Fig. 4: PhyloTune’s performance in phylogenetic tree reconstruction. | Nature Communications

Fig. 4: PhyloTune’s performance in phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

From: PhyloTune: An efficient method to accelerate phylogenetic updates using a pretrained DNA language model

Fig. 4: PhyloTune’s performance in phylogenetic tree reconstruction.

a Difference in Robinson-Foulds (RF) distance between high-attention regions and full-length (RF(high, full)) versus low-attention regions and full-length (RF(low, full)) on the simulated datasets, across sequence counts and attention region lengths (1/K of the full length). Each box plot displays the median, interquartile range (25th to 75th percentile), and whiskers to minima/maxima within 1.5 times IQR (n = 10 independent experiments). b Difference in RF(high, full) versus RF(low, full) for order subtrees shown in Fig. 2d. c Phylogenetic trees for the angiosperm order Rosales constructed using high-attention (left) and low-attention (right) regions extracted by PhyloTune (same dataset as Fig. 2d). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page