Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59110-9, published online 14 May 2025
In our article, Cohen’s d was calculated by dividing the fixed-effect estimate from linear mixed-effects models (LMMs) by the residual standard deviation. While this differs from the classical Cohen’s d based on group means and pooled standard deviations, it is a commonly accepted approximation of effect size within the LMM framework1,2,3,4. This method accounts for the hierarchical structure of the data, including random effects, providing a semi-standardized effect size. We clarify this to ensure transparency and avoid misinterpretation. The article and scientific conclusions remain unchanged.
References
Feingold, A. New approaches for estimation of effect sizes and their confidence intervals for treatment effects from randomized controlled trials. Quant. Method. Psychol. 15, 96–111 (2019).
Brysbaert, M. & Stevens, M. Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: a tutorial. J. Cogn. 1, 9 (2018).
Chinn, S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 19, 3127–3131 (2000).
Lakens, D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol. 4, 863 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, X., Zhang, K., Kuang, N. et al. Author Correction: Developing brain asymmetry shapes cognitive and psychiatric outcomes in adolescence. Nat Commun 16, 6325 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61785-z
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61785-z
This article is cited by
-
The role of biological age in stroke prediction: evidence from CHARLS and machine learning models
BMC Neurology (2026)
-
A predictive nomogram for hemorrhage risk following endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal tumors: a retrospective cohort study
European Journal of Medical Research (2025)
