Introduction

With the explosive production of green hydrogen from water electrolyzers based on renewable energy resources, the large-scale storage and transportation of hydrogen are vital for building a sustainable society based on hydrogen energy1,2. Among the alternative strategies, H2 storage based on liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC) is considered a promising route for large-scale implementation due to its compatibility with current industry infrastructure3,4,5,6. To date, several LOHC-based hydrogen storage systems have been proposed, among which the hydrogenation-dehydrogenation cycle between toluene (TOL) and methylcyclohexane (MCH) has attracted tremendous attention from academia and industry7,8. As shown in Fig. 1a, the combination of water electrolysis, synthesis of TOL from fossil resources or hydrogenation of captured CO2, and the H2 storage process based on the MCH-TOL cycle can establish a sustainable production chain in the generation and transportation of green H2 and aromatic resources, which strongly relies on the development of efficient catalysts in each step.

Fig. 1: Solid catalysts for H2 storage and transportation based on toluene-methylcyclohexane cycle.
Fig. 1: Solid catalysts for H2 storage and transportation based on toluene-methylcyclohexane cycle.
Full size image

a A sustainable production chain in the generation and transportation of green H2 and aromatic resources. Green H2 is generated from water electrolysis based on renewable electricity and green toluene is produced from fossil resources or hydrogenation of CO2 from direct air capture. The green toluene can further serve as the carrier for H2 through hydrogenation of toluene to MCH and then transport to the target market. At the endpoint, H2 is released through the MCH dehydrogenation reaction, and the resultant toluene can be further used in the chemical industry for downstream processes. b Illustrations of the structural features of the supported metal catalysts for MCH dehydrogenation reaction. c Structural features of the zeolite-encapsulated bimetallic PtFe clusters developed in this work for MCH dehydrogenation reaction. dk HAADF-STEM image of the Pt@MFI and PtM4.7@MFI catalysts. d PtZn4.7@MFI, (e) PtSn4.7@MFI, (f) PtMn4.7@MFI, (g) PtFe4.7@MFI, (h) PtGa4.7@MFI, (i) PtIn4.7@MFI, (j) Pt@MFI. k Schematic illustration of the Pt-based zeolite materials, in which subnanometer Pt clusters are encapsulated within the MFI zeolite crystallites.

From the mechanistic point of view, the dehydrogenation of MCH to TOL could be a critical step in the H2 storage system based on the MCH-TOL cycle, because the dehydrogenation of MCH is an endothermic process and relies on the activation of sp3-type C-H bonds9. From a practical point of view, the solid catalysts need to deal with concentrated MCH feeds to achieve high efficiency in H2 production. Besides, considering the inevitable deactivation of supported metal catalysts under dehydrogenation reaction conditions due to coke formation, the catalyst must show robust recyclability in consecutive reaction-regeneration cycles. Moreover, the purity of H2 produced from the dehydrogenation of LOHC is an essential criterion for evaluating the catalyst’s potential for storing H2 for fuel cells, thus requiring the deployment of a highly selective catalyst for the dehydrogenation process10. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, although numerous strategies have been proposed for improving the performances of supported metal catalysts for MCH dehydrogenation, such as optimization of metal-support synergy, and modifying the chemical composition and domain size of the metal active sites11,12,13,14,15. For instance, by selectively poisoning the Pt nanoparticles supported on Al2O3 by sulfur, high activity, and selectivity have been achieved in the MCH dehydrogenation reaction and the S-modified Pt/Al2O3 catalysts are now being used in the commercial process16,17. To further decrease the cost of the supported Pt catalysts and reduce the reactor size, it is of interest to develop efficient Pt catalysts with high specific activities in H2 production from MCH dehydrogenation reaction.

In this work, we have developed a highly efficient supported Pt catalyst for MCH dehydrogenation reaction by incorporating subnanometer bimetallic PtFe clusters with precisely controlled composition and location within a zeolite matrix (Fig. 1c). The rigid zeolite framework can provide effective confinement on the subnanometer PtFe clusters to suppress the sintering of the active sites during the MCH dehydrogenation reaction18. The resultant zeolite-encapsulated PtFe clusters exhibit the up-to-date highest reaction rate for MCH dehydrogenation reaction, very high chemoselectivity to toluene (enabling the production of H2 with purity >99.9%), remarkably high stability (>2000 h) and regenerability over consecutive reaction-regeneration cycles.

Results

Synthesis of Pt-based catalysts

Pure-silica MFI-type zeolite with three-dimensional pore structures is chosen as the host for subnanometer metal species because the pore dimensions of the 10-member ring (10MR) channels well match the molecule size of TOL and MCH (see illustration in Fig. 1c). We anticipate that, if the active Pt sites can be well stabilized in the 10MR channels of MFI zeolite, the MCH can diffuse along the zeolite channels to access the Pt sites for catalytic transformation into toluene, but the mobility of the active Pt sites will be constrained by the rigid zeolite channels, resulting in a highly stable catalyst19,20. Following this hypothesis, we have prepared a series of Pt@MFI and bimetallic PtM4.7@MFI (M = Sn, Zn, Ga, In and Fe) materials one-pot synthesis with an M/Pt molar ratio of ~4.7 (see illustrative description of the synthesis process in Supplementary Fig. 1), which allows the simultaneous encapsulation of subnanometer Pt and M species into the zeolite crystallites during the crystallization process without affecting the formation of MFI zeolite crystallites (see field emission scanning electron microscopy images and XRD patterns in Supplementary Figs. 29). The M elements are involved in tuning the electronic properties of Pt species and then modulating the catalytic properties21,22.

As shown in Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figs. 1016, subnanometer Pt clusters with an average particle size of ~0.6 nm are formed within the MFI zeolite crystallites in the monometallic Pt@MFI sample, which remain stable after calcination in air and reduction by H2 at 600 °C. Furthermore, the encapsulations of subnanometer PtM clusters into the MFI zeolite crystallites are also validated with the PtM4.7@MFI materials, indicating that introducing M elements does not affect the generation and size distributions of Pt clusters.

We have employed the high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) imaging technique to figure out the exact location of the Pt clusters in the microporous zeolite matrix. As shown in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 1730, by correlating the paired high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF-STEM) image and the integrated differential phase contrast (iDPC-STEM) image, the Pt clusters are determined to be predominantly in the sinusoidal 10MR channels of MFI zeolite structure, regardless of the type of the M elements23. The above characterization results infer that the PtM4.7@MFI materials can be employed as model systems to study the influences of the chemical composition of subnanometer Pt-based catalysts for MCH dehydrogenation, which may provide new insights into the structure-reactivity relationship in the subnanometer regime.

Fig. 2: Determination of the location of subnanometer Pt clusters by electron microscopy characterization.
Fig. 2: Determination of the location of subnanometer Pt clusters by electron microscopy characterization.
Full size image

Representative high-resolution HADDF-STEM (a, c, e, g, i, k, m) and the paired iDPC (b, d, f, h, j, l, n) images of the bimetallic PtM4.7@MFI (al) and the monometallic Pt@MFI (m, n) catalysts. PtZn4.7@MFI (a, b), PtSn4.7@MFI (c, d), PtMn4.7@MFI (e, f), PtFe4.7@MFI (g, h), PtGa4.7@MFI (i, j), PtIn4.7@MFI (k, l). All the samples were pre-reduced by H2 at 600 °C. o Schematic illustration showing the presence of subnanometric Pt clusters in the sinusoidal channels of MFI zeolite. In the HAADF-STEM images, the red and yellow colors represent the contrast of Pt clusters while the blue color represents the contrast of zeolite support.

Evaluation of the Pt-based catalysts for MCH dehydrogenation

The catalytic performances of the Pt-based catalysts have been tested for MCH dehydrogenation reaction in a fix-bed reactor at ambient pressure. As shown in Fig. 3a, b, the monometallic Pt@MFI sample shows nearly complete conversion of MCH at 350 °C at WHSV of 2.2 h-1 when using mixture of MCH and N2 (MCH:N2 = 1:1) as the reaction feed and the Pt@MFI catalyst remains stable for >60 h and gives 97–99% selectivity to TOL over the testing period, suggesting that subnanometer Pt clusters are highly active for MCH dehydrogenation reaction, which could be associated with the advantages of the under-coordinated Pt sites in Pt clusters for activation of saturated C-H bonds in MCH24.

Fig. 3: Catalytic results of Pt-zeolite materials for MCH dehydrogenation reaction.
Fig. 3: Catalytic results of Pt-zeolite materials for MCH dehydrogenation reaction.
Full size image

a, b MCH conversion levels and selectivity to toluene (TOL) over test periods of ~17 h of Pt@MFI and PtM4.7@MFI (M=Sn, Zn, In, Ga, Fe) catalysts. c, d Catalytic performances of the Pt@MFI, PtSn4.7@MFI and PtFe4.7@MFI catalysts for extended periods of >50 h. Reaction conditions for tests shown in (ad): 350 °C, a mixture of MCH and N2 (MCH:N2 = 1:1) as the feed gas, weight-hour space velocity (WHSV) = 2.2 h-1. e, f Catalytic performance of Pt@MFI and PtFex@MFI (x = 4.7, 2.4, 1.2, 0.6) catalysts for MCH dehydrogenation reaction under harsh conditions. e MCH conversion and f TOL selectivity. Reaction conditions: 400 °C, a mixture of MCH and N2 (MCH:N2 = 1:1) as the feed gas, weight-hour space velocity (WHSV) = 108 h−1. g Summary of the specific H2 evolution rate of PtFe4.7@MFI and other reported Pt-based catalysts at 350 °C. h Summary of the forward reaction rates (kf) of PtFe4.7@MFI and other reported Pt-based catalysts at 350 °C.

As suggested by Fig. 3a, b, the addition of M species into the Pt@MFI material has remarkable impacts on the catalytic properties. In the cases of PtZn4.7@MFI, PtGa4.7@MFI, and PtIn4.7@MFI, they exhibit significantly declined activities for MCH dehydrogenation. Morphological and spectroscopy characterization of the spent catalysts infer that the low initial reaction rates and rapid catalyst deactivation of PtZn4.7@MFI, PtGa4.7@MFI, and PtIn4.7@MFI catalysts could be related to the modification of the electronic properties of Pt clusters by the co-catalyst metal species, resulting in low capability for C-H activation and elevated coke deposition (Supplementary Figs. 3135). In contrast, the PtSn4.7@MFI and PtFe@MFI show similar activity as the Pt@MFI catalyst over the course of ~20 h. More importantly, under steady reaction conditions, the PtSn4.7@MFI and PtFe4.7@MFI show improved selectivity to toluene (~99%), indicating that introducing Sn and Fe can suppress the undesired conversion of toluene to benzene. The short induction period observed with the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst could be associated with the covering of the residual acid sites by the coke species as indicated by the NH3 temperature-programmed desorption (NH3-TPD) profiles (Supplementary Figs. 36). The long-term catalytic tests show that the PtSn4.7@MFI catalyst suffers deactivation after ~20 h on stream (Fig. 3c, d). In comparison, the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst maintains a high conversion of MCH (>90%) and very high selectivity (~99%) for >85 h of time on stream, indicating the potential of PtFe4.7@MFI as an efficient, stable, and highly selective catalyst for MCH dehydrogenation reaction. The accelerated deactivation of PtSn4.7@MFI catalyst after reaction for ~25 h could be caused by coke deposition on the MFI zeolite crystallites, leading to a rapid loss of available Pt sites to the reactants.

It should be noted that, besides the co-catalyst metal, K+ is also a critical promotor in the Pt-zeolite catalysts for stabilizing the subnanometer Pt clusters in MFI zeolite channels. In the absence of K+ promotor, Pt nanoparticles are formed in the K-free PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst and exhibit very low activity for the MCH dehydrogenation reaction (Supplementary Figs. 3738).

Structural characterizations of the PtFe@MFI catalysts

Based on the above results, we have optimized the bimetallic PtFex@MFI catalysts by varying the Fe loading while fixing the Pt loading. Electron microscopy characterizations of a series of PtFe@MFI catalysts show that adding an excess amount of Fe species as a promotor will cause the sintering of Pt species into large nanoparticles in the PtFe7.9@MFI catalyst (Fig. 4a), which can cause a dramatic decrease in activity for MCH dehydrogenation reaction. For the PtFex@MFI (x = 0.6–4.7) samples with Fe loadings of <0.6 wt%, the morphology of the PtFex@MFI samples, size distributions, and dispersion of the Pt species and their locations within the MFI zeolite structure are quite similar (Supplementary Figs. 3953, Fig. 4b–n and Supplementary Table 4), indicating that introducing an appropriate amount of Fe species will not affect the generation and stabilization of subnanometer Pt clusters in MFI zeolite.

Fig. 4: Electron microscopy characterization of PtFex@MFI catalysts with different compositions.
Fig. 4: Electron microscopy characterization of PtFex@MFI catalysts with different compositions.
Full size image

Representative low-magnification HAADF-STEM images of the PtFex@MFI catalysts. a PtFe7.9@MFI, b PtFe4.7@MFI, c PtFe2.4@MFI, d PtFe1.2@MFI, e PtFe0.6@MFI and f Pt@MFI. gn Determination of the location of subnanometer Pt species in MFI zeolite structure by paired HAADF-STEM and iDPC-STEM images. Representative high-resolution HADDF-STEM (g, i, k, m) and the corresponding iDPC (h, j, l, n) images of the PtFex@MFI. g, h PtFe4.7@MFI, i, j PtFe2.4@MFI, k, l PtFe1.2@MFI and m, n PtFe0.6@MFI. In the HAADF-STEM images, the red and yellow colors represent the contrast of Pt clusters while the blue color represents the contrast of zeolite support.

To decipher the atomic-level structural features of the bimetallic PtFe species in different samples, we have employed in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy to study the chemical states and coordination environment of Pt and Fe species in the working PtFex@MFI catalysts. As shown in Fig. 5a, the Pt L3-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra show the presence of metallic Pt in all the measured Pt-zeolite materials, regardless of their chemical composition, being consistent with the XPS results (Supplementary Fig. 54). The fitting results of the Pt L3-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Fig. 55, and Table 1) indicate the formation of subnanometer Pt clusters in the monometallic Pt@MFI and the PtFex@MFI (x = 0.6–4.7) samples while the formation of Pt nanoparticles (>2 nm) is validated with the PtFe7.9@MFI sample25. It should be noted that when the Fe loading is <0.6 wt%, only minor differences in the coordination number of Pt-Pt bonding are observed with the Pt@MFI and PtFex@MFI samples, which is consistent with the electron microscopy characterization results. The low contribution of Pt-Fe bonding in the Pt L3-edge EXAFS spectra could be caused by the relatively low percentage of Fe species in the bimetallic PtFe clusters26.

Fig. 5: Spectroscopy characterizations of the Pt-zeolite materials.
Fig. 5: Spectroscopy characterizations of the Pt-zeolite materials.
Full size image

ad Characterization results of the Pt-zeolite materials by in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy. a Pt L3-edge XANES spectra, b Fe K-edge XANES spectra, c Pt L3-edge EXAFS spectra, d Fe K-edge EXAFS spectra. e, f Characterization results of the Pt-zeolite materials by in situ Mössbauer spectroscopy. e PtFe7.9@MFI, f PtFe4.7@MFI and g PtFe2.4@MFI. The three samples were subjected to in situ reduction treatment by H2 at 600 °C for 3 h before the collection of the Mössbauer spectra. h Contents of different types of Fe species in three bimetallic PtFe@MFI catalysts derived from the fitting of quasi in situ Mössbauer spectra. The contents of tetrahedrally coordinated FeOx species (FeOx-Tetra), hexagonally coordinated FeOx species (FeOx-Hexa) and Fe species in partial reduced Fe are listed in (h).

Table 1 Fit results for the Pt L3-edge and Fe K-edge EXAFS spectra of PtFe-zeolite materials

The comparison of the Fe K-edge XANES spectra (Fig. 5b) and those of the reference samples (Fe, FeO, Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) indicate the formation of reduced FeOx species in the PtFe@MFI samples after the in situ reduction treatment by H2 at 600 °C. Interestingly, the K-edge XANES spectra of the PtFe@MFI samples don’t resemble any of the reference samples, inferring the presence of a mixture of different types of Fe species, which is reasonable for Fe-containing zeolite materials because of the low reducibility of Fe species encapsulated in zeolites27,28. Only the first-shell Fe-O bonding is observed in the Fe K-edge EXAFS spectra (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 55, and Table 1), regardless of the Fe loading in the PtFex@MFI samples, implying the presence of highly dispersed FeOx species in the form of atomically dispersed Fe species or partially reduced FeOx clusters in the zeolite matrices, as confirmed by the EDS mapping results (Supplementary Fig. 56)29. The chemical states and coordination environment of Fe species are further studied by quasi in situ Mössbauer spectroscopy30. As summarized in Fig. 5e–h and Supplementary Table 5, regardless of the composition of the PtFex@MFI catalysts, the iron species mostly exist as iron oxide species in a combination of tetrahedrally coordinated FeOx species (FeOx-Tetra) and hexagonally coordinated FeOx species (FeOx-Hexa), which is in line with the measurement results of the magnetic properties (Supplementary Fig. 57). Besides the FeOx species, we have also observed the presence of partially reduced Fe species in the Mössbauer spectra, which can be associated with the FeOx (x < 1) clusters in the MFI zeolite channels and the reduced Fe species interacting with Pt clusters (i.e., the FePt bimetallic species). The abundances of the partially reduced Fe species in the PtFe4.7@MFI and PtFe7.9@MFI samples are considerably higher than that in the PtFe2.4@MFI, which is consistent with the chemical composition analysis of the bimetallic clusters/nanoparticles by electron microscopy (Supplementary Fig. 5859 and Supplementary Tables 6-7) and the UV-vis spectroscopy measurements (Supplementary Fig. 6061)27,31. It should be noted that the absence of the FeCx species in the bimetallic PtFe@MFI catalysts is confirmed by the Mössbauer spectra of the spent catalysts (Supplementary Fig. 62a). The incorporation of Fe into Pt clusters will cause the modification of their electronic properties, as inferred by the IR spectra using CO as the probe molecules (Supplementary Fig. 63), which can influence the adsorption/interaction between the Pt active sites and the reactant/product.

We have followed the reduction process of the pristine PtFe4.7@MFI sample obtained from one-pot synthesis by in situ XAS to gain further insights into the formation mechanism of subnanometer PtFe clusters. As shown in Supplementary Figs. 6465, the pristine PtFe4.7@MFI sample (named as PtFe4.7@MFI-air) mainly comprises oxidized Pt and Fe species. After reduction treatment by H2 at 200 °C, we can observe the presence of Pt-Pt bonding in the Pt L3-edge EXFAS spectra, indicating the formation of metallic Pt clusters, as also confirmed by HAADF-STEM images (Supplementary Figs. 6672). After reduction treatment at 350 °C (i.e., the reaction temperature for MCH dehydrogenation), both Pt-Fe and Pt-Pt bonding are observed. This result also infers that, even if the catalyst is pre-reduced at 200 °C by H2, the Pt-Fe bonding will still form in the working catalyst for the MCH dehydrogenation reaction at 350 °C. Further increasing the reduction treatment temperature to 600 °C will cause a slight increase in the coordination number of Pt-Fe bonding while the coordination number of Pt-Pt bond remains almost unchanged. The evolution behaviors of the Fe and Pt species during the catalyst activation procedure are also followed by other spectroscopy and electron microscopy techniques, which confirm the gradual formation of bimetallic PtFe clusters when elevating the reduction temperature (Supplementary Figs. 62b,  7374 and Supplementary Table 8).

Catalytic performances of PtFe@MFI catalysts

As shown in Fig. 3e, f, when measuring the catalytic performances at 400 °C and a very high WHSV of 108 h-1 for better differentiating the catalysts, the monometallic Pt@MFI catalyst suffers a fast deactivation under this condition, which is probably caused by the aggravated coke deposition according to the characterizations of the spent catalyst (Supplementary Figs. 7580). When the Fe loading is increased, the stability of the PtFex@MFI catalyst is gradually improved. With a Fe loading of 0.58 wt% (corresponding to a Fe/Pt molar ratio of 4.7), the PtFe4.7@MFI exhibits excellent stability with a prolonged decay rate in the MCH conversion level. However, introducing an excess amount of Fe will cause sharply decreased reactivity, resulting in the loss of activity of the PtFe7.9@MFI sample when testing at very high WHSV. The deactivation constants derived from the activity profiles show that, by incorporating an appropriate amount of Fe, the deactivation rate of the Pt@MFI catalyst can be decreased by four times (Supplementary Fig. 81).

Kinetic studies show that the bimetallic PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst gives a lower apparent activation energy than the Pt@MFI catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 82), implying that the MCH dehydrogenation reaction is more favorable on PtFe clusters than on Pt clusters. The intrinsic reaction rates on various Pt-zeolite catalysts also infer the advantages of the bimetallic PtFe clusters over the monometallic Pt. For the bimetallic PtFe@MFI catalysts with Fe/Pt ratios ranging from 0.55 to 4.7, the more Fe the catalyst contains, the higher H2 evolution rates it can achieve in the MCH dehydrogenation reaction. In particular, the optimal PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst gives twice the H2 formation rate compared to the monometallic Pt@MFI catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 83). The comparisons between the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst and supported PtFe catalysts prepared by other methods confirm the superior performance of the subnanometer PtFe clusters confined in MFI zeolite generated by one-pot synthesis (Supplementary Fig. 84). The exceptional performance of the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst is further confirmed compared to reported Pt-based catalysts regarding the specific H2 evolution rate (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Table 9).

Considering that the H2 evolution rate in the MCH dehydrogenation reaction strongly depends on the reaction conditions, we have carried out the thermodynamic analysis and calculations of the forward reaction rates (kf) based on the data provided in the literature (see detailed discussion in Supplementary Note 1). The comparative analysis suggests that the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst developed in this work exhibits the best performance among the reported materials to date (Fig. 3h). A detailed analysis of the gaseous by-products formed in the MCH dehydrogenation reaction shows that methane is the major component with a concentration at ~500 ppm with the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst, corresponding to an H2 purity of ~99.95%, which is much lower than the Pt-based catalysts supported on oxide carriers (Supplementary Fig. 85).

Theoretical studies on the Pt-based catalysts

By collective analysis of the characterization results from different techniques, we can conclude that, Pt-Fe bonding is formed in the bimetallic PtFex@MFI samples after reduction treatment at ≥350 °C by H2 and the abundance of the Pt-Fe bonding depends on the Fe loading. We have employed theoretical modeling and calculations to gain insights into the structure-reactivity relationship in the bimetallic PtFe@MFI samples. Initially, we constructed three models to study the influence of the chemical composition of the Pt-based active sites on the MCH dehydrogenation reaction. Three Pt-based cluster models (Pt7, Pt6Sn and Pt6Fe) made by metal clusters located in the sinusoidal 10-ring channels of MFI zeolite are constructed based on the electron microscopy characterization results to represent the Pt@MFI, PtSn4.7@MFI and PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst, respectively. As shown in Fig. 6a and Supplementary Fig. 86, DFT-calculated O affinity shows that both Pt7 and Pt6Sn clusters in the Pt7-MFI and Pt6Sn-MFI models tend to form metallic clusters while the Fe species tend to exist in the form of Fe(II) in the Pt6FeO-MFI model. The results of theoretical modeling align with the spectroscopic characterization results on the chemical states of Pt and Fe species in the realistic PtFe4.7@MFI catalysts.

Fig. 6: Theoretical studies on methylcyclohexane dehydrogenation over Pt-based clusters confined in MFI.
Fig. 6: Theoretical studies on methylcyclohexane dehydrogenation over Pt-based clusters confined in MFI.
Full size image

a Reaction mechanism for methylcyclohexane dehydrogenation. b Energy profile for the third and the last steps of C-H bond cleavage of methylcyclohexane over MFI-confined Pt7, Pt6FeO and Pt6Sn clusters. c Activation energy for C-H bond cleavage and C−C bond dissociation of toluene over MFI-confined Pt7, Pt6FeO and Pt6Sn clusters. d Electron transfer from the top Pt site to toluene adsorbate. e Schematic diagram for crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP) analysis of Pt−C bond in toluene-adsorbed Pt7, Pt6FeO and Pt6Sn clusters.

In light of the prior works on theoretical modeling of the MCH dehydrogenation process on metal catalysts, we have studied two plausible key steps in the transformation process from MCH to TOL (Supplementary Figs. 8788)9. As shown in Fig. 6b, the Pt6FeO clusters give lower energy barriers for activation of the C-H bonds in methylcyclohexene and methylcyclohexadiene than the Pt7 and Pt6Sn clusters, suggesting the high activity of Pt6FeO clusters for MCH dehydrogenation reaction, which are in line with the experimental results from the kinetic studies. The advantages of Pt6FeO clusters over the Pt7 clusters in the activation of C-H bonds are further validated by the isotopic exchange experiments (Supplementary Fig. 89).

Prior mechanistic studies suggest that the coke deposition on the Pt catalyst and the production of methane due to hydrogenolysis of TOL can be associated with the undesired side reactions of TOL on the Pt active sites, which are responsible for the catalyst deactivation and decline in selectivity32. In this context, we have studied two elementary steps associated with the coke deposition (cleavage of the C-H bond in the methyl group of TOL) and side reaction (cleavage of the C-C bond in TOL) with the three models by DFT calculations33. As presented in Fig. 6c and Supplementary Figs. 9091, the Pt7-MFI and Pt6Sn-MFI models exhibit similar activation energy for the two elementary steps, while the Pt6FeO-MFI model exhibits considerably higher activation energies, inferring that the undesired elementary reactions are not favorable on bimetallic PtFe clusters. Furthermore, the adsorption of toluene and *C6H5-CH2 species (the coke precursor) is significantly weakened (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 92), indicating that Fe modification promotes toluene desorption and inhibits its deep dehydrogenation to produce the coke precursor, which is consistent with the activation energy analysis34,35. Detailed analysis of the electronic structures of the three Pt-based clusters indicates that the charge transfer from the Pt atom to the adsorbed TOL molecule at the binding site will be partly decreased on Pt6FeO-MFI model (Supplementary Fig. 93), resulting in a relatively weaker bonding interaction of TOL on the Pt6FeO cluster in compared to the Pt7 and Pt6Sn cluster, as evidenced in the crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP) analysis (Fig. 6d, e). Consequently, the undesired transformation of TOL on Pt active sites is suppressed on the Pt6FeO cluster (Supplementary Fig. 94).

Our experimental results show that the Fe loading and the chemical states of Fe species have marked impacts on the catalytic properties of the bimetallic PtFex@MFI catalysts (Supplementary Figs. 9598). We have then studied the two elementary reactions on three different PtFe cluster models (Supplementary Fig. 99), and the results show that the incorporation of two Fe(II) atoms into the Pt clusters will cause a decrease in the energy barrier for C-H activation in TOL, which may accelerate the coke deposition on Pt sites. The results from DFT calculations are consistent with our experimental observation, in which we have found that the PtFe7.9@MFI catalyst with a high Fe loading exhibits fast deactivation in the MCH dehydrogenation reaction. The combination of experimental and theoretical study demonstrates that the catalytic properties of subnanometer metal clusters are sensitive to chemical composition. Therefore, it is of great necessity to control the size and composition of the bimetallic clusters precisely21,36,37.

Long-term stability tests

Long-term stability is a crucial criterion for the potential industrial implementation of the PtFe@MFI catalyst in the practical process. We first tested the stability of the optimized PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst under the conditions in which the conversion levels of MCH are maintained at high levels (>90%). As shown in Fig. 7a, the optimized PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst exhibits high activity and selectivity to TOL for >200 h in every single catalytic run. Moreover, the catalyst can be facilely regenerated by calcination in air and subsequent reduction by H2 during a course of >2000 h in eight consecutive reaction-regeneration cycles. Furthermore, to confirm the full recovery of the regenerated PtFe@MFI catalyst, we have carried out consecutive reaction-regeneration tests under high WHSV conditions (i.e., maintaining the conversion levels <40%) which can better reflect the catalytic efficiency of the Pt active sites than the tests performed at high conversion levels. As shown in Fig. 7b, the activity of the deactivated PtFe@MFI catalyst can be fully recovered after calcination treatment in the air for the removal of the coke. Besides, even after elevating the calcination temperature to 600 °C, the performance of the PtFe@MFI catalyst will not be affected. Instead, the high-temperature calcination is helpful for the removal of hard coke on the spent catalyst, facilitating the recovery of the activity for MCH dehydrogenation reaction. After seven consecutive reaction-regeneration cycles for >400 h, the PtFe@MFI catalyst maintains its catalytic performance as the fresh catalyst. Structural characterizations of the spent catalysts show that the size distributions and location of the bimetallic PtFe clusters within the zeolite structure are retained after the long-term stability tests (Fig. 7c, j and Supplementary Figs. 100107), suggesting the remarkably high activity and structural robustness of the subnanometer PtFe clusters confined in MFI zeolite (see the comparison with reported catalysts for MCH dehydrogenation reaction in Supplementary Table 9).

Fig. 7: Long-term stability tests of the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst for MCH dehydrogenation.
Fig. 7: Long-term stability tests of the PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst for MCH dehydrogenation.
Full size image

a Cyclic long-term catalytic experiment at high conversion levels. The conversion levels of MCH were kept above 90% to facilitate the detection of any potential activity loss after exposure to a high partial pressure of TOL. Dehydrogenation reaction conditions: 350 °C, MCH:H2 = 1:1, WHSV = 4.4 h−1. b Cyclic long-term catalytic experiment at high WHSV. The conversion levels of MCH were kept below 50% to facilitate the detection of any potential activity loss in the catalyst during cyclic tests. Reaction conditions: 350 °C, MCH:H2 = 1:1, WHSV = 43 h−1. In (a-b), the deactivated catalyst was subjected to a regeneration treatment by calcination in air and subsequent reduction by H2 to restore the active sites. Structural characterizations of the spent catalyst at WHSV of 43 h−1 (cf) and 4.4 h−1 (gj). c, d, g, h Representative low-magnification and high-magnification of HAADF-STEM images of the spent PtFe4.7@MFI catalysts. e, f, i, j High-resolution HAADF-STEM and the paired iDPC-STEM images of the spent PtFe4.7@MFI catalyst, showing the presence of Pt clusters in the sinusoidal channels. In the HAADF-STEM images, the red and yellow colors represent the contrast of Pt clusters while the blue color represents the contrast of zeolite support.

Discussion

In this work, we have reported a zeolite-encapsulated subnanometer PtFe catalyst for the production of high-purity H2 from an MCH dehydrogenation reaction, which gives high activity, selectivity and stability under challenging reaction conditions. The remarkable performance is ascribed to the unique structures of the bimetallic PtFe clusters and the surrounding rigid zeolite framework. The principles for catalyst design can be extended to other H2 storage systems based on other LOHCs (e.g., benzyltoluene and dibenzyltoluene) in which the size, composition and surrounding environment of the metal active sites within the microporous supports should be further optimized according to the molecular structures of the LOHC molecules and reaction mechanisms.

Methods

Chemicals

Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (Aladdin, product code: Z190758-500g), Ga(NO3)2·9H2O (Macklin, product code: G810494-1g), Mn(NO3)2·4H2O (Energy Chemical, product code: E060921), In(NO3)2·4H2O (Macklin, product code: I834112-25g), SnCl4·5H2O (Energy Chemical, product code: E010541), Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (from Macklin, product code: I809398-100g), KCl (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent, product code: 10016318), H2PtCl6 (Adamas-beta, product code: 32606 A), Tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS, from Alfa Aesar, product code: 014082), Tetrapropylammonium hydroxide (TPAOH, 40 wt%, Energy Chemical, product code: 17456.22), Ethylenediamine (Alfa Aesar, product code: A12132.AP).

Synthesis of Pt-zeolite materials

Pt@MFI and a series of bimetallic PtM@MFI samples (where M represents the second metal, M=Sn, Zn, In, Ga, Fe) were synthesized by one-pot approach. In a typical synthesis procedure of PtFe4.7@MFI sample, a TPAOH solution was initially prepared by blending 6.12 g of a 40 wt% TPAOH solution, 0.0531 g of KCl, and 14.1 g of distilled water at room temperature. Subsequently, 6.19 g of TEOS was added to TPAOH solution at 35 °C and then the suspension was kept stirring for 6 h to ensure the full hydrolysis of TEOS. Afterwards, 240 μL of H2PtCl6 aqueous solution (100 mg/mL), 87.5 mg of Fe(NO3)3 ∙ 9H2O, and 225 μL of ethylenediamine were added to the above solution. The resulting yellow solution was then transferred to Teflon-lined autoclaves and heated in an electric oven at 175 °C for 96 h under static conditions. After the hydrothermal process, the solid product was isolated by filtration, washed with distilled water and acetone, and subsequently dried at 60 °C. The solid sample was further calcined in static air at 560 °C for 8 h with a ramp rate of 2 oC/min, followed by an additional heating step at 600 °C for 2 h with a ramp rate of 5 °C/min.

The bimetallic PtM@MFI catalysts (M = Sn, Zn, Ga, In and Fe) were prepared by altering the type of metal precursors while the M/Pt atomic ratio is maintained at around 4.7. Details of the synthesis procedure of PtM@MFI catalysts are provided in Supplementary Table 1. The preparation of the monometallic Pt@MFI sample was carried out in the absence of a co-catalyst metal precursor in the synthesis mixture. In addition, PtFe@MFI samples with different Fe loadings were prepared in a similar approach but the Fe loading was controlled by the mass of the Fe precursor added (Supplementary Table 2). The results of ICP-OES analysis of the chemical composition of Pt-based samples are shown in Supplementary Table 3.

Characterizations

Powder X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out with a Rigaku RU-200b X-ray powder diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. Pore structure analysis was performed through argon adsorption-desorption on a BSD-660M A3M sorption instrument at −186 °C. Prior to the measurements, the reduced samples underwent a degassing process at 300 °C for 6 h. Specific surface area and micropore volume were determined using the Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) and Saito-Foley (SF) models, respectively, while the total pore volume was estimated at P/P0 = 0.99. The metal loading for all catalysts was quantified through inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analysis using a Thermo IRIS Intrepid II instrument.

Magnetic susceptibility measurements were conducted using a Quantum Design SQUID VSM magnetometer. The measurements were conducted over a temperature range spanning from 300 K to 5 K and reciprocally from 5 K to 300 K, all under an external magnetic field of 100 Oe. To prevent oxidation, the sample was carefully placed into a pre-weighed SQUID capsule within a glovebox. Subsequently, the capsule was sealed, weighed, and transferred to the SQUID cavity for magnetic susceptibility measurements.

The quasi-in situ 57Fe Mössbauer spectra were acquired at 80 K using an MFD-500AV spectrometer (Topologic Systems, Japan) with a proportional counter, utilizing 57Co(Rh) as the γ-ray radioactive source. Before characterization, the sample was reduced in a 5% H2/Ar atmosphere for 3 h at temperatures of 600 °C. After the pre-reduction treatment, the sample was carefully transferred into a capsule within a glovebox to avoid contact with air. The measuring velocity was calibrated using a standard α-iron foil. The data analysis was performed with Moss Winn 4.0i software.

UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy was performed using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer (Lambda 950) within the wavelength range of 200–800 nm. UV-Raman spectroscopic characterization was conducted at room temperature using the HORIBA JY LabRAM HR Evolution Raman spectrometer with a 266 nm excitation source.

The number of exposed metal sites in each Pt-zeolite catalyst was determined by CO pulse chemisorption experiments, which were carried out on an automatic chemisorption analyzer (BSD-Chem C200). The solid samples (100–200 mg) were subjected to pretreatment under an H2 atmosphere at a given temperature for 3 h, followed by cooling to the adsorption temperature at ~50 °C. After purging with helium, CO pulses were injected multiple times until the cumulative quantity of adsorbed CO reached saturation. The quantity adsorbed for each CO pulse was recorded using a thermal conductivity detector, and the metal dispersion was calculated assuming a ratio of surface Pt/adsorbed CO equal to 1. The equations used for the calculation of metal dispersion (D) are provided below:

$${D}\left(\%\right)=\frac{{{N}}_{{m}}{{F}}_{{s}}{M}\times 1{0}^{4}}{{L}}$$
(1)

Where Nm represents the chemisorption uptake expressed in mol of CO per gram of the sample, and Fs represents the adsorption stoichiometry, assumed to be 1 in our measurement. M represents the molecular weight of the supported metal (Pt), and L represents the loading of Pt.

In situ CO diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectra (CO-DRIFTS) were acquired using a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer equipped with a mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector cooled by liquid nitrogen. Before the measurements, the sample was subjected to a H2 reduction treatment at a given temperature for 3 h. Following the reduction pretreatment, the sample was exposed to 10 vol% CO/N2 at 30 °C for 30–50 min, and the spectra were collected after purging with N2 for an additional 30–50 min.

Samples for electron microscopy studies were prepared by dropping the suspension of the solid samples in CH2Cl2 directly onto holey-carbon coated copper grids. Electron Microscopy measurements were performed using two types of microscopes. A JEOL 2100 F microscope operating at 200 kV was used to record HAADF-STEM images at low resolution. High-resolution HAADF-STEM and iDPC-STEM imaging was performed on a FEI Titan3 Themis 60–300 microscope working at 300 kV. To reduce the electron beam damage to the sample, the images were recoded with a beam current of 10–30 pA and a 2.5 μs dwell time. More details about the optimization of the measurement conditions of Pt-zeolite materials can be referred to prior work19,38.

X-ray absorption experiments at the Pt (11,564 eV) LIII and Fe (7112 eV) K edges were performed in NOTOS beamline in ALBA synchrotron. The beam was monochromatized using Si(111) double crystals; harmonic rejection was performed setting the correct angle of collimating and focusing mirrors. Si and Rh stripes have been chosen to adjust the reflectivity curves. The spectra were collected in fluorescence modes by means of the ionization chambers filled with appropriate gases (95% N2 + 5% Kr for I0 (ionization chamber 0, located before the sample) and 17.1% N2 + 82.9% Kr for I1 (ionization chamber 1, located after the sample)), and a fluorescence solid-state detector. Samples was diluted using BN and loaded inside a high-pressure gas cell with one end of the both-way open-ended quartz capillary (diameter of 1 mm) is connected to desired gas, and the other end is connected to the mass spectrometer for on-line gas analysis. Several scans were acquired at each measurement step to ensure spectral reproducibility and good signal-to-noise ratio. The data reduction and extraction of the χ(k) function were performed using the Athena code. EXAFS data analysis was performed using the Artemis software. Phase and amplitudes were calculated with the FEFF6 code.

Theoretical calculations

Density functional theory calculations were completed via Vienna ab initio simulation software package with the atomic simulation environment39,40. As a form of the generalized gradient approximation, the Perdew−Burke−Ernzerhof functional was carried out to describe the electron exchange and correlation effects41. DFT-D3 method with Becke-Jonson damping was utilized to deal with van der Waals correction for the catalytic systems42. The projector-augmented wave method was used to treat the interaction between atomic cores and electrons43. The plane-wave basis set was employed with a cutoff energy of 400 eV. Besides, the atomic force convergence criterion was set to 0.03 eV/Å. Three Pt-based clusters (Pt7, Pt6Sn and Pt6Fe) confined in MFI zeolite were constructed to represent the Pt@MFI, PtSn@MFI and PtFe@MFI catalysts, respectively. A 1 × 1 × 1 Gamma point was selected for geometry optimization. Besides, all models were fully relaxed.

To find transition state geometries, a combination of the climbing image nudged elastic band (CI-NEB) method and dimer method was employed with a total of 6 images44,45. There was only one imaginary frequency for all transition state structures.

The adsorption energy of the adsorbate is calculated by the following equation:

$$E\left(*{\mbox{ads}}\right)=E\left({\mbox{clean}}+{\mbox{ads}}\right)-E\left({\mbox{clean}}\right)-E\left({\mbox{gas}}\right)$$
(2)

Where E(clean+ads) is the energy for the model after the adsorption of the adsorbate, E(clean) is the energy for the model without any adsorbate, E(gas) is the energy for the adsorbate in its gas phase.

Here, we took the energies of methylcyclohexane(g) and hydrogen(g) as references, the adsorption energy of other species was further calculated by the reference energies. Take methylbenzene as an example:

$$E\left(*{{\mbox{C}}}_{7}{{\mbox{H}}}_{8}\right)=E\left({\mbox{clean}}+{{\mbox{C}}}_{7}{{\mbox{H}}}_{8}\right)-E\left({\mbox{clean}}\right)-[E({{\mbox{C}}}_{7}{{\mbox{H}}}_{14\left({\mbox{g}}\right)})-3E({{\mbox{H}}}_{2\left({\mbox{g}}\right)})]$$
(3)

Where E(\(*\)C7H8) is the adsorption energy of methylbenzene species on the model, E(C7H14(g)) and E(H2) are the reference energies.

The activation energy of an elementary step is calculated by the following equations:

$${{E}}_{{{\rm{act}}}}={{E}}_{{{\rm{TS}}}}-{{E}}_{{\mbox{IS}}}$$
(4)

Where Eact is the activation energy of a specific elementary step. EIS and ETS are initial state energy and transition state energy for the step, respectively.

Catalytic testing

For screening the candidate materials for MCH dehydrogenation reaction, the catalytic tests were conducted in a fixed-bed reactor under atmospheric pressure using a mixture of MCH/N2 as the feed gas at 350 °C. Prior to the reaction, the PtM@MFI catalyst was pre-reduced by H2 (5% H2 diluted by Ar, 20 mL/min) at 600 °C for 3 h with a ramp rate of 10 °C/min. Following the reduction pre-treatment, the sample was cooled to 350 °C in a N2 atmosphere. Subsequently, the reaction was initiated by introducing the reactant mixture (MCH:N2 = 1:1). The N2 feed was regulated by a mass flow controller, and the MCH feed was controlled using an injection pump.

When measuring the initial reaction rates, a fresh Pt-zeolite catalyst was used for each measurement at a specific temperature. By using a mixture of MCH and H2 as the reaction feed, at the initial several hours, the Pt-zeolite catalyst remains relatively stable, allowing us to acquire a reliable initial reaction rate for calculating the specific reaction rates normalized to the total mass of Pt species in the solid zeolite or to the exposed Pt sites determined by CO chemisorption.

To investigate the apparent activation energy of a series of catalysts, the conversions of MCH were adjusted to below 25% by varying the weight-hour-space-velocity (WHSV) while the feed composition is fixed to MCH/H2 mixture with an MCH/H2 of 1/1. For obtaining the apparent activation energy, the yield of TOL was measured at 300, 320, 350, 380, and 400 °C.

To expedite the catalyst selection process, MCH conversion levels were adjusted the weight-hour-space-velocity (WHSV) while maintaining a constant ratio of MCH/N2 in the feed gas. The products were analysed using an online GC (Agilent 8890 equipped with TCD and FID detectors). The conversion of MCH (XMCH), selectivity of TOL (STOL), yield of TOL (YTOL), H2 evolution rate (\({R}_{{{\mbox{H}}}_{2}}\)), and the deactivation constant (kd) were calculated based on the following Equations.

$${X}_{{\mbox{MCH}}}=\frac{{F}_{{\mbox{MCH}},{\mbox{in}}}-{F}_{{\mbox{MCH}},{\mbox{out}}}}{{F}_{{\mbox{MCH}},{\mbox{in}}}}\times 100\%$$
(5)
$${S}_{{\mbox{TOL}}}=\frac{{F}_{{\mbox{TOL}},{\mbox{out}}}}{{F}_{{\mbox{MCH}},{\mbox{in}}}-{F}_{{\mbox{MCH}},{\mbox{out}}}}\times 100\%$$
(6)
$${{\mbox{Y}}}_{{\mbox{TOL}}}={{\mbox{X}}}_{{\mbox{MCH}}}\times {{\mbox{S}}}_{{\mbox{TOL}}}\times 100\%$$
(7)
$${R}_{{{\mbox{H}}}_{2}}\left({\mbox{mmol}}/{{\mbox{g}}}_{{\mbox{Pt}}}/\min \right)=\frac{3\times {Y}_{{\mbox{TOL}}}\times {F}_{{\mbox{MCH}},{\mbox{in}}}}{{{\mbox{M}}}_{{\mbox{Pt}}}}$$
(8)
$${{\mbox{k}}}_{{\mbox{d}}}\left({{\mbox{h}}}^{-1}\right)=\frac{{{\mathrm{ln}}}\frac{1-{{\mbox{X}}}_{{\mbox{final}}}}{{{\mbox{X}}}_{{\mbox{final}}}}-{{\mathrm{ln}}}\frac{1-{{\mbox{X}}}_{{\mbox{initial}}}}{{{\mbox{X}}}_{{\mbox{initial}}}}}{{\mbox{t}}}$$
(9)

where FMCH,in and FMCH,out, represent the flow velocity of MCH in the feed and effluent, respectively and FTOL,out represents the flow velocity of TOL in the effluent; MPt represents the mass of Pt in the solid catalyst. Xinitial and Xfinal represent the initial and final conversion of MCH, respectively, and t represents the time the reaction time.

Long-term stability tests

To assess the catalyst’s regeneration stability under severe deactivation conditions and working stability under high conversion conditions, the conversion levels of MCH were kept below 50% to facilitate the detection of any potential deactivation of the varying the PtFe4.8@MFI catalyst during consecutive reaction-regeneration cycles. To simulate MCH dehydrogenation under practical working conditions, the reactant feed was changed to MCH/H2 mixture with an MCH/H2 of 1/1 which allows the downstream application of the H2 released from LOHC. Before the catalytic test, the PtFe4.8@MFI catalyst was subjected to a pre-reduction treatment by H2 (5% H2 diluted by Ar, 20 mL/min) at 200 °C for 3 h. Following the reduction pre-treatment, the catalytic test was initiated by introducing the reactant gas mixture (MCH:H2 = 1:1) under atmospheric pressure at 350 °C with a WHSV of 43 h-1, with a ramp rate of 10 °C/min from 200 to 350 °C. After the initial MCH dehydrogenation test, the sample was cooled to ~100 °C and initiated the regeneration process through calcination in air at 450 °C for 3 h, with a ramp rate of 2 °C/min. Following air calcination, the sample was cooled to 100 °C and then subjected to reduction with H2 at 200 °C for 3 h. After reduction, the second cycle of the MCH dehydrogenation reaction was initiated by introducing the reactant gas mixture (MCH:H2 = 1:1) under atmospheric pressure at 350 °C, with a ramp rate of 10 °C/min from 200 to 350 °C. The regeneration procedure for the samples after the third and fifth cycles remained consistent with the process after the first MCH dehydrogenation. However, for the regeneration of the samples after the fourth and sixth cycles of the MCH dehydrogenation reaction, the calcination temperature was increased to 600 °C, while the other regeneration procedures remained the same as for the samples after the first MCH dehydrogenation.

To evaluate the performance of the PtFe4.8@MFI catalyst at high MCH conversion levels, the WHSV is changed to 4.3 h-1 at atmosphere pressure while the reaction temperature is maintained at 350 °C. The pretreatment and the regeneration procedure is the same as the stability tests performed at high WHSV.