Fig. 2: Comparison of proxy and simulated vertical δ13C gradients of dissolved inorganic carbon in the upper ocean during the three hyperthermals. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Comparison of proxy and simulated vertical δ13C gradients of dissolved inorganic carbon in the upper ocean during the three hyperthermals.

From: Microbial metabolism amplified warming in three Phanerozoic hyperthermal events

Fig. 2: Comparison of proxy and simulated vertical δ13C gradients of dissolved inorganic carbon in the upper ocean during the three hyperthermals.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Proxy data are from marine carbonate δ13C of three depth-dependent depositional settings (Supplementary Data 1) during the three hyperthermals: Permian−Triassic, early Toarcian and Palaeocene−Eocene Thermal Maximum. The average of simulated δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon (δ13CDIC) is calculated from low to middle latitudes (48.6° S to 48.6° N), where most sections are located (Supplementary Fig. 1). Both proxy and modelled δ13CDIC values are adjusted as an offset from the average δ13CDIC in surface water (Methods). Error bars represent the one standard deviation. ac Proxy (grey) and simulated δ13CDIC depth profiles at pre-carbon isotope excursion (CIE) phases with low temperatures for “microbial metabolism” (red), “eutrophication” (blue) and “circulation change” (green) scenarios. df The proxy and simulated δ13CDIC depth profiles at peak CIE phases with global warming for “microbial metabolism”, “eutrophication” and “circulation change” scenarios. gi Vertical δ13CDIC gradients (mean ± 1 s.d.) are calculated from the δ13C difference between surface water (~40 m) and mid-water (~130 m), expressed as the δ13CDIC change per 100 m of water depth (‰/hm).

Back to article page