Table 1 Candidate regions identified across the genome

From: Interplay between large low-recombining regions and pseudo-overdominance in a plant genome

Chr

Start

End

Size (Mb)

Number of clusters in the population

Includes the centromere

Mean FIS genome / HWE

Ratio πN/ πs

Ratio pN/pS

Ratio deleterious to tolerated mutations

Number of genes

Chr1

99,793,192

161,758,608

62.0

-

Yes

0.0034 ns/ns

0.76 **

0.62**

0.29ns

511

Chr2

131,088,113

186,649,394

55.6

6

Yes

−0.037*** /***

0.48ns

0.54*

0.35*

476

Chr3

101,238,580

188,834,466

87.6

5

Yes

−0.017*** /*

0.48ns

0.48*

0.25ns

688

Chr4

118,491,302

160,157,576

41.7

3

Yes

−0.056*** /***

0.39ns

0.34ns

0.14ns

436

Chr6

132,717,319

201,482,742

68.8

6

Yes

−0.037*** /***

0.43ns

0.40ns

0.27ns

567

Chr6

224,133,144

229,409,049

5.3

6

No

−0.005*** /NS

0.32ns

0.30ns

0.22ns

95

Chr7

128,666,580

177,591,959

48.9

3

Yes

−0.106*** /***

0.60ns

0.48ns

0.58**

390

All genome

  

1778

  

0.024

0.31

0.30

0.18

37,814

  1. Summary statistics for the seven regions identified by the Local PCA approach. The start and end positions and the size of each region are shown. The number of clusters identified using a kmean approach for each region are indicated. The FIS was computed for each polymorphic locus across the genome, and here we show the mean values within each region. We performed two tests for which the significance is reported in the table, separated by a slash. The left-hand number is the significant result for two-sided Wilcoxon tests comparing the mean FIS within the region with the mean FIS calculated for the rest of the genome. The right-hand number is for testing whether the mean FIS is significantly different from zero, as expected under HWE. A two-sided resampling procedure with 1000 tests was performed to assess if the ratios pN/pS and πN/πS of each candidate region are different from the ratio of the rest of the genome. The statistical significance levels are indicated as follows: *** for p-values < 0.001, ** for p-values < 0.01, * for p-values < 0.05, ns for non-significant p-values. For the ratio of deleterious to tolerated mutations, we performed two tests, a G-test and a two-sided resampling procedure, to investigate whether these ratios were significantly different from the rest of the genome (Supplementary Table 8). P-values of the resampling procedure are indicated.