Abstract
As per de Gennes’ predictions, a superconducting layer placed between two ferromagnetic insulators can drive an antiferromagnetic exchange coupling between them. Using two ferromagnetic insulating GdN layers having dissimilar switching fields sandwiching a superconducting Vanadium thin film, we demonstrate evidence of such exchange coupling. We demonstrate that such an exchange coupling promotes switching between zero and finite resistance states of Vanadium. Our devices hold either a finite resistance or a zero-resistance state at zero magnetic field, dependent on their magnetic field history. Moreover, we demonstrate the absolute switching effect, thus making such devices suitable for application at the lowest temperatures as non-volatile cryogenic memory useful for futuristic quantum circuits and for several other superconducting spintronic applications.
Introduction
Spin-dependent magnetoresistance (MR) effects in spacer-layer separated magnetic multilayers has led to several novel phenomena and device concepts1,2,3,4. Such devices attract great interest both from a fundamental as well as an applied standpoint. While from a fundamental perspective—novel magnetic exchange coupling mechanisms have been unearthed5; the development of such spintronic devices has ushered in a new era in memory technologies. The archetypal device in the current in-plane (CIP) geometry is a Giant Magnetoresistance pseudo spin valve (CIP GMR PSV)6, where the MR of the device is dependent on the relative orientation between metallic spacer layers separated by ferromagnets. Curiously, theoretical predictions of a superconducting spacer layer mediated exchange coupling between two ferromagnetic insulating (FI) layers7 potentially leading to infinite magneto-resistance, predates much of the experimental work on metallic spintronics related to GMR. However, despite the early predictions, there is very little experimental literature on the subject. With the advent of newer low-temperature computing paradigms, it is envisaged that dissipation less cryogenic memory8 will be a key element for future low-temperature computing control architectures, and hence there is a need to comprehensively explore such device proposals in greater detail and explore more and better materials options to achieve the same.
The specific proposal under consideration in this work is that of de Gennes7. The salient propositions from his theory are i) That there should be an angular dependence of Tc on the relative magnetization orientations of FI layers in FI/S/FI trilayer superconducting pseudo spin valves (SPSVs) ii) The angular dependence arises due to a relative angular magnetic orientation dependent effective exchange field in the S layer iii) In case such Tc differences exist, the two FI layers can be exchange coupled through the S layer, and its strength is inversely proportional to the S spacer layer thickness. The above physics is aptly encapsulated in the following relation:
Equation 1 gives the value of the average exchange field in FI/S/FI trilayers; where Γ is the exchange integral, ds is the thickness of superconducting spacer layer, θ is the angle between the magnetization of the two F layers, a is the lattice parameter of the superconductor, and S is the ferromagnetic spin.
Among the three propositions, the first two have been verified experimentally for the parallel (P) and anti-parallel (AP) relative magnetic orientations in Fe3O4/In/Fe3O49, EuS/Al/EuS trilayers10, recently in an EuS/Au/Nb/EuS system11 and potentially in GdN/NbN/GdN devices with a Gd interlayer12. However, till date, a comprehensive experimental proof of all the three propositions, including that of Superconducting Exchange Coupling (SEC) has only ever been explored in one publication using a GdN/Nb/GdN system13.
In this communication, we show that GdN/V/GdN SPSVs can be used to verify all of de Gennes’ propositions; and in the CIP geometry – these SPSVs can operate as a non-volatile cryogenic memory element. Most importantly, we demonstrate that on reduction of V layer thickness, we approach the regime of the absolute spin valve - where the device exhibits a superconducting transition only for the AP state of the ferromagnets, and no superconducting transition is evident for the P state.
A ferromagnetic insulator proximity coupled to a superconductor is a reasonably well understood system14,15,16,17, and the proximity effect in these systems is known to be manifested by an effective Zeeman field inside the superconductor18. Among FI material candidates showing evidence of induced Zeeman fields, there is now a considerable body of work on various Europium chalcogenides10,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, and GdN26,27. The choice of V as the superconductor is instigated by the need to verify SEC in an alternative superconductor other than Nb. Additionally, V with bulk Tc of 5.4 K and coherence length of approximately 44 nm, offers a reasonable range of temperatures and experimentally realizable SPSV thicknesses. Moreover, V has been used earlier for designing superconducting spin valves with metallic ferromagnets28.
Results and discussion
In Fig. 1 we show the characteristics of a typical GdN/V/GdN superconducting SPSV valve with V thickness as 11 nm. Figure 1b shows the evolution of resistance (and hence Tc) of the system as the in plane magnetic field is swept from zero to negative (positive) values on the left (right) halves of the plot. The magnetic fields are swept after applying a positive (negative) saturation field of 40 mT. The color contrast boundary indicates that there is a sudden rise of Tc at approximately 5.5 mT on either side, and a relatively more gradual fall of Tc which stabilizes approximately at 16 mT on either side. The maximum and minimum Tc of the trialyer is approximately 2.35 K and 2.17 K respectively. Similar color plots of other SPSVs used in this study, are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. In Fig. 1c, we show the MH loops of the same trilayer at various temperatures from 2 K to 3 K (top panel), along with the MR measurement of the same trilayer from temperatures just above the AP state Tc (2.4 K) to temperatures close to P state Tc (2.2 K). There are several noticeable features in Fig. 1c. First, the drop in magnetization at −5.5 mT is much larger as compared to −16 mT. This confirms the assumption that 5 nm GdN has a lower coercive field than 3 nm GdN (For MH measurements of only 3 nm GdN film, please refer to Supplementary Fig. 2). Second, there are two drops in magnetizations starting at approximately −5.5 mT and −16 mT. The first drop in terms of magnetic field almost exactly corresponds to the sudden rise of Tc in Fig. 1b (indicating a robust stability of superconducting state on achieving an AP state). Third - these drops in magnetization correspond almost exactly to switching in and out of the superconducting state in the RH measurements. Fourth, in the temperature range between P and AP state Tc, the switching field of the 5 nm GdN remains almost constant, while that of the 3 nm GdN keeps on increasing monotonically with lowering of temperature. This indicates that the onset of superconductivity in the system is correlated with a more prolonged survival of the effective AP state between the two GdN layers. This is a strong indicator for the existence of superconducting exchange coupling (SEC) in the system. To confirm the existence of SEC, we perform Tc measurements on this device as a function of the relative saturation magnetization orientations. In accordance to Eq. 1, and because \({\Delta T}_{c}\propto {\overline{h}}\) (where \(\Delta {T}_{c}\) is the difference in \({T}_{c}\) between the P and AP states), we expect the same functional form for \(\Delta {T}_{c}\). In Fig. 1e, we show the measured \(\Delta {T}_{c}\); which tally almost exactly to an expected \(\cos \frac{\theta }{2}\) dependence. To preclude effects related to domain wall superconductivity (DWS), we have analyzed GdN/V bilayers and coherence lengths of thin film V. Please refer to Supplementary Figs. 3, 4 and Supplementary Table 1 and their associated discussions for an insight on DWS in the GdN/V system.
a A cartoon depiction of a typical SPSV multi-layered stack wire-bonded for four probe measurements. b Color map of 11 nm V thickness sample, where several Resistance (R) vs in plane external magnetic field (μ0H) sweeps in the sequence +25 mT to −25 mT and from −25 mT to +25 mT (termed downward and upward sweeps respectively) were performed with fixed temperatures; at 5 mK intervals from 2.15 K to 2.4 K. The color map shows the parts of MR measurements corresponding only to 0 to −25 mT, and 0 to +25 mT, from the downward and upward sweeps respectively. c Top panel shows MH loops of the 11 nm SPSV, measured at various temperatures. Inset to top panel of c shows resistance (R) vs temperature (T) measured when the relative orientation of the magnets is in P (+25 mT) and AP (−5.5 mT) configuration. Lower panel shows R vs H sweeps at various temperatures. d Demonstration of nonvolatile zero field bistable states in the 11 nm SPSV. e Measured value of \({\Delta T}_{c}\) of the 11 nm SPSV as a function of angle between saturation magnetization vectors of the two GdN layers, plotted along with an ideal \(\cos\frac{\theta }{2}\) functional behavior of \({\Delta T}_{c}\).
We note that in Fig. 1c, the transitions of the V layer into and out of the superconducting state are remarkably sharp and hence would be ideal for switching applications. Following this observation, in Fig. 1d, we show the switching characteristics of the 11 nm V trilayer over several cycles. The lower panel shows the sequence of external in-plane magnetic field application. The measurement starts with saturating both GdN layers at 40 mT, when the V layer remains in a metallic state due to P orientation of both GdN layers. Then several sequences of switching are carried out between – (+) 6 mT, thereby repeatedly achieving AP and P state of the trilayer. After application of each field, we return to zero field and record the resistance state of the device. Clear sharp transitions into and out of the superconducting state are observed at – (+) 6 mT, and interestingly the same state is retained at zero fields. This clearly demonstrates the suitability of the trilayer as a non-volatile cryogenic memory.
In Fig. 2, we show details of measurement of spin valves of several V thicknesses, and elucidate on further evidence of SEC in our system. The crux of SEC is that the onset of superconductivity in the system mediates an effective antiferromagnetic (AF) exchange interaction between the two FI layers. While the onset of superconductivity is ensured by achieving an AP state by the switching of the softer FI layer (5 nm GdN); from thereon – the superconducting state (with thickness much lower than the bulk coherence length) couples the two FI layers through coherent electrons of the cooper pair, each sitting at the top and bottom S/FI interfaces. A further experimental evidence of SEC induced AF exchange from MH and RH measurements would be that due to this new AF exchange coupling, it becomes harder than normal to come out of the AP state, and hence a higher-than-normal switching field is required to switch the 3 nm layer, in order to break out of the AP state. Through MH and RH measurements in Fig. 1c, this phenomenon is already demonstrated for the 11 nm V sample. In Fig. 2 we demonstrate this in all other measured spin valves. Since it is difficult to access MH below 2 K in most commercial magnetometers, and since the switching in RH and MH match for a sample for whom both measurements could be done for a reasonable temperature range; we base most of our observations on switching fields derived from RH measurements in color plots similar to that shown in Fig. 1b for all other SPSVs. A clear increase in switching field of the 3 nm layer is visible in the respective \(\Delta {T}_{c}\) regions; indicating that it indeed becomes harder to come out of the superconducting (AP) state. Interestingly there seems to be almost no noticeable change in the first switching fields of 5 nm GdN in all SPSVs in the \(\Delta {T}_{c}\) region. These observations are almost identical to those in the GdN/Nb/GdN system13. Please refer to Supplementary Fig. 5 for methodology adopted for choosing \(\Delta {T}_{c}\) boundaries for few SPSVs.
Dashed vertical lines denote the region of operation of SPSVs of various V thicknesses. All quantities of each V thickness are represented by a particular color but different shapes. Filled circles indicate switching field of 3 nm GdN from RH measurements. Unfilled circles indicate switching fields of 3 nm GdN from MH measurements. Filled squares indicate switching fields of 5 nm GdN from RH measurements. Unfilled squares indicate switching fields of 5 nm GdN from MH measurements (MH data is only available for the 11 nm sample). Filled diamonds indicate switching energy \(\left({E}_{Z}\right)\) associated with switching of the 3 nm GdN in each spin valve at the P and AP state \({T}_{c}\). Filled triangles indicate the superconducting condensation energy \(({E}_{{exS}})\) associated with the P and AP states of each spin valve. Filled hexagons indicate the switching field of a 3 nm GdN sample grown on AlN and capped by AlN.
Phenomenologically, this effect can be understood from a thermodynamical viewpoint. The onset of superconductivity in the AP state introduces the superconducting condensation energy in the system (\({E}_{{exS}}\)). For mediating the net AF exchange coupling, the increased energy for switching (\({E}_{Z}\)) of the 3 nm GdN out of the AP state to the P state must be compensated by \({E}_{{exS}}\). Hence, in the temperature range of operation of SPSVs; \({\Delta E}_{{exS}}\left({T}_{{cAP}}-{T}_{{cP}}\right)\) should be comparable to the magnitude of \({\Delta E}_{Z}\left({T}_{{cAP}}-{T}_{{cP}}\right)\). Using the expressions for the energy terms per unit area13:
Where γ is the specific heat constant of V29 = 9.8 \({mJ}{{mol}}^{-1}{K}^{-2}\), \({d}_{V}\) is the thickness of the thin Vanadium layer, and all other terms are defined earlier.
Where, dGdN = 3 nm, MGdN = 0.9*106 A/m, Hc2−P = 18.55 mT corresponding to switching field for 3 nm GdN at 2.18 K, and Hc2−AP = 15.39 mT corresponding to switching field of 3 nm GdN at 2.34 K.
Using the above values, we find that \({\Delta E}_{{exS}}\left({T}_{{cAP}}-{T}_{{cP}}\right)\)= 7.31 \(\mu J{m}^{-2}\), while \({\Delta E}_{Z}\left({T}_{{cAP}}-{T}_{{cP}}\right)=17.07\, \mu J{m}^{-2}\). The closeness of these two energy scales is similar to that in GdN/Nb/GdN systems13, and gives a phenomenological justification for the possibility of SEC in our system for the 11 nm SPSV. The inset to Fig. 2 shows these two energy scales plotted for all SPSVs. We note that for most of the samples these two energy scales are closely matched. For some samples especially between 8.5 and 10 nm, although there seems to be an apparent mismatch, we note that the two energy scales are roughly of the same order of magnitude.
We point out the crucial role of γ of the superconducting layer in observation of SEC, as it significantly impacts the magnitude of \({\Delta E}_{{exS}}\). Among the elemental superconductors, V has one of the highest magnitudes of \(\gamma\), and is significantly higher than that of Nb – the superconductor used for the first experimental demonstration of SEC. This was the main basis for choosing V for this experiment. It is therefore understandable why FI based SPSVs explored earlier with superconductors having almost an order of magnitude lower specific heats – Al10 (γ = 1.35 \({mJ}{{mol}}^{-1}{K}^{-2}\)) and In9 (γ = 1.67 \({mJ}{{mol}}^{-1}{K}^{-2}\)) may not show typical SEC induced AP state hardening features as shown in Fig. 2. On similar lines, we predict that among elemental superconductors, Ta with γ = 6.15 \({mJ}{{mol}}^{-1}{K}^{-2}\) and relatively high coherence length of 95 nm should be a strong contender as another alternative superconductor for observation of SEC.
Finally, we turn our attention to the possibility of realization of absolute switching using these SPSVs. The original proposal pertaining to absolute spin valve effect in CPP geometry relies on varying magnitudes of tunneling currents between two ferromagnet proximitized superconducting/metal layers separated by a tunnel barrier30. In such a device, depending on the relative orientation of the ferromagnets, a finite tunneling current appears or ideally disappears completely at the induced minigap voltage. The CIP equivalent of such a device would be the appearance or complete disappearance of the superconducting state, which is dependent on the relative orientation of ferromagnets. This phenomenon has been recently demonstrated in a EuS/Au/Nb/EuS spin valve11. Such a condition can be realized in our SPSVs if the induced exchange fields in the V layer far exceeds its superconducting gap value and well beyond the paramagnetic limit of superconductivity31,32 for V.
As indicated in previous works by Hauser9, and Li10, the P state \({T}_{c}\) of the spin valves can be used to estimate Γ and subsequently \({\overline{h}}\) for each V thickness. For estimating, \(\varGamma\) we use:
Where \({T}_{{cP}}\) is the P state \({T}_{c}\) for a particular Vanadium thickness (\({d}_{V}\)) spin valve, \({T}_{c0}\) is the corresponding \({T}_{c}\) of a bare V film of thickness \({d}_{V}\); \({E}_{F}\) is the fermi energy of V (approximately 10 eV) estimated using free electron theory; \({\xi }_{{eff}}\) is the zero-temperature dirty limit coherence length of each bare V film estimated from perpendicular critical field measurements shown in Supplementary Fig. 3. Figure 3a shows Γ calculated using the above equation for various V thicknesses. Using the value obtained for Γ, we use Eq. 1 to estimate the exchange field \(({\overline{h}})\) in each spin valve. While Γ fluctuates in the range of 150−250 meV, \(({\overline{h}})\) rises monotonically by more than an order of magnitude for the lowest thickness. From this observation, we expect the lowest thicknesses of V spin valves to demonstrate absolute switching. In Fig. 3b,c, we show evidence of such absolute switching in the 8.5 nm V SPSV. No evidence whatsoever of the appearance of a superconducting state is visible at the lowest temperatures till 20 mK. Finally, in Fig. 3d, we demonstrate bistable switching at 20 mK and zero field, with several different patterns of field cycling. This clearly demonstrates the suitability of application of such SPSVs for usage as sub-kelvin non-volatile memory elements.
a Calculated value of exchange fields (maroon crosses) in different thicknesses of V layer SPSVs (left axes). Right axes show calculated values of the exchange constant (green circles) for every spin valve as per de Gennes formulation. Inset shows monotonic evolution of \(\Delta {T}_{c}\) with lowering of V thickness down to 9 nm. b RvsT heating measurement of the 8.5 nm SPSV with in plane external field values corresponding to P and AP states. c Color plot with RH measurements as a function of temperature for the 8.5 nm SPSV. d Demonstration of zero field bistable switching phenomena at 20 mK.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that V-based SPSVs tally with all of de Gennes’ predictions, and it mediates SEC between FI layers. Apart from the demonstration of a new material system for observation of SEC, the highlight of this work lies in the demonstration of absolute switching and switchable bistable states at the lowest temperatures. Although evidence of bistable switching in SPSVs was shown earlier in an EuS/Al/EuS SPSV; we believe that SEC-mediated AF exchange coupled SPSVs make the non-volatile bistable states more robust and insulate them against typical field cycling effects related to domain wall dynamics and minor loop magnetization changes33. Moreover, switching in these SPSVs is remarkably sharp and hence well-suited for practical applications as cryogenic memory devices.
Methods
Growth of SPSV multilayers
Several multilayers of the type AlN/GdN(5 nm)/V/GdN(3 nm)/AlN with varying V (8 nm to 20 nm) layer thickness were grown on n-doped Si substrates with a 285 nm thermal oxide. The film growth was carried out in an ultra-high vacuum custom-designed sputtering system with four DC magnetrons and one RF magnetron, with a base pressure below 2*10−9 mbar. All samples were grown in the same sputtering run without breaking the vacuum. The bottom and top AlN layers act as a buffer layer for the growth of GdN and a capping layer to prevent atmospheric degradation of GdN, respectively. While AlN was grown using RF sputtering from an AlN target, GdN was grown using a 92%Ar and 8% N2 reactive gas mixture using a Gd target, and V was grown using Ar gas plasma from a V target. Following the only experimental work on SEC demonstration, GdN thicknesses were kept as 5 nm and 3 nm to achieve a PSV kind of behavior, with 5 nm GdN expected to have a lower coercive field as compared to 3 nm GdN. Please refer to Supplementary Fig. 6 for TEM EDS image of cross section of GdN/V/GdN trilayer.
Electronic and magnetic measurements
Low-temperature resistance measurements were done in Oxford Teslatron PT cryostat, where a base temperature of 0.26 K can be achieved using a He3 insert. For temperatures below 0.26 K, measurements were done in a Bluefors dilution refrigerator. In both systems, un-patterned multilayers were wire bonded and measured in a 4-probe geometry using source measure units with a constant current of 100 μA and the output voltage was recorded. Magnetization measurements were performed in a Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer system.
Data availability
Data sets generated during the current study are available at the following link - https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17025543.
References
Bader, S. D. & Parkin, S. S. P. Spintronics. Annu Rev. Condens Matter Phys. 1, 71–88 (2010).
Žutić, I. & Das Sarma, S. Spintronics: fundamentals and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323–410 (2004).
Wolf, S. A. et al. Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future. Science 294, 1488–1495 (2001).
Fert, A. Nobel lecture: origin, development, and future of spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1517–1530 (2008).
Parkin, S. S. P. & Mauri, D. Spin engineering: direct determination of the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida far-field range function in ruthenium. Phys. Rev. B 44, 7131–7134 (1991).
Dieny, B. et al. Giant magnetoresistive in soft ferromagnetic multilayers. Phys. Rev. B 43, 1297–1300 (1991).
De Gennes, P. G. Coupling between ferromagnets through a superconducting layer. Phys. Lett. 23, 10–11 (1966).
Alam, S., Hossain, M. S., Srinivasa, S. R. & Aziz, A. Cryogenic memory technologies. Nat. Electron 6, 185–198 (2023).
Hauser, J. J. Coupling between ferrimagnetic insulators through a superconducting layer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 374–377 (1969).
Li, B. et al. Superconducting spin switch with infinite magnetoresistance induced by an internal exchange field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 097001 (2013).
Matsuki, H. et al. Realisation of de Gennes’ absolute superconducting switch with a heavy metal interface. Nat. Commun. 16, 5674 (2025).
Takamura, Y. et al. Analysis of spin switching effect in GdN/NbN/GdN superconducting spin valves. 65th JSAP Spring Meet. 2018 09, 164 (2018).
Zhu, Y., Pal, A., Blamire, M. G. & Barber, Z. H. Superconducting exchange coupling between ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 16, 195–199 (2017).
Tokuyasu, T., Sauls, J. A. & Rainer, D. Proximity effect of a ferromagnetic insulator in contact with a superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 38, 8823–8833 (1988).
Bergeret, F. S., Verso, A. & Volkov, A. F. Spin-polarized Josephson and quasiparticle currents in superconducting spin-filter tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B 86, 060506 (2012).
Bergeret, F. S., Silaev, M., Virtanen, P. & Heikkilä, T. T. Colloquium: nonequilibrium effects in superconductors with a spin-splitting field. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 041001 (2018).
Aikebaier, F., Virtanen, P. & Heikkilä, T. Superconductivity near a magnetic domain wall. Phys. Rev. B 99, 104504 (2019).
Hao, X., Moodera, J. S. & Meservey, R. Thin-film superconductor in an exchange field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1342–1345 (1991).
Hijano, A. et al. Coexistence of superconductivity and spin-splitting fields in superconductor/ferromagnetic insulator bilayers of arbitrary thickness. Phys. Rev. Res 3, 023131 (2021).
Strambini, E. et al. Revealing the magnetic proximity effect in EuS/Al bilayers through superconducting tunneling spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 054402 (2017).
Xiong, Y. M., Stadler, S., Adams, P. W. & Catelani, G. Spin-resolved tunneling studies of the exchange field in EuS/Al bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 1–4 (2011).
Liu, T. J., Prestigiacomo, J. C. & Adams, P. W. Electrostatic tuning of the proximity-induced exchange field in EuS/Al bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 027207 (2013).
Tedrow, P. M., Tkaczyk, J. E. & Kumar, A. Spin-polarized electron tunneling study of an artificially layered superconductor with internal magnetic field: EuO-Al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1746–1749 (1986).
Muller, M. et al. Exchange splitting and bias-dependent transport in EuO spin filter tunnel barriers. Europhys. Lett. 88, 47006 (2009).
Moodera, J., Meservey, R. & Hao, X. Variation of the electron-spin polarization in EuSe tunnel junctions from zero to near 100% in a magnetic field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 853–856 (1993).
Pal, A. & Blamire, M. G. Large interfacial exchange fields in a thick superconducting film coupled to a spin-filter tunnel barrier. Phys. Rev. B 92, 180510(R) (2015).
Banerjee, P., Sharma, P. K., Bhakat, S., Dutta, B. & Pal, A. Large tunable exchange fields due to purely paramagnetically limited domain wall superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 108, L140502 (2023).
Miao, G.-X., Ramos, A. V. & Moodera, J. S. Infinite magnetoresistance from the spin dependent proximity effect in symmetry driven Fe/V/Fe heteroepitaxial superconducting spin valves. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 137001 (2008).
Van Duzer, T. & Turner, C. W. Principles of Superconductive Devices and Circuits. (Elsevier North Holland, New York, 1981).
Huertas-Hernando, D., Nazarov, Yu. V. & Belzig, W. Absolute spin-valve effect with superconducting proximity structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 047003 (2002).
Chandrasekhar, B. S. A note on the maximum critical field of high-field superconductors. Appl Phys. Lett. 1, 7–8 (1962).
Clogston, A. M. Upper limit for the critical field in hard superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 266–267 (1962).
Berger, A., Mangin, S., McCord, J., Hellwig, O. & Fullerton, E. E. Cumulative minor loop growth in Co/Pt and Co/Pd multilayers. Phys. Rev. B 82, 104423 (2010).
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by a Core Research Grant from the Department of Science and Technology, Science and Engineering Research Board, India (Grant No. CRG/2019/004758).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.B. and A.P. designed the experiments. S.B. grew the thin film multilayers and performed all magneto-transport measurements. S.S. and S.M. performed the measurements in the dilution refrigerator. S.B. and A.P. together analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhakat, S., Samanta, S., Mahapatra, S. et al. Bistable and absolute switching driven by superconducting exchange coupling. Nat Commun 16, 9609 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64594-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64594-6


