Retraction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15795-8, published online 20 April 2020

The Authors have retracted this article. After publication, concerns were raised regarding some of the data presented in the Figures and Supplementary information, specifically:

  • Fig. 1b, 3g and 3i Con images appear highly similar;

  • Fig. 1g, 2e and 5a right Vinculin blots appear highly similar;

  • Fig. 2d, S2i and S15c Vinculin blots appear highly similar;

  • Fig. 5a and 6i Fdt1 blots appear highly similar;

  • Fig. 5a, 6l and S23l mTOR blots appear highly similar;

  • Fig. 5m SW620 and Fig. S23i GLUT1 blots appear highly similar;

  • Fig. S13a Bright con and pcDNA-NC images appear to overlap;

  • Fig. S15g and S19d con and pcDNA-Fdft1 images appear highly similar;

  • Fig. S23j and S24f PGK1 blots appear highly similar (flipped).

The authors have stated that these errors occurred due to inaccurate image labelling.

All authors agree to this retraction.