Introduction

Over the last three decades, the field of asymmetric epoxidation has seen substantial advancements1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, profoundly impacting the synthesis of optically active epoxides essential in diverse chemical processes. The period has witnessed major breakthroughs in chiral metal catalysis10,11,12,13 and organocatalysis14,15, including the titanium-catalyzed Sharpless epoxidation10, Jacobsen-Katsuki epoxidation11, and Shi’s fructose-based epoxidation14, targeting electron-neutral or electron-rich olefins with electrophilic oxidants effectively (Fig. 1a). In parallel, developments in asymmetric nucleophilic epoxidation, exemplified by the Weitz-Scheffer epoxidation16, have leveraged chiral ligand-enhanced metal peroxides17,18, polypeptides19, cinchona-based alkaloids20 as catalyst components, significantly expanding substrate versatility and achieving high enantioselectivity. Recent strides in covalent aminocatalysis, led by Jørgensen21, MacMillan22, Córdova23 and notably List24,25,26,27, have further diversified the epoxidation scope, encompassing various enones and enals through the activation of iminium ion intermediates (Fig. 1b). Despite the considerable progress, the enantioselective epoxidation of alkenyl N-heteroarenes, which is pivotal for the creation of chiral α-azaaryl oxiranes, continues to present a formidable challenge28,29. The intrinsic limitations of azaarenes, including their low electron-withdrawing capacity and propensity towards N-oxide formation, significantly impede conventional epoxidation techniques. Additionally, while non-covalent organocatalysis has shown preliminary success in epoxidizing electron-deficient olefins30,31,32,33,34,35, significant challenges related to efficiency and selectivity remain unresolved, particularly in the context of complex heterocyclic systems. These ongoing challenges underscore an urgent need for innovative epoxidation strategies capable of surmounting these barriers and bridging a notable gap in existing synthetic repertoire.

Fig. 1: Organocatalytic asymmetric epoxidations of alkenyl aza-heteroarenes.
figure 1

a Survey of prior achievements and unaddressed challenges in the catalytic asymmetric epoxidation. b Mechanistic insights into asymmetric epoxidation via covalent aminocatalysis, with a focus on the formation of chiral ion-pair intermediates. c Our approach involves enantioselective epoxidation of alkenyl N-heteroarenes catalyzed by chiral phosphoric acid using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant. CPA, chiral phosphoric acid.

Chiral azaarenes, especially those with imine functionalities, hold critical importance in pharmaceutical research due to their significant impact on drug efficacy and selectivity36. The pursuit of enantioenriched azaarene derivatives has led to heightened research into catalytic asymmetric reactions37,38,39, focusing on methods like conjugate addition to prochiral azaarene-derived substrates40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47 and enantioselective addition to 2-alkylazaarenes48,49,50,51. Despite the strides made with photoredox catalysis exploiting azaarenes’ unique attributes for radical-based synthesis52,53,54,55,56,57,58, the seamless integration of vicinal stereogenic centers into nitrogen-containing heteroarenes has remained a significant challenge59,60. Traditional techniques often fall short in efficiency and specificity when modifying complex structures such as α-azaaryl oxiranes and α-cyanomethylazaarenes, which are essential both as synthetic intermediates and as bases for pharmaceuticals61,62,63,64. Addressing this gap, the advent of direct, catalytic asymmetric synthesis heralds a considerable advancement, introducing a targeted and precise method to instill chirality and functionality directly into azaaryls. This streamlined approach promises to revolutionize synthetic processes and significantly impact the pharmaceutical industry.

In this study, we address the enduring challenges in the enantioselective epoxidation of alkenyl N-heteroarenes through the deployment of a chiral Brønsted acid catalysis method (Fig. 1c). Drawing on the principles of asymmetric counteranion-directed catalysis (ACDC)65,66, our approach employs chiral phosphoric acid for the simultaneous activation of aza-heteroarene substrates and hydrogen peroxide. This dual activation approach significantly enhances the electrophilic nature of the alkenyl group through the protonation of adjacent N-heteroarenes and increases the nucleophilicity of hydrogen peroxide. Consequently, it transcends the conventional limitations associated with azaarenes, enabling selective epoxidation across a diverse array of alkenyl N-heteroarenes, including those devoid of electron-withdrawing groups. The method promotes efficient organocatalytic nucleophilic epoxidation, delivering unparalleled control over chemo- and stereoselectivity via attractive non-covalent interactions. This innovative technique not only enables the facile synthesis of a broad spectrum of chiral α-heterocyclic oxiranes, from mono- to tetrasubstituted variants but also advances the field of asymmetric epoxidation, opening pathways for the creation of complex chiral azaarenes.

Results and Discussion

Reaction Development

Initially, our research aimed to craft enantioenriched α-azaaryl oxiranes by devising a catalytic system that merges chiral phosphoric acids with hydrogen peroxide. The strategic insertion of a cyano group into alkenyl aza-heteroarene substrates significantly boosted both reactivity and stereoselectivity, thus streamlining the creation of essential α-azaaryl cyanoepoxides, instrumental for pharmaceutical innovations and subsequent chemical advancements. Detailed optimization of reaction parameters revealed ideal conditions for this epoxidation process, as summarized in Table 1. Notably, under optimal conditions (entry 1), the epoxidation of (Z)-configured substrate 1aa with chiral phosphoric acid (S)−4a, hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w in H2O), and MgSO4 exclusively yielded cis-epoxide 3aa with exceptional yield (97%) and enantioselectivity (97% e.e.). It is crucial to emphasize that no oxidation products involving the nitrogen atoms of aza-heteroarenes were detected, which highlights the specificity of the oxidation process towards the double bonds. A comprehensive screening of various phosphoric acid catalysts underscored the superior performance of the bis-anthracenyl-substituted catalyst (S)−4a, in terms of both activity and stereoselectivity. The reaction’s efficiency was distinctly modulated by the choice of additives; in particular, the incorporation of MgSO4 played a critical role. Serving as an effective desiccant, MgSO4 efficiently sequestered water—a byproduct inherent to the use of aqueous hydrogen peroxide—thereby enhancing the epoxidation process’s efficiency67,68. The absence of MgSO4 led to a discernible decrease in both yield and enantioselectivity, as evidenced by comparative analyzes presented in entries 8–10. Alternative oxidants, such as CHP and TBHP, were explored but did not enhance the product yield despite maintaining high enantioselectivity (entries 11 and 12). Solvent screening indicated that CH2Cl2, although slower in reaction rate, was as effective as toluene for this reaction (entry 13). This protocol has demonstrated robustness under varying conditions, exhibiting only slight reductions in enantioselectivity with increased temperatures (as documented in Supplementary Table 4) or higher substrate concentrations (detailed in Supplementary Table 5).

Table 1 Summary of key reaction parameter effectsa

Upon refining our reaction protocols, we extended our investigations to encompass a broad spectrum of α-heterocyclic oxiranes with electron-withdrawing substituents, as demonstrated in Fig. 2. Efficient synthesis of these substrates was realized through Knoevenagel condensation, a process that involves combining heteroaryl acetonitrile with aldehydes, thereby enhancing the practicality and applicability of our method. Our exploration spanned an array of N-heterocyclic motifs, ranging from pyridine and diazine to triazine derivatives (3aa3af), benzofused N-heterocycles (3ag3an), azoles (3ao3ar), extending even to nonaromatics like oxazoline (3as), achieving consistently with excellent yields and selectivities. To evaluate the impact of the C = N bond’s position within an azaarene, we performed the epoxidation of 4-pyridine derivatives efficiently, though this led to a modest decrease in enantioselectivity (3ab). The (2 S,3 R)-configuration of the epoxide products was assigned by comparison to product 3ah, whose structure was unambiguously established through X-ray crystallography analysis. Further investigations into β-position substituents of alkenyl aza-heteroarenes revealed their compatibility with a broad spectrum of aryl and heteroaryl groups, successfully leading to the formation of tri-substituted α-azaaryl oxiranes with superior enantioselectivities (3ba3bl). In our pursuit of synthetically valuable transformations, we diversified our exploration by incorporating various aliphatic substituents at the β-position of acrylonitriles. These substituents varied from linear and cyclic to conjugated forms and were supplemented with functional groups, including halide, phthalimide, ether, ester, alkyl alkyne, conjugated enyne, and acetal. This expansive substrate scope, conducted under optimized conditions, led to the generation of a series of alkylated oxiranes (3ca3co) with noteworthy yields and enantiopurities, thus highlighting its broad utility in the synthesis of chiral α-azaaryl oxiranes.

Fig. 2: Substrate scope for the synthesis of diverse α-heterocyclic oxiranes from various N-heterocycle substituted and trisubstituted alkenes.
figure 2

Reaction conditions: (S)−4a (3 mol %), 1 (0.1 mmol), 2 (30% aq. H2O2, 0.2 mmol), MgSO4 (120 mg) and toluene (1.0 mL) at 35  oC. Isolated yields were reported. Enantiomeric excess (e.e.) and diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) values were determined using chiral HPLC analysis or 1H NMR spectroscopy. aAr = 3-Br-C6H4. bUse of 5 mol % (S)−4a. cReaction conducted at −20 oC. dSolvent mix of toluene/EtOAc in a 2/1 ratio. het, N-heterocycle; SEM, 2-(trimethylsilyl)ethoxymethyl; Ts, toluenesulfonyl; Mom, methoxymethyl; Ac, acetyl; Phth, phthalimidyl; Bn, benzyl; TBS, tert-butyl(dimethyl)silyl; TMS, trimethylsilyl.

Successfully navigating the steric complexities associated with tetrasubstituted alkenes, our approach delivers optically active oxiranes with varied substituents (cycloalkyl, dimethyl, asymmetric alkyl), reaching enantiomeric excesses up to 98% (3da3dg), and highlights the method’s potential in creating chiral quaternary stereocenters69 (Fig. 3). The adaptability of our approach was further evidenced by its application to geminally disubstituted terminal alkenes, yielding key precursors for chiral tertiary alcohols (3ea3ec). Despite a modest reduction in enantioselectivity (75–85% e.e.), this extension significantly broadens the method’s applicability, accommodating a wider array of electron-withdrawing groups beyond cyano functionalities, including ester and sulfonyl groups. However, substituting electron-withdrawing groups with electron-donating methyl groups in substrates resulted in no detectable epoxide formation, underscoring a specific limitation related to the electronic effects of substituents, as illustrated in the Supplementary Fig. 69. Our protocol also exhibits unparalleled site-specificity, preferentially epoxidizing olefinic bonds adjacent to aza-heteroarenes across various substrate configurations. This specificity ensures consistent high yields and enantiomeric excesses, even in substrates featuring diverse alkene geometries and functionalities such as conjugated esters or ketones (3fa3fi). Extending our method to naturally derived substrates, such as (S)-Perillaldehyde (3ga), (R)-Myrtenal (3gb), and (R)-Citronellal (3gc), alongside intermediates for Febuxostat (3gd) and derivatives of Cholesterol (3ge) and D-Glucuronic acid (3gf), we demonstrated its flexibility and efficiency in producing aza-heteroarenes with multiple stereocenters. The impressive diastereoselectivities achieved further affirm the technique’s significant impact on the field of asymmetric epoxidation and its potential for intricate N-heterocycle modifications.

Fig. 3: Substrate scope including tetrasubstituted and 1,1-disubstituted alkenes, chemoselectivity, and biologically relevant complex structures.
figure 3

Reaction conditions: (S)−4a (3 mol %), 1 (0.1 mmol), 2 (30% aq. H2O2, 0.2 mmol), MgSO4 (120 mg) and toluene (1.0 mL) at 35  oC. Isolated yields were reported. Enantiomeric excess (e.e.) and diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) values were determined using chiral HPLC analysis or 1H NMR spectroscopy. aReaction conducted at −20  oC. bUse of 5 mol % (S)−4a. het, N-heterocycle; Bz, benzoyl.

In our extended investigation into vinyl-substituted N-heteroaromatic compounds, as illustrated in Fig. 4, the original catalytic system utilizing (S)−4a demonstrated restricted efficacy. This diminished effectiveness likely stems from the vinyl substrates’ decreased propensity to stabilize an anionic charge at the α-position, especially compared to those with electron-withdrawing groups. To overcome this limitation, we adopted an innovative N-phosphinyl phosphoramide catalyst (R)−4j, distinguished by its additional basic P = O functionality70, tailored to boost the epoxidation efficiency of these challenging substrates. Additionally, the strategic exclusion of MgSO4 from the catalytic system resulted in substantial improvements in both reactivity and stereoselectivity, leading to the synthesis of diverse α-heterocyclic terminal epoxides (6a6n) with high enantioselectivities (86–96% e.e.). The assignment of (R)-configuration to these terminal epoxides was confidently determined through a comparative analysis with 6b, the structure of which was unequivocally established via X-ray crystallography. Our methodology proved to be widely applicable, notably in the epoxidation of 1,2-disubstituted (E)-alkenes featuring quinoline, isoquinoline, benzoxazole and benzimidazole derivatives, consistently yielding the corresponding trans-epoxides (6o6s) with yields and enantioselectivities ranging from 65–92%. Nonetheless, a notable limitation of our approach became apparent when attempting to epoxidize alkenyl pyridines possessing β-aryl groups (6t), which underscored certain methodological constraints. Moreover, our refined protocol exhibited commendable functional group tolerance, enabling the successful epoxidation of complex vinyl N-heteroarenes derived from compounds such as adenosine and sulfadoxine, and producing pharmaceutically significant oxiranes with high stereoselectivities (6u6v).

Fig. 4: Range of mono-substituted and 1,2-disubstituted alkenyl azaarenes in the catalytic asymmetric epoxidation.
figure 4

Reaction conditions: (R)−4j (3 mol %), 5 (0.1 mmol), 2 (30% aq. H2O2, 0.2 mmol), and toluene (1.0 mL) at 25  oC. Isolated yields were reported. Enantiomeric excess (e.e.) and diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) were determined using chiral HPLC analysis. aUse of 3 mol % (S)−4a. bUse of 5 mol % (R)−4j. Ts, toluenesulfonyl; TBS, tert-butyl(dimethyl)silyl.

Synthetic transformations

In an upscaled reaction, the epoxidation between 1ci and hydrogen peroxide 2 with a minimal catalyst concentration of 0.5 mol %, resulted in 2.8 g of oxirane 3ci, replicating the excellent performance of preliminary experiments by achieving an 85% yield and 97% e.e. (Fig. 5a). The versatility of α-cyanoepoxides such as 3cj and 3co, primarily attributed to the adaptable CN group, enables selective conversion into various derivatives including carboximidate (7a), carboximidic acid (7b), ketone (7c), ester (7d), and amine (7e), all while preserving the integrity of the oxirane structure and maintaining enantiomeric purity (Fig. 5b). The chiral oxiranes 3ci and 3cj also underwent regioselective and stereospecific ring-opening reactions, yielding compounds 7f7h with vicinal stereocenters, where the site of reaction was determined by the choice of reagent. The formation of a five-membered ring compound 7i from 3co was achieved via acetonitrile-induced ring opening and subsequent cyclization, while 3ci was transformed into 7j through a piperidine-mediated rearrangement, albeit in moderate yields. These transformations illustrate the varied reactivity of chiral α-heterocyclic oxiranes, establish an approach for the catalytic stereoselective synthesis of densely functionalized aromatic N-heterocycles adorned with vicinal stereocenters.

Fig. 5: Scale-up reaction and synthetic applications of the chiral products.
figure 5

a Gram-scale synthesis of 3ci. Performed with 1ci (9.1 mmol) and (S)−4a (0.5 mol %) in toluene (0.1 M) at 35 oC for 7 h. b Derivatization of enantiopure α-heterocyclic cyanoepoxides. Conditions: (a) MeONa (1.2 equiv.), MeOH, rt, 12 h. (b) H2O2 (27.0 equiv.), Na2CO3 (3.0 equiv.), acetone, rt, 12 h. (c) TMSCl (3.0 equiv.), p-MeO-PhMgBr (2.0 equiv.), toluene, −40 oC, 3 h. (d) BF3·Et2O (3.0 equiv.), CH2Cl2, 40 oC, 12 h. (e) DIBAL-H (5.0 equiv.), toluene, −78  oC, 3 h, then di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (2.0 equiv.), NaHCO3 (2.0 equiv.), MeOH, rt, 24 h. (f) DIBAL-H (5.0 equiv.), toluene, −78  oC, 3 h, followed by di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (2.0 equiv.), NaHCO3 (2.0 equiv.), MeOH, rt, 24 h, then Zinc chloride (1.5 equiv.), CH2Cl2, 0  oC, 2 h. (g) Zinc chloride (1.5 equiv.), acetyl chloride (2.0 equiv.), CH2Cl2, 35  oC, 12 h. (h) TEAB (2.0 equiv.), BF3·Et2O (1.5 equiv.), CH2Cl2, 0  oC, 1 h. (i) CH3CN (1.5 equiv.), KHMDS (3.0 equiv.), THF, −20  oC, 2 h. (j) piperidine (3.0 equiv.), EtOH, 50  oC, 18 h. Isolated yields were reported. Enantiomeric excess (e.e.) and diastereomeric ratio (d.r.) values were determined using chiral HPLC analysis or gas chromatography (GC). The absolute stereochemistry of compound 7d was assigned as (1 S,5 S)-configuration via X-ray crystallography analysis. TBS, tert-butyl(dimethyl)silyl; DIBAL-H, diisobutylaluminium hydride; TEAB, tetraethylammonium bromide; KHMDS, potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide.

Mechanistic investigations

Through a comprehensive mechanistic investigation, our control experiments shed light on the substrate specificity of the epoxidation process. The critical importance of the nitrogen atom in azaarenes was established that its removal under otherwise optimal conditions halted the epoxidation process, thereby affirming the essential role of the C = N bond as an activation site (Fig. 6a). By epoxidizing a 10:1 E/Z mixture of compound 1dg, we observed the formation of the trans/cis stereoisomers 3dg at a diminished ratio of 2:1, illustrating a compromise in stereochemical integrity. Additionally, a control experiment—excluding hydrogen peroxide but including chiral phosphoric acid—altered the E/Z ratio of 1dg from 10:1 to 2.5:1, indicating the profound influence of catalyst-substrate interactions in isomerization processes. In addition, a linear relationship between the enantioselectivities of the catalyst and the epoxide product 3bi was observed during epoxidation, suggesting the influence of a monomeric catalyst in the reaction’s crucial transition state (Fig. 6b). Kinetic studies, based on Burés’ graphical method71, confirmed the reaction’s first-order dependency on catalyst concentration, accentuating the catalyst’s vital role in shaping both the stereooutcome and the overall reaction kinetics (Fig. 6c).

Fig. 6: Mechanistic insights into the epoxidation reaction.
figure 6

a Reactivity comparison between compounds 8a and 8b under optimized conditions. b Study of the nonlinear effect. c Determination of reaction order by variable time normalization analysis following the method of Burés71: a first-order dependence on the catalyst concentration with product concentration plotted against a normalized time scale. The convergence of plots from reactions with varying catalyst concentrations, where the exponent n equals the catalyst order (n = 1), signifies first-order kinetics. Conversions of 1bi were quantified by gas chromatography (GC), employing n-dodecane as the internal standard.

To decode the molecular basis of the observed stereoselectivity, we employed density functional theory (DFT) calculations, focusing on 1aa as the model compound. The computational insights unveiled the formation of a pivotal intermediate Int1-SR, stabilized by a combination of two hydrogen bonds and one O‒H···π interaction involving the catalyst (S)−4a, hydrogen peroxide, and 1aa. This stabilization manifests as a substantial energy reduction of −19.6 kcal/mol (Fig. 7a), demonstrating the essential role of non-covalent interactions (NCI) in steering the reaction pathway toward high stereoselectivity. Progressing from Int1-SR to the final epoxide necessitates overcoming a free energy barrier of 20.4 kcal/mol at the transition state TS1-SR. In a comparative analysis, the non-cyano variant of 1aa exhibited a notably higher barrier of 27.6 kcal/mol, illustrating the profound effect of the cyano substituent on reducing the energy requirements of the reaction. This finding underscores the significant impact of substituent nature on catalytic efficiency and stereoselectivity, effectively facilitating ring closure via TS2-SR and completing the epoxidation cycle.

Fig. 7: Computational studies and proposed mechanisms.
figure 7

a Possible reaction pathways for the asymmetric epoxidation of alkenyl N-heteroarene 1aa with hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by (S)−4a. The relative Gibbs free energies and bond distances are given in kcal mol−1 and Å, respectively. The dihedral angles of the catalyst centers in (S)−4a are represented as 1234. b Density Functional Theory (DFT)-optimized structures of transition states TS1-SR and TS1-RS. c, Proposed catalytic cycle.

Distinguishing TS1-SR from its enantiomeric counterpart, TS1-RS, by a Gibbs free energy difference of 4.0 kcal/mol, directly correlates with the experimentally observed enantiomeric excess of 97% e.e., providing a computational validation of the reaction’s stereoselectivity (Fig. 7b). An energy decomposition analysis further elucidated a significant electronic energy difference (ΔΔE) of 4.4 kcal/mol between the transition states TS1-SR and TS1-RS. This discrepancy is primarily attributed to the differential distortion of the catalyst and its nuanced interactions with the substrate. Notably, the structural analysis highlighted minimal substrate differences between these states, emphasizing the critical role of the catalyst’s conformational dynamics in stereoselectivity. Specifically, we observed dihedral angle shifts from −74.8° in the resting state to −73.3° in TS1-SR and further to −72.8° in TS1-RS, underscoring the importance of these conformational changes for achieving high enantioselectivity. Furthermore, TS1-SR exhibits a 2.3 kcal/mol greater interaction energy with the substrate than TS1-RS, indicative of stronger non-covalent bonding that reinforces the observed ΔΔEint value, as shown by NCI plots in Supplementary Fig. 117.

Integrating data from both detailed experimental studies and DFT calculations, we propose a catalytic mechanism for the stereoselective epoxidation of alkenyl aza-heteroarenes, as depicted in Fig. 7c. Initiation of this catalytic cycle involves the chiral phosphoric acid-mediated simultaneous activation of both the aza-heteroarene substrates and hydrogen peroxide, primarily through electrostatic and hydrogen-bonding interactions. This dual activation gives rise to complex A, wherein the aza-heteroarene substrate is protonated by chiral phosphoric acid and intimately associated with hydrogen peroxide. The ensuing stage involves a nucleophilic attack by hydrogen peroxide on the activated alkene, accompanied by an essential proton transfer, leading to the formation of the enantioenriched complex B. The culmination of this sequence is achieved through a stereospecific elimination step, effectively reinstating the aromaticity of the aza-heteroarene and resulting in the synthesis of the desired chiral oxirane with notable enantiopurity.

In summary, our research pioneers an organocatalytic approach for the enantioselective epoxidation of alkenyl aza-heteroarenes, leveraging hydrogen peroxide as an environmentally benign oxidant in concert with chiral Brønsted acid catalysis. The key to this advancement is the synergistic interplay of chiral phosphoric acid with C = N functionalities embedded within azaarenes, markedly enhancing both the selectivity and reactivity of the epoxidation process. Our approach has been demonstrated to be highly effective across a diverse range of substrates, achieving enantioselectivities of up to 99% e.e. and exhibiting specific reactivity towards targeted sites, thereby enabling the precise creation of chiral azaaryl molecules with consecutive stereocenters. Kinetic studies and DFT calculations elucidate the reaction’s stereoselectivity, highlighting the importance of the chiral phosphoric acid in orchestrating the epoxidation process through a finely tuned balance of non-covalent interactions. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of asymmetric epoxidation. This advance not only marks a crucial development in asymmetric epoxidation but also provides a robust, versatile platform for constructing complex N-heterocyclic frameworks, offering extensive utility in both pharmaceutical development and synthetic chemistry.

Methods

General procedure for the asymmetric epoxidation of tri-, tetra- and 1,1-disubstituted alkenyl aza-heteroarenes

A mixture of alkenyl aza-heteroarenes (0.1 mmol), (S)−4a (3 mg, 0.03 mmol), and MgSO4 (120 mg) was placed in a 4 mL vial with a magnetic stir bar. Freshly distilled toluene (1.0 mL) was added, followed by a dropwise addition of H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 16 μL, 0.2 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 35 °C and its progress monitored via TLC. Once the reaction was deemed complete, the solution was filtered through a short celite pad. The combined organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and further purified via flash column chromatography on silica gel to isolate the desired products.

General procedure for the asymmetric epoxidation of mono-substituted and 1,2-disubstituted alkenyl aza-heteroarenes

A mixture of alkenyl aza-heteroarenes (0.1 mmol), (R)−4j (4 mg, 0.03 mmol) was placed in a 4 mL vial with a magnetic stir bar. Freshly distilled toluene (1.0 mL) was added, followed by a dropwise addition of H2O2 (30% w/w in H2O, 16 μL, 0.2 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 25 °C and its progress was monitored via TLC. Once the reaction was deemed complete, the solution was filtered through a short celite pad. The combined organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and further purified via flash column chromatography on silica gel to isolate the desired products.