Introduction

Direct capture and in situ conversion of diluted CO2 from flue gas into value-added chemical stocks and fuels driven by natural abundant solar energy is a promising strategy to mitigate the superfluous greenhouse gas and achieve the utilization of CO21,2,3,4. The prominent merit of this strategy lies in bypassing the energy-intensive processes of CO2 separation and enrichment in conventional CO2 utilization technology5,6. In fact, the contained H2O vapor (8–12 wt%) in common flue gas could serve as sacrificial agent in CO2 reduction reaction, and gas–solid artificial photosynthesis overall reaction of CO2 reduction is feasible, which is more appropriate for practical industrial application7,8,9. In recent years, various semiconductor photocatalysts with high activity and selectivity have been developed for artificial photosynthetic CO2 reduction to target products under a pure CO2 atmosphere10,11,12,13,14,15. Although many photocatalysts have exhibited high reduction activity in a pure CO2 atmosphere, their artificial photosynthetic activity usually turned into extremely low level under diluted CO2 condition16,17,18. One of the primary reasons for this is attributed to the sluggish CO2 adsorption process which hinders the overall reaction kinetics18,19,20. Because the anthropogenic CO2 concentration derived from industrial gaseous waste (~15% CO2) is relatively low21,22,23. It is of great significance to develop robust artificial photosynthetic systems that can effectively enrich diluted CO2 and simultaneously realize in situ reduction24,25,26.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), as a type of crystalline porous materials composed of organic ligands and metal nodes, have shown great potential in the field of artificial photosynthesis due to their intrinsic advantages, such as high surface area, structural tunability, customizable light absorption, and abundant open metal sites27,28,29,30,31. In additional, the porous nature of MOFs also provides great opportunities of loading guest species to endow the materials with the aimed function by post synthetic modification32,33. Generally, the organic ligands of MOFs serve as light absorber while the metal clusters act as reduction and/or oxidation sites in artificial photosynthetic reactions34,35,36. For example, a pyrazolyl porphyrinic Ni-MOF (PCN-601) realized visible-light-driven overall CO2 reduction with H2O vapor at room temperature, with the porphyrin ligand serving as a light harvester and generating electron-hole pairs37. Previously, our group firstly proved that heterometallic nodes in MOFs could serve a CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation centers separately by using Fe2M-based NNU-31-M (M = Ni, Co, Zn) as artificial photosynthetic overall reaction catalysts38. Despite significant progress has been achieved in MOF artificial photosynthetic systems, the attempts to utilize MOF-based photocatalysts for the reduction of diluted CO2 often result in extremely low activity, which is far from practical application39,40,41. Ionic liquids (ILs) are an excellent type of CO2 absorption materials with high ionic conductivity, low volatility, and high thermal stability merits42,43,44. By using the CO2 absorption ability of ILs, researchers have successfully constructed ILs@MOFs materials to enhance CO2 adsorption and achieve diluted CO2 enrichment45,46. Based on the above, we reasoned that the combination of CO2-enriching ILs and photoactive MOFs has great potential to achieve efficient low-concentration CO2 reduction. Nevertheless, it is still a blank about combining the advantages of ILs and MOFs for artificial photosynthetic overall reaction, especially for diluted CO2 reduction.

In this work, a series of heterometallic MOFs, PCN-250-Fe2M (M = Fe, Co, Ni, Zn, Mn) with visible-light-harvesting azo-based ligands, were chosen as host photocatalysts, and typical imidazole-based ILs with excellent CO2 enriching ability as guest species were introduced into the pores to construct host-guest photocatalysts for diluted CO2 reduction in gas–solid reaction (Fig. 1). It was confirmed that the [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co ([Emim]BF4: 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazole tetrafluoroborate) exhibits about 1.88 times higher CO2 absorption amount than pure PCN-250-Fe2Co. Without the addition of any photosensitizers and sacrificial agents, [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co shows an optimal CO2-to-CO convention rate of 313.34 μmol g−1 h−1, which is about 25 times higher than that of pristine PCN-250-Fe2Co (12.27 μmol g−1 h−1). Notably, the host-guest photocatalyst reaches a record high photocatalytic activity of 153.42 μmol g−1 h−1 under diluted CO2 (15%) atmosphere. The CO2 concentration (15%) could be apparently decreased to below 10% in the scaled-up experiment with 1.0 g catalysts in 1072 cm2 reactor under natural sunlight irradiation, showing its practical application potential. Further experimental and theoretical results suggest that the loaded ILs can effectively enrich diluted CO2, and simultaneously transfer the activated CO2 to Co2+ sites. The Gibbs free energy barrier in the rate-determining step of *COOH-Emim formation is significantly reduced by host-guest synergistic effect between ILs and Co2+ sites in PCN-250-Fe2Co, leading to an overall improvement in the activity of artificial photosynthetic diluted CO2 reduction.

Fig. 1: Schematic representation of conventional techniques of CO2 utilization from flue gas and our new strategy for the construction of host-guest photocatalysts to direct capture and in situ reduction of diluted CO2.
Fig. 1: Schematic representation of conventional techniques of CO2 utilization from flue gas and our new strategy for the construction of host-guest photocatalysts to direct capture and in situ reduction of diluted CO2.
Full size image

ILs ionic liquids, MOFs metal-organic frameworks.

Results

Synthesis and structural characterization of ILs@MOFs

PCN-250-Fe2Co was synthesized via a solvothermal reaction between preformed Fe2Co clusters and 3,3′,5,5′-azo-benzene tetra-carboxylic acid (H4abtc) ligand in the presence of acetic acid as a competing reagent47. Subsequently, a representative ionic liquid [Emim]BF4 with high CO2 absorption capacity was introduced into the pores of PCN-250-Fe2Co to prepare [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2M composites, as shown in Fig. 2a. The powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern of the synthesized PCN-250-Fe2Co in Fig. 2b agrees well with the simulated pattern, demonstrating the successful synthesis of PCN-250-Fe2Co. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images reveal that PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibits polyhedral shape with a particle size of ~10 μm (Supplementary Fig. 1). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) elemental mappings of PCN-250-Fe2Co indicate that the Fe and Co elements are evenly distributed over the whole material and the atomic ratio of Fe/Co is of approximate 2:1, in agreement with the theoretical value (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3, Supplementary Table 1). Furthermore, the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra support the heterometallic nature of PCN-250-Fe2Co (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5)48.

Fig. 2: Synthetic procedures and characterizations of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2M.
Fig. 2: Synthetic procedures and characterizations of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2M.
Full size image

a Synthesis of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2M. H4abtc: 3,3′,5,5′-azo-benzene tetra-carboxylic acid, Fe2Co: Fe2Co(μ3-O)(CH3COO)6], [Emim]BF4: 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate. b PXRD patterns of PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co. c FT-IR spectra of PCN-250-Fe2Co, [Emim]BF4 and [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co. d TEM images and EDS elemental mapping of [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co. e N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (77 K) and f CO2 adsorption of PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co. Source data are provided as a Source data file.

The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and XPS spectroscopy have been applied to study the chemical compositions of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co. The FT-IR spectrum of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co displays a peak around 1060 cm−1, which corresponds to the stretching vibration peak of B-F bond49,50. In addition, the peaks at 1472 and 1575 cm−1 can be ascribed to the stretching vibration of C=C and C=N bonds on the imidazole ring, respectively (Fig. 2c)51,52,53. The XPS spectrum of F 1s shows a strong peak at 685.82 eV, which is attributed to the negatively charged BF4, indicating the successful integration of [Emim]BF4 and PCN-250-Fe2Co (Supplementary Fig. 6). After [Emim]BF4 loading, the crystalline structure of PCN-250-Fe2Co retained (Fig. 2b), and its morphology of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co was consistent with the parent PCN-250-Fe2Co, with a uniform distribution of F and B elements (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 7). The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) conducted under air atmosphere reveals that both PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co could remain their structural integration up to 350 °C (Supplementary Fig. 8).

As confirmed by N2 adsorption and desorption measurements at 77 K (Fig. 2e), both PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibit type-I absorption characteristics with a rapid N2 uptake at low relative pressure. The introduction of [Emim]BF4 into the pores of PCN-250-Fe2Co led to a decrease in Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area from 960.8 to 482.6 m2 g−1. Furthermore, the pore size decreased from 0.82 nm to 0.48 nm (Supplementary Fig. 9), indicating that the pore channel space of PCN-250-Fe2Co was occupied by [Emim]BF4. Although the BET surface area and pore size of PCN-250-Fe2Co obviously decreased after loading [Emim]BF4, its CO2 absorption capability increased significantly with the addition amount of ILs (Supplementary Fig. 10). As shown in Fig. 2f, [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibits a CO2 adsorption capacity of 87.3 cm3 g−1 at 298 K, which is ~1.88 times higher than that of PCN-250-Fe2Co (46.4 cm3 g−1). The enhanced CO2 enrichment ability of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co lays a solid foundation for high photocatalytic activity.

The optical absorption property and band gap of PCN-250-Fe2Co were investigated by UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS). PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibited considerable absorption in the UV and visible regions (Supplementary Fig. 11), and the band gap of PCN-250-Fe2Co is estimated to be 1.85 eV from Tauc plots (Supplementary Fig. 12). According to Mott-Schottky measurements (Supplementary Fig. 13), the flat band potential of PCN-250-Fe2Co is −0.66 V referenced to the Ag/AgCl electrode. Considering the conduction band (CB) position of n-type semiconductor is generally 0.1 V more negative than the flat band potential54, the CB position of PCN-250-Fe2Co is derived to be −0.56 V vs. normal hydrogen electrode (NHE). Meanwhile, the valence band (VB) position is calculated to be 1.29 V through band gap and the CB value. It is obvious that the CB value of PCN-250-Fe2Co is more negative than the standard potential of CO2 reduction to CO (−0.52 V vs. NHE at pH = 7), and the VB value is more positive than the standard potential of H2O oxidation to O2 (0.82 V vs. NHE at pH = 7), indicating its abilities to achieve the overall reactions of CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation (Supplementary Fig. 14).

Study of photocatalytic CO2 conversion

The photocatalytic CO2 reduction performances of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co were evaluated in gas–solid reaction under visible light irradiation (300 W Xe lamp with a cut-off filter of 420 nm) without adding any photosensitizers, sacrificial agents or promoters. The as-synthesized [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co composites were uniformly coated on a glass before photocatalytic tests. As shown in Fig. 3a and Supplementary Fig. 15, a series of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co with different loading amounts of [Emim]BF4 exhibited significantly improved CO2-to-CO reduction activity compared to that of parent PCN-250-Fe2Co. An optimal photocatalytic CO evolution rate of 313.34 μmol g−1 h−1 was observed when the loading amount of [Emim]BF4 reached 39.3 wt%, which is ~25 times higher than the activity of pristine PCN-250-Fe2Co (12.27 μmol g−1 h−1). In addition, the detected CO/O2 production amounts are close to the stoichiometric ratio of 2:1 (Supplementary Fig. 16), indicating it is an artificial photosynthetic overall reaction of CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation. It is noteworthy that the CO2 reduction activity of [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co surpasses various reported photocatalysts under similar reaction condition (Supplementary Table 2). An apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 2.9% was obtained at 420 nm, and the change of AQE at diverse light irradiation wavelength was consistent with the tendency of light absorption curve (Supplementary Fig. 17). In addition, it is found that the optimal loading amount of [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%) for photocatalytic activity is comparable to the pore volume of PCN-250-Fe2Co, which may ensure the loaded [Emim]BF4 existing in the pores of MOF maximumly. In control experiment, the sample obtained by simply mixing [Emim]BF4 and PCN-250-Fe2Co (denoted as IL + MOF) only exhibited a little improvement of CO production rate compared to pure MOF (Supplementary Fig. 18), demonstrating the necessary of loading ILs into the pores of MOFs for the enhanced photocatalytic activity in the system.

Fig. 3: Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CO.
Fig. 3: Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to CO.
Full size image

a Photocatalytic performance of PCN-250-Fe2Co with different loading amounts of [Emim]BF4. b Photocatalytic performance of PCN-250-Fe2M and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2M (M = Co, Mn, Zn, Ni, Fe). c Photocatalytic performance of PCN-250-Fe2Co with different kinds of ILs. [Emim]Ac: 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate, [Emim]Br: 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazole bromide. d Photocatalytic performance of CO2 reduction to CO under diluted CO2 (15% CO2 and 85% N2) atmosphere. e Summary of photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity under pure CO2 atmosphere. f Photocatalytic stability of [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co under diluted CO2 atmosphere. Source data are provided as a Source data file.

To evaluate the effect of different divalent metal species in Fe2M cluster of MOFs on the photocatalytic activity, a series of PCN-250-Fe2M (M = Mn, Zn, Ni, Fe) were synthesized (Supplementary Fig. 19). As confirmed, all PCN-250-Fe2M possess suitable band energy positions for artificial photosynthetic CO2 reduction overall reaction (Supplementary Figs. 12142023). Photocatalytic experiments confirmed that both PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibited superior photocatalytic CO2-to-CO conversion activities in comparison with other pure MOFs and composite systems, respectively (Fig. 3b). The influence of different ILs on the photocatalytic performance was further determined. Two other ILs, [Emim]Br (39.3 wt%) and [Emim]Ac (39.3 wt%), were selected and loaded into PCN-250-Fe2Co to evaluate the photocatalytic properties. As shown in Fig. 3c, the combination of [Emim]BF4 and PCN-250-Fe2Co lead to the highest photocatalytic activity than others, which may be attributed to its high CO2 adsorption capacity (Supplementary Fig. 24).

Encouraged by the excellent photocatalytic activity in pure CO2 atmosphere, diluted CO2 (15% CO2 and 85% N2) reduction activity of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co was further studied. Under visible light irradiation, [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co still showed a high CO evolution rate of 153.42 μmol g−1 h−1 in gas–solid reaction with diluted CO2 as source, while almost no CO can be detected for the pristine PCN-250-Fe2Co under the same conditions (Fig. 3d). Thus, the remarkable photocatalytic activity of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co under diluted CO2 atmosphere should be attributed to the contribution of ILs which effective enriched diluted CO2. Notably, the host-guest [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co catalyst presents the most outstanding artificial photosynthetic CO evolution rate both in high and diluted CO2 atmosphere (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). It can be observed that only CO can be detected in the gas chromatography FID detector, while only O2 can be detected in the gas chromatography TCD detector (Supplementary Fig. 25). Ion chromatography and 1H NMR spectrum analyses confirmed no liquid products was produced in photocatalytic reaction, indicating the CO production selectivity of ~100% (Supplementary Figs. 26 and 27). In addition, [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibited consistent CO yielding rate during consecutive five cycles photocatalytic tests in both pure CO2 and diluted CO2 conditions (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Fig. 28). Meanwhile, the XRD patterns and SEM images reveal that the crystalline structure and morphology of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co remain unchanged after five consecutive photocatalytic cycles (Supplementary Figs. 2932), proving its stable photocatalytic performance.

The universality of the strategy in improving diluted CO2 reduction by the integration of photocatalytic MOFs and CO2-enriching ILs was further examined. Some typical MOFs with visible light absorption properties and high moisture stability were synthesized, then loading [Emim]BF4 to prepare [Emim]BF4@MOFs (Supplementary Fig. 33). As a result, all [Emim]BF4@MOFs photocatalyst show apparently improved CO2-to-CO conversion activities in comparison with pristine MOFs both under pure and diluted CO2 (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Figs. 3437), suggesting the effectiveness of a host-guest photocatalytic system based on MOFs and ILs. Among all [Emim]BF4@MOFs, [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibits the best photocatalytic activity, which may be attributed to its intrinsic azo units in the ligands and heterometallic clusters with unsaturated metal centers, benefitting light absorption and the providing sufficient reduction and oxidation sites for overall photocatalytic reactions38.

To explore the practical application potential of the host-guest photocatalyst, we made a scaled-up glass reactor with a surface area of 1072 cm2 coating with 1.0 g photocatalyst and conducted the scaled-up test for 60 h (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 38). After the reaction under visible light and natural sunlight irradiation, the pure CO2 concentration was observed to decrease to 75.36% and 84.27%, respectively, and the diluted CO2 (15%) decreased to 5.44% and 9.85%, as detailed in Table 1. [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co achieved a visible-light-driven CO2-to-CO conversion rate up to 172.38 μmol g−1 h−1 under pure CO2 condition and 67.42 μmol g−1 h−1 under a diluted CO2 atmosphere. Meanwhile, under natural sunlight irradiation at 298 K, the photocatalytic CO evolution rate still reached 119.64 and 39.88 μmol g−1 h−1 under pure and diluted CO2 conditions, respectively (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 39). It is worth mentioning that gram-scale PCN-250-Fe2Co (about 15.0 g) can be facile obtained in one day by stirring/reflux method (Workflow see Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig. 40), which lays a solid foundation for its extensive use. The above experimental results show the application perspective of ILs@MOFs host-guest photocatalysts in direct diluted CO2 reduction. The isotope 13CO2 tracing experiment was performed to determine the carbon source origin of CO product. As detected by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS), the reduction product 13CO (m/z = 29) was observed by using 13CO2 as source (Fig. 4c). The oxygen source of oxidation product O2 was also checked by isotopic labeling experiment, and 18O2 (m/z = 36) and 18O16O (m/z = 34) were detected by GC-MS when using H218O as the reaction solvent (Fig. 4d). The above results confirm that the photocatalyst really drive overall reaction of CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation.

Fig. 4: Scaled-up experiments and carbon/oxygen source origin determination.
Fig. 4: Scaled-up experiments and carbon/oxygen source origin determination.
Full size image

a Illustration of a photocatalytic experimental device for scaled-up experiments. b Photocatalytic performance of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co in scaled-up experiments. c Mass spectroscopy of 13CO (m/z = 29) produced from 13CO2 reduction. d Mass spectroscopy of 18O16O (m/z = 34) produced from H2O oxidation. Source data are provided as a Source data file.

Table 1 CO2 concentration of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co after scaled-up experiments

Mechanistic insights into the photocatalytic CO2 reduction processes

The photoelectrochemical measurements for PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co were performed to investigate the effect of ILs loading on the separation and migration behavior of photogenerated electron-hole pairs. It is found that the transient photocurrent intensity of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co is nearly 3 times higher that of PCN-250-Fe2Co (Fig. 5a). In addition, [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co possesses a smaller the radius of Nyquist curve compared to PCN-250-Fe2Co (Fig. 5b). These indicate that more efficient charge transport existed in the composite. As shown in Fig. 5c, d, [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co exhibits weaker photoluminescence (PL) intensity and longer PL lifetimes than PCN-250-Fe2Co, implying a lower recombination efficiency of photogenerated electrons and holes in [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co. The room-temperature electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra show that [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co owns a higher intensity of EPR signal upon light irradiation, meaning that more free electrons could participate in photocatalytic reactions (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Figs. 41 and 42). The results of free radical trapping experiments indicate that the peaks intensity of DMPO-•OH (DMPO: 1,3-Dimethyl-5-pyrazolone) from [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co sample is apparently higher than that of PCN-250-Fe2Co, suggesting its more potential for driving the oxidation reaction from H2O to O2 (Fig. 5f).

Fig. 5: Comparisons for photochemical properties of PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co.
Fig. 5: Comparisons for photochemical properties of PCN-250-Fe2Co and [Emim]BF4(39.3 wt%)@PCN-250-Fe2Co.
Full size image

a Transient photocurrent responses. b EIS Nyquist plots. c Photoluminescence spectra. d Time-resolved PL spectra. e EPR spectra with 420 nm light irradiation. f EPR spectra of •OH radical trapped by DMPO. Source data are provided as a Source data file.

The in situ measurements combined with DFT calculations were conducted to further reveal the mechanism of the overall photocatalytic reaction (details in Supplementary Information). Using in situ XPS measurements can clearly reveal the electron transfer process in photochemical reactions of PCN-250-Fe2Co. As shown in Fig. 6a, b, under light irradiation, the binding energy of Fe 2p in PCN-250-Fe2Co increases from 710.66 to 710.91 eV. In contrast, the binding energy of Co 2p decreases from 780.97 to 780.74 eV, indicating that electrons transfer to the Co sites under photoexcitation. After introducing CO2 into the system, the binding energy of Co 2p increases to 780.89 eV, and the binding energy of Fe 2p remains nearly unchanged, indicating that the photogenerated electrons transferred from Co2+ to CO2. Moreover, the C 1s spectra exhibit a shift towards lower binding energy upon exposure to light in the presence of CO2, which indicates the adsorbed CO2 molecules receive electrons from the Co2+ (Supplementary Fig. 43). Consequently, it can be inferred that Co2+ serve as the active sites for the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CO and Fe3+ for the H2O oxidation to O255. Combining with DFT calculations, the projected density of states (PDOS) diagram was calculated based on optimized crystal geometry of PCN-250-Fe2Co (Supplementary Fig. 44) to further confirm its active centers. As shown in Fig. 6c, it can be seen that the conduction band minimum (CBM) and the valence band maximum (VBM) are mainly contributed by the 3d orbitals of Co and the 3d orbitals of Fe, respectively. Therefore, photo-excited electrons and holes are mainly concentrated on Co2+ and Fe3+, suggestive of the active sites for CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation on PCN-250-Fe2Co being Co2+ and Fe3+, respectively. In contrast, the 2p orbitals of N makes almost no contribution near the Fermi level, indicating that azo groups were not the main redox sites in the system. In addition, no CO product can be detected with individual [Emim]BF4 as photocatalyst and even no photocatalytic improvement from [Emim]BF4 can be observed in the system with [Ru(bpy)3]Cl2 as a photosensitizer and TEOA as a sacrificial agent (Supplementary Fig. 18), indicating the fact that IL itself can not serve as CO2 reduction active site.

Fig. 6: Mechanism for CO2 photoreduction on [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co.
Fig. 6: Mechanism for CO2 photoreduction on [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co.
Full size image

In situ XPS spectra of a Fe 2p and b Co 2p for the simulated solar-driven CO2 reduction process over PCN-250-Fe2Co. c PDOS diagram of PCN-250-Fe2Co. d In situ DRIFTS measurement of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co for CO2 reduction under visible light irradiation (irradiation time of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 min, respectively). e Free energy profiles of PCN-250-Fe2Co, Emim+ and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co in the process of photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO. f Schematic diagram of the photocatalytic CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation mechanism. g The differential charge density diagram of *CO2-Emim. The yellow and blue contours represent charge accumulation and charge depletion, respectively. Source data are provided as a Source data file.

In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectra (DRIFTS) was applied to detect the generated intermediates during the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction in [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co, as shown in Fig. 6d. Upon CO2 introduction in the dark, the characteristic peaks at 2335 and 2360 cm−1 correspond to the gaseous and weakly adsorbed CO2, which gradually raised over time with continued exposure to CO2 (Supplementary Fig. 45a). Under illumination, these CO2 characteristic peaks decreased over a period of 0 to 60 min, indicating the consumption and conversion of CO2 (Supplementary Fig. 45b)56. In contrast, the intensities of some new peaks gradually increased over illumination period. Notably, the peaks at 1274, 1339, and 1579 cm−1 correspond to the bidentate carbonate (b-CO32-), while the peak at 1510 cm−1 is attributed to the monodentate carbonate (m-CO32-)55. The band at 1412 cm−1 is assigned to the bicarbonate radical (HCO3)55. The peak at 1459 cm−1 matches the vibrational frequency of CO32- 57. The increased peaks of identified carboxylates suggests that [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co can chemically adsorb and interact with CO2 and H2O molecules. In addition, the peaks appearing at 1559 and 1640 cm−1 after photoirradiation are ascribed to the formation of *COOH, which is a key intermediate during the photochemical conversion of CO2 to CO14. In addition, the gradually enhanced peak at 2080 cm−1 corresponds to the *CO intermediate, which is related directly to the formation of the final CO product3.

The electrostatic potential (ESP) analysis was employed to validate the host-guest interaction between the [Emim]BF4 and PCN-250-Fe2Co. From ESP map (Supplementary Fig. 46), it can be observed that there is a strong electrostatic interaction between [Emim]BF4 and PCN-250-Fe2Co. In order to clarify the contribution of ionic liquids on the CO2 reduction performance, the Gibbs free energy of CO2 adsorption process was firstly evaluated by DFT calculations to compare the CO2 adsorption abilities of [Emim]BF4, [Emim]Br, and [Emim]Ac. The spontaneous adsorption of CO2 was observed on [Emim]BF4 (ΔG = −0.02 eV), whereas [Emim]Br and [Emim]Ac showed small energy barriers for CO2 adsorption with ΔG values of 0.06 eV and 0.07 eV, respectively (Supplementary Table 4). These findings provide additional evidences to confirm the superior CO2 adsorption abilities of [Emim]BF4, which consistent with the experimental results. To further explore the CO2 capture process of [Emim]BF4, four possible adsorption mechanisms were considered (Supplementary Information). By comparing the change of Gibbs free energy for each adsorption process (Supplementary Fig. 47), the formation of Emim-CO2 is highly favorable for CO2 capture with lowest ΔG of −4.72 eV. Thus, in subsequent investigation of the photocatalytic mechanism, we focused on the crucial contribution of Emim+ in the host-guest synergistic effect.

As the free energy profiles in the CO2-to-CO reaction pathway of PCN-250-Fe2Co, Emim+ and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co shown in Fig. 6e, f, the first step on Fe2Co node is the adsorption of CO2 molecule with the ΔG of 0.10 eV. For Emim+ and [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co, the Emim+ tends to spontaneously combine CO2 molecules to form Emim-CO2 and the adsorbed CO2 molecules exhibit a bent structure (the bent angle O-C-O = 133.19°) (Supplementary Fig. 48), indicating the remarkable capability of [Emim]BF4 in enriching and activating CO2 molecule. To further investigate the CO2 transfer process, we calculated the differential charge density of the crucial intermediate *CO2-Emim. As illustrated in Fig. 6g, the electrons mainly concentrated on the area between Co2+ sites and CO2 molecule absorbed on Emim, indicating that CO2 molecule could be transferred from Emim-CO2 to Co2+ active sites of PCN-250-Fe2Co. Notably, the synergistic effect between Co2+ and Emim could effectively promote proton-coupled electron transfer process from *CO2 to *COOH. As confirmed, the ΔG value of rate-determining step (RDS) for *COOH-Emim formation is 0.55 eV for [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co, which is much smaller than that of PCN-250-Fe2Co (1.72 eV) and Emim+ (1.12 eV). Subsequently, Emim deviated from the *COOH-Emim intermediate and spontaneously bind with an H+ to form Emim+. On the other hand, *COOH further get a photogenerated electron and proton pair to form CO with a minimal energy barrier (0.02 eV). Meanwhile, the RDS energy barrier of H2O oxidation to form O2 is lower on the Fe3+ site (1.91 eV) compared to the azo group (2.28 eV) (Supplementary Fig. 49). This further supports that Fe3+ is the active site for H2O oxidation, finally completing the artificial photosynthetic overall reaction as shown in Fig. 6f. All the calculation results support that ILs plays a crucial role in facilitating artificial photosynthesis of diluted CO2 and the host-guest synergistic mechanism of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co is inferred.

Discussion

In summary, a host-guest synergistic artificial photosynthetic system was developed based on CO2-enriching ILs and photoactive MOFs PCN-250 for direct capture and in situ reduction of diluted CO2 in gas–solid phase. The [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co composite realized an impressive visible-light-driven CO2-to-CO conversion rate of 313.34 μmol g−1 h−1. Moreover, a record-breaking CO evolution rate of 153.42 μmol g−1 h−1 was achieved under a diluted CO2 (15%) atmosphere, surpassing all previously reported photocatalytic systems. In the scaled-up experiment under diluted CO2 and natural light, the CO2 concentration was decreased significantly below to 10% and a high CO yield of 39.88 μmol g−1 h−1 was reached. Both experimental and theoretical calculated results indicate that the loaded [Emim]BF4 serve as a CO2 enrichment component, while the Co2+ and Fe3+ in PCN-250-Fe2Co work as the active sites for CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation, respectively. Furthermore, the loaded ILs not only improve the adsorption capacity of CO2, but also activate the adsorbed CO2. The synergistic effect of the metal sites and ILs in [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co decreases the Gibbs free energy barrier for *COOH intermediate formation of CO product. This work reports a universal strategy for artificial photosynthetic diluted CO2 conversion from flue gas and depth insights into the host-guest synergistic catalytic mechanism.

Methods

Material preparation

All of the reagents and solvents were commercially available and used without further purification.

Synthesis of PCN-250-Fe2M

Fe2M (Fe2M(μ3-O)(CH3COO)6) metal clusters were synthesized according to the method reported in previous literature58. A certain dose of crystalline sodium acetate (42 g, 0.31 mol) was dissolved in 70 mL water. And then ferric nitrate (8 g, 0.02 mol) was completely dissolved under magnetic stirring, then divalent metal nitrate was added. Stopping experiment after magnetic stirring for 1 h and left the liquid overnight. Then the membrane was removed and filtered under reduced pressure and washed with a large amount of ethanol at 100 °C after air drying for 24 h, the target metal cluster was obtained for reserve.

The PCN-250-Fe2M materials were synthesized by solvothermal method according to the previous literature47. The preformed Fe2M clusters (0.015 g), 3,3′,5,5′-azo-benzene tetra-carboxylic acid (H4abtc) (0.01 g) and acetic acid (0.1 mL) were placed in 2 mL N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) and ultrasonic dissolved reagents into a Teflon-lined stainless-steel autoclave. The mixture was heated in an oven at 140 °C for 2 h. After reaction, the mixture was slowly cooled to room temperature. The dark brown precipitate formed by the reaction was filtered and washed with DMF for 3 times. The collected powder was soaked in anhydrous acetone for 48 h with the solvent changed for 5 times, and finally dried in vacuum at 120 °C for 12 h.

Gram-scale production of PCN-250-Fe2Co

PCN-250-Fe2Co were Gram-scale production by improving the synthetic method. The Fe2Co clusters (1.5 g), 3,3′,5,5′-azo-benzene tetra-carboxylic acid (H4abtc) (1 g) and acetic acid (1 mL) were, respectively, placed in 200 mL N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) and ultrasonic dissolved reagents into a 500 ml round bottom flask. The mixture was stirred and heated in a heating sleeve at 140 °C for 2 h. The dark brown precipitate formed by the reaction was filtered and washed with DMF for 3 times. After reaction, the mixture was slowly cooled to room temperature. The collected powder was soaked in anhydrous acetone for 48 h with the solvent changed for 5 times, and finally dried in vacuum at 120 °C for 12 h.

The calculation of material cost are as follows: The PCN-250-Fe2Co (15 g) was synthesized using Fe2Co clusters (11 g), H4abtc (5.5 g), acetic acid (10 mL), and DMF (200 mL). The costs for Fe2Co clusters and H4abtc are CNY 0.568 and CNY 2.513 per gram, respectively. DMF, considering its recyclability, costs CNY 0.03 per mL, and acetic acid costs CNY 0.03 per gram. With a 90% yield, the total cost for producing PCN-250-Fe2Co is about CNY 4.31 per gram. For the preparation of [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co, 9.71 g of [Emim]BF4 at CNY 4.48 per gram is required. The total cost to prepare 24.71 g of the catalyst is CNY 108.15, making the cost approximately CNY 4.38 per gram.

Synthesis of NH2-MIL-101(Fe)

NH2-MIL-101(Fe) were synthesized by solvothermal method59. In brief, 2-aminoterephthalic acid (0.63 g, 2.50 mmol) and FeCl6H2O (0.23 g, 1.24 mmol) were dissolved in DMF (30 mL) for thermal reaction at 110 °C for 20 h, the final resulting brown solid was washed with DMF and ethanol, respectively.

Synthesis of HKUST-1

HKUST-1 was prepared based on a previously reported method60. Briefly, copper nitrate hemipentahydrate (5 g) and benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid (2.5 g) were dissolved in DMF (125 mL). The solution kept at 75 °C for 24 h. The final resulting solid was washed with DMF and ethanol/water solution (1:2, v:v), respectively.

Synthesis of NH2-UIO-66(Zr)

NH2-UiO-66 was synthesized by a previous reported method61. Briefly, 2-aminoterephthalic acid (0.14 g, 0.75 mmol), ZrCl4 (0.13 g, 0.54 mmol), and concentrated HCl (1 mL) dissolved in DMF (15 mL) were being heated at 80 °C. Subsequently, the resultant suspension was centrifuged and washed anhydrous methanol.

Synthesis of NH2-MIL-125(Ti)

NH2-MIL-125(Ti) prepared by a previous reported method62. Typically, titanium (IV) isopropoxide (0.177 mL, 0.6 mmol) and 2-aminoterephthalic acid (217 mg, 1.2 mmol) in mixture of DMF and CH3OH (1:1, v:v) was heated at 150 °C for 15 h. A yellow solid powder was recovered by filtration, washed with DMF and CH3OH.

Synthesis of ILs@PCN-250-Fe2M

3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 μL of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([Emim]BF4), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate [Emim]Ac or 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazole bromide ([Emim]Br) were dispersed in 1 mL of anhydrous ethanol, respectively. Then, 10 mg of PCN-250-Fe2M was added to the above system and stirred continuously with magnetic force for 24 h so that the ILs could enter the pores of PCN-250-Fe2M. The composites was uniformly coated on glass sheet, and the obtained sample was dried under vacuum at 120 °C for 72 h to obtain a self-supporting ILs@PCN-250-Fe2M film after anhydrous ethanol had been dried. The resulting samples can be directly used in photocatalytic reactions.

Synthesis of [Emim]BF4@MOFs

The synthesis method is the same as that in 1.7. The following MOFs were used: NH2-MIL-101(Fe), HKUST-1(Cu), NH2-UIO-66 (Zr) or NH2-MIL-125(Ti).

Characterizations

The characteristics of the materials were investigated by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra (Avatar 370), power X-ray powder diffraction (PXRD) patterns (Panalytical X´ Pert PRO). N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were determined by Micromeritics ASAP 2020 analyzer at 77 K. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs (Hitachi S-4800), the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiment (JEM-2100 electron microscope), diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectroscopy techniques (Shimadzu UV3600), and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA/SDTA851e), photoluminescence spectrum (PL) (Shimadzu RF-5301PC spectrofluorometer), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) techniques (Kratos-AXIS ULTRA DLD apparatus). The electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS), Mott-Schottky plot and photocurrent–time (I–T) profiles was recorded on the CHI660E electrochemical workstation with a standard three-electrode system with the photocatalyst-coated ITO as the working electrode, Pt plate as the counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl electrode as a reference electrode, A 300 W Xenon lamp with a 420 nm cut-off filter was used as the light source during the measurement. A 0.25 M Na2SO4 solution was used as the electrolyte. The as-synthesized samples (2 mg) were added into 1 mL ethanol and 10 µL Nafion mixed solution, and the working electrodes were prepared by dropping the suspension (200 µL) onto an ITO glass substrate electrode surface and dried at room temperature.

Photocatalytic CO2 reduction experiments

The photocatalytic gas–solid CO2 reduction activity test was carried out in the 80 mL gas–solid reactor, and gas products in the headspace of the reactor were measured using gas chromatography (GC-7920A, Aulight Co, China). Detailed procedure is as follows: 10 mg of sample was uniformly dispersed in 1 mL acetone solution, and then coated on a round glass sheet with a diameter of 4.5 cm, and then dried statically to obtain a self-supporting membrane on the glass sheet. Subsequently, 0.5 mL of deionized water was added into reactor. It was purged by high-purity CO2 (or 15% CO2 and 85% N2) for 30 min to fully remove the air in the reactor, and then reactor was sealed under 1 atm CO2 saturation. The reaction system was irradiated under 300 W Xe lamp (λ ≥ 420 nm). The gas samples were collected every 1 h, and the CO gas was detected by GC 7920 on-line gas chromatograph with FID and TID detector. The liquid products were collected and analyzed using ion chromatography and 1H NMR spectroscopy. At the same time, the cooling circulating water temperature of the reactor is kept at 25 °C. The 13CO was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (7890A and 5975C, Agilent Technologies). In order to remove the 12CO2 previously adsorbed by ILs, the tested samples were degassed in a vacuum drying oven at 120 °C, and the vacuum state was released with N2 to prevent the rapid collection of 12CO2 in the air by ILs. The analyzed method of 18O2 was the same as that of 13CO.

Scaled-up experiments

Imitating industrial production, a large reactor composed of ten channels in series was built, with a total surface area of 1072 cm2. In detail, we first prepare 1 g of catalyst and then divide it into ten equal parts. Each part of the catalyst (100 mg) is evenly dispersed in 5 mL acetone solution, and then coated on a rectangular glass sheet with 32 cm in length and 3 cm in width. After drying, it was placed in a large reactor, and then appropriate water is added to the gaps to seal the reactor. Subsequently, it was purged by high-purity CO2 (or 15% CO2 and 85% N2) for 30 min to fully remove the air in the reactor, and then reactor was sealed under 1 atm CO2 saturation. The reaction system was irradiated centrally by six 300 W Xe lamps (λ ≥ 420 nm) The gas samples were collected every 1 h, and the CO gas was detected by GC7920 on-line gas chromatograph with FID and TID detector. At the same time, the cooling circulating water temperature of the reactor is kept at 25 °C. We also put the reactor outdoors and conducted scaled-up experiments under sunlight for 60 h.

AQE determination

AQE for CO evolution was measured using 300 W xenon lamp with attenuation filter and band pass filter of 420, 450, 500, 550, 600, and 500 nm. Take an example, band pass filter is 450 nm. The formula for calculating the AQE is as follows:

$${{{\rm{\eta }}}}_{{{\rm{co}}}}\,({{\rm{AQE}}})\,=\frac{2\times {{\rm{M}}}\times {{{\rm{N}}}}_{{{\rm{A}}}}\times {{\hslash }}\times {{\rm{c}}}}{{{\rm{S}}}\times {{\rm{P}}}\times {{\rm{T}}}\times {{\rm{\lambda }}}}$$

Area (S) = 15.89 × 10−4 m2

Light power density (P) = 36.11 W/m2.

Time (T) = 3600 s

Wavelength (λ) = 450 nm = 4.5 × 10−7 m

Avogadro constant (NA) = 6.02 × 1023 mol−1

Planck constant (ħ) = 6.626 × 10−34 J·s

speed of light (c) = 2.998 × 108 m/s

M is moles of product.

In one hour, the CO yields were determined to be 11.4498 μmol (450 nm), by using 10 mg PCN-250-Fe2Co as photocatalyst.

Calculation details and reaction mechanism

The crystal structure optimization and the density of state (DOS) calculations were performed using first-principle DFT as implemented in the software package VASP 5.4.463,64. The projector-augmented-wave (PAW) approach was used to describe the electron–ion interactions, and the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used for the exchange–correlation interactions65,66,67. The plane-wave energy cutoff was set to 400 eV, and the convergence of energy and force was <10−5 eV and 0.01 eV Å−1, respectively, for both lattice vectors and atomic positions. The Monkhorst-Pack k-point grid of 1 × 1 × 1 was used to sample the Brillouin Zone for all calculations. All molecular geometries were optimized at the level of the B3LYP hybrid functional in the gas phase68. For geometric optimization, the Lanl2dz basis set was employed for the Fe and Co, while the 6-31g was used for the other main-group elements, i.e. C, N, H, and O69,70. The stationary frequency calculations at 298.15 K and 1 atm were performed at the same level for each of the optimized structures to examine any imaginary frequency, and obtain the thermal correction to Gibbs free energy through the corresponding vibrational modes. Then a higher precision setting including D3 dispersion correction developed by Grimme for weak interactions is used to perform single point calculations for obtaining a more accuracy self-consistent electronic energy71. The SDD basis set was employed for the Fe and Co, while the 6-311+g(d, p) was used for the other main-group elements72,73. All of these calculations were performed by the Gaussian 09 program package74 Free energy change of each elemental step was calculated by the following equation: ΔG = ΔE + ΔZPE – TΔS, where ΔE is the total self-consistent energy change, ΔZPE is the difference in zero-point energies (ZPE), and ΔS is the change of entropy. ZPE and entropies for intermediates were obtained from the vibrational frequency calculations. The free energy of H+ + e has been replaced by one-half of the chemical potential of the hydrogen molecule. The electrostatic potential analysis was performed by Multiwfn75.

Four possible adsorption mechanisms of the CO2 capture process on [Emim]BF4 are as follows:

$${{{{\rm{BF}}}}_{4}}^{-}+{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}({{\rm{g}}})\to {[{{{\rm{BF}}}}_{4}-{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}]}^{-}$$
(1)
$${{{\rm{Emim}}}}^{+}+{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}({{\rm{g}}})\to {[{{\rm{Emim}}}-{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}]}^{+}$$
(2)
$${{{\rm{Emim}}}}^{+}+{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}({{\rm{g}}})+{{{\rm{e}}}}^{-}\to [{{\rm{Emim}}}-{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}]$$
(3)
$${{{\rm{Emim}}}}^{+}+{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}({{\rm{g}}})\to {{\rm{Emim}}}-{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}+{{{\rm{H}}}}^{+}$$
(4)

The host-guest synergistic mechanism of CO2 reduction to CO in [Emim]BF4@PCN-250-Fe2Co is inferred as follows (* represents the Co2+ sites in PCN-250-Fe2Co):

$${{{\rm{Emim}}}}^{+}+{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}({{\rm{g}}})\to {{\rm{Emim}}}-{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}+{{{\rm{H}}}}^{+}$$
(5)
$${{\rm{Emim}}}-{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}+\ast \to*{{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}-{{\rm{Emim}}}$$
(6)
$${{{\rm{H}}}}_{2}{{\rm{O}}}\to {{{\rm{H}}}}^{+}+{{{\rm{OH}}}}^{-}$$
(7)
$${*{{\rm{CO}}}}_{2}-{{\rm{Emim}}}+{{{\rm{H}}}}^{+}+{{{\rm{e}}}}^{-}\to*{{\rm{COOH}}}-{{\rm{Emim}}}$$
(8)
$$*{{\rm{COOH}}}-{{\rm{Emim}}}+{{{\rm{H}}}}^{+}+{{{\rm{e}}}}^{-}\to*{{\rm{CO}}}+{{{\rm{H}}}}_{2}{{\rm{O}}}+{{\rm{Emim}}}$$
(9)
$${{\rm{Emim}}}+{{{\rm{H}}}}^{+}\to {{{\rm{Emim}}}}^{+}$$
(10)
$$*{{\rm{CO}}}\to \ast+{{\rm{CO}}}({{\rm{g}}})$$
(11)