Introduction

In the time span of only a few years, lead halide perovskites with the general formula of APbX3 (A and X being a monovalent cation and halide anion, respectively) have established superior performance in many key optical and electronic devices, including solar cells1,2,3, light-emitting diodes4,5,6,7,8, photodetectors9, and memory devices10. Particularly, Cs-based perovskites have emerged as a new class of emitters because of their high quantum yield, narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM), and versatility to widely tune the bandgap in the visible-light range11,12. Notwithstanding their promising aspects as next-generation optoelectronic material, lead halide perovskites critically suffer from degradation under atmospheric environments. Hence, in order to extend the stability of these perovskite emitters, various methods such as encapsulating them with organic ligands13 or embedding them in low dimensional inorganic perovskite scaffold of similar chemical compositions has been introduced14,15,16,17,18; while use of organic ligands can confer additional benefits in terms of potential surface functionalization, use of solid inorganic matrix is often more desirable in terms of atmospheric stability.

Among low dimensional networked perovskites in the Cs–Pb–X compositional space, Cs4PbX6 (referred to as the zero-dimensional (0D) phase) adopts a structure in which the [PbX6]4– octahedra are detached from each other by surrounding Cs+ atoms, whereas conventional three-dimensional (3D) CsPbX3 perovskites consist of corner-sharing octahedra with Cs+ cations filling the cavities13,19,20. While the 0D phase shows superior stability compared to the 3D perovskite phase, visible-light emission from the 0D phase itself was not expected to occur due to the large intrinsic bandgap of 0D structure which corresponds to the ultraviolet (UV) region18,19,20,21,22. Thus, experimentally observed green emission from 0D Cs4PbBr6 has remained a puzzle and conflicting theories on the exact origin of such emission exist: while some have attributed the improved stability and high photoluminescence (PL) quantum efficiency (QE) to the serendipitous formation of a 0D/3D host–guest structure with 3D perovskite embedded within the insulating 0D matrix14,23,24,25,26,27,28,29, others have predicted the existence of intrinsic defects within the 0D Cs4PbBr6 phase as the origin of such PL21,22,30,31,32. Although a definitive agreement has not been reached, recent experimental investigations using Raman spectroscopy25, neutron diffraction26, cathodoluminescence imaging27, and superfluorescence emission28 have provided evidence in favor of unintended inclusion of 3D CsPbBr3 nano-sized emitters in the 0D Cs4PbBr6 matrix. These investigations have subsequently kindled a series of studies on the formation mechanism of such embedded 3D emitters by real-time tracking of PL signals during solution-based synthesis of 0D phases33,34. However, the inability to fully “freeze” the reaction during solution-based synthesis methods has hampered a detailed analysis of the underlying mechanism responsible for the formation of 3D/0D heterostructures. Furthermore, a controllable growth of such heterointerfaces is challenging in solution phase due to its homogeneous nature, which in turn limits the controllability over the number of possible final heterostructures, as well as the synthetic routes towards them.

In contrast to solution-based chemistry, mechanochemical synthesis (MCS) has recently received increasing attention as an alternative and facile method to produce halide perovskites35,36,37,38,39,40,41. MCS, or ball milling, is a synthetic process in which solid-state reactions are induced by the mechanical energy of rotating balls in the reaction container without the need for (often toxic) solvent media. Crucially, and to our advantage, MCS reactions can be halted at any point during synthesis by simply turning off the mechanical agitation42,43,44. This allows us to capture the intermediate reaction stages involved in the formation of the final product. Moreover, the MCS process has the additional advantage of being able to use different solid phases37, as long as they are of the same stoichiometry (e.g., 4CsBr + PbBr2 and CsPbBr3 + 3CsBr are all expected to yield Cs4PbBr6), whereas such flexibility is absent in solution-based synthesis methods.

Exploiting this synthetic degree of freedom of MCS, we provide means of enhancing the green emission in the 0D Cs4PbBr6 phase through an in-depth study of time-dependent structural and optical properties of various co-existing Cs–Pb–Br polymorphs formed during a slow MCS process. Surprisingly, intermediate-stage samples obtained during the MCS process exhibited significantly higher PL intensity than the final 0D Cs4PbBr6 product, the bright emission of which is shown to arise from an endotaxial formation of 3D CsPbBr3 particles inside the 0D Cs4PbBr6 matrix. Furthermore, we exploit mechanochemistry as a route to accessing diverse heterostructural 0D/3D host–guest configurations (i.e., both in composition and structure) and providing insights into the kinetics underlying the formation mechanism of such embedded heterostructures. This understanding allows us to target-design a synthesis protocol to facilitate the formation of 0D phase components on the surface of the parent 3D phase in an endotaxial manner, thereby resulting in a two-fold enhancement in the PLQE values and ultimately providing guidelines for the large-scale synthesis of highly luminescent perovskite emitters. We also demonstrate the possibility to further improve the emissivity of these heterostructures by ligand encapsulation, which may prove crucial for facile processing in terms of device production.

Results

Mechanochemically synthesized Cs–Pb–Br composite perovskites

In order to devise any synthesis in an informed manner, the underlying mechanism and its driving forces need to be understood first. Since these considerations in turn depend on the exact technique used in practice, we first explore the available methods for realizing synthesis through mechanochemical means. For MCS, several methods can be employed such as hand-grinding (through mortar and pestle), rotating mill-type, planetary-type, and shaker-type ball mill35,42,45. To conduct a systematic observation of time-dependent properties of synthesized perovskite compounds, the following conditions should be satisfied: (i) a uniform force should be applied to the powder throughout the entire synthesis process and (ii) the temperature of the mixture must be maintained at a constant value to implement a quasistatic process. The rotating mill-type MCS method can satisfy these conditions and, more importantly, the slower kinetics of this process allows us to observe the intermediate phases present within the conversion from the precursors to the 0D Cs4PbBr6 phase (the full reaction takes 48 hr to complete; further details are discussed in Supplementary Notes 1.1 and 1.2). Figure 1 illustrates the rotating mill-type MCS used to synthesize Cs–Pb–Br composite perovskites. Precursor salts of CsBr and PbBr2, shown in the bottom–left part of Fig. 1, were put into a cylindrical alumina jar with a 10-cm diameter and 15-cm height (see photo in the bottom–right part of Fig. 1) along with stainless-steel grinding balls. The MCS process is conducted by rotating the jar with two mechanical rollers. Through this process, three different phases of 0D Cs4PbBr6, 3D CsPbBr3, and two-dimensional (2D) CsPb2Br5 can be synthesized by adjusting the stoichiometric ratio of the precursors (CsBr:PbBr2 = 4:1, 1:1, and 1:2 for 0D, 3D, and 2D material, respectively). The phase purity of mechanochemically synthesized powder samples was confirmed via powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns (Supplementary Fig. 2). As depicted in the upper-right part of Fig. 1, 3D CsPbBr3 and 0D Cs4PbBr6 are composed of corner-sharing and isolated [PbBr6]4− octahedra, respectively, whereas 2D CsPb2Br5 is composed of [Pb2Br5] polyhedron layers with alternating Cs+ atoms. The entire process was conducted in ambient conditions at room temperature, which demonstrates the simple and practical nature of the process when compared with the relatively strict conditions required for conventional synthesis routes of metal–halide perovskites37,46,47. The pure-phase Cs–Pb–Br composite perovskites, as well as their stable intermediate phases, can be systematically synthesized and analyzed by capitalizing on the controllability of the rotating mill-type MCS process. Specifically, the MCS process enables us to study in full by “mapping” the intermediate products at different reaction time coordinates (i.e., milling times).

Fig. 1: Rotating mill-type MCS process.
Fig. 1: Rotating mill-type MCS process.
Full size image

Schematic illustration of the overall MCS procedure for the synthesis of perovskite phases. Two precursor salts (CsBr and PbBr2) and grinding balls are put into a container (alumina jar) and rotated continuously. This process results in different Cs–Pb–Br perovskite phases of 0D Cs4PbBr6, 3D CsPbBr3, and 2D CsPb2Br5. The slow reaction nature of rotating mill-type MCS enables the subdivision of intermediate process into several steps, which allows precise observation of intermediate phases. Crystal structures of precursors and each perovskite phase are schematically presented. The figure in the bottom–right shows a photograph of our experimental setup.

Time evolution of optical properties during the MCS process

We began the MCS process with CsBr and PbBr2 precursors mixed in a stoichiometric ratio of 4:1 to form 0D Cs4PbBr6 perovskite powder. The top image in Fig. 2a shows the synthesized perovskite powder samples under ordinary fluorescent light during the MCS process as a function of milling time, from the start to 2880 min (48 hr). The hue of the products gradually changed from orange to white. Considering that the colors of the two precursors, CsBr and PbBr2, are white and 3D CsPbBr3 is the only powder with orange color among all possible Cs–Pb–Br perovskite phases (0D, 2D, and 3D), only 5 min of milling time is deemed sufficient to initiate the formation of 3D CsPbBr3 (ref. 39,42). Powder samples with white colors (observed after ~360 min of milling time) indicate that the 0D Cs4PbBr6 perovskite is the dominant phase in these samples. Further verification and quantification of the intermediate phases will be discussed in detail later.

Fig. 2: Time evolution of optical properties and the origin of highly luminescent green emission during the MCS process.
Fig. 2: Time evolution of optical properties and the origin of highly luminescent green emission during the MCS process.
Full size image

a Images of powder samples during the MCS process with successive increase in milling time. The samples show a gradual change in hue under ordinary fluorescent (top) and in intensity under UV (bottom) lamps. b Time evolution of integrated PL intensity (solid black symbols) and PLQE (open cyan symbols) with an excitation wavelength of 365 nm. The green gradient marks the maximum region of both emission parameters. c Time evolution of PL spectra as milling time elapses with an excitation wavelength of 365 nm. The gray lines in the milling time–rel. PL intensity plane indicate the orthogonal projection of the PL spectra. d Time evolution of absorption spectra as milling time elapses. The dashed black box indicates the onset elevation difference between 180-min and 360-min samples near a wavelength of 532 nm. e Calculated optical bandgaps as a function of milling time. Values of optical bandgaps correspond to the absorption onsets of the Tauc plots60 as shown in Supplementary Fig. 8. Error bars are derived from the deviations in linear fitting. f Temperature-dependent integrated PL intensity of the green emissive region in the 90-min sample (one of the intermediate-stage samples with high intensity green emission) under a 405-nm laser excitation source. The inset shows an optical image of the target scene with laser collimation marked in semi-transparent purple cross. Scale bar, 20 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Along with the visual changes in hue, the evolution of the PL intensity under a UV lamp (wavelength of 365 nm) showed that the PL intensity first increased, maxing out at a milling time of 180 min, and then decreased steadily until the completion of reaction (bottom image of Fig. 2a and solid black symbols in Fig. 2b). When PLQE values of samples in each milling step were measured through densely packing the powder into a quartz cell with a width of 2 mm (see Supplementary Note 1.3 for detailed notes on the PLQE acquisition of powder samples), a similar trend of reaching the maximum value for the sample in the intermediate stage was observed (open cyan symbols in Fig. 2b). The slight discrepancy in the maximum conditions of the milling time between the PL intensity and PLQE (180 min and 360 min, respectively) is attributed to a relatively low absorption for the 360-min sample in comparison with that for the 180-min sample (see the onset elevation difference in the dotted black box of Fig. 2d). We note that sample before milling showed a near zero PLQE value of 0.07 %, indicating that no emissive properties were present beforehand (see Supplementary Fig. 5). The FWHM of the PL peak reached its minimum (18 nm) at a milling time of 360 min and then gradually increased afterward (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 6). From these results, an optimum milling time ranging from 180 to 360 min could be identified in terms of both PL intensity and PL peak FWHM of powder samples in the intermediate stages of the synthesis.

Absorption spectrum for each milling step is shown in Fig. 2d. In the early stages of the MCS process (until a milling time of ~90 min), band-to-band absorption with an onset of ~532 nm was dominant and an optical bandgap of ~2.30 eV could be derived through the Tauc plot (Supplementary Fig. 8) with its ratio between absorption and scattering constants (α) obtained by the Kubelka–Munk function48. The extracted optical bandgap was nearly constant throughout the synthesis process, as shown in Fig. 2e. Note that the onset position of ~532 nm coincides with the characteristic absorption for 3D CsPbBr3 (ref. 49.), which further supports the presence of 3D phases within the samples. As the milling process continued, a noticeable absorption peak around ~320 nm (corresponding to ~3.87 eV) emerged, which indicates the formation of 0D Cs4PbBr6 (ref. 19), whereas the aforementioned band absorption at ~532 nm gradually diminished (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 9). These results imply that the 3D phase is abundant in the early stages of synthesis and the 0D phase becomes dominant as the milling time increases toward completion. Hence, we can expect that the 0D Cs4PbBr6 phase is formed at the expense of the 3D CsPbBr3 phase at the later stages of the MCS process; this initial mechanistic insight is discussed in further detail below.

In order to ascribe the origin of such high intensity green emission on intermediate stages, the exciton binding energy, a quantity that depends on the nature of the perovskite phase (i.e., structure and size), was obtained by variable-temperature PL measurements. Assuming that the decrease in PL intensity upon heating is solely due to the increased thermal dissociation rate of excitons, the exciton binding energy could be obtained from an Arrhenius-type relation, I(T) 1/(1 + A exp(−Eb/(kBT))), where I(T) is the integrated PL intensity at temperature T, Eb is the exciton binding energy, and kB is the Boltzmann constant50. A small exciton binding energy of 43.8 ± 0.4 meV for the 90-min sample, which is in agreement with previously reported values for 3D CsPbBr3 (ref. 51), was determined from Fig. 2f and implies Wannier–Mott excitonic property. Among the various forms of CsPbBr3 (e.g., powder, single crystal, and nanocrystal), the powder and single crystal forms of CsPbBr3 exhibit very poor PLQE (less than 0.1 %), with almost no detection of PL21,49. This suggests that the green luminescent moiety observed in our samples (Supplementary Fig. 11) contains nanocrystalline CsPbBr3. Moreover, the presence of a distinct Arrhenius-type region at low temperatures and the “anti-quenching” region at high temperatures (above ~250 K) suggest the presence of heterostructure where 3D CsPbBr3 nanocrystals (NCs) are embedded in 0D Cs4PbBr6 matrix, as previously reported29. On the other hand, weak intensity green emission in the final stage of the synthesis exhibited an exciton binding energy of 225.7 ± 18.6 meV (Supplementary Fig. 14) which lies on the tightly bound Frenkel excitonic property21,22. Hence, these results imply that the high intensity emission in the intermediate synthesis steps can be attributed to the presence of luminescent 3D CsPbBr3 NCs embedded within the 0D Cs4PbBr6 host. Further details on microscopic spatial identification of emissive moiety are described in Supplementary Note 2.

Time evolution of Cs–Pb–Br perovskite phases and reaction kinetics during the MCS process

The evolution of optical properties discussed above must correlate with the evolution of crystalline structures during the MCS process, which we now discuss. Figure 3 shows PXRD data of synthesized perovskite powder samples as a function of MCS milling time. The time evolution of the PXRD patterns (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. 18) shows the clear appearance of 3D CsPbBr3 as an intermediate product as well as the targeted formation of 0D Cs4PbBr6 during synthesis. At the early steps of synthesis, peaks corresponding to the two precursors (CsBr and PbBr2) are observed (each marked with semi-transparent yellow and blue strips, respectively, in Fig. 3). As the milling time increases, the peaks corresponding to the 3D CsPbBr3 initially grow in intensity and then subsequently diminish (see the semi-transparent red strip from the 20 to 180-min panel in Fig. 3). Concurrently, the peaks corresponding to 0D Cs4PbBr6 steadily increase (see the semi-transparent black strip from the 20-min panel in Fig. 3). Note that the small intensity peak at a low angle diffraction of 11.7° for the 20-min and 40-min sample arises from the 2D CsPb2Br5 phase, which can be further supported by the following NMR analysis. We note that this small amount of 2D CsPb2Br5 does not influence the green PL emission (see Supplementary Note 3.3).

Fig. 3: Time evolution of perovskite structures through PXRD.
Fig. 3: Time evolution of perovskite structures through PXRD.
Full size image

PXRD patterns of CsBr and PbBr2 (top gray panel), samples from different milling times (middle panel), and reference patterns for 3D CsPbBr3 (COD ID 4510745; ref. 47) and 0D Cs4PbBr6 (COD ID 4002857; ref. 22) (bottom gray panel). Representative peaks of CsBr, PbBr2, CsPbBr3, and Cs4PbBr6 are marked by semi-transparent yellow, blue, red, and black strips, respectively. The full diffraction patterns are given in Supplementary Fig. 18. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To reveal the presence of any ternary or amorphous compound other than 3D CsPbBr3 and 0D Cs4PbBr6 that can be corroborated with the PXRD results, magic-angle-spinning (MAS) solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR), a sensitive characterization tool used to determine the local environments to an atomic level, was performed. The 133Cs MAS ssNMR signals exhibit superior spectral resolution and sensitivity when compared with their 207Pb and 79Br counterparts31,39,41,52. Thus, we focused on characterizing the 133Cs signals. Figure 4a shows a series of peaks for different phases that contain Cs polymorphs. The four peaks marked with semi-transparent yellow, black, and red strips in this figure correspond to precursor CsBr (δiso = 260.2 ppm), 0D Cs4PbBr6 (δiso = 226.5 ppm, 346.7 ppm), and 3D CsPbBr3 (δiso = 113.5 ppm), respectively31,39. In accordance with PXRD data, 3D CsPbBr3 appeared as an intermediate product and noticeably diminished in the later steps of synthesis. Moreover, the presence of 2D CsPb2Br5 was detected only in the 20-min sample (i.e., in the early stage of the synthesis) with its δiso at 235.7 ppm (see the semi-transparent purple strip in the inset of Fig. 4a) and vanishes afterwards. The spectrum of the 2880-min sample showed no signs of 3D CsPbBr3 peaks, indicating that this final product contains a negligible level of 3D phase, below the detection limit of NMR (see Supplementary Fig. 19).

Fig. 4: Compositional evolution of Cs–Pb–Br polymorphs and the underlying kinetics of competing reaction paths.
Fig. 4: Compositional evolution of Cs–Pb–Br polymorphs and the underlying kinetics of competing reaction paths.
Full size image

a 133Cs MAS ssNMR spectra of samples with different milling times at 10 kHz MAS and 300 K. CsBr, Cs4PbBr6, CsPbBr3, and CsPb2Br5 peaks are marked with semi-transparent yellow, black, red, and purple strips, respectively. The remaining peaks correspond to spinning side bands. Inset shows magnified spectra of 20 and 90-min samples (red and yellow line, respectively). The full spectra of a are given in Supplementary Fig. 19. b Weight fractions of precursors and synthesized Cs–Pb–Br perovskites for each sample calculated through Rietveld refinement process. The same graph shown in molar fraction can be found in Supplementary Fig. 21. The dividing of stages coincides with the near consumption of PbBr2 (below 2 wt%) and different reaction paths contributing to these stages are labeled as Path A and Path B. The green gradient is marked at the same region as in Fig. 2b. c A schematic reaction kinetics diagram of two competing paths (Paths A and B) in the synthesis of 0D Cs4PbBr6 from the precursors. Formation enthalpy of CsPbBr3 (22 kJ/mol) and Cs4PbBr6 (38 kJ/mol) are from ref. 24. The inset illustrates the potential origin of difference between the two activation energies of E0D and E3D. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

As we confirmed that the major constituents participating in the synthesis are the two precursors (CsBr and PbBr2) and the 0D and 3D perovskite phases, the weight fraction for each constituent in the samples at each step is quantified from PXRD results of Fig. 3 using Rietveld refinement analysis (Fig. 4b). Based on the dominant reactants that contribute to the formation of 0D Cs4PbBr6, the synthesis process can be tentatively divided into two stages (Stage 1: 0−90 min; Stage 2: 180−2880 min). In Stage 1, the two precursors react to form 0D Cs4PbBr6 in parallel with 3D CsPbBr3 whereas in Stage 2, after the full consumption of PbBr2 (see the zero-baseline and red dashed oval in Fig. 4b), the as-synthesized 3D CsPbBr3 formed in Stage 1 begins to take part in the production of 0D Cs4PbBr6 with the remaining CsBr (reaction formulae occurring in each stage are indicated by red and blue arrows in the upper part of Fig. 4b). Note that the maxima of the PL intensity and PLQE occurred at milling times of ~180 to ~360 min and these milling times correspond to the early period of Stage 2 (see the green gradients in Figs. 2b and 4b).

From these observations, the overall reaction kinetics regarding this synthesis process can be understood as schematically illustrated in Fig. 4c. Starting from CsBr and PbBr2 with a stoichiometric ratio of 4:1, the existence of 3D CsPbBr3-abundant stages (until ~90 min of milling shown in Fig. 4b) implies the possibility of two different routes in forming 0D Cs4PbBr6. In one path (named Path A and marked by a red line in Fig. 4c) the two precursors react directly to form 0D Cs4PbBr6 with the activation energy of E0D, whereas in the other path (named Path B and marked by a blue line in Fig. 4c) the precursors initially form a 3D CsPbBr3 intermediate with the corresponding activation energy of E3D, that subsequently reacts with the remaining CsBr to produce 0D Cs4PbBr6. Here, both Path A and Path B occur simultaneously during the synthesis process, as long as the reactants (CsBr and PbBr2) are present in the mixture. Thus, the reaction produces both 3D CsPbBr3 and 0D Cs4PbBr6 at early stages of the synthesis. However, the fact that these two reaction pathways occur at the same time and share the same reactants means that they are in competition against each other; hence, the relative kinetics between the two pathways is the key factor in determining which pathway dominates the reaction. Out of the two competing reaction paths, Path B is expected to be dominant as observed from the time-dependent fractions of each phase (Fig. 4b), because the 3D phase is formed before the 0D phase (Stage 1) and the rapid growth of 0D phase happens later in Stage 2. This implies that the activation energy E3D, required to form 3D CsPbBr3, is lower than E0D as depicted in Fig. 4c. The discrepancy between E0D and E3D can be explained by the difference in the degree to which the topological connectivity of Pb–Br polymorphs changes among different crystalline phases during the formation process (see the inset of Fig. 4c). We speculate that Path B requires less energy and is thus more favorable than Path A since the initial stage of reaction Path B involves a structural rearrangement of Pb–Br polyhedra, from the edge and corner-sharing polyhedra (PbBr2) to simply corner-sharing octahedra (CsPbBr3), whereas Path A accompanies a complete break-up of the interlinked Pb–Br polyhedra into isolated [PbBr6]4− octahedra (Cs4PbBr6). Correlating this reaction kinetics analysis with the observed emissive stages provides a valuable picture for understanding and maximizing the PL properties of the mechanochemically synthesized Cs–Pb–Br perovskites.

Designing a synthesis route for highly emissive Cs–Pb–Br perovskite

The correlation of the reaction kinetics governing conversion from 3D CsPbBr3 to 0D Cs4PbBr6 with the identification of the “3D-embedded 0D” configuration indicates that the inward formation of 0D from the surface of pre-formed 3D (i.e., endotaxial growth of 0D from 3D) is a key synthesis strategy for enhancing PL. To our advantage, MCS can directly employ the solid 3D phase as the starting ingredient for synthesizing Cs–Pb–Br perovskite composites with the optimum composition. Moreover, because the MCS reaction is fundamentally a heterogeneous process involving the physical contact of two particles, reactions are typically expected to initiate from particle surfaces, thus bestowing the opportunity to guide synthesis from any given particle in an endotaxial manner. Thus, a synthesis recipe for maximizing PL intensity can be designed by selecting 3D CsPbBr3 and CsBr as the starting ingredients (denoted as Case 1 in Fig. 5a) for facilitating endotaxial growth of 0D Cs4PbBr6 from the parent 3D CsPbBr3. By contrast, starting compositions not amenable to such endotaxial growth are expected to result in powder products with different structural configurations albeit the same chemical composition as Case 1. Thus, two other synthesis routes with CsBr and PbBr2 (denoted as Case 2; i.e., a similar reaction process as outlined from Fig. 1 to Fig. 4 but with a different compositional ratio of starting ingredients) and 0D Cs4PbBr6 and PbBr2 (denoted as Case 3, wherein endotaxial growth of 3D is expected from the parent 0D) as the starting reagents were employed as controls. As the PL and PLQE of synthesized samples depend on the compositional ratio of 3D CsPbBr3 and 0D Cs4PbBr6 (see the correlation between Figs. 2b and 4b), we first found the optimum nominal wt% of 3D CsPbBr3 in the final product for achieving the highest PL intensity and PLQE; this value was ~7 wt% (see Supplementary Note 4.2). This intentional under-stoichiometry of CsBr (i.e., x < 3 in Case 1; Fig. 5a) is expected to result in the favorable formation of a 0D/3D host–guest system in which unreacted 3D particles are embedded in the 0D matrix rather than a pure-phase 0D product. To confirm our prediction, final products with the optimum composition of ~7 wt% 3D CsPbBr3 were synthesized via the aforementioned synthesis routes (Cases 1, 2, and 3) according to the stoichiometry outlined in Fig. 5a. While the PXRD patterns along with the compositional analysis by Rietveld refinement show ~7 wt% of 3D CsPbBr3 phase in the final products for all three cases as expected (see Supplementary Fig. 29), the corresponding PL and PLQE data show a marked difference in their emissive properties (box-and-whisker plot of Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 30): for both PL intensity and PLQE, Case 1 was the most superior, Case 3 was the least, and Case 2 was in between. This result can be understood by different spatial distribution within the CsPbBr3–Cs4PbBr6 heterostructure: despite being the same chemical composition, the final product in Case 1 is likely to have more CsPbBr3 NCs embedded within the Cs4PbBr6 matrix, which provides a stable emissive environment for CsPbBr3 particles (see the illustration in the upper panel of Fig. 5c). By contrast, the final product in Case 3 is likely to have a majority of CsPbBr3 particles residing on the exterior of Cs4PbBr6 because the reaction is designed to occur from the surface of the parent Cs4PbBr6 (see the illustration in the lower panel of Fig. 5c). CsPbBr3 particles formed on the exterior becomes either highly susceptible to degradation or agglomerate into bulk particles, which in both cases rendering them as weakly emissive moities49. In line with this scenario, 133Cs MAS ssNMR analyses of these emissive samples show additional shoulder-like features with slightly reduced shifts to the main 0D Cs peaks (see Supplementary Note 4.4). We tentatively assign this feature to the 0D Cs atoms residing in the interface of 0D Cs4PbBr6 and 3D CsPbBr3, therefore supporting the encapsulation hypothesis as described above.

Fig. 5: Target-designed synthesis route for enhancing emissivity of the CsPbBr3–Cs4PbBr6 heterostructure.
Fig. 5: Target-designed synthesis route for enhancing emissivity of the CsPbBr3–Cs4PbBr6 heterostructure.
Full size image

a Three different reaction schemes (Cases 1, 2, and 3) for producing the same final CsPbBr3–Cs4PbBr6 stoichiometries but with different initial precursor compositions. b PLQE for Cases 1, 2, and 3 as in powder form (box-and-whisker symbols) and ligand-capped NC form (triangle symbols) under excitation wavelength of 365 nm and 405 nm, respectively. Samples in powder form were dispersed in toluene for measurements. c Schematic illustration regarding the evolution of heterostructural samples for Cases 1 and 3. Case 1 shows the formation of 0D Cs4PbBr6 from the surface of 3D CsPbBr3, whereas Case 3 shows the formation of 3D CsPbBr3 from the surface of 0D Cs4PbBr6. df SAED patterns of the final products from Case 1 (d) and Case 3 (e), and graph of the rotational average intensity at a distance (= 1/d) from the center of each pattern (f). g HRTEM image of the final product from Case-1 powder. The left image of g is covered with semi-transparent false colors of cyan to indicate the 0D Cs4PbBr6 matrix and magenta to indicate the 3D CsPbBr3 particles. FFT images (right images in each box of g) were obtained from the magnified HRTEM images (left images in each box of g). Scale bar, 20 nm. h, i Contour plots of PL intensity as a function of excitation and emission wavelengths from the simple mixture of 0D NC and 3D NC (h) and ligand-capped Case-1 NC (i). The inset of h and i are rescaled colormaps near the excitation wavelength of 318 nm. j Schematic illustration explaining PL quenching in the inset of i at an excitation wavelength with an energy of the bandgap of 0D Cs4PbBr6 (3.9 eV; ~318 nm). Slow relaxation of self-trapped excitons leads to exciton quenching in the interface of 0D and 3D. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

The structural analysis of these contrasting final products (Cases 1 and 3) using selected area electron diffraction (SAED) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) further confirms the predictions illustrated in Fig. 5c. The SAED pattern in Case 1 clearly shows a mixture of diffraction peaks originating from 3D and 0D phases, whereas only the 0D phase is visible in the SAED pattern of Case 3 (Fig. 5d, e; projected 1D-profile in Fig. 5f). Consistent with this result, HRTEM image of Case-1 powder shows a mixture of hexagonal and orthorhombic lattice fringes corresponding to the 0D and 3D phases, respectively (Fig. 5g). Examples of such phases are shown by the cyan (0DI) and magenta (3DI) boxes together with fast Fourier transformed (FFT) images obtained from the magnified HRTEM images (right images of Fig. 5g). FFT images of other regions can be found in Supplementary Fig. 34. By contrast, no such features related to the 3D CsPbBr3 phase could be found in the corresponding HRTEM images for the Case 3 sample (Supplementary Note 4.5), indicating the absence of 3D/0D heterostructures, which is consistent with the poor emission observed in this sample.

Ligand encapsulation of MCS product through wet-milling

For practical application of these perovskites to optoelectronic devices, deposition in forms of perovskite films is generally required. While this can be achieved by several means, large-scale production of uniform films is often performed by printing the perovskite ink onto a substrate. For this, the ball-milled product needs to be further encapsulated with organic ligands to ensure the colloidal stability of NC suspension. To this end, each powder sample of Cases 1, 2, and 3 was engineered into NCs via wet-milling process with oleylamine (see Methods for milling procedures) and the PLQE of each case increased relatively to that of each powder form with Case-1 sample exhibiting the highest value of 66.6% (triangle symbols of Fig. 5b, see Supplementary Note 4.6). In order to ensure that the host–guest configuration of the sample is maintained after the wet-milling process, we observed the PL intensity as a function of excitation and emission wavelengths. Figure 5h shows the contour map of the PL intensity from a simple mixture of ligand-capped 0D and 3D NCs, (i.e., a physical mixture with no direct interface between the two phases). Emission near 510 nm at the excitation range of 280 nm and above is attributed to 3D NC and the rest is attributed to 0D NC (see Supplementary Note 4.7). From the Case-1 NC sample as shown in Fig. 5i, most area of the plot can be attributed to either 3D or 0D. However, a marked difference exists between the simple mixture and the Case-1 NC sample near the excitation wavelength of 318 nm (see the insets of Fig. 5h and i): quenching of PL emission is observed near the 318-nm excitation for Case-1 NC sample, whereas the mixture sample does not exhibit such effect. We ascribe this difference to the existence of 3D and 0D interface for Case-1 NC, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 5j. When excited with a wavelength of 318 nm (~3.9 eV) which matches with the bandgap of 0D Cs4PbBr6, self-trapped excitons are readily formed which possess a slower relaxation time for radiative recombination than the free excitons53 (i.e., following the sequential process marked as ‘1’ and ‘2’ yellow boxes in Fig. 5j). Meanwhile, the as-formed excitons travel towards the interface of 0D and 3D, and are expected to be quenched due to an ineffective energy transfer at the 0D/3D interface at room temperature18,20,54 (i.e., following the ‘3a’ process rather than the ‘3b’ process in Fig. 5j). Hence, the observed quenching of 318-nm emission in the ligand-encapsulated Case-1 NC indicates the persistence of 3D/0D interfaces, which implies that the host–guest configuration of Case-1 sample is maintained throughout the wet-milling process.

Discussion

In this work, we demonstrated an efficient synthesis route for producing highly luminescent host–guest configuration driven by tracing the time evolution of different Cs–Pb–Br phases and the emissive properties during the formation of 0D Cs4PbBr6. By exploiting the MCS process, we observe that the formation of the 3D CsPbBr3 phase precedes the growth of the 0D Cs4PbBr6 phase and that the delayed formation of Cs4PbBr6 in an endotaxial manner on the pre-formed CsPbBr3 particle surfaces coincides with the green emission observed in the samples. While the precise origin of this emission has remained controversial, our current results using a variety of structural and optical characterization techniques favor the “CsPbBr3-embedded Cs4PbBr6” structural motif as the key to achieving such bright green emission in the intermediate reaction stages. More importantly, understanding the mechanism of particle growth and emission origin, combined with the capacity of predictive solid-state synthesis in heterostructural systems bestowed by MCS, enabled us to clearly identify the strategy for producing highly luminescent perovskite emitters with host–guest heterostructural configuration.

The analytical framework built in this study can be easily expanded to a wide range of perovskite-related materials due to the simplicity of MCS procedures and the superior advantage of bypassing any solubility issues. Moreover, the highly emissive CsPbBr3–Cs4PbBr6 products obtained from optimizing the MCS process may possess the immediate potential for use as new precursors to create ligand-capped nanocrystalline heterostructures through a reduction in size by further ball milling. Such a “top–down” approach to NC synthesis is a promising synthesis method due to its facile nature and high throughput12,40,45,55. Ligand capping of CsPbBr3-embedded Cs4PbBr6 nanoparticles could result in inorganic–organic hybrid protective layers wherein the inorganic Cs4PbBr6 provides a stable shell for encapsulating emissive CsPbBr3 particles and organic ligands provide a further barrier to degradation. Furthermore, while a simple oleyl ligand was used for NC encapsulation in the current work, we note that our approach of producing NC suspensions for film applications can be straightforwardly extended to accommodate various other functional ligands as widely exploited in recent perovskite light-emitting diodes and photovoltaic studies13. As discussed above, this functionalization of MCS-prepared NCs can open up possibilities for e.g., better atmospheric protection, enhanced charge conductivity, and improved colloidal formulation for large-scale printing of perovskite optoelectronics. Considering the potential of the MCS process as a synthesis method for mass-producing a wide range of host–guest (e.g., core–shell) type NCs with minimal use of toxic solvents, our study provides a novel perspective on large-scale synthesis and functionalization of metal–halide perovskites for light-emitting applications.

Methods

Sample preparation

Mechanochemical synthesis of Cs–Pb–Br perovskites

For all reactants involved in the synthesis of this paper, precursor salts of cesium bromide (CsBr, 99.9%, Sigma-Aldrich) and lead(II) bromide (PbBr2, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich) were used. As-received CsBr salt was hand-ground using an agate mortar and pestle before each synthesis to match its particle size with that of the PbBr2 salt. For the powder samples used for the measurements in Figs. 24, 100 mmol (21.281 g) of CsBr and 25 mmol (9.175 g) of PbBr2 were put into an alumina jar along with a total of 336 g of stainless-steel grinding balls (4 balls 1.9 cm in diameter and 200 balls 0.6 cm in diameter). The alumina jar with the mixture was rotated in ball mill equipment (BD4530, LK Lab) with a rotating speed of 350 rpm with respect to the mechanical roller. In Cases 1, 2, and 3 of Fig. 5a, the precursors were added in the desired stoichiometric ratio to obtain 7 g of the final product along with a total of 400 g of stainless-steel balls (2 balls 1.9 cm in diameter, 2 balls 1.5 cm in diameter, 10 balls 1.2 cm in diameter, 20 balls 0.9 cm in diameter, and 150 balls 0.6 cm in diameter) and the duration time of the synthesis was equally set to 48 hours. For all the syntheses, the mass ratio of stainless-steel balls to precursor salts was set to be over 10 (refs. 35,44). All syntheses were conducted in an ambient atmosphere and at room temperature.

Ligand-capped NCs via wet-milling

Wet-milling procedures for producing ligand-capped Case-1, Case-2, and Case-3 NCs shown in Fig. 5 follows protocols from literature45 with minor modification. To specify, bulk powder of each case with 0.1 g in mass was initially loaded into a glass vial with 5 g of zirconia grinding balls (0.2 cm in diameter), giving fine-powdered samples. As-prepared powder sample was loaded into a glass vial with zirconia balls (50 μm in diameter), 0.5 g of oleylamine, and 10 mL of toluene (99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich). The vial was mounted on a lab rolling mixer (custom-made) and the rotating speed was set to 250 rpm with respect to the mechanical roller and the mixing time was set to 48 hours. After the mixing, a green suspension was obtained, which was diluted with 2 mL of toluene and precipitated with centrifugation at 11,515 × g for 5 minutes. The precipitate was redispersed in 2 mL of toluene and centrifuged at 1036 × g for 5 minutes to remove large sized particles. The final precipitate was redispersed in 2 mL of toluene.

Optical characterization

Photoluminescence

Steady-state PL emission and PL excitation spectra were measured with a spectrofluorometer (JASCO FP-8500) utilizing a Xenon arc lamp with a power of 150 W. PLQE was measured using the same spectrofluorometer equipped with a 100 mm integrating sphere (ILF-835) coated with barium sulfate and the value was calculated using Jasco SpectraManager II software. A correction for taking account of absorption from the scattered light (i.e., indirect configuration) was performed in order to rule out the possibility of overestimating the PLQE when measuring highly scattering powder samples56,57. Confocal PL mapping was performed using an XperRam 200 (Nanobase Inc.) instrument with a 405-nm laser excitation source and a diffraction-limited laser spot size of ~1 μm. Temperature-dependent PL measurements were conducted using the same equipment (XperRam 200, Nanobase Inc.), with the temperature controlled by liquid N2.

UV–Visible absorption

Absorption spectra were obtained through reflectance measurements using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (JASCO V-770) equipped with a 150-mm integrating sphere (ILN-925) coated with barium sulfate.

Structural characterization

Powder X-ray diffraction

PXRD measurements were performed with Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer using a Cu Kα radiation source with a wavelength at 1.5406 Å. Phase fractions from the PXRD patterns were calculated by Rietveld refinement using GSAS-II software58. The simulated PXRD results (Fig. 3) were obtained using VESTA software59 with CIF files from the crystallography open database22,47.

Solid-state NMR

Solid-state 133Cs ssNMR spectra were obtained using 4 mm cross-polarization (CP)-MAS probes and a 500 MHz Bruker ADVANCE III HD NMR spectrometer with 10 kHz spinning speed. A simple pulse-acquire sequence was used with flip angle of 20 degrees (52 kHz radiofrequency amplitude). Approximately 100 mg samples in mass were packed in disposable Kel-F inserts to mitigate issues with spinning instability.

Electron microscopy observation

Field emission SEM

Synthesized perovskite powder samples were placed on a carbon tape. SEM images were obtained using a JSM-7800F (JEOL Ltd.) Prime equipped with SDD-type EDS operating at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV. EDS mapping images were obtained using the same equipment at an acceleration voltage of 10 kV.

TEM and SAED

TEM images were obtained with a JEM-F200 (JEOL Ltd.) operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Synthesized perovskite powder samples were dispersed in toluene and then dropped onto copper mesh coated with a carbon layer and Formvar film. SAED patterns were obtained using an aperture of 10 μm and an area of 150 nm.