Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Response to comment on: A novel rat model for investigating erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Karapanos L, Albayrak AT. Comment on: A novel rat model for investigating erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01163-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guo Y, Tao R, Wang Z, Jiang D, Ren Z, Fan H, et al. A novel rat model for investigating erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01142-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salomon L, Saint F, Anastasiadis AG, Sebe P, Chopin D, Abbou CC. Combined reporting of cancer control and functional results of radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2003;44:656–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2003.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandel A, Parekh S, Choudhary M, Morizane S, Kacagan C, Tillu N, et al. Analysis of the Current Surgical Anatomical Knowledge of Radical Prostatectomy: An Updated Review. Eur Urol. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:418–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Quinlan DM, Nelson RJ, Partin AW, Mostwin JL, Walsh PC. The rat as a model for the study of penile erection. J Urol. 1989;141:656–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40926-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chung E, De Young L, Brock GB. Investigative models in erectile dysfunction: a state-of-the-art review of current animal models. J Sex Med. 2011;8:3291–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02505.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Haney NM, Nguyen HMT, Honda M, Abdel-Mageed AB, Hellstrom WJG. Bilateral Cavernous Nerve Crush Injury in the Rat Model: A Comparative Review of Pharmacologic Interventions. Sex Med Rev. 2018;6:234–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2017.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weyne E, Castiglione F, Van der Aa F, Bivalacqua TJ, Albersen M. Landmarks in erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy. Nat Rev Urol. 2015;12:289–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sato Y, Rehman J, Santizo C, Melman A, Christ GJ. Significant physiological roles of ancillary penile nerves on increase in intracavernous pressure in rats: experiments using electrical stimulation of the medial preoptic area. Int J Impot Res. 2001;13:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3900650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982;128:492–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53012-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mulhall JP, Müller A, Donohue JF, Mullerad M, Kobylarz K, Paduch DA, et al. The functional and structural consequences of cavernous nerve injury are ameliorated by sildenafil citrate. J Sex Med. 2008;5:1126–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00794.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Yashou Guo: conceptualization, writing original draft. Ronggui Tao: writing, review & editing. Zhongyu Wang: writing, review & editing. Dalin He: conceptualization, writing, review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dalin He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, Y., Tao, R., Wang, Z. et al. Response to comment on: A novel rat model for investigating erectile function after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int J Impot Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01222-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01222-3

Search

Quick links