MS, Phillips EA, Carrasquillo RJ, Thornton A, Greenfield JM, Levine LA, et al. Multicenter investigation of the micro-organisms involved in penile prosthesis infection: an analysis of the efficacy of the AUA and EAU guidelines for penile prosthesis prophylaxis. J Sex Med. 2017;14:455–63.
Carvajal A, Benavides J, GarcÃa-Perdomo HA, Henry GD. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:587–97.
Im BH, Hochberg AR, Giordano AH, Evans R, Fertala A, Fertala J, et al. Hydrophilic inflatable penile prosthesis surface coatings readily rebind antibiotics and maintain antimicrobial efficacy ex vivo. Int J Impot Res. 2025;1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01104-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Draft manuscript preparation: BHI, PHC. All Authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
PHC receives research support from and consults for Coloplast and Boston Scientific.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Im, B.H., Chung, P.H. Response to comment on: hydrophilic inflatable penile prosthesis surface coatings readily rebind antibiotics and maintain antimicrobial efficacy ex vivo. Int J Impot Res 38, 143 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01220-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01220-5