Fig. 1: Naturalistic study design and inpatient tracking of acute pain states. | Nature Communications

Fig. 1: Naturalistic study design and inpatient tracking of acute pain states.

From: Naturalistic acute pain states decoded from neural and facial dynamics

Fig. 1: Naturalistic study design and inpatient tracking of acute pain states.

A The naturalistic paradigm comprises recording intermittent verbal pain self-report along with simultaneous intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) and patient videos. Transient episodes of momentary pain are manually annotated based on video review. iEEG spectro-spatial features and quantitative facial dynamics are used to decode acute pain states. B Anatomical distribution of self-reported pain locations based on group level aggregate (N = 12). C Variations in pain scores for an example participant over the course of nine days. Blue dots denote time when a pain medication was given and red dots denote seizure occurrences. D Histogram of all recorded pain scores for the same example participant. The median value was used to denote the threshold to define low versus high acute pain states. E Amount of time spent in low versus high pain states based on consecutive pain reports that are of the same state. Participants overall spent less time in the high pain state compared to the low pain state (N = 12, paired t-test; t(11): 2.6, P = 0.02). F More pain medications were given during the high pain state compared to the low pain state (N = 12, paired t-test; t(11): 10.1, P < .001). G Distribution of pain medication timing with regard to time of pain report. H Higher mean arterial pressure (MAP) across participants was observed in the high pain state as compared to the low pain state (N = 12, paired t-test: t(11): 2.7, P = 0.02). I Proportion of different AUs encountered during high versus low pain states for an example participant. Certain AUs denoting a positive affect are expressed more during low pain states whereas AUs associated with negative affect are expressed more during high pain states (Number of pain measurements = 83). J Consensus AUs (d > 0.2) across participants were differentially expressed between acute pain states. Colors represent the effect size between high versus low pain states. *Denotes P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. All bar graph error bars denote s.e.m. All statistical tests performed were two-sided. AU facial action unit.

Back to article page