Fig. 5: Electrochemical performance comparison between LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S and LPSC1.5-CommLi2S solid sulfide electrolyte.
From: Advancing sulfide solid electrolytes via green Li2S synthesis
a Illustration of the (Li-In or Si)|LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB. b A digital picture of Li-In|LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB that works at ambient temperature to make the LED bead light up. c The dQ/dV curves of Li-In|LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S | LCO@LNO and Li-In|LPSC1.5-CommLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB. d Charge–discharge curves of Li-In|LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB at 0.05 C (6.85 mA g–1, 0.049 mA cm–2), 0.1 C (13.7 mA g–1, 0.098 mA cm–2) and 0.2 C (27.4 mA g–1, 0.195 mA cm–2) under 25 °C with a. e Charge–discharge curves of Li-In|LPSC1.5-CommLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB at 0.05 C (6.85 mA g–1, 0.049 mA cm–2), 0.1 C (13.7 mA g–1, 0.098 mA cm–2) and 0.2 C (27.4 mA g–1, 0.195 mA cm–2) under 25 °C. f Rate capability of Li-In|LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S | LCO@LNO and Li-In|LPSC1.5-CommLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB. g The second charge–discharge curves of Si|LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S | LCO@LNO and Si|LPSC1.5-CommLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB at 0.1 C (420 mA g–1, 11.24 mA cm–2) under 25 °C. h Cycling stability of Si|LPSC1.5-SmetaLi2S | LCO@LNO and Si|LPSC1.5-CommLi2S | LCO@LNO ASSB. The active material loadings were 7.13 mg/cm2 for LCO and 26.8 mg/cm2 for Si.
